ASSESSING THE SEISMIC RISK OF CITIES AT FINE-SCALE: A CASE STUDY OF HAIDIAN DISTRICT IN BEIJING, CHINA

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.015

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to provide practical and useful information for the disaster prevention and relief actions, it is necessary to take into account spatial differences and temporal changes of seismic risk in evaluating seismic risk at a proper temporal and spatial scale. From the perspectives of identifying spatial difference of seismic risk within the city and performing disaster relief operations, the evaluation of urban seismic risk is done in this paper at the spatial scale of 500m*500m grids for day time and night time separately. For this purpose, this paper proposes the methods for the assessment of seismic risk, establishing the correspondence relations between the population and land use, and between the floor area of buildings destroyed and casualties at more reasonable spatial and temporal scales. Taking a case study of Haidian District in Beijing using these methods, we estimate the floor area and the value of buildings destroyed and the casualties at daytime and nighttime separately at the 500m grid scale. Results show that:a total of 185, 000m² of areas is expected to be destroyed annually in Haidian District, and the total loss of the houses is 325 million Yuan(excluding properties within the houses). During the day(night)time, 3, 159(2, 037)victims are expected to be killed and 12, 071(7, 790) injured. Destruction of buildings and loss of houses is spatially concentrated in the downtowns in the south and the industrial parks in the east. The casualties inflicted during the day and night descend from southeast to northwest, i.e. from urban core areas, urban fringes, urban outskirts, to village. Several regions suffer heavy casualties during the day, but nighttime casualties are scattered across different regions. The conclusions in this paper efficiently identify the spatial distribution of areas at the level of high and the very high seismic risk, which provides reliable decision support for identifying priority areas for pre-disaster prevention and mitigation, emergency rescue and the distribution of various relief supplies.

Key words: fine-scale, seismic risk assessment, building destroyed, economic loss, casualties, Haidian District

摘要：

地震风险评估需充分考虑到地震风险的时空差异,选择合理的时空间尺度进行研究,才能给政府防灾减灾规划、政策的落实和应急救援等提供具有可操作性、切实有效的信息。为此,基于辨识城市地震风险时空格局差异以及抗震救灾组织2个方面的综合考虑,本研究选择在500m×500m格网尺度上进行昼夜2个不同时段的地震风险评估研究,建立了昼夜人口分布与土地利用的对应关系,以及建筑物损毁与人员伤亡之间的关系,提出了昼夜地震风险精细化评估的方法。并以北京市海淀区为例,在500m×500m格网尺度上进行了地震风险的模拟评估,估算了海淀区总体及格网在相应的地震烈度下可能的建筑物损毁面积、房屋损失以及人员伤亡数。结果表明,海淀区年期望建筑物损毁总面积为18.5万m²,房屋总损失为3.25亿元(不包括屋内财产),白天死亡总人数3,158人,受伤总人数12,071人,夜晚死亡总人数2,037人,受伤总人数7,790人;空间上,建筑物损毁面积和房屋损失比较大的地区集中在南部城市中心区和东部产业园区,白天和夜晚伤亡人数自东南向西北呈现出显著的"城市核心区-城市边缘区-城市影响区-乡村腹地"的衰减模式,白天伤亡人口有几个显著的高值区,夜晚伤亡人口则分布相对分散。文中的分析结果识别了昼夜精细化尺度地震风险的高值区域,为进一步确定防震减灾、震后应急救援以及各种救灾物资分配的重点地区提供了决策依据。

关键词: 精细化尺度, 地震风险评估, 建筑物损毁, 损失, 人员伤亡, 海淀区

CLC Number:

P315.99

YUAN Hai-hong, GAO Xiao-lu, QI Wei. ASSESSING THE SEISMIC RISK OF CITIES AT FINE-SCALE: A CASE STUDY OF HAIDIAN DISTRICT IN BEIJING, CHINA[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(1): 197-210.

袁海红, 高晓路, 戚伟. 城市地震风险精细化评估——以北京海淀区为例[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(1): 197-210.

References

陈洪富. 2012. HAZ-China地震灾害损失评估系统设计及初步实现[D]:[学位论文]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.
CHEN Hong-fu. 2012. General development and design of HAZ-China Earthquake Disaster Loss Estimation System[D]. Ph D thesis. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin(in Chinese).
陈健云, 毕可为, 温瑞智. 2009. 一种适于震后快速评估的群体易损性分析方法［J］. 震灾防御技术, 4(2):174-181.
CHEN Jian-yun, BI Ke-wei, WEN Rui-zhi. 2009. A fast approach of group vulnerability evaluation for post-earthquake［J］. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 4(2):174-181(in Chinese).
方伟华, 王静爱, 史培军, 等. 2011. 综合风险防范:数据库、风险地图与网络平台[M]. 北京:科学出版社.
FANG Wei-hua, WAGN Jing-ai, SHI Pei-jun, et al. 2011. Integrated Risk Governance:Database, Risk Map and Network Platform[M]. Science Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
胡少卿, 孙柏涛, 王东明. 2010. 基于建筑物易损性分类的群体震害预测方法研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, (3):96-101.
HU Shao-qing, SUN Bai-tao, WANG Dong-ming. 2010. A method for earthquake damage prediction of building group based on building vulnerability classification［J］. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, (3):96-101(in Chinese).
黄会平, 张岑. 2007. 分类、分级模型与GIS集成的探讨［J］. 华北水利水电学院学报, 28(3):72-74.
HUANG Hui-ping, ZHANG Cen. 2007. Study on integration of classification model and GIS［J］. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 28(3):72-74(in Chinese).
黄荣清. 2003. 北京城市的地域构造［J］. 中国人口科学, (5):49-55.
HUANG Rong-qing. 2003. Urban structure of Beijing［J］. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (5):49-55(in Chinese).
匡文慧, 杜国明. 2011. 北京城市人口空间分布特征的GIS分析［J］. 地球信息科学学报, 13(4):506-512.
KUANG Wen-hui, DU Guo-ming. 2011. Analyzing urban population spatial distribution in Beijing proper［J］. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 13(4):506-512(in Chinese).
马东辉, 程洋, 王志涛. 2014. 基于群体特性的建筑物震害预测方法［J］. 北京工业大学学报, 40(5):720-724.
MA Dong-hui, CHENG Yang, WANG Zhi-tao. 2014. Method for earthquake damage prediction of buildings based on group characteristics［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 40(5):720-724(in Chinese).
马玉宏, 谢礼立. 2000. 地震人员伤亡估算方法研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 20(4):140-147.
MA Yu-hong, XIE Li-li. 2000. Methodologies for assessment of earthquake casualty［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(4):140-147(in Chinese).
孙得璋. 2008. 建筑物单体震害预测新方法探讨[D]:[学位论文]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.
SUN De-zhang. 2008. New method of seismic damage prediction of single building[D]. Ph D thesis. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin(in Chinese).
王晓青, 丁香, 王龙, 等. 2009. 四川汶川8级大地震灾害损失快速评估研究［J］. 地震学报, 31(2):205-211.
WANG Xiao-qing, DING Xiang, WANG Long, et al. 2009. A study on fast earthquake loss assessment and its application to 2008 Wenchuan M8 earthquake［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 31(2):205-211(in Chinese).
温增平. 1999. 建筑物地震易损性分析研究[D]:[学位论文]. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所.
WENG Zeng-ping. 1999. Seismic vulnerability analysis for building[D]. Ph D thesis. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
吴凡, 汪明, 刘宁. 2012. 美国地震风险评估中建筑物易损性与损失组合的探讨［J］. 灾害学, 27(3):116-121.
WU Fan, Wang Ming, Liu Ning. 2012. Discussion of Vulnerability of Building Structures and Loss Combinations for Earthquake Risk Assessment［J］. Journal of Catastrophology, 27(3):116-121(in Chinese).
徐伟, 王静爱, 史培军, 等. 2004. 中国城市地震灾害危险度评价［J］. 自然灾害学报, 13(1):9-15.
XU Wei, WANG Jing-ai, SHI Pei-jun, et al. 2004. Hazard degree assessment of urban earthquake disaster in China［J］. Journal of Natural Disasters, 13(1):9-15(in Chinese).
杨杰, 刘茂, 徐宁. 2011. 基于能力谱的建筑物震害评估及城市抗震规划［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 20(11):18-24.
YANG Jie, LIU Mao, XU Ning. 2011. Application of capacity spectrum in building damage state assessment and urban earthquake disaster mitigation planning［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 20(11):18-24(in Chinese).
尹之潜. 1995. 地震灾害及损失预测方法[M]. 北京:地震出版社.
YIN Zhi-qian. 1995. Earthquake Disaster and Forecast Methods of Its Loss[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
尹之潜, 杨淑文. 2004. 地震损失分析与设防标准[M]. 北京:地震出版社.
YIN Zhi-qian, YANG Shu-wen. 2004. Earthquake Loss Analysis and Fortification Criteria[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
袁海红, 高晓路. 2014. 城市经济脆弱性评价研究:以北京海淀区为例［J］. 自然资源学报, 29(7):1159-1172.
YUAN Hai-hong, GAO Xiao-lu. 2014. Assessing the economic vulnerability to disasters of cities:A case study of Haidian District in Beijing［J］. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(7):1159-1172(in Chinese).
张风华, 谢礼立, 范立础. 2004. 城市建构筑物地震损失预测研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 24(3):12-20.
ZHANG Feng-hua, XIE Li-li, FAN Li-chu. 2004. A study on disaster loss prediction caused by damaged structures under earthquake［J］. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 24(3):12-20(in Chinese).
张子民, 周英, 李琦, 等. 2010. 城市局域动态人口估算方法与模拟应用［J］. 地球信息科学学报, 12(4):503-509.
ZHANG Zi-min, ZHOU Ying, LI Qi, et al. 2010. An estimation method of dynamic population within an urban local area［J］. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 12(4):503-509(in Chinese).
Ji J, Gao X L, Wang K Y. 2012. Evaluation methods about service quality of emergency shelters for evacuation in cities[C]. In:ISCRAM ASIA 2012 Conference on Information System for Crisis Response and Management, Beijing, China.
Lantada N, Irizarry J, Barbat A H, et al. 2010. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method［J］. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2):201-229.
Sabetta F, Goretti A, Lucantoni A. 1998. Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion[C]. In:Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France.

[1]	WEI Ben-yong, SU Gui-wu. ASSESSMENT ON INDIRECT ECONOMIC LOSS OF WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER BASED ON INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 1082-1094.
[2]	LI Xi, ZHANG Jian-guo, XIE Ying-qing, MIAO Qing-wen. LUDIAN M_S 6.5 EARTHQUAKE SURFACE DAMAGE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH STRUCTURE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2014, 36(4): 1280-1291.
[3]	DENG Qi-dong, LU Zao-xun, YANG Zhu-en. REMARKS ON URBAN ACTIVE FAULTS EXPLORATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2007, 29(2): 189-200.
[4]	WANG Yi-peng. RECOGNITION OF “THE WORKING GUIDELINES FOR EXPLORATION AND SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF ACTIVE FAULTS IN URBAN AREAS (ON TRIAL)” [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2004, 26(4): 559-565.
[5]	CUI Yu-hong, WU Guo-you, NIE Yong-an, YAO Lan-yu, QIU Hu. PREDICTED MODELS OF ECONOMIC AND LIFE LOSSES CAUSED BY EARTHQUAKE FOR TIANJIN CITY [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2002, 24(3): 412-422.