A NEW REFERENCE SCHEME FOR THE DELINEATION OF ACTIVE BLOCK BOUNDARIES IN THE SICHUAN-YUNNAN EXPERIMENTAL SITE

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.05.003

Abstract

Abstract:

Active block boundaries represent areas where significant crustal stress accumulates, leading to concentrated tectonic deformation and frequent seismic activity. These boundaries are crucial for understanding the patterns of strong earthquakes within mainland China. The China Seismic Experimental Site, located in the Sichuan-Yunnan region, is a key area of tectonic deformation caused by the collision and convergence of the Indian and Eurasian plates. This region plays a vital role in transferring tectonic stress between western China and adjacent plates.

This comprehensive study analyzes the integrity, three-dimensional characteristics, hierarchy, and tectonic activity of blocks within the Sichuan-Yunnan region, following established schemes and criteria for defining active block boundaries. After detailed research, the major active fault zones in the region have been divided into three primary active block boundary zones and sixteen secondary boundary zones.

A new reference scheme was developed by considering several factors, including the historical distribution of strong earthquakes, the hierarchical patterns of earthquake frequency and magnitude, spatial variations in present-day deformation as revealed by GNSS data, and deep crustal differences indicated by gravity data and velocity structures. The Jinshajiang-Honghe Fault, Ganzi-Yushu-Xianshuihe-Anninghe-Zemuhe-Xiaojiang Fault, and Longmenshan Fault are identified as the primary active block boundary zones, while faults such as the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe, Nantinghe, and Longriba faults are classified as secondary boundary zones.

Through an integrated analysis of seismic activity, current deformation patterns, fault sizes, deep crustal structures, and paleoseismic data, the study estimates that the primary boundary zones have the potential to generate earthquakes of magnitude 7.5 or greater, while the secondary boundary zones could produce earthquakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater.

The expansion of geophysical exploration, including shallow and deep earth data, has allowed for a transition in the study of active tectonics from surface-focused to depth-focused, from qualitative to quantitative, and from two-dimensional to three-dimensional analysis. By integrating multiple data sources, i.e. regional geology, geophysics, seismicity, and large-scale deformation measurements, this study presents a more refined delineation of active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan region.

The new delineation scheme provides a scientific basis for future mechanical simulations of interactions between active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan Experimental Site. It also offers a framework for assessing the probability of strong earthquakes and evaluating seismic hazards. The purpose of this study is to re-analyze and refine the delineation of active block boundaries using high-resolution, coordinated data while building on previous research.

In summary, the Sichuan-Yunnan region’s primary fault zones are divided into three primary and sixteen secondary active block boundary zones. The study concludes that primary boundary zones are capable of generating magnitude 7.5 or greater earthquakes, while secondary zones can produce magnitude 6.5 or greater earthquakes. While the current block delineation scheme offers a valuable foundation, further discussion and refinement of certain secondary boundary zones are needed as detection and observational data improve. This study provides an essential framework for analyzing the dynamic interactions between active blocks, identifying seismogenic environments, and assessing seismic risks in the Sichuan-Yunnan region.

Key words: active block boundary, seismic activity, tectonic features, seismic hazard, Sichuan-Yunnan Experimental Site

摘要：

活动地块边界带是现今地壳应力高度积累和构造变形显著集中的区域, 地震频发, 是研究中国大陆强震活动规律的重要对象。中国地震科学实验场所在的川滇地区位于印度大陆与欧亚板块碰撞和持续会聚引起的强烈变形区, 是中国大陆西部与周边板块动力传递的关键部位。根据前人划分活动地块边界带的方案和依据, 文中综合分析了地块的整体性、立体性、层次性和活动性, 将川滇地区的主要活动断裂带划分为3条一级活动地块边界带和16条次级活动块体边界带。通过川滇地区有记录以来的强震分布特征、地震数量和震级的分带分级性、 GNSS揭示的现今变形分区性、速度结构和重力资料反映的地壳深部构造差异性等结果, 新的参考方案将金沙江-红河断裂带、甘孜-玉树-鲜水河-安宁河-则木河-小江断裂带、龙门山断裂带归为一级活动地块边界带; 丽江-小金河断裂、南汀河断裂、龙日坝断裂等研究区内其他主要活动断裂归为次级活动块体边界带。基于对研究区强震活动、现今变形特征、活动断裂规模、地壳深部结构及古地震等研究成果的综合分析, 研究认为一级边界带具备发生M≥7.5大地震的潜力, 次级边界带有发生M≥6.5强震的能力。川滇地区活动地块边界新划分的参考方案, 可为后续川滇实验场区活动地块之间相互作用的力学数值模拟、强震概率预测分析及大地震危险性评估等提供科学依据。

关键词: 活动地块边界带, 地震活动性, 构造特征, 地震危险性, 川滇实验场

SUN Xiao, LU Ren-qi, ZHANG Jin-yu, WANG Wei, SU Peng. A NEW REFERENCE SCHEME FOR THE DELINEATION OF ACTIVE BLOCK BOUNDARIES IN THE SICHUAN-YUNNAN EXPERIMENTAL SITE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2024, 46(5): 1027-1047.

孙晓, 鲁人齐, 张金玉, 王伟, 苏鹏. 川滇实验场地区活动地块边界新划分参考方案[J]. 地震地质, 2024, 46(5): 1027-1047.

Figures/Tables 10

References 51

[1]	常祖峰. 2021. 1515年云南永胜 7 3 / 4级大地震遗迹[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 42(S1): 176—178.
	CHANG Zu-feng. 2021. Relics of the Yunnan Yongsheng M7 3 / 4 earthquake in 1515[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 42(S1): 176—178 (in Chinese).
[2]	陈石, 王青华, 王谦身, 等. 2014. 云南鲁甸 M_S6.5 地震震源区和周边三维密度结构及重力场变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(9): 3080—3090.
	CHEN Shi, WANG Qing-hua, WANG Qian-shen, et al. 2014. The 3D density structure and gravity change of Ludian M_S6.5 Yunnan epicenter and surrounding regions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(9): 3080—3090 (in Chinese).
[3]	程佳, 徐锡伟, 甘卫军, 等. 2012. 青藏高原东南缘地震活动与地壳运动所反映的块体特征及其动力来源[J]. 地球物理学报, 55(4): 1198—1212.
	CHENG Jia, XU Xi-wei, GAN Wei-jun, et al. 2012. Block model and dynamic implication from the earthquake activities and crustal motion in the southeastern margin of Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(4): 1198—1212 (in Chinese).
[4]	邓起东, 程绍平, 马冀, 等. 2014. 青藏高原地震活动特征及当前地震活动形势[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(7): 2025—2042.
	DENG Qi-dong, CHENG Shao-ping, MA Ji, et al. 2014. Seismic activities and earthquake potential in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(7): 2025—2042 (in Chinese).
[5]	邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2002. 中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 32(12): 1020—1030.
	DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2002. Basic characteristics of active tectonics in China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 32(12): 1020—1030 (in Chinese).
[6]	丁国瑜. 1993. 地震预报与活断层分段[J]. 地震学刊, 13(1): 8—10.
	DING Guo-yu. 1993. Earthquake prediction and active fault segmentation[J]. Journal of Seismology, 13(1): 8—10 (in Chinese).
[7]	高伟, 何宏林, 孙浩越, 等. 2016. 大凉山断裂带中段普雄断裂晚第四纪古地震[J]. 地震地质, 38(4): 797—816. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.001.
	GAO Wei, HE Hong-lin, SUN Hao-yue, et al. 2016. Paleoearthquakes along Puxiong fault of Daliangshan fault zone during late Quaternary[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(4): 797—816 (in Chinese).
[8]	国家地震局震害防御司. 1995. 中国历史强震目录(公元前23世纪—公元1911年)[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
	Disaster Prevention Department of State Seismological Bureau. 1995. The Historical Strong Earthquakes in China(23^rd Century BC—1911 AD)[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[9]	何宏林, 池田安隆, 何玉林, 等. 2008. 新生的大凉山断裂带: 鲜水河-小江断裂系中段的裁弯取直[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 38(5): 564—574.
	HE Hong-lin, Yasutaka I, HE Yu-lin, et al. 2008. The newly formed Daliangshan fault zone: Straightening the previously curved segment of the Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault system in the middle section[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 38(5): 564—574 (in Chinese).
[10]	黄小巾, 吴中海, 黄小龙, 等. 2018. 滇西北程海-宾川断裂带第四纪分段活动性的构造地貌表现与限定[J]. 地球科学, 43(12): 4651—4670.
	HUANG Xiao-jin, WU Zhong-hai, HUANG Xiao-long, et al. 2018. Tectonic geomorphology constrains on Quaternary activity and segmentation along Chenghai-Binchuan fault zone in northwest Yunnan, China[J]. Earth Science, 43(12): 4651—4670 (in Chinese).
[11]	计昊旻, 任治坤, 刘金瑞. 2023. 青藏高原东南缘上地壳晚新生代构造变形综述[J]. 地球科学, 49(2): 480—499.
	JI Hao-min, REN Zhi-kun, LIU Jin-rui. 2023. Review of structural deformation in the upper crust of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau since the late Cenozoic[J]. Earth Science, 49(2): 480—499 (in Chinese).
[12]	李玉江, 石富强, 张辉, 等. 2020. 川滇地区主要断裂带上的库仑应力变化及其对地震危险性的指示[J]. 地震地质, 42(2): 526—546. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.02.017.
	LI Yu-jiang, SHI Fu-qiang, ZHANG Hui, et al. 2020. Coulomb stress change on active faults in Sichuan-Yunnan region and its implications for seismic hazard[J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(2): 526—546 (in Chinese).
[13]	刘影, 于子叶, 张智奇, 等. 2023. 基于密集流动台阵构建的川滇地区高分辨率公共速度模型2.0版本[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 53(10): 2407—2424.
	LIU Ying, YU Zi-ye, ZHANG Zhi-qi, et al. 2023. High resolution public velocity model for Sichuan-Yunnan region based on dense mobile array construction version 2.0[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 53(10): 2407—2424 (in Chinese).
[14]	M7专项工作组. 2012. 中国大陆大地震中—长期危险性研究[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
	Working Group of M7. 2012. Study on the Mid-Long-Term Potential of Large Earthquakes on the Chinese Continent[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[15]	马宏生, 张国民, 刘杰, 等. 2006. 中国大陆活动地块边界带强震活动特征的研究[J]. 地震地质, 28(1): 48—60.
	MA Hong-sheng, ZHANG Guo-min, LIU Jie, et al. 2006. Research on the characteristics of large earthquake activity on the active tectonic boundaries in Chinese mainland[J]. Seismology and Geology, 28(1): 48—60 (in Chinese).
[16]	潘裕生. 1994. 青藏高原第五缝合带的发现与论证[J]. 地球物理学报, 37(2): 184—192.
	PAN Yu-sheng. 1994. Discovery and evidence of the fifth suture zone of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 37(2): 184—192 (in Chinese).
[17]	钱小仕, 蔡晓光, 任晴晴. 2013. 中国大陆活动地块边界带强震震级分布特征研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 33(1): 212—220.
	QIAN Xiao-shi, CAI Xiao-guang, REN Qing-qing. 2013. Characteristics of the great earthquake magnitude distributions for active tectonic boundaries in Chinese mainland[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 33(1): 212—220 (in Chinese).
[18]	戎泽鹏. 2021. 岷江上游1933年叠溪地震形成滑坡坝堆积特征及溃坝洪水模拟研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学.
	RONG Ze-peng. 2021. Accumulation characteristics of landslide dam formed by Diexi earthquake in 1933 and simulation of outburst flood in the Upper Minjiang River[D]. Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu (in Chinese).
[19]	邵志刚, 冯蔚, 王芃, 等. 2020. 中国大陆活动地块边界带的地震活动特征研究综述[J]. 地震地质, 42(2): 271—282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.02.002.
	SHAO Zhi-gang, FENG Wei, WANG Peng, et al. 2020. A study review on characteristics of seismic activity of active-tectonic block boundaries in mainland China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(2): 271—282 (in Chinese).
[20]	邵志刚, 张国民, 李志雄, 等. 2008. 中国大陆活动地块边界带地震活动过程及其趋势研究[J]. 地震, 28(3): 33—42.
	SHAO Zhi-gang, ZHANG Guo-min, LI Zhi-xiong, et al. 2008. Research on the process and tendency of seismicity along the active tectonic boundaries in Chinese mainland[J]. Earthquake, 28(3): 33—42 (in Chinese).
[21]	宋方敏, 李如成, 徐锡伟. 2002. 四川大凉山断裂带古地震研究初步结果[J]. 地震地质, 24(1): 27—34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2002.01.003.
	SONG Fang-min, LI Ru-cheng, XU Xi-wei. 2002. Preliminary results of the investigation of paleo-earthquakes along the Daliangshan fault zone, Sichuan provience, China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 24(1): 27—34 (in Chinese).
[22]	谈洪波, 申重阳, 玄松柏, 等. 2017. 鲁甸 M_S6.5 地震孕育环境的重力学分析[J]. 地震地质, 39(2): 356—373. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.02.007.
	TAN Hong-bo, SHEN Chong-yang, XUAN Song-bai, et al. 2017. The seismogenic environment analysis of Ludian M_S6.5 earthquake using gravity data[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(2): 356—373 (in Chinese).
[23]	王敏, 沈正康. 2020. 中国大陆现今构造变形: 三十年的GPS观测与研究[J]. 中国地震, 36(4): 660—683.
	WANG Min, SHEN Zheng-kang. 2020. Present-day tectonic deformation in continental China: Thirty years of GPS observation and research[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 36(4): 660—683 (in Chinese).
[24]	文龙, 巴金, 朱兵, 等. 2018. 川滇块体东边界大凉山断裂带中段断层氡气特征及活动性探讨[J]. 矿物岩石, 38(4): 56—65.
	WEN Long, BA Jin, ZHU Bing, et al. 2018. Characteristics of radon gas and fault activity in the middle Daliangshan fault belt, eastern margin of Sichuan-Yunnan block[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 38(4): 56—65 (in Chinese).
[25]	徐锡伟, 韩竹军, 杨晓平, 等. 2016. 中国及邻近地区地震构造图[CM]. 北京: 地震出版社.
	XU Xi-wei, HAN Zhu-jun, YANG Xiao-ping, et al. 2016. Seismotectonic Map in China and Its Adjacent Regions[CM]. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[26]	徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 2003. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S2): 151—162.
	XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, ZHENG Rong-zhang, et al. 2003. Pattern of latest tectonic motion and its dynamics for active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 46(S2): 210—226.
[27]	徐志萍, 王夫运, 姜磊, 等. 2018. 川滇地区莫霍面深度和地壳厚度[J]. 地震地质, 40(6): 1318—1331. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2018.06.009.
	XU Zhi-ping, WANG Fu-yun, JIANG Lei, et al. 2018. The depth of moho interface and crustal thickness in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 40(6): 1318—1331 (in Chinese).
[28]	俞维贤, 张建国, 周光全, 等. 2005. 2001年永胜6级地震的地表破裂与程海断裂[J]. 地震研究, 28(2): 125—128.
	YU Wei-xian, ZHANG Jian-guo, ZHOU Guang-quan, et al. 2005. Surface rupture of the 2001 Yongsheng M6 earthquake and Chenghai Fault[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 28(2): 125—128 (in Chinese).
[29]	张国民, 马宏生, 王辉, 等. 2005. 中国大陆活动地块边界带与强震活动[J]. 地球物理学报, 48(3): 602—610.
	ZHANG Guo-min, MA Hong-sheng, WANG Hui, et al. 2005. Boundaries between active-tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the China mainland[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(3): 602—610 (in Chinese).
[30]	张国民, 张培震. 1999. 近年来大陆强震机理与预测研究的主要进展[J]. 中国基础科学, (Z1): 47—58.
	ZHANG Guo-min, ZHANG Pei-zhen. 1999. Recent research progress on the mechanism and forecast for continental strong earthquakes[J]. China Basic Science, (Z1): 47—58 (in Chinese).
[31]	张国民, 张培震. 2000. “大陆强震机理与预测”中期学术进展[J]. 中国基础科学, 10: 4—10.
	ZHANG Guo-min, ZHANG Pei-zhen. 2000. Academic progress on the mechanism and forecast for continental strong earthquake in the first two years[J]. China Basic Science, 10:4—10 (in Chinese).
[32]	张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S2): 12—20.
	ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 46(S2): 13—24.
[33]	张培震, 邓起东, 张竹琪, 等, 2013. 中国大陆的活动断裂、地震灾害及其动力过程[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 43(10): 1607—1620.
	ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Zhu-qi, et al. 2013. Active faults, earthquake hazards and associated geodynamic processes in continental China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 43(10): 1607—1620 (in Chinese).
[34]	张培震, 王伟涛, 甘卫军, 等. 2022. 青藏高原的现今构造变形与地球动力过程[J]. 地质学报, 96(10): 3297—3313.
	ZHANG Pei-zhen, WANG Wei-tao, GAN Wei-jun, et al. 2022. Present-day deformation and geodynamic processes of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 96(10): 3297—3313 (in Chinese).
[35]	郑文俊, 王庆良, 袁道阳, 等. 2020. 活动地块假说理论框架的提出、发展及未来需关注的科学问题[J]. 地震地质, 42(2): 245—270. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.02.001.
	ZHENG Wen-jun, WANG Qing-liang, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. 2020. The concept, review and new insights of the active-tectonic block hypothesis[J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(2): 245—270 (in Chinese).
[36]	郑文俊, 张竹琪, 郝明, 等. 2022. 强震孕育发生的大陆活动地块理论未来发展与强震预测探索[J]. 科学通报, 67(13): 1352—1361.
	ZHENG Wen-jun, ZHANG Zhu-qi, HAO Ming, et al. 2022. Physical basis for prediction of continental strong earthquakes: Development and prospect of active tectonic block theory[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 67(13): 1352—1361 (in Chinese).
[37]	中国地震局监测预报司. 2023. 中国 5 级以上地震目录汇编(1900年1月1日—2022年12月31日)[R]. 北京: 中国地震局监测预报司.
	Earthquake Monitoring and Forecasting Department, China Earthquake Administration. 2023. A compilation of earthquakes with M≥5.0(Jan.1, 1900—Dec.31, 2022)[R]. Earthquake Monitoring and Forecasting Department, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing (in Chinese).
[38]	中国地震局震害防御司. 1999. 中国近代地震目录(公元1912—1990年, M_S≥4.7)[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社.
	Earthquake Disaster Prevention Department,China Earthquake Administration. 1999. The Modern Historical Earthquakes in China(1912—1990, M_S≥4.7)[M]. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[39]	周荣军, 黎小刚, 黄祖智, 等. 2003. 四川大凉山断裂带的晚第四纪平均滑动速率[J]. 地震研究, 26(2): 191—196.
	ZHOU Rong-jun, LI Xiao-gang, HUANG Zu-zhi, et al. 2003. Average slip rate of Daliang mountain fault zone in Sichuan in late Quaternary period[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 26(2): 191—196 (in Chinese).
[40]	England P, Houseman G. 1986. Finite strain calculations of continental deformation: 2. Comparison with the India-Asia Collision Zone[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B3): 3664—3676. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB03p03664.
[41]	Gan W, Molnar P, Zhang P, et al. 2021. Initiation of clockwise rotation and eastward transport of southeastern Tibet inferred from deflected fault traces and GPS observations[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 134(5-6): 1129—1142. doi: 10.1130/B36069.1.
[42]	Lu R, Liu Y, Xu X, et al. 2019. Three-dimensional model of the lithospheric structure under the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Implications for the active tectonics and seismic hazards[J]. Tectonics, 38:1292—1307. doi: 10.1029/2018TC005239.
[43]	Molnar P, England P, Martinod J. 1993. Mantle dynamics, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian monsoon[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 31(4): 357—396. doi: 10.1029/93RG02030.
[44]	Royden L H, Burchfiel B C, Van der Hilst R D. 2008. The geological evolution of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science, 321(5892): 1054—1058. doi: 10.1126/science.1155371.
[45]	Shen Z K, Lü J, Wang M, et al. 2005. Contemporary crustal deformation around the southeast borderland of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110: B11409. doi: 10.1029/2004JB003421.
[46]	Tapponnier P, Peltzer G, Le Dain A Y, et al. 1982. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with plasticine[J]. Geology, 10(12): 611—616.
[47]	Tapponnier P, Zhiqin X, Roger F, et al. 2001. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet Plateau[J]. Science, 294:1671—1677. doi: 10.1126/science.105978. PMID
[48]	Wang L, Barbot S. 2023. Three-dimensional kinematics of the India-Eurasia Collision[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 164(4): 1—13. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00815-4.
[49]	Wang M, Shen Z K. 2020. Present-day crustal deformation of continental China derived from GPS and its tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125: e2019JB018774. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018774.
[50]	Wang Q, Zhang P Z, Freymueller J T, et al. 2001. Present-day crustal deformation in China constrained by Global Positioning System measurements[J]. Science, 294(5542): 574—577. doi: 10.1126/science.1063647.
[51]	Zhang P Z, Gan W J. 2008. Combined model of rigid-block motion with continuous deformation: Patterns of present-day deformation in continental China, Investigations into the Tectonics of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 444:59—71. doi: 10.1130/2008.2444(04).

序号一级	块体边界张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	参考前人块体边界的划分方案强	强震活动性中	现今变形特征不显著	地壳三维速度结构差异显著性不显著	布格重力异常特征显著性Ⅰ
Ⅱ	一级	张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	强	强	不显著	不显著
Ⅲ	一级	张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	强	中	显著	显著
1	次级	程佳等,2012	较强	中	显著	不显著
2	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
3	次级		一般	中	不显著	显著
4	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
5	次级	Shen et al., 2005;程佳等,2012	较强	中	不显著	不显著
6	次级	徐锡伟等,2003;程佳等,2012	一般	中	显著	显著
7	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
8	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
9	次级		较强	中	显著	不显著
10	次级		一般	中	显著	不显著
11	次级	Shen et al., 2005;程佳等,2012	较强	中	不显著	不显著
12	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
13	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
14	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
15	次级		较强	中	显著	显著
16	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著

序号一级	块体边界张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	参考前人块体边界的划分方案强	强震活动性中	现今变形特征不显著	地壳三维速度结构差异显著性不显著	布格重力异常特征显著性Ⅰ
Ⅱ	一级	张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	强	强	不显著	不显著
Ⅲ	一级	张培震等,2003;徐锡伟等,2003	强	中	显著	显著
1	次级	程佳等,2012	较强	中	显著	不显著
2	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
3	次级		一般	中	不显著	显著
4	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
5	次级	Shen et al., 2005;程佳等,2012	较强	中	不显著	不显著
6	次级	徐锡伟等,2003;程佳等,2012	一般	中	显著	显著
7	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
8	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
9	次级		较强	中	显著	不显著
10	次级		一般	中	显著	不显著
11	次级	Shen et al., 2005;程佳等,2012	较强	中	不显著	不显著
12	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
13	次级		较强	中	不显著	不显著
14	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著
15	次级		较强	中	显著	显著
16	次级		一般	中	不显著	不显著