ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS OF FOCAL MECHANISM IN RESERVOIR HEAD REGION OF XILUODU RESERVOIR AFTER IMPOUNDMENT

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.03.008

Abstract

Abstract:

There are carbonate rock, limestone and caves in the reservoir head area of Xiluodu Reservoir, which is the third largest reservoir in the world. After the impoundment, the water level has risen to about 140 meters, and consequently, more than 6 000 micro-earthquakes occurred on the reservoir head region, with magnitude of the vast majority being less than 1 and the maximum magnitude M_L3. These micro-earthquakes concentrated within an area of 10km in width from the reservoir banks, 5km in depth, and 40km in length along the reservoir basin. These earthquakes did not affect the safety of the reservoir and dam. We inverted 700 focal mechanisms by using the waveforms recorded by the reservoir's digital seismic network before and after the impoundment, and further inverted the stress field of the whole reservoir head region and the sub-regions. The results show a complex orientation of focal mechanism, different rupture types, and uneven and unstable stress state, which is not in consistency with other regional stress fields obtained by a lot of natural earthquakes, indicating the reservoir induced seismicity is not strictly controlled by the regional stress field. According to the analysis, the reservoir water flows into caves, penetrating into cracks and joints, leading to increase of pore pressure, reducing the friction and fracture strength of rocks, and generating elastic deformation caused by the increased load of reservoir water. The joint actions of these may be the cause of the earthquakes. The accumulated regional stress and local stress were released first, then, the additional stress produced by the reservoir water loading was dominating. There are no major active faults in the reservoir head area. Reservoir water level will rise again by tens of meters in 2014. With the penetration of cracks, the adjustment of stress field, and the backflow of water which will inundate the upstream region of the reservoir basin, the possibility of occurrence of moderate earthquakes cannot be ruled out. The seismic fortification criteria are high for the dam of Xiluodu Reservoir, so these earthquakes will not cause safety problems. We suggest carrying out detailed hydro-geological, geophysical explorations during the continuous active period of the reservoir-induced seismicity to obtain accurate scientific data for determining the causes of induced seismicity and searching for the technical approaches for controlling the induced seismicity. These measurements will mitigate the impact of emergencies and play an exemplary role for the other similar reservoirs.

Key words: Xiluodu reservoir, induced earthquake, focal mechanism, stress field

摘要：

目前世界第三大水库溪洛渡的库首区遍布碳酸盐岩、灰岩，存在溶洞，蓄水后水位升高140m左右，随之发生6 000多次地震，但绝大多数是1级以下微震，最大震级仅仅M_L3；集中在库岸两侧10km、深度5km、从大坝向上游沿库盆40km长度的范围内。微小地震对于水库、大坝的安全没有产生影响。使用较为密集的水库数字地震台网资料反演得到蓄水前后700多次地震的震源机制，并进一步反演了全区和分区的应力场，发现：震源机制空间取向复杂、破裂类型多样，应力状态不均匀、不稳定。与他人使用大量天然地震资料反演的区域应力场不一致，表明水库诱发地震没有受到区域应力场的严格控制。分析认为库水涌入溶洞、渗透到裂隙、节理，原来存在的小断层面或者间断面的孔隙压力增加，摩擦强度、岩石破裂强度降低以及库水载荷加大造成弹性变形等共同作用是地震的成因。并且首先主要释放的是已经积累的区域应力、局部应力，然后才表现出以库水载荷产生的附加应力为主。库首区没有较大的活动断层，2014年库水位将再度升高数十m，伴随裂隙的贯通，应力场的调整，回流的库水淹没库盆上游，还会发生中小地震乃至中等强度地震。溪洛渡水库大坝抗震设防水准较高，不会造成安全问题。建议在诱发地震继续活动期间，尽早实施详细的水文地质、地球物理探测，提供精细的科学资料，为确定诱发地震的成因、寻找控制诱发地震的技术条件，以减轻突发事件的影响，为其他类似水库发挥示范作用。

关键词: 溪洛渡水库, 诱发地震, 震源机制, 应力场

CLC Number:

P135.2

DIAO Gui-ling, WANG Yue-feng, FENG Xiang-dong, WANG Xiao-shan, FENG Zhi-ren, ZHANG Hong-zhi, CHENG Wan-zheng, LI Yue, WANG Li-bing. ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS OF FOCAL MECHANISM IN RESERVOIR HEAD REGION OF XILUODU RESERVOIR AFTER IMPOUNDMENT[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2014, 36(3): 644-657.

刁桂苓, 王曰风, 冯向东, 王晓山, 冯志仁, 张洪智, 程万正, 李悦, 王利兵. 溪洛渡库首区蓄水后震源机制分析[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 644-657.

References

车用太, 陈俊华, 张莉芬, 等. 2009. 长江三峡工程库首区胡家坪M_S4.1水库诱发地震研究 . 地震,29(4):1―13.
CHE Yong-tai, CHEN Jun-hua, ZHANG Li-fen, et al. 2009. Study of the reservoir-induced Hujiaping M_S4.1 earthquake in the Three Gorges Dam area . Earthquake, 29 (4): 1―13.
陈厚群, 徐泽平, 李敏. 2009. 关于高坝大库与水库地震的问题
[J]. 水力发电学报, 28(5): 1-7.
CHEN Hou-qun, XU Ze-ping, LI Min. 2009. Discussion on the relationship between large reservoirs and seismicity
[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 28(5): 1-7(in Chinese).
程万正. 2013. 高烈度区的水库地震问题
[J]. 国际地震动态, 4: 11-18.
CHENG Wan-zheng. 2013. The reservoir induced earthquake problem in the high intensity area
[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, 4: 11-18(in Chinese).
程万正, 阮祥, 张永久. 2006. 川滇次级地块震源机制解类型与一致性参数
[J]. 地震学报, 28(6): 561-573.
CHENG Wan-zheng, RUAN Xiang, ZHANG Yong-jiu. 2006. Types of focal mechanism solutions and parameter consistency of the sub-blocks in Sichuan and Yunnan Provinces
[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(6): 561-573(in Chinese).
丁原章, 潘建雄, 肖安予, 等. 1983. 新丰江水库诱发地震的构造条件
[J]. 地震地质, 5(3): 63-74.
DING Yuan-zhang, PAN Jian-xiong, XIAO An-yu, et al. 1983. Tectonic environment of reservoir induced earthquake in the Xinfengjiang reservoir area
[J]. Seismology and Geology, 5(3): 63-74(in Chinese).
樊启祥, 苏立. 2010, 金沙江下游水电站水库地震监测系统的建设与项目管理
[J]. 水力发电, 36(1): 38-41.
FAN Qi-xiang, SU Li. 2010. Construction and management of seismic monitoring system for downstream hydropower reservoir of Jinsha River
[J]. Water Power, 36(1): 38-41(in Chinese).
高士钧, 曾心传, 陈永成, 等. 1990. 水库诱生的孔压变化及应力特征
[J]. 西北地震学报, 12(1): 87-95.
GAO Shi-jun, ZENG Xin-chuan, CHEN Yong-cheng, et al. 1990. The pore pressure variation and stress characteristics induced by reservoir
[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 12(1): 87-95(in Chinese).
胡毓良, 陈献程. 1979. 中国的水库地震及有关成因问题的讨论
[J]. 地震地质, 1(4): 45-57.
HU Yu-liang, CHEN Xian-cheng. 1979. Discussion on the reservoir-induced earthquakes in China and some problems related to the origin
[J]. Seismology and Geology, 1(4): 45-57(in Chinese).
阚荣举, 张四昌, 晏凤桐, 等. 1977. 中国西南地区现代构造应力场与现代构造活动特征的探讨
[J]. 地球物理学报, 20(2): 96-109.
KAN Rong-ju, ZHANG Si-chang, YAN Feng-tong, et al. 1977. Present tectonic stress field and its relation to the characteristics of recent tectonic activity in southwestern China
[J]. Chinese J Geophys, 20(2): 96-109(in Chinese).
梁尚鸿, 李幼铭, 束沛镒, 等. 1984. 利用区域地震台网P、 S振幅比资料测定小震震源参数
[J]. 地球物理学报, 27(3): 247-257.
LIANG Shang-hong, LI You-ming, SHU Pei-yi, et al. 1984. On the determining of source parameters of small earthquake by using amplitude ratios of P and S from regional network observations
[J]. Chinese J Geophys, 27(3): 249-257(in Chinese).
刘正荣, 雷素华, 胡素华. 1977. 1974年5月11日云南省永善-大关地震
[J]. 地球物理学报, 20(2): 110-114.
LIU Zheng-rong, LEI Su-hua, HU Su-hua. 1977. The Yongshan-Daguan earthquake(M=7.1)on May 11, 1974
[J]. Chinese J Geophys, 20(2): 110-114(in Chinese).
马瑾. 1987. 构造物理学概论
[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
MA Jin. 1987. Introduction of Tectonophysics
[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
夏其发, 汪雍熙, 李敏. 1988. 论外成因的水库诱发地震 . 水文地质工程地质, 1:18―24.
XIA Qi-fa, WANG Yong-xi, LI Min. 1988. On exogenous reservoir-induced earthquakes . Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 1: 18―24.
许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 1987. 由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征
[J]. 地球物理学报, 3(5): 476-486.
XU Zhong-huai, WANG Su-yun, HUANG Yu-rui, et al. 1987. Directions of mean stress axes in southwestern China deduced from microearthquake data
[J]. Chinese J Geophys, 30(5): 476-486(in Chinese).
杨国宪, 汪雍熙. 2003. 小浪底水库区天然地震本底特征分析
[J]. 水利学报, 6: 89-94.
WANG Guo-xian, WANG Yong-xi. 2003. Analysis on natural seismic background characteristics of Xiaolangdi Reservoir
[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 6: 89-94(in Chinese).
中国科学院地质研究所破裂与震源力学组,广东省科技局新丰江地震总结组. 1974. 新丰江水库区微震震源力学的初步研究 . 地质科学, 9(3):234―245.
Focal Mechanism and Fracture Research Group, Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica and Hsinfengkiang Earthquake Research Group, Kwangtung Scientific and Technological Bureau. 1974. A preliminary analysis of the mechanism of microearthquakes in the region of Hsinfengkiang Reservoir . Scientia Geologica Sinica, 9(3): 234―245.
Beck J L. 1976. Weight-induced stresses and the recent seismicity at Lake Oroville, California
[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66(4): 1121-1131.
Carder D S. 1945. Seismic investigations in the Boulder Dam area, 1940-1944, and the influence of reservoir loading on local earthquake activity
[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 35(4): 175-192.
Do Nascimento A F, Lunn R J, Cowie P A. 2005. Numerical modeling of pore-pressure diffusion in a reservoir-induced seismicity site in northeast Brazil
[J]. Geophys J Int, 160: 249-262.
Frohlich C. 1992. Triangle diagrams: Ternary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms
[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 75: 193-198.
Gephart J W. 1990. FMSI: A Fortran program for inverting fault/slickenside and earthquake focal mechanism data to obtain the regional stress tensor
[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 16(7): 953-989.
Gephart J W, Forsyth D W. 1984. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence
[J]. J Geophys Res, 89: 9305-9320.
Gupta H K. 2002. A review of recent studies of triggered earthquakes by artificial water reservoirs with special emphasis on earthquakes in Koyna, India
[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 58(3-4): 279-310.
Hainzl S, T Kraft, Wassermann J, et al. 2006. Evidence for rain-triggered earthquake activity
[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L19303. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027642.
Simpson D W, Leith W S, Scholz C H. 1988. Two types of reservoir-induced seismicity
[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 78(6): 2025-2040.
Talwani P. 1997. On the nature of reservoir-induced seismicity
[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 150(3): 473-492.
Talwani P. 2000. Seismogenic properties of the crust inferred from recent studies of reservoir-induced seismicity-Application to Koyna
[J]. Current Science, 79(9): 1327-1333.
Wan Yong-ge. 2010. Contemporary tectonic stress field in China
[J]. Earthquake Science, 23: 377-386.

[1]	WANG Xi-long, LUO Yin-hua, JIN Xiu-ying, YANG Meng-yao, KONG Xiang-rui. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS IN ACTIVE FAULT ZONE AND ITS IMPLICATION TO THE ADJUSTMENT OF REGIONAL STRESS FIELD IN THE SOUTHERN AREA OF LIAONING PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(3): 710-734.
[2]	FAN Wen-jie. CHARACTERISTICS OF TECTONIC STRESS FIELD AROUND THE YANGBI M_S6.4 EARTHQUAKE AND ITS SURROUNDING AREAS ON MAY 21, 2021 AND ITS GEODYNAMIC IMPLICATION [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(1): 208-230.
[3]	ZHANG Ke, WANG Xin, YANG Hong-ying, WANG Yue, XU Yan, LI Jing. THE CHARACTERISTICS AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF THE 2021 YANGBI M_S6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE, YUNNAN [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(1): 231-251.
[4]	JIANG Cong, JIANG Chang-sheng, YIN Xin-xin, WANG Rui-jia, ZHAI Hong-yu, ZHANG Yan-bao, LAI Gui-juan, YIN Feng-ling. SPATIOTEMPORAL HETEROGENEITY AND APPLICATION OF b VALUES IN HYDRAULIC FRACTURING INDUCED SEISMICITY [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(5): 1333-1349.
[5]	DENG Wen-ze, LIU Jie, YANG Zhi-gao, SUN Li, ZHANG Xue-mei. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS FOR RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE MAY 22TH, 2021, MADOI(QINGHAI) M_S7.4 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(4): 1059-1070.
[6]	LI Zong-xu, HE Ri-zheng, JI Zhan-bo, LI Yu-lan, NIU Xiao. THE FOCAL MECHANISM AND TECTONIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE M_S5.6 EARTHQUAKE ON JULY 24, 2009 IN NIMA, TIBET [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(4): 992-1010.
[7]	WANG Yu-qing, FENG Wan-peng, ZHANG Pei-zhen. PRESENT DEFORMATION OF~90° INTERSECTING CONJUGATE FAULTS AND MECHANICAL IMPLICATION TO REGIONAL TECTONICS: A CASE STUDY OF 2019 M_W≥6.4 PHILIPPINES EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 313-332.
[8]	WANG Xiao-shan, WAN Yong-ge. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CRUSTAL STRESS FIELD AND ITS DIRECTION CONVERGENCE BEFORE THE WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 363-377.
[9]	YU Zhan-yang, SHEN Xu-zhang, LIANG Hao, ZHENG Wen-jun, LIU Xu-zhou. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR FAULTS AND STRESS FIELD IN WEIHE-YUNCHENG BASIN CONSTRAINED BY SEISMIC ACTIVITY AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 395-413.
[10]	ZHANG Zhi-wei, LONG Feng, ZHAO Xiao-yan, WANG Di. STUDY ON FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTION AND STRESS FIELD CHARACTERISTICS IN SICHUAN AND YUNNAN AREA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(1): 170-187.
[11]	SUN Ye-jun, HUANG Yun, LIU Ze-min, ZHENG Jian-chang, JIANG Hao-lin, LI Ting-ting, YE Qing, FANG Tao. CHARACTERISTICS OF TECTONIC STRESS FIELD AND DYNAMIC SIGNIFICANCE IN THE SHANDONG-JIANGSU-ANHUI SEGMENT OF TANCHENG-LUJIANG FAULT ZONE AND ITS ADJACENT AREAS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(5): 1188-1207.
[12]	ZHAO Tao, WANG Ying, MA Ji, SHAO Ruo-tong, XU Yi-fei, HU Jing. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 MADUO, QINGHAI M_S7.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 790-805.
[13]	GUO Xiang-yun, YIN Hai-quan, WANG Zhen-jie, YANG Hui. EARTHQUAKE CENTROID, SEISMIC MOMENT TENSOR AND DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS OF THE M_S6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE IN YANGBI, YUNNAN ON MAY 21, 2021 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 806-826.
[14]	LIANG Shan-shan, XU Zhi-guo, ZHANG Guang-wei, ZOU Li-ye, LIU Yan-qiong, GUO Tie-long. GEOMETRIC COMPLEXITY OF FAULT SYSTEM IN THE SOURCE REGION OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN, M_S6.4 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 827-846.
[15]	WANG Ying, ZHAO Tao, HU Jing, LIU Chun. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN M_S6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 847-863.