SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 170-187.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.01.011
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Zhi-wei1),2)(), LONG Feng1), ZHAO Xiao-yan3), WANG Di1)
Received:
2021-01-15
Revised:
2021-04-23
Online:
2022-02-20
Published:
2022-04-20
作者简介:
张致伟, 男, 1983年生, 2009年于中国地震局兰州地震研究所获固体地球物理专业硕士学位, 现为成都理工大学地球物理学专业在读博士研究生, 高级工程师, 主要从事数字地震学和地震预测方法等研究, 电话: 028-85440713, E-mail: zzw1983107@163.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Zhi-wei, LONG Feng, ZHAO Xiao-yan, WANG Di. STUDY ON FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTION AND STRESS FIELD CHARACTERISTICS IN SICHUAN AND YUNNAN AREA[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(1): 170-187.
张致伟, 龙锋, 赵小艳, 王迪. 川滇地区的震源机制解及应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 170-187.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.01.011
分区 | 地震 总数 | 走滑型 | 逆冲型 | 正断型 | 不确定型 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | ||
龙门山断裂带(F3) | 559 | 163 | 29 | 249 | 45 | 92 | 16 | 55 | 10 |
鲜水河断裂带(F5) | 98 | 58 | 59 | 16 | 17 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
安宁河-则木河断裂带(F6-F7) | 65 | 37 | 57 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 7 | 11 |
马边-盐津断裂带(F9) | 51 | 20 | 39 | 16 | 31 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 16 |
莲峰-昭通断裂带(F10) | 75 | 42 | 56 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 15 | 8 | 10 |
小江断裂带(F11) | 59 | 31 | 53 | 15 | 25 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 10 |
丽江-小金河断裂带(F12) | 300 | 177 | 59 | 40 | 13 | 58 | 20 | 25 | 8 |
红河断裂带(F17) | 163 | 85 | 52 | 27 | 17 | 33 | 20 | 18 | 11 |
华南地块(四川盆地)(Ⅱ) | 189 | 62 | 33 | 50 | 27 | 27 | 14 | 50 | 26 |
川西北地块(Ⅳ1) | 189 | 99 | 52 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 23 | 17 | 9 |
滇中地块(Ⅳ2) | 254 | 153 | 60 | 40 | 16 | 40 | 16 | 21 | 8 |
滇西地块(Ⅴ) | 330 | 190 | 58 | 46 | 14 | 78 | 23 | 16 | 5 |
滇西南地块(Ⅵ) | 198 | 100 | 51 | 29 | 14 | 48 | 24 | 21 | 11 |
Table 1 Number and proportion of focal mechanism types of sub blocks and fault zones in Sichuan and Yunnan area
分区 | 地震 总数 | 走滑型 | 逆冲型 | 正断型 | 不确定型 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | 个数 | 比例/% | ||
龙门山断裂带(F3) | 559 | 163 | 29 | 249 | 45 | 92 | 16 | 55 | 10 |
鲜水河断裂带(F5) | 98 | 58 | 59 | 16 | 17 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
安宁河-则木河断裂带(F6-F7) | 65 | 37 | 57 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 7 | 11 |
马边-盐津断裂带(F9) | 51 | 20 | 39 | 16 | 31 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 16 |
莲峰-昭通断裂带(F10) | 75 | 42 | 56 | 14 | 19 | 11 | 15 | 8 | 10 |
小江断裂带(F11) | 59 | 31 | 53 | 15 | 25 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 10 |
丽江-小金河断裂带(F12) | 300 | 177 | 59 | 40 | 13 | 58 | 20 | 25 | 8 |
红河断裂带(F17) | 163 | 85 | 52 | 27 | 17 | 33 | 20 | 18 | 11 |
华南地块(四川盆地)(Ⅱ) | 189 | 62 | 33 | 50 | 27 | 27 | 14 | 50 | 26 |
川西北地块(Ⅳ1) | 189 | 99 | 52 | 29 | 15 | 44 | 23 | 17 | 9 |
滇中地块(Ⅳ2) | 254 | 153 | 60 | 40 | 16 | 40 | 16 | 21 | 8 |
滇西地块(Ⅴ) | 330 | 190 | 58 | 46 | 14 | 78 | 23 | 16 | 5 |
滇西南地块(Ⅵ) | 198 | 100 | 51 | 29 | 14 | 48 | 24 | 21 | 11 |
分区 | S1 | S2 | S3 | Var | R | 应力 类型 | 其他结果 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | S1 /(°) | 来源 | ||||
龙门山断裂带(F3) | 87 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 180 | 72 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 逆冲 | 98 | ① |
鲜水河断裂带(F5) | 113 | 3 | 56 | 87 | 157 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.72 | 走滑 | 80 | ② |
安宁河-则木河断裂带(F6-F7) | 118 | 18 | 133 | 45 | 13 | 40 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 走滑 | 127 | ① |
马边-盐津断裂带(F9) | 122 | 4 | 30 | 31 | 141 | 58 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 逆冲 | 305 | ① |
莲峰-昭通断裂带(F10) | 114 | 2 | 58 | 88 | 156 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.63 | 走滑 | 127 | ② |
小江断裂带(F11) | 133 | 11 | 12 | 69 | 227 | 18 | 0.32 | 0.82 | 走滑 | 314 | ① |
丽江-小金河断裂带(F12) | 166 | 3 | 7 | 87 | 104 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 走滑 | 147 | ② |
红河断裂带(F17) | 166 | 21 | 48 | 65 | 71 | 13 | 0.30 | 0.51 | 走滑 | 169 | ② |
华南地块(四川盆地)(Ⅱ) | 104 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 41 | 72 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 逆冲 | 110~140 | ③ |
川西北地块(Ⅳ1) | 152 | 11 | 13 | 75 | 64 | 10 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 走滑 | 160~170 | ③ |
滇中地块(Ⅳ2) | 156 | 2 | 82 | 86 | 66 | 3 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 走滑 | 150~160 | ③ |
滇西地块(Ⅴ) | 23 | 2 | 114 | 87 | 113 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 走滑 | 25 | ① |
滇西南地块(Ⅵ) | 24 | 16 | 131 | 73 | 116 | 7 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 走滑 | 16 | ① |
Table 2 Parameters of principal stress axis of sub blocks and fault zones in Sichuan and Yunnan area
分区 | S1 | S2 | S3 | Var | R | 应力 类型 | 其他结果 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | S1 /(°) | 来源 | ||||
龙门山断裂带(F3) | 87 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 180 | 72 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 逆冲 | 98 | ① |
鲜水河断裂带(F5) | 113 | 3 | 56 | 87 | 157 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.72 | 走滑 | 80 | ② |
安宁河-则木河断裂带(F6-F7) | 118 | 18 | 133 | 45 | 13 | 40 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 走滑 | 127 | ① |
马边-盐津断裂带(F9) | 122 | 4 | 30 | 31 | 141 | 58 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 逆冲 | 305 | ① |
莲峰-昭通断裂带(F10) | 114 | 2 | 58 | 88 | 156 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.63 | 走滑 | 127 | ② |
小江断裂带(F11) | 133 | 11 | 12 | 69 | 227 | 18 | 0.32 | 0.82 | 走滑 | 314 | ① |
丽江-小金河断裂带(F12) | 166 | 3 | 7 | 87 | 104 | 1 | 0.26 | 0.41 | 走滑 | 147 | ② |
红河断裂带(F17) | 166 | 21 | 48 | 65 | 71 | 13 | 0.30 | 0.51 | 走滑 | 169 | ② |
华南地块(四川盆地)(Ⅱ) | 104 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 41 | 72 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 逆冲 | 110~140 | ③ |
川西北地块(Ⅳ1) | 152 | 11 | 13 | 75 | 64 | 10 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 走滑 | 160~170 | ③ |
滇中地块(Ⅳ2) | 156 | 2 | 82 | 86 | 66 | 3 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 走滑 | 150~160 | ③ |
滇西地块(Ⅴ) | 23 | 2 | 114 | 87 | 113 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 走滑 | 25 | ① |
滇西南地块(Ⅵ) | 24 | 16 | 131 | 73 | 116 | 7 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 走滑 | 16 | ① |
[1] | 陈化然, 陈连旺, 马宏生, 等. 2004. 川滇地区应力场演化与强震间相互作用的三维有限元模拟[J]. 地震学报, 26(6): 567-575. |
CHEN Hua-ran, CHEN Lian-wang, MA Hong-sheng, et al. 3-D finite element modeling for evolution of stress field and interaction among strong earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan region[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(6): 567-575. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 成尔林. 1981. 四川及其邻区现代构造应力场和现代构造运动特征[J]. 地震学报, 3(3): 231-241. |
CHENG Er-lin. 1981. Recent tectonic stress field and tectonic movement of the Sichuan Province and its vicinity[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(3): 231-241. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 程万正, 刁桂苓, 吕弋培, 等. 2003. 川滇地块的震源力学机制、 运动速率和活动方式[J]. 地震地质, 25(1): 71-87. |
CHENG Wan-zheng, DIAO Gui-ling, LÜ Yi-pei, et al. 2003. Focal mechanisms, displacement rate and mode of motion of the Sichuan-Yunnan block[J]. Seismology and Geology, 25(1): 71-87. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 程万正, 阮祥, 张永久. 2006. 川滇次级地块震源机制解类型与一致性参数[J]. 地震学报, 28(6): 561-573. |
CHENG Wan-zheng, RUAN Xiang, ZHANG Yong-jiu. 2006. Types of focal mechanism solutions and parameter consistency of the sub-blocks in Sichuan and Yunnan Provinces[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(6): 561-573. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 崔效锋, 谢富仁. 1999. 利用震源机制解对中国西南及邻区进行应力分区的初步研究[J]. 地震学报, 21(5): 513-522. |
CUI Xiao-feng, XIE Fu-ren. 1999. Preliminary research to determine stress districts from focal mechanism solutions in Southwest China and its adjacent area[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 21(5): 513-522. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 崔效锋, 谢富仁, 张红艳. 2006. 川滇地区现代构造应力场分区及动力学意义[J]. 地震学报, 28(5): 451-461. |
CUI Xiao-feng, XIE Fu-ren, ZHANG Hong-yan. 2006. Recent tectonic stress field zoning in Sichuan-Yunnan region and its dynamic interest[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(5): 451-461. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 崔效锋, 谢富仁, 赵建涛. 2005. 中国及邻区震源机制解的分区特征[J]. 地震地质, 27(2): 298-307. |
CUI Xiao-feng, XIE Fu-ren, ZHAO Jian-tao. 2005. The regional characteristic of focal mechanism solutions in China and its adjacent areas[J]. Seismology and Geology, 27(2): 298-307. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2002. 中国活动构造基本特征[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 32(12): 1020-1030. |
DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2002. Basic features of activity structures of China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 32(12): 1020-1030. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 刁桂苓, 王海涛, 高国英, 等. 2005. 伽师强震系列应力场的转向过程[J]. 地球物理学报, 48(5): 1062-1068. |
DIAO Gui-ling, WANG Hai-tao, GAO Guo-ying, et al. 2005. A deflection process for the stress field of the Jiashi strong earthquake sequence[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(5): 1062-1068. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 刁桂苓, 徐锡伟, 陈于高, 等. 2011. 汶川 MW7.9 和集集 MW7.6 地震前应力场转换现象及其可能的前兆意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 54(1): 128-136. |
DIAO Gui-ling, XU Xi-wei, CHEN Yu-gao, et al. 2011. The precursory significance of tectonic stress field transformation before the Wenchuan MW7.9 earthquake and the Chi-Chi MW7.6 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(1): 128-136. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 黄骥超, 万永革, 盛书中, 等. 2016. 汤加-克马德克俯冲带现今非均匀应力场特征及其动力学意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 59(2): 578-592. |
HUANG Ji-chao, WAN Yong-ge, SHENG Shu-zhong, et al. 2016. Heterogeneity of present-day stress field in the Tonga-Kermadec subduction zone and its geodynamic significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(2): 578-592. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 阚荣举, 张四昌, 晏凤桐, 等. 1977. 我国西南地区现代构造应力场与现代构造活动特征的探讨[J]. 地球物理学报, 20(2): 96-109. |
KAN Rong-ju, ZHANG Si-chang, YAN Feng-tong, et al. 1977. Present tectonic stress field and its relation to the characteristics of recent tectonic activity in southwestern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 20(2): 96-109. (in Chinese) | |
[13] |
李君, 王勤彩, 崔子健, 等. 2019. 川滇菱形块体东边界及邻区震源机制解与构造应力场空间分布特征[J]. 地震地质, 41(6): 1395-1412. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.06.006.
DOI |
LI Jun, WANG Qin-cai, CUI Zi-jian, et al. 2019. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field in the eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan block and its adjacent area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 41(6): 1395-1412. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 梁尚鸿, 李幼铭, 束沛镒, 等. 1984. 利用区域地震台网$\bar{P}$、$\bar{S}$振幅比资料测定小震震源参数[J]. 地球物理学报, 27(3): 249-257. |
LIANG Shang-hong, LI You-ming, SHU Pei-yi, et al. 1984. On the determining of source parameters of small earthquakes by using amplitude ratios of $\bar{P}$ and $\bar{S}$ from regional network observations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 27(3): 249-257. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 刘平江, 刁桂苓, 宁杰远. 2007. 川滇地块的震源机制解特征及其地球动力学解释[J]. 地震学报, 29(5): 449-458. |
LIU Ping-jiang, DIAO Gui-ling, NING Jie-yuan. 2007. Fault plane solutions in Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block and their dynamic implications[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 29(5): 449-458. (in Chinese) | |
[16] |
罗钧, 赵翠萍, 周连庆. 2014. 川滇块体及周边区域现今震源机制和应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 36(2): 405-421. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.02.011.
DOI |
LUO Jun, ZHAO Cui-ping, ZHOU Lian-qing. 2014. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field of the Chuan-Dian rhombic block and its adjacent regions[J]. Seismology and Geology, 36(2): 405-421. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 马文涛, 徐锡伟, 曹忠权, 等. 2008. 震源机制解分类与川滇及邻近地区最新变形特征[J]. 地震地质, 30(4): 926-934. |
MA Wen-tao, XU Xi-wei, CAO Zhong-quan, et al. 2008. Classification of focal mechanism solutions and characteristics of latest crustal deformation of Sichuan-Yunnan region and its adjacency[J]. Seismology and Geology, 30(4): 926-934. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 钱洪, 沈钧礼, 黄进, 等. 1980. 西南地区近代构造应力场和地壳运动特征的实验研究[J]. 地震研究, 3(3): 60-67. |
QIAN Hong, SHEN Jun-li, HUANG Jin, et al. 1980. Experimental study on the tectonic stress field and crustal movement in the southwest of China[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 3(3): 60-67. (in Chinese) | |
[19] |
孙业君, 赵小艳, 黄耘, 等. 2017. 云南地区震源机制及应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 39(2): 390-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.02.009.
DOI |
SUN Ye-jun, ZHAO Xiao-yan, HUANG Yun, et al. 2017. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field of Yunnan area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(2): 390-407. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 万永革. 2015. 联合采用定性和定量断层资料的应力张量反演方法及在乌鲁木齐地区的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(9): 3144-3156. |
WAN Yong-ge. 2015. A grid search method for determination of tectonic stress tensor using qualitative and quantitative data of active faults and its application to the Urumqi area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics. 58(9): 3144-3156. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 万永革, 盛书中, 许雅儒, 等. 2011. 不同应力状态和摩擦系数对综合P波辐射花样影响的模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 54(4): 994-1001. |
WAN Yong-ge, SHENG Shu-zhong, XU Ya-ru, et al. 2011. Effect of stress ratio and friction coefficient on composite P wave radiation patterns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics. 54(4): 994-1001. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 王勤彩, 陈章立, 郑斯华. 2009. 汶川大地震余震序列震源机制的空间分段特征[J]. 科学通报, 54(16): 2348-2354. |
WANG Qin-cai, CHEN Zhang-li, ZHENG Si-hua. 2009. Spatial segmentation characteristic of focal mechanism of aftershock sequence of Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(16): 2348-2354. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 王晓山, 吕坚, 谢祖军, 等. 2015. 南北地震带震源机制解与构造应力场特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(11): 4149-4162. |
WANG Xiao-shan, LÜ Jian, XIE Zu-jun, et al. 2015. Focal mechanisms and tectonic stress field in the North-South Seismic Belt of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(11): 4149-4162. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 谢富仁, 陈群策, 崔效峰, 等. 2003. 中国大陆地壳应力环境研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社. |
XIE Fu-ren, CHEN Qun-ce, CUI Xiao-feng, et al. 2003. Crustal Stress in China[M]. Geological Publishing House. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 谢富仁, 崔效峰, 赵建涛, 等. 2004. 中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J]. 地球物理学报, 47(4): 654-662. |
XIE Fu-ren, CUI Xiao-feng, ZHAO Jian-tao, et al. 2004. Regional division of the recent tectonic stress field in China and adjacent areas[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 47(4): 654-662. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 谢富仁, 苏刚, 崔效峰, 等. 2001. 滇西南地区现代构造应力场分析[J]. 地震学报, 23(1): 17-23. |
XIE Fu-ren, SU Gang, CUI Xiao-feng, et al. 2001. Modern tectonic stress field in southwestern Yunnan, China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 23(1): 17-23. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 谢富仁, 祝景忠, 梁海庆, 等. 1993. 中国西南地区现代构造应力场基本特征[J]. 地震学报, 15(4): 407-417. |
XIE Fu-ren, ZHU Jing-zhong, LIANG Hai-qing, et al. 1993. Basic characteristics of modern tectonic stress field in southwest China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 15(4): 407-417. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | 徐纪人, 尾池和夫. 1995. 南北地震带南段应力场特征及其与板块运动的关系[J]. 地震学报, 17(1): 31-40. |
XU Ji-ren, Oike K. 1995. Characteristics of stress field and its relationship with plate movement in the southern part of the North-South Seismic Belt in China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 17(1): 31-40. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
|
[29] | 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 2003. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S1): 151-162. |
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, ZHENG Rong-zhang, et al. 2003. Pattern of latest tectonic motion and its dynamics for active blocks in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 33(S1): 151-162. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | 徐锡伟, 陈桂华, 于贵华, 等. 2013. 芦山地震发震构造及其与汶川地震关系讨论[J]. 地学前缘, 20(3): 11-20. |
XU Xi-wei, CHEN Gui-hua, YU Gui-hua, et al. 2013. Seismogenic structure of Lushan earthquake and its relationship with Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 20(3): 11-20. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 许忠淮, 汪素云, 黄雨蕊, 等. 1987. 由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 30(5): 476-486. |
XU Zhong-huai, WANG Su-yun, HUANG Yu-rui, et al. 1987. Directions of mean stress axes in southwestern China deduced from microearthquake data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 30(5): 476-486. (in Chinese) | |
[32] |
易桂喜, 闻学泽, 张致伟, 等. 2010. 川南马边地区强震危险性分析[J]. 地震地质, 32(2): 282-293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2010.02.011.
DOI |
YI Gui-xi, WEN Xue-ze, ZHANG Zhi-wei, et al. 2010. Study on potential strong earthquake risk in Mabian area, southern Sichuan[J]. Seismology and Geology, 32(2): 282-293. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S1): 12-20. |
ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 33(S1): 12-20. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 张致伟, 阮祥, 王晓山, 等. 2015. 汶川、 芦山地震前后四川地区应力场时空演化[J]. 地震, 35(4): 136-146. |
ZHANG Zhi-wei, RUAN Xiang, WANG Xiao-shan, et al. 2015. Spatial-temporal evolution of stress fields in Sichuan area before and after the 2008 Wenchuan and the 2013 Lushan earthquake[J]. Earthquake, 35(4): 136-146. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 郑勇, 马宏生, 吕坚, 等. 2009. 汶川地震强余震(MS≥5.6)的震源机制解及其与发震构造的关系[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 39(4): 413-426. |
ZHENG Yong, MA Hong-sheng, LÜ Jian, et al. 2009. Source mechanism of strong aftershocks(MS≥5.6)of the 2008/05/12 Wenchuan earthquake and the implication for seismotectonics[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 39(4): 413-426. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 钟继茂, 程万正. 2006. 由多个地震震源机制解求川滇地区平均应力场方向[J]. 地震学报, 28(4): 337-346. |
ZHONG Ji-mao, CHENG Wan-zheng. 2006. Determination of directions of the mean stress field in Sichuan-Yunnan region from a number of focal mechanism solutions[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(4): 337-346. (in Chinese) | |
[37] | Angelier J. 1979. Determination of the mean principal directions of stress for a given fault population[J]. Tectonophysics, 56: T17-T26. |
[38] |
Frohlich C. 2001. Display and quantitative assessment of distributions of earthquake focal mechanisms[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 144(2): 300-308.
DOI URL |
[39] |
Gephart J W, Forsyth D W. 1984. An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: Application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B11): 9305-9320.
DOI URL |
[40] | Hardebeck J L, Michael A J. 2006. Damped regional-scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B11): B11310. |
[41] |
Heidbach O, Tingay M, Barth A, et al. 2010. Global crustal stress pattern based on the World Stress Map database release 2008 [J]. Tectonophysics, 482(1): 3-15.
DOI URL |
[42] |
Liu Q Y, Van Der Hilst R D, Li Y, et al. 2014. Eastward expansion of the Tibetan plateau by crustal flow and strain partitioning across plateau[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173(8): 2687-2710.
DOI URL |
[43] |
Michael A J. 1984. Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B13): 11517-11526.
DOI URL |
[44] | Michael A J. 1991. Spatial variations in stress within the 1987 Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence: New techniques and results[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 96(B4): 6303-6319. |
[45] |
Tian J H, Luo Y, Zhao L. 2019. Regional stress field in Yunnan revealed by the focal mechanisms of moderate and small earthquakes[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 3(3): 243-252.
DOI URL |
[46] | Wessel P, Smith W H F. 1991. Free software helps map and display data[J]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 72(41): 441-446. |
[47] |
Yang Y H, Liang C T, Fang L H, et al. 2018. A comprehensive analysis on the stress field and seismic anisotropy in eastern Tibet[J]. Tectonics, 37: 1648-1657.
DOI URL |
[48] |
Zhao L, Luo Y, Liu T Y, et al. 2013. Earthquake focal mechanisms in Yunnan and their inference on the regional stress field[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(4): 2498-2507.
DOI URL |
[49] | Zhao L S, Helmberger D V. 1994. Source estimation from broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(1): 91-104. |
[50] |
Zhu L, Helmberger D V. 1996. Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(5): 1634-1641.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Xi-long, LUO Yin-hua, JIN Xiu-ying, YANG Meng-yao, KONG Xiang-rui. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS IN ACTIVE FAULT ZONE AND ITS IMPLICATION TO THE ADJUSTMENT OF REGIONAL STRESS FIELD IN THE SOUTHERN AREA OF LIAONING PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(3): 710-734. |
[2] | YU Zhan-yang, SHEN Xu-zhang, LIANG Hao, ZHENG Wen-jun, LIU Xu-zhou. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR FAULTS AND STRESS FIELD IN WEIHE-YUNCHENG BASIN CONSTRAINED BY SEISMIC ACTIVITY AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 395-413. |
[3] | ZHAO Tao, WANG Ying, MA Ji, SHAO Ruo-tong, XU Yi-fei, HU Jing. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 MADUO, QINGHAI MS7.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 790-805. |
[4] | WANG Ying, ZHAO Tao, HU Jing, LIU Chun. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 847-863. |
[5] | LI Jin, JIANG Hai-kun, WEI Yun-yun, SUN Zhao-jie. PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE MS6.4 JIASHI EARTHQUAKE ON JANUARY 19, 2020 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2021, 43(2): 357-376. |
[6] | LIANG Shan-shan, XU Zhi-guo, SHENG Shu-zhong, ZHANG Guang-wei, ZHAO-Bo, ZOU Li-ye. FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS AND STRESS FIELD OF THE 2019 CHANGNING, SICHUAN MAINSHOCK AND ITS MODERATE-STRONG AFTERSHOCKS(MS≥4.0) [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(3): 547-561. |
[7] | ZHANG Zhi-bin ZHAO Xiao-cheng REN Lin. FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTION AND TECTONIC STRESS FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MIDDLE TIANSHAN MOUNTAINS, XINJIANG [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(3): 595-611. |
[8] | ZHAN Hui-li, ZHANG Dong-li, HE Xiao-hui, SHEN Xu-zhang, ZHENG Wen-jun, LI Zhi-gang. LIMITATION OF CURRENT TECTONIC DEFORMATION MODES IN THE WESTERN MARGIN OF ORDOS BASED ON SEISMIC ACTIVITY CHARACTERISTICS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(2): 346-365. |
[9] | DUAN Meng-qiao, ZHAO Cui-ping. CHARACTERISTICS OF FOCAL MECHANISMS IN THE DOWNSTREAM RESERVOIR AREAS OF JINSHA RIVER [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2019, 41(5): 1155-1171. |
[10] | XIE Zhang-di, HAN Zhu-jun. STUDY ON THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND DYNAMICS PARAME-TERS OF THE 2014 MS6.6 JINGGU EARTHQUAKE IN YUNNAN [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2019, 41(4): 887-912. |
[11] | LIU Fang-bin, QU Jun-hao, LI Ya-jun, FAN Xiao-yi, MIAO Qing-jie. RESEARCH ON CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS CONSISTENCY OF RUSHAN EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE, SHANDONG PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2018, 40(5): 1086-1099. |
[12] | QI Yu-ping, ZHANG Zhi-wei, LONG Feng, XIAO Ben-fu, LIANG Ming-jian, LU Qian, JIANG Peng. EARTHQUAKE FOCAL MECANISMS IN THE DALIANGSHAN SUB-BLOCK AND ADJACENT AREAS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REGIONAL STRESS FIELD [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2018, 40(2): 377-395. |
[13] | SUN Ye-jun, ZHAO Xiao-yan, HUANG Yun, YANG Hao, LI Feng. CHARACTERISTICS OF FOCAL MECHANISMS AND STRESS FIELD OF YUNNAN AREA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2017, 39(2): 390-407. |
[14] | JIANG ying, LIU Zi-wei, LI Hui, ZHANG Xiao-tong, WEI-Jin, SHEN Chong-yang. CONSTRAINING THE FOCAL MECHANISM OF THE 2015 NEPAL EARTHQUAKE WITH OBSERVATIONS OF THE CONTINUOUS GRAVITY STATIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(3): 660-669. |
[15] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Jian-chang, LIU Xi-qiang, XU Chang-peng, LI Xia. research of source parameters and stress state in shandong segment of tanlu fault zone [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(4): 966-981. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||