SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 847-863.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.007
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Ying1)(), ZHAO Tao1),*(), HU Jing2), LIU Chun1)
Received:
2021-06-02
Revised:
2021-07-02
Online:
2021-08-20
Published:
2021-09-29
Contact:
ZHAO Tao
通讯作者:
赵韬
作者简介:
王莹, 女, 1987年生, 2012年于云南大学获固体地球物理学硕士学位, 高级工程师, 现主要从事地震活动性与数字地震学研究, 电话: 13991380599, E-mail: wy200543@163.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Ying, ZHAO Tao, HU Jing, LIU Chun. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 847-863.
王莹, 赵韬, 胡景, 刘春. 2021年云南漾濞6.4级地震序列重定位及震源机制解特征分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 847-863.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.007
数据来源 | 节面Ⅰ | 节面Ⅱ | 矩心深度 /km | 矩震级 MW | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | |||
USGS①(① | 135 | 82 | -165 | 43 | 75 | -9 | 17.5 | 6.1 |
GCMT②(② | 315 | 86 | 168 | 46 | 78 | 4 | 15 | 6.1 |
中国地震局地球物理研究所③(③ | 138 | 82 | -161 | 45 | 71 | -8 | 5 | 6.0 |
本文结果 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 226 | 86 | 10 | 10 | 6.0 |
Table1 Comparison between the result of this paper and the focal mechanisms of different sources
数据来源 | 节面Ⅰ | 节面Ⅱ | 矩心深度 /km | 矩震级 MW | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | |||
USGS①(① | 135 | 82 | -165 | 43 | 75 | -9 | 17.5 | 6.1 |
GCMT②(② | 315 | 86 | 168 | 46 | 78 | 4 | 15 | 6.1 |
中国地震局地球物理研究所③(③ | 138 | 82 | -161 | 45 | 71 | -8 | 5 | 6.0 |
本文结果 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 226 | 86 | 10 | 10 | 6.0 |
来源 | 震源机制解 | 作为初始解得到的中心震源机制解 | 作为初始 解得到的 标准差S /(°) | 以标准差最小的解作为初始解的中心震源机制与其他震源机制的最小空间旋转角/(°) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | |||
USGS | 135 | 82 | -165 | 135.85 | 84.45 | -169.53 | 10.343 502 | 5.29 |
GCMT | 315 | 86 | 168 | 135.84 | 84.49 | -10.51 | 91.404 601 | 9.74 |
CEA-IGP | 138 | 82 | -161 | 135.84 | 84.43 | -169.52 | 10.343 496 | 8.87 |
本文 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 135.85 | 84.42 | -169.52 | 10.343 468 | 15.05 |
Table2 Focal mechanisms of Yangbi MS6.4 earthquake from different institutions and the central focal mechanism and its residuals
来源 | 震源机制解 | 作为初始解得到的中心震源机制解 | 作为初始 解得到的 标准差S /(°) | 以标准差最小的解作为初始解的中心震源机制与其他震源机制的最小空间旋转角/(°) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | |||
USGS | 135 | 82 | -165 | 135.85 | 84.45 | -169.53 | 10.343 502 | 5.29 |
GCMT | 315 | 86 | 168 | 135.84 | 84.49 | -10.51 | 91.404 601 | 9.74 |
CEA-IGP | 138 | 82 | -161 | 135.84 | 84.43 | -169.52 | 10.343 496 | 8.87 |
本文 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 135.85 | 84.42 | -169.52 | 10.343 468 | 15.05 |
序号 | 发震时间 | 北纬 /(°) | 东经 /(°) | 震级 MW | 震源 深度 /km | 节面Ⅰ | 节面Ⅱ | T轴 | B轴 | P轴 | 地震 类型 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | |||||||
1 | 2021-05-18 18:49:30 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 3.7 | 8 | 136 | 83 | -158 | 44 | 68 | -7 | 268 | 10 | 153 | 67 | 2 | 20 | 走滑型 |
2 | 2021-05-18 20:56:46 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 3.7 | 2 | 310 | 83 | 131 | 49 | 42 | 11 | 257 | 38 | 124 | 41 | 9 | 26 | 混合型 |
3 | 2021-05-18 21:39:35 | 25.64 | 99.92 | 4.3 | 4 | 309 | 85 | 161 | 41 | 71 | 5 | 263 | 17 | 116 | 70 | 356 | 10 | 走滑型 |
4 | 2021-05-19 03:27:56 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 3.8 | 4 | 315 | 79 | 156 | 50 | 67 | 12 | 271 | 25 | 111 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 走滑型 |
5 | 2021-05-19 20:05:56 | 25.65 | 99.91 | 4.7 | 8 | 319 | 90 | 178 | 49 | 88 | 0 | 274 | 2 | 124 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 走滑型 |
6 | 2021-05-19 21:13:07 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 3.9 | 4 | 313 | 80 | 174 | 44 | 84 | 10 | 269 | 11 | 73 | 78 | 178 | 3 | 走滑型 |
7 | 2021-05-20 01:58:59 | 25.66 | 99.89 | 3.9 | 2 | 144 | 56 | 179 | 234 | 89 | 34 | 104 | 24 | 235 | 56 | 3 | 23 | 混合型 |
8 | 2021-05-21 21:21:24 | 25.65 | 99.92 | 5.3 | 10 | 307 | 85 | 175 | 37 | 86 | 5 | 262 | 7 | 80 | 83 | 172 | 0 | 走滑型 |
9 | 2021-05-21 21:37:33 | 25.62 | 99.96 | 3.7 | 22 | 315 | 74 | 178 | 46 | 88 | 16 | 271 | 12 | 52 | 74 | 179 | 10 | 走滑型 |
10 | 2021-05-21 21:48:34 | 25.70 | 99.88 | 6.0 | 10 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 226 | 86 | 10 | 91 | 10 | 247 | 79 | 360 | 4 | 走滑型 |
11 | 2021-05-21 22:15:16 | 25.61 | 99.95 | 4.3 | 18 | 309 | 76 | -155 | 213 | 66 | -15 | 79 | 7 | 336 | 62 | 173 | 27 | 走滑型 |
12 | 2021-05-21 22:31:10 | 25.61 | 99.97 | 5.0 | 20 | 138 | 68 | -175 | 47 | 85 | -22 | 95 | 12 | 216 | 67 | 0 | 19 | 走滑型 |
13 | 2021-05-21 22:52:08 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 3.8 | 6 | 301 | 85 | 174 | 32 | 84 | 5 | 256 | 7 | 82 | 83 | 346 | 1 | 走滑型 |
14 | 2021-05-21 22:59:37 | 25.61 | 99.92 | 3.9 | 4 | 318 | 78 | 163 | 51 | 73 | 12 | 274 | 20 | 105 | 69 | 5 | 3 | 走滑型 |
15 | 2021-05-21 23:08:58 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 3.7 | 8 | 299 | 83 | -176 | 209 | 86 | -7 | 254 | 2 | 1 | 82 | 164 | 8 | 走滑型 |
16 | 2021-05-21 23:13:54 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 4.0 | 4 | 308 | 90 | 176 | 38 | 86 | 0 | 263 | 3 | 126 | 86 | 353 | 3 | 走滑型 |
17 | 2021-05-21 23:18:09 | 25.60 | 100.0 | 3.8 | 2 | 307 | 85 | 137 | 42 | 47 | 7 | 255 | 33 | 122 | 47 | 2 | 25 | 混合型 |
18 | 2021-05-21 23:23:35 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 4.5 | 6 | 126 | 86 | 177 | 216 | 88 | 4 | 81 | 4 | 251 | 86 | 351 | 1 | 走滑型 |
19 | 2021-05-22 00:51:41 | 25.70 | 99.88 | 4.2 | 6 | 125 | 73 | -177 | 34 | 88 | -17 | 81 | 10 | 206 | 73 | 348 | 13 | 走滑型 |
20 | 2021-05-22 00:56:07 | 25.63 | 99.89 | 3.7 | 18 | 112 | 77 | 121 | 222 | 34 | 24 | 55 | 49 | 284 | 30 | 178 | 25 | 混合型 |
21 | 2021-05-22 01:36:06 | 25.62 | 99.95 | 4.1 | 4 | 109 | 86 | 175 | 200 | 85 | 4 | 65 | 6 | 254 | 84 | 155 | 1 | 走滑型 |
22 | 2021-05-22 01:50:18 | 25.61 | 99.97 | 3.9 | 8 | 317 | 81 | 176 | 47 | 86 | 9 | 272 | 9 | 71 | 80 | 182 | 3 | 走滑型 |
23 | 2021-05-22 04:10:57 | 25.62 | 99.94 | 4.2 | 16 | 272 | 40 | 159 | 18 | 77 | 52 | 250 | 45 | 28 | 37 | 136 | 22 | 混合型 |
24 | 2021-05-22 08:36:47 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 3.9 | 6 | 112 | 75 | -143 | 11 | 55 | -18 | 238 | 13 | 131 | 51 | 337 | 36 | 走滑型 |
25 | 2021-05-22 09:48:00 | 25.70 | 99.89 | 4.2 | 8 | 312 | 89 | -180 | 222 | 90 | -1 | 267 | 1 | 36 | 89 | 177 | 1 | 走滑型 |
26 | 2021-05-22 17:24:16 | 25.64 | 99.89 | 3.9 | 10 | 311 | 82 | 173 | 42 | 83 | 8 | 267 | 11 | 85 | 79 | 177 | 0 | 走滑型 |
27 | 2021-05-22 20:14:36 | 25.60 | 99.92 | 4.6 | 14 | 309 | 77 | 177 | 40 | 87 | 13 | 265 | 12 | 52 | 76 | 174 | 7 | 走滑型 |
28 | 2021-05-22 22:30:05 | 25.60 | 99.93 | 3.8 | 4 | 306 | 37 | -176 | 213 | 88 | -53 | 273 | 33 | 32 | 36 | 155 | 37 | 混合型 |
29 | 2021-05-22 23:30:17 | 25.57 | 99.95 | 3.4 | 4 | 135 | 78 | -171 | 43 | 82 | -13 | 89 | 3 | 190 | 75 | 358 | 15 | 走滑型 |
30 | 2021-05-23 00:17:20 | 25.57 | 99.96 | 3.6 | 4 | 337 | 76 | -148 | 239 | 59 | -16 | 105 | 11 | 358 | 56 | 202 | 32 | 走滑型 |
31 | 2021-05-26 06:37:24 | 25.66 | 99.91 | 3.6 | 4 | 296 | 81 | 173 | 27 | 83 | 9 | 251 | 11 | 67 | 79 | 161 | 1 | 走滑型 |
Table3 The focal mechanism solutions of the 31 MS≥3.0 earthquakes of the Yangbi earthquake sequence
序号 | 发震时间 | 北纬 /(°) | 东经 /(°) | 震级 MW | 震源 深度 /km | 节面Ⅰ | 节面Ⅱ | T轴 | B轴 | P轴 | 地震 类型 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | 方位角 /(°) | 倾俯角 /(°) | |||||||
1 | 2021-05-18 18:49:30 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 3.7 | 8 | 136 | 83 | -158 | 44 | 68 | -7 | 268 | 10 | 153 | 67 | 2 | 20 | 走滑型 |
2 | 2021-05-18 20:56:46 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 3.7 | 2 | 310 | 83 | 131 | 49 | 42 | 11 | 257 | 38 | 124 | 41 | 9 | 26 | 混合型 |
3 | 2021-05-18 21:39:35 | 25.64 | 99.92 | 4.3 | 4 | 309 | 85 | 161 | 41 | 71 | 5 | 263 | 17 | 116 | 70 | 356 | 10 | 走滑型 |
4 | 2021-05-19 03:27:56 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 3.8 | 4 | 315 | 79 | 156 | 50 | 67 | 12 | 271 | 25 | 111 | 64 | 4 | 8 | 走滑型 |
5 | 2021-05-19 20:05:56 | 25.65 | 99.91 | 4.7 | 8 | 319 | 90 | 178 | 49 | 88 | 0 | 274 | 2 | 124 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 走滑型 |
6 | 2021-05-19 21:13:07 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 3.9 | 4 | 313 | 80 | 174 | 44 | 84 | 10 | 269 | 11 | 73 | 78 | 178 | 3 | 走滑型 |
7 | 2021-05-20 01:58:59 | 25.66 | 99.89 | 3.9 | 2 | 144 | 56 | 179 | 234 | 89 | 34 | 104 | 24 | 235 | 56 | 3 | 23 | 混合型 |
8 | 2021-05-21 21:21:24 | 25.65 | 99.92 | 5.3 | 10 | 307 | 85 | 175 | 37 | 86 | 5 | 262 | 7 | 80 | 83 | 172 | 0 | 走滑型 |
9 | 2021-05-21 21:37:33 | 25.62 | 99.96 | 3.7 | 22 | 315 | 74 | 178 | 46 | 88 | 16 | 271 | 12 | 52 | 74 | 179 | 10 | 走滑型 |
10 | 2021-05-21 21:48:34 | 25.70 | 99.88 | 6.0 | 10 | 135 | 80 | 176 | 226 | 86 | 10 | 91 | 10 | 247 | 79 | 360 | 4 | 走滑型 |
11 | 2021-05-21 22:15:16 | 25.61 | 99.95 | 4.3 | 18 | 309 | 76 | -155 | 213 | 66 | -15 | 79 | 7 | 336 | 62 | 173 | 27 | 走滑型 |
12 | 2021-05-21 22:31:10 | 25.61 | 99.97 | 5.0 | 20 | 138 | 68 | -175 | 47 | 85 | -22 | 95 | 12 | 216 | 67 | 0 | 19 | 走滑型 |
13 | 2021-05-21 22:52:08 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 3.8 | 6 | 301 | 85 | 174 | 32 | 84 | 5 | 256 | 7 | 82 | 83 | 346 | 1 | 走滑型 |
14 | 2021-05-21 22:59:37 | 25.61 | 99.92 | 3.9 | 4 | 318 | 78 | 163 | 51 | 73 | 12 | 274 | 20 | 105 | 69 | 5 | 3 | 走滑型 |
15 | 2021-05-21 23:08:58 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 3.7 | 8 | 299 | 83 | -176 | 209 | 86 | -7 | 254 | 2 | 1 | 82 | 164 | 8 | 走滑型 |
16 | 2021-05-21 23:13:54 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 4.0 | 4 | 308 | 90 | 176 | 38 | 86 | 0 | 263 | 3 | 126 | 86 | 353 | 3 | 走滑型 |
17 | 2021-05-21 23:18:09 | 25.60 | 100.0 | 3.8 | 2 | 307 | 85 | 137 | 42 | 47 | 7 | 255 | 33 | 122 | 47 | 2 | 25 | 混合型 |
18 | 2021-05-21 23:23:35 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 4.5 | 6 | 126 | 86 | 177 | 216 | 88 | 4 | 81 | 4 | 251 | 86 | 351 | 1 | 走滑型 |
19 | 2021-05-22 00:51:41 | 25.70 | 99.88 | 4.2 | 6 | 125 | 73 | -177 | 34 | 88 | -17 | 81 | 10 | 206 | 73 | 348 | 13 | 走滑型 |
20 | 2021-05-22 00:56:07 | 25.63 | 99.89 | 3.7 | 18 | 112 | 77 | 121 | 222 | 34 | 24 | 55 | 49 | 284 | 30 | 178 | 25 | 混合型 |
21 | 2021-05-22 01:36:06 | 25.62 | 99.95 | 4.1 | 4 | 109 | 86 | 175 | 200 | 85 | 4 | 65 | 6 | 254 | 84 | 155 | 1 | 走滑型 |
22 | 2021-05-22 01:50:18 | 25.61 | 99.97 | 3.9 | 8 | 317 | 81 | 176 | 47 | 86 | 9 | 272 | 9 | 71 | 80 | 182 | 3 | 走滑型 |
23 | 2021-05-22 04:10:57 | 25.62 | 99.94 | 4.2 | 16 | 272 | 40 | 159 | 18 | 77 | 52 | 250 | 45 | 28 | 37 | 136 | 22 | 混合型 |
24 | 2021-05-22 08:36:47 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 3.9 | 6 | 112 | 75 | -143 | 11 | 55 | -18 | 238 | 13 | 131 | 51 | 337 | 36 | 走滑型 |
25 | 2021-05-22 09:48:00 | 25.70 | 99.89 | 4.2 | 8 | 312 | 89 | -180 | 222 | 90 | -1 | 267 | 1 | 36 | 89 | 177 | 1 | 走滑型 |
26 | 2021-05-22 17:24:16 | 25.64 | 99.89 | 3.9 | 10 | 311 | 82 | 173 | 42 | 83 | 8 | 267 | 11 | 85 | 79 | 177 | 0 | 走滑型 |
27 | 2021-05-22 20:14:36 | 25.60 | 99.92 | 4.6 | 14 | 309 | 77 | 177 | 40 | 87 | 13 | 265 | 12 | 52 | 76 | 174 | 7 | 走滑型 |
28 | 2021-05-22 22:30:05 | 25.60 | 99.93 | 3.8 | 4 | 306 | 37 | -176 | 213 | 88 | -53 | 273 | 33 | 32 | 36 | 155 | 37 | 混合型 |
29 | 2021-05-22 23:30:17 | 25.57 | 99.95 | 3.4 | 4 | 135 | 78 | -171 | 43 | 82 | -13 | 89 | 3 | 190 | 75 | 358 | 15 | 走滑型 |
30 | 2021-05-23 00:17:20 | 25.57 | 99.96 | 3.6 | 4 | 337 | 76 | -148 | 239 | 59 | -16 | 105 | 11 | 358 | 56 | 202 | 32 | 走滑型 |
31 | 2021-05-26 06:37:24 | 25.66 | 99.91 | 3.6 | 4 | 296 | 81 | 173 | 27 | 83 | 9 | 251 | 11 | 67 | 79 | 161 | 1 | 走滑型 |
[1] | 常祖峰, 常昊, 臧阳, 等. 2016. 维西-乔后断裂新活动特征及其与红河断裂的关系[J]. 地质力学学报, 22(3): 517-530. |
CHANG Zu-feng, CHANG Hao, ZANG Yang, et al. 2016. Recent active features of Weixi-Qiaohou Fault and its relationship with the Honghe Fault[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 22(3): 517-530. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2002. 中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 32(12): 1020-1030. |
DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2003. Basic characteristics of active tectonics in China[J]. Science in China (Ser D), 32(12): 1020-1030. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 房立华, 吴建平, 王长在, 等. 2013. 2012年新疆新源MS6.6地震余震序列精定位研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 43(12): 1929-1933. |
FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, WANG Chang-zai, et al. 2013. Relocation of the 2012 MS6.6 Xinjiang Xinyuan earthquake sequence[J]. Science in China, 43(12): 1929-1933. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 房立华, 吴建平, 王未来, 等. 2015. 2014年新疆于田MS7.3地震序列重定位[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(3): 802-808. |
FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, WANG Wei-lai, et al. 2015. Relocation of the 2014 MS7.3 earthquake sequence in Yutian, Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(3): 802-808. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 高原, 周蕙兰, 郑斯华, 等. 1997. 测定震源深度的意义的初步讨论[J]. 中国地震, 13(4): 321-329. |
GAO Yuan, ZHOU Hui-lan, ZHENG Si-hua, et al. 1997. Preliminary discussion on implication of determination on source depth of earthquake[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 13(4): 321-329. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 李金, 王琼, 吴传勇, 等. 2016. 2015年7月3日皮山6.5级地震发震构造初步研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 59(8): 2859-2870. |
LI Jin, WANG Qiong, WU Chuan-yong, et al. 2016. Preliminary study for seismogenic structure of the Pishan MS6.5 earthquake of July 3, 2015[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(8): 2859-2870. (in Chinese) | |
[7] |
李通, 郭志, 高星. 2020. 云南通海2018年8月地震序列重定位及震源机制[J]. 地震地质, 42(4): 111-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.04.007.
DOI |
LI Tong, GUO Zhi, GAO Xing. 2020. Relocation and focal mechanisms of Yunnan Tonghai earthquake sequence of August 2018 [J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(4): 111-122. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 刘自凤, 龙锋, 彭关灵, 等. 2019. 滇西北地区强震危险性分析[J]. 地震研究, 42(3): 330-337. |
LIU Zi-feng, LONG Feng, PENG Guan-ling, et al. 2019. Analysis on strong earthquake risk in northwestern Ynnnan[J]Journal of Seismological Research, 42(3): 330-337. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 吕坚, 郑秀芬, 肖健, 等. 2013. 2012年9月7日云南彝良MS5.7、 MS5.6地震震源破裂特征与发震构造研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 56(8): 2645-2654. |
LÜ Jian, ZHENG Xiu-feng, XIAO Jian, et al. 2013. Rupture characteristics and seismogenic structures of the MS5.7 and MS5.6 Yiliang earthquake of Sep.7, 2012[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56(8): 2645-2654. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 冉勇康, 陈立春, 程建武, 等. 2008. 安宁河断裂冕宁以北晚第四纪地表变形与强震破裂行为[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 38(5): 543-554. |
RAN Yong-kang, CHEN Li-chun, CHENG Jian-wu, et al. 2008. Late Quaternary surface deformation and rupture behavior of strong earthquake on the segment north of Mianning of the Anninghe Fault[J]. Science in China (Ser D), 38(5): 543-554. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 万永革. 2019. 同一地震多个震源机制中心解的确定[J]. 地球物理学报, 62(12): 4718-4728. |
WAN Yong-ge. 2019. Determination of center of several focal mechanisms of the same earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(12): 4718-4728. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 王琪, 张培震, 牛之俊, 等. 2001. 中国大陆现今地壳运动和构造变形[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 31(7): 529-536. |
WANG Qi, ZHANG Pei-zhen, NIU Zhi-jun, et al. 2001. Crustal movement and tectonic deformation of continental China[J]. Science in China (Ser D), 31(7): 529-536. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 王绍晋, 张建国, 余庆坤, 等. 2010. 红河断裂带的震源机制与现代构造应力场[J]. 地震研究, 33(2): 200-207. |
WANG Shao-jin, ZHANG Jian-guo, YU Qing-kun, et al. 2010. Focal mechanism of strong and medium-small earthquakes and modern tectonic stress-field of the Red-River fault zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 33(2): 200-207. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 王未来, 吴建平, 房立华, 等. 2014. 2014年云南鲁甸MS6.5地震序列的双差定位[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(9): 3042-3051. |
WANG Wei-lai, WU Jian-ping, FANG Li-hua, et al. 2014. Double difference location of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake sequences in Yunnan Province in 2014[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(9): 3042-3051. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 王阎昭, 王恩宁, 沈正康, 等. 2008. 基于GPS资料约束反演川滇地区主要断裂现今活动速率[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 38(5): 582-597. |
WANG Yan-zhao, WANG En-ning, SHEN Zheng-kang, et al. 2008. GPS-constrained inversion of present-day slip rates along major faults of the Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J]. Science in China (Ser D), 38(5): 582-597. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 王莹, 赵韬, 李陈侠, 等. 2019. 2017年四川九寨沟7.0级地震序列重定位和震源机制特征分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 34(2): 469-478. |
WANG Ying, ZHAO Tao, LI Chen-xia, et al. 2019. Relocations and focal mechanism solutions of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan MS7.0 earthquake sequence[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 34(2): 469-478. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 向宏发, 虢顺民, 张晚霞, 等. 2007. 红河断裂带南段中新世以来大型右旋位错量的定量研究[J]. 地震地质, 29(1): 34-50. |
XIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, ZHANG Wan-xia, et al. 2007. Quantitative study on the large scale dextral strike slip offset in the southern segment of the Red River Fault since Miocene[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(1): 34-50. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 向宏发, 韩竹军, 虢顺民, 等. 2004. 红河断裂带大型右旋走滑运动与伴生构造地貌变形[J]. 地震地质, 26(4): 597-610. |
XIANG Hong-fa, HAN Zhu-jun, GUO Shun-min, et al. 2004. Large-scale dextral strike-slip movement and associated tectonic deformation along the Red-River fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 26(4): 597-610. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 熊探宇, 姚鑫, 张永双. 2010. 鲜水河断裂带全新世活动性研究进展综述[J]. 地质力学学报, 16(2): 176-188. |
XIONG Tan-yu, YAO Xin, ZHANG Yong-shuang. 2010. A review on study of activity of Xianshuihe fault zone since the Holocene[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 16(2): 176-188. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 2003. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S1): 151-162. |
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, ZHENG Rong-zhang, et al. 2003. Pattern of latest tectonic motion and its dynamics for active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J]. Science in China (Ser D), 33(S1): 151-162. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 徐晓雪, 季灵运, 蒋锋云, 等. 2020. 基于GPS和小震研究金沙江断裂带现今活动特征[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 40(10): 1062-1067. |
XU Xiao-xue, JI Ling-yun, JIANG Feng-yun, et al. 2020. Study on current activity features of Jinshajiang fault zone based on GPS and small earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 40(10): 1062-1067. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 徐志国, 梁姗姗, 盛书中, 等. 2020. 2019年四川长宁MS6.0地震序列重定位和震源特征分析[J]. 地震学报, 42(4): 377-397. |
XU Zhi-guo, LIANG Shan-shan, SHENG Shu-zhong, et al. 2020. Relocation and source characteristics of the 2019 Changning MS6.0 earthquake sequence[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 42(4): 377-397. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 易桂喜, 龙锋, 梁明剑, 等. 2017. 2017年8月8日九寨沟M7.0地震及余震震源机制解与发震构造分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(10): 4083-4097. |
YI Gui-xi, LONG Feng, LIANG Ming-jian, et al. 2017. Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 8 August 2017 M70 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershocks, northern Sichuan[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(10): 4083-4097. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 易桂喜, 龙锋, 闻学泽, 等. 2015. 2014年11月22日康定M6.3地震序列发震构造分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(4): 1205-1219. |
YI Gui-xi, LONG Feng, WEN Xue-ze, et al. 2015. Seismogenic structure of the M6.3 Kangding earthquake sequence on 22 Nov. 2014, southwestern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(4): 1205-1219. (in Chinese) | |
[25] |
易桂喜, 龙锋, 赵敏, 等. 2016. 2014年10月1日越西M5.0地震震源机制与发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 38(4): 1124-1136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.025.
DOI |
YI Gui-xi, LONG Feng, ZHAO Min, et al. 2016. Focal mechanism and seismogenic structure of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake on 1 Oct. 2014, southwestern China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(4): 1124-1136. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 张广伟, 雷建设, 梁姗姗, 等. 2014. 2014年8月3日云南鲁甸MS6.5地震序列重定位与震源机制研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(9): 3018-3027. |
ZHANG Guang-wei, LEI Jian-she, LIANG Shan-shan, et al. 2014. Relocations and focal mechanism solutions of the 3 August 2014 Ludian, Yunnan MS6.5 earthquake sequence[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(9): 3018-3027. (in Chinese) | |
[27] |
张广伟, 张洪艳, 孙长青. 2016. 2015年新疆皮山MS6.5地震震源机制及余震序列定位[J]. 地震地质, 38(3): 711-720. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.03.016.
DOI |
ZHANG Guang-wei, ZHANG Hong-yan, SUN Chang-qing. 2016. Mechanism of the 2015 Pishan, Xinjiang, MS6.5 mainshock and relocation of its aftershock sequences[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(3): 711-720. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 赵韬, 赵曦, 王莹, 等. 2016. 区域台网地震矩张量快速反演系统研究[J]. 地震学报, 38(6): 889-897. |
ZHAO Tao, ZHAO Xi, WANG Ying, et al. 2016. Study on the fast seismic moment tensor inversion system using regional seismic network data[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(6): 889-897. (in Chinese) | |
[29] |
Ichinose G A, Anderson J G, Smith K D, et al. 2003. Source parameters of eastern California and western Nevada earthquakes from regional moment tensor Iiversion[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1): 61-84.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Jost M L, Herrmann R B. 1989. A student’s guide to and review of moment tensor[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 60(2): 37-57.
DOI URL |
[31] | Kawakatsu H. 1998. On the realtime monitoring of the long-period seismic wavefield[J]. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 73(3-4): 267-274. |
[32] |
Liu Y, Yao H J, Zhang H J, et al. 2021. The community velocity model V.1.0 of southwest China, constructed from joint body- and surface-wave travel-time tomography[J/OL]. Seismological Research Letters. doi: org/10.1785/0220200318.
DOI |
[33] |
Long F, Yi G X, Wang S W, et al. 2019. Geometry and tectonic deformation of the seismogenic structure for the 8 August 2017 MS70 Jiuzhaigou earthquake sequence, northern Sichuan, China[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 3(3): 253-267. doi.org/ 10.26464/epp2019027.
DOI URL |
[34] |
Tajima F, Megnin C, Dreger D S, et al. 2002. Feasibility of real-time broadband waveform inversion for simultaneous moment tensor and centroid location determination[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(2): 739-750.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. 2000. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward Fault, California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(6): 1353-1368.
DOI URL |
[36] |
Xie Z J, Zheng Y, Liu C, et al. 2015. Source parameters of the 2014 MS6.5 Ludian earthquake sequence and their implications on the seismogenic structure[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 86(6): 1614-1621. doi: 10.1785/0220150085.
DOI URL |
[37] |
Xu Z, Huang Z, Wang L, et al. 2016. Crustal stress field in Yunnan: Implication for crust-mantle coupling[J]. Earthquake Science, 29(2): 47-57. doi: 10.1007/s11589-016-0146-3.
DOI |
[38] | Zoback M L. 1992. First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 97(B8): 11703-11728. |
[1] | YU Zhan-yang, SHEN Xu-zhang, LIANG Hao, ZHENG Wen-jun, LIU Xu-zhou. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR FAULTS AND STRESS FIELD IN WEIHE-YUNCHENG BASIN CONSTRAINED BY SEISMIC ACTIVITY AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 395-413. |
[2] | DU Hao-guo, LIN Xu-chuan, ZHANG Jian-guo, DU Hao-biao, ZHANG Fang-hao, DU Zhu-quan, LU Yong-kun, DAI Bo-yang. A SEISMIC DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION METHOD BASED ON IMPROVED ANT COLONY ALGORITHM AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE IMAGES AND ITS APPLICATION TO YANGBI EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 1013-1029. |
[3] | WU Gui-ju, YU Bing-fei, HAO Hong-tao, HU Min-zhang, TAN Hong-bo. THE DEEP STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE SEIS-MOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE YANGBI EARTHQUAKE REGION AND ITS SURROUNDING AREAS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 739-756. |
[4] | ZHAO Tao, WANG Ying, MA Ji, SHAO Ruo-tong, XU Yi-fei, HU Jing. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 MADUO, QINGHAI MS7.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 790-805. |
[5] | GUO Zhi, GAO Xing, LU Zhen. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM FOR THE XINJIANG JIASHI EARTHQUAKE ON 19 JANUARY, 2020 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2021, 43(2): 345-356. |
[6] | LI Tong, GUO Zhi, GAO Xing. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISMS OF YUNNAN TONGHAI EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE OF AUGUST 2018 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(4): 881-892. |
[7] | LI Cui-ping, TANG Mao-yun, GUO Wei-ying, HUANG Shi-yuan, WANG Xiao-long, GAO Jian. RELOCATION OF THE 23 NOVEMBER 2017 WULONG MS5.0 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE AND ANALYSIS OF ITS SEISMOGENIC FAULT [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2019, 41(3): 603-618. |
[8] | GUO Zhi, CHEN Li-chun, LI Tong, GAO Xing. FOCAL MECHANISM OF THE AUGUST 8, M7.0 SICHUAN JIUZHAIGOU AND AUGUST 9, M6.6 XINJIANG JINGHE EARTHQUAKES OF 2017 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2018, 40(6): 1294-1304. |
[9] | JIN Chun-hua, HE Qiu-ju, TIAN Xiao-hui. RESEARCH OF FOCAL MECHANISM AND DEPTH OF TWOMS4.5 EARTHQUAKES IN YONGNING [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2017, 39(1): 193-205. |
[10] | YANG Ting, WU Jian-ping, FANG Li-hua, WANG Wei-lai. RELOCATION OF MAIN SHOCK AND AFTERSHOCKS OF THE 2014 YINGJIANG MS5.6 AND MS6.1 EARTHQUAKES IN YUNNAN [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 1047-1057. |
[11] | ZHANG Guang-wei, ZHANG Hong-yan, SUN Chang-qing. MECHANISM OF THE 2015 PISHAN, XINJIANG, MS6.5 MAINSHOCK AND RELOCATION OF ITS AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(3): 711-720. |
[12] | JIANG ying, LIU Zi-wei, LI Hui, ZHANG Xiao-tong, WEI-Jin, SHEN Chong-yang. CONSTRAINING THE FOCAL MECHANISM OF THE 2015 NEPAL EARTHQUAKE WITH OBSERVATIONS OF THE CONTINUOUS GRAVITY STATIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(3): 660-669. |
[13] | HAN Xiao-ming, LIU Fang, ZHANG Wen-tao, LI Juan, HOU Di. analyzing the variation characteristics of stress field in hetao seismic belt using focal mechanism data [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(4): 1030-1042. |
[14] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Jian-chang, LIU Xi-qiang, XU Chang-peng, LI Xia. research of source parameters and stress state in shandong segment of tanlu fault zone [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(4): 966-981. |
[15] | ZHANG Zhi-wei, ZHOU Long-quan, LONG Feng, RUAN Xiang. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTIC OF STRESS FIELD FOR WENCHUAN MS8.0 AND LUSHAN MS7.0 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(3): 804-817. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||