SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1013-1029.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.018
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
DU Hao-guo1)(), LIN Xu-chuan2),*(), ZHANG Jian-guo1), DU Hao-biao3), ZHANG Fang-hao1), DU Zhu-quan4), LU Yong-kun1), DAI Bo-yang5)
Received:
2021-05-31
Revised:
2021-06-20
Online:
2021-08-20
Published:
2021-09-29
Contact:
LIN Xu-chuan
杜浩国1)(), 林旭川2),*(), 张建国1), 杜浩标3), 张方浩1), 杜竹泉4), 卢永坤1), 代博洋5)
通讯作者:
林旭川
作者简介:
杜浩国, 男, 1991年生, 2015年于东北大学获通信工程专业学士学位, 主要从事地震应急救援、 地震灾害损失评估研究, E-mail: 1364125834@qq.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DU Hao-guo, LIN Xu-chuan, ZHANG Jian-guo, DU Hao-biao, ZHANG Fang-hao, DU Zhu-quan, LU Yong-kun, DAI Bo-yang. A SEISMIC DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION METHOD BASED ON IMPROVED ANT COLONY ALGORITHM AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE IMAGES AND ITS APPLICATION TO YANGBI EARTHQUAKE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 1013-1029.
杜浩国, 林旭川, 张建国, 杜浩标, 张方浩, 杜竹泉, 卢永坤, 代博洋. 基于改进蚁群算法与无人机影像的震害识别方法及其在漾濞地震中的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 1013-1029.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.018
飞行器性能 | 技术参数 | 飞行器性能 | 技术参数 |
---|---|---|---|
型号 | 精灵4多光谱版 | 航拍架次 | 4架次 |
总重量 | 1 487g | 航向重叠度 | 70% |
飞行升限 | 200m | 旁向重叠图 | 65% |
续航时间 | ≤27min | 成像总面积 | 2km2 |
悬停精度 | 垂直方向±0.1m 水平方向±0.1m | 照片格式 | JPEG(可见光成像) TIFF(多光谱成像) |
倾斜角度 | -88° | 航拍照片数量 | 918张 |
飞行速度 | ≥20km/h | 单色传感器增益 | 1~8倍 |
影像传感器 | 6个1/2.9英寸CMOS, 包括1个用于可见光成像的彩色传感器和5个用于多光谱成像的单色传感器 | 滤光片 | 蓝(B): (450±16)nm 绿(G): (560±16)nm 红(R): (650±16)nm 红边(RE): (730±16)nm 近红外(NIR): (840±26)nm |
Table1 Multispectral image acquisition equipment parameters
飞行器性能 | 技术参数 | 飞行器性能 | 技术参数 |
---|---|---|---|
型号 | 精灵4多光谱版 | 航拍架次 | 4架次 |
总重量 | 1 487g | 航向重叠度 | 70% |
飞行升限 | 200m | 旁向重叠图 | 65% |
续航时间 | ≤27min | 成像总面积 | 2km2 |
悬停精度 | 垂直方向±0.1m 水平方向±0.1m | 照片格式 | JPEG(可见光成像) TIFF(多光谱成像) |
倾斜角度 | -88° | 航拍照片数量 | 918张 |
飞行速度 | ≥20km/h | 单色传感器增益 | 1~8倍 |
影像传感器 | 6个1/2.9英寸CMOS, 包括1个用于可见光成像的彩色传感器和5个用于多光谱成像的单色传感器 | 滤光片 | 蓝(B): (450±16)nm 绿(G): (560±16)nm 红(R): (650±16)nm 红边(RE): (730±16)nm 近红外(NIR): (840±26)nm |
序号 | 震害等级 | 训练样本 | 验证样本 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 严重 | 217 | 404 |
2 | 中度 | 1 094 | 441 |
3 | 轻度 | 120 | 372 |
4 | 无破坏 | 250 | 831 |
合计 | 1 680 | 2 048 |
Table2 The training data and test data samples
序号 | 震害等级 | 训练样本 | 验证样本 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 严重 | 217 | 404 |
2 | 中度 | 1 094 | 441 |
3 | 轻度 | 120 | 372 |
4 | 无破坏 | 250 | 831 |
合计 | 1 680 | 2 048 |
Fig. 5 Building contour test results(a), building grayscale results(b), building damage identification results(c), and identification result of building earthquake damage grade(d).
改进的蚁群算法 | 蚁群算法 | ||
---|---|---|---|
规则1: | if 110<B1 and B2<120 and 100<B3 then 严重破坏 | 规则1: | if 110<B1<119 and 140<B2<149 and 120<B3<129 then 严重破坏 |
规则2: | if 110<B1 and 120<B3 then 中等破坏 | 规则2: | if 190<B1<199 and 100<B2<109 and 190<B3<199 then 中等破坏 |
规则3: | if 140<B1 and 130<B2 and B3<89 then 轻微破坏 | 规则3: | if 150<B1<159 and 90<B2<99 and 60<B3<69 then 轻微破坏 |
规则19: | if 100<B1 and 100<B2<159 and 120<B3 then 中等破坏 | 规则35: | if 180<B1<189 and 150<B2<99 and 60<B3<150 then 中等破坏 |
规则20: | if 99<B2<129 and B3<129 then 严重破坏 | 规则36: | if 90<B1<99 and 140<B2<149 and 120<B3<129 then 严重破坏 |
Table3 Part of classification rules from improved ant colony algorithm and ant-miner algorithm
改进的蚁群算法 | 蚁群算法 | ||
---|---|---|---|
规则1: | if 110<B1 and B2<120 and 100<B3 then 严重破坏 | 规则1: | if 110<B1<119 and 140<B2<149 and 120<B3<129 then 严重破坏 |
规则2: | if 110<B1 and 120<B3 then 中等破坏 | 规则2: | if 190<B1<199 and 100<B2<109 and 190<B3<199 then 中等破坏 |
规则3: | if 140<B1 and 130<B2 and B3<89 then 轻微破坏 | 规则3: | if 150<B1<159 and 90<B2<99 and 60<B3<69 then 轻微破坏 |
规则19: | if 100<B1 and 100<B2<159 and 120<B3 then 中等破坏 | 规则35: | if 180<B1<189 and 150<B2<99 and 60<B3<150 then 中等破坏 |
规则20: | if 99<B2<129 and B3<129 then 严重破坏 | 规则36: | if 90<B1<99 and 140<B2<149 and 120<B3<129 then 严重破坏 |
Fig. 7 Seismic damage identification results of improved ant colony algorithm(a), seismic damage identification results of ant colony algorithm(b), seismic damage identification results of maximum likelihood method(c), and visual interpretation results(d).
Fig. 8 An improved ant colony algorithm for local amplification of seismic damage identification(a), ant colony algorithm for seismic damage identification local amplification(b), local amplification of earthquake damage identification by maximum likelihood method(c), and local magnification of visual interpretation(d).
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 353 | 15 | 8 | 18 | 394 | 89.59 |
中等破坏 | 13 | 384 | 21 | 21 | 439 | 87.47 |
轻微破坏 | 21 | 31 | 320 | 13 | 385 | 83.11 |
无破坏 | 17 | 11 | 23 | 779 | 830 | 93.85 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 87.37 | 87.07 | 86.02 | 93.74 | ||
总体精度 | 89.64% | Kappa系数 | 0.855 |
Table4 Accuracy evaluation results of seismic damage identification of Yangbi county seat based on improved ant colony optimization algorithm
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 353 | 15 | 8 | 18 | 394 | 89.59 |
中等破坏 | 13 | 384 | 21 | 21 | 439 | 87.47 |
轻微破坏 | 21 | 31 | 320 | 13 | 385 | 83.11 |
无破坏 | 17 | 11 | 23 | 779 | 830 | 93.85 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 87.37 | 87.07 | 86.02 | 93.74 | ||
总体精度 | 89.64% | Kappa系数 | 0.855 |
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 352 | 20 | 8 | 24 | 404 | 87.13 |
中等破坏 | 15 | 370 | 23 | 19 | 427 | 86.65 |
轻微破坏 | 22 | 33 | 323 | 15 | 393 | 82.18 |
无破坏 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 773 | 824 | 93.81 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 87.12 | 83.9 | 86.82 | 93.02 | ||
总体精度 | 88.76% | Kappa系数 | 0.843 |
Table5 Evaluation results of earthquake damage identification of Yangbi county seat based on ant colony algorithm
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 352 | 20 | 8 | 24 | 404 | 87.13 |
中等破坏 | 15 | 370 | 23 | 19 | 427 | 86.65 |
轻微破坏 | 22 | 33 | 323 | 15 | 393 | 82.18 |
无破坏 | 15 | 18 | 18 | 773 | 824 | 93.81 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 87.12 | 83.9 | 86.82 | 93.02 | ||
总体精度 | 88.76% | Kappa系数 | 0.843 |
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 324 | 21 | 15 | 27 | 387 | 83.72 |
中等破坏 | 39 | 363 | 23 | 25 | 450 | 80.66 |
轻微破坏 | 24 | 33 | 315 | 35 | 407 | 77.39 |
无破坏 | 17 | 24 | 19 | 744 | 804 | 92.53 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 80.19 | 82.31 | 84.67 | 89.53 | ||
总体精度 | 85.25% | Kappa系数 | 0.795 |
Table6 Accuracy evaluation results of earthquake damage identification of Yangbi county seat based on maximum likelihood method
震害识别等级 | 严重破坏/栋 | 中等破坏/栋 | 轻微破坏/栋 | 无破坏/栋 | 总和 | 生产精度/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
严重破坏 | 324 | 21 | 15 | 27 | 387 | 83.72 |
中等破坏 | 39 | 363 | 23 | 25 | 450 | 80.66 |
轻微破坏 | 24 | 33 | 315 | 35 | 407 | 77.39 |
无破坏 | 17 | 24 | 19 | 744 | 804 | 92.53 |
总和 | 404 | 441 | 372 | 831 | 2 048 | |
使用精度/% | 80.19 | 82.31 | 84.67 | 89.53 | ||
总体精度 | 85.25% | Kappa系数 | 0.795 |
[1] | 邓飞, 窦爱霞, 王晓青. 2018. 融合航空影像的震后机载LiDAR建筑物点云提取[J]. 遥感学报, 22(S1): 224-232. |
DENG Fei, DOU Ai-xia, WANG Xiao-qing. 2018. Fusion of aerial imagery and airborne LiDAR data for post-earthquake building point extraction[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 22(S1): 224-232. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 杜浩国, 陈亮, 林旭川, 等. 2019. 云南红河县城区房屋地震灾害三维仿真模拟方法[J]. 地震研究, 42(2): 218-229. |
DU Hao-guo, CHEN Liang, LIN Xu-chuan, et al. 2019. 3D simulation method of housing earthquake disaster in Honghe County of Yunnan[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 42(2): 218-229. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 杜浩国, 林旭川, 张方浩, 等. 2021. 基于蚁群优化算法的应急避难场所选址模型研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 30(2): 89-101. |
DU Hao-guo, LIN Xu-chuan, ZHANG Fang-hao, et al. 2021. Study on emergency shelter location model based on ant colony optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 30(2): 89-101. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 范熙伟, 聂高众, 邓砚, 等. 2017. 基于摄影测量技术的房屋提取方法: 以中国西部地区乡村为例[J]. 地震地质, 39(4): 805-818. |
FAN Xi-wei, NIE Gao-zhong, DENG Yan, et al. 2017. The extraction of house distribution based on photogrammetry method: Taking the countryside in the west of China for example[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(4): 805-818. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 何曼芸, 程英蕾, 邱浪波, 等. 2017. 一种改进顶帽变换与LBP高程纹理的城区建筑物提取算法[J]. 测绘学报, 46(9): 1116-1122, 1146. |
HE Man-yun, CHENG Ying-lei, QIU Lang-bo, et al. 2017. An algorithm of building extraction in urban area based on improved top-hat transformations and LBP elevation texture[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 46(9): 1116-1122, 1146. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 郭建兴, 张宇翔, 姬建中, 等. 2020. 利用居民地建筑物数据和高分遥感影像评估地震烈度的方法初探[J]. 地震地质, 42(4): 968-980. |
GUO Jian-xing, ZHANG Yu-xiang, JI Jian-zhong, et al. 2020. A preliminary study on the method of seismic intensity assessment based on residential building data and high-resolution remote sensing images[J]. Seismology and Geology, 42(4): 968-980. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 井然, 宫兆宁, 朱文定, 等. 2020. 多尺度SLIC-GMRF与FCNSVM联合的高分影像建筑物提取[J]. 遥感学报, 24(1): 11-26. |
JING Ran, GONG Zhao-ning, ZHU Wen-ding, et al. 2020. Extraction of buildings from remote sensing imagery based on multi-scale SLIC-GMRF and FCNSVM[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 24(1): 11-26. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 刘莹, 陶超, 闫培, 等. 2017. 图割能量驱动的高分辨率遥感影像震害损毁建筑物检测[J]. 测绘学报, 46(7): 910-917. |
LIU Ying, TAO Chao, YAN Pei, et al. 2017. Graph cut energy driven earthquake-damaged building detection from high-resolution remote sensing images[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 46(7): 910-917. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 李强, 张景发, 龚丽霞, 等. 2018. SAR图像纹理特征相关变化检测的震害建筑物提取[J]. 遥感学报, 22(S1): 128-138. |
LI Qiang, ZHANG Jing-fa, GONG Li-xia, et al. 2018. Extraction of earthquake-collapsed buildings based on correlation change detection of multi-texture features in SAR images[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 22(S1): 128-138. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 宋平, 聂高众, 邓砚, 等. 2016. 基于现场调查的地震灾害损失预评估--以云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州为例[J]. 地震地质, 38(4): 1148-1159. |
SONG Ping, NIE Gao-zhong, DENG Yan, et al. 2016. Pre-assessment of earthquake-induced losses based on field survey and kilometer grid dataset: A case study from Dehongdai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(4): 1148-1159. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 游永发, 王思远, 王斌, 等. 2019. 高分辨率遥感影像建筑物分级提取[J]. 遥感学报, 23(1): 125-136. |
YOU Yong-fa, WANG Si-yuan, WANG Bin, et al. 2019. Study on hierarchical building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing imagery[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 23(1): 125-136. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 张景发, 李强, 焦其松, 等. 2017. 建筑物震害多源遥感特征与机理分析[J]. 地震学报, 39(2): 257-272. |
ZHANG Jing-fa, LI Qiang, JIAO Qi-song, et al. 2017. Multi-source remote sensing characteristics and mechanism analysis of building earthquake damage[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(2): 257-272. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 张景发, 李强, 张庆云, 等. 2018. 多源遥感图像的1976年MS7.8唐山大地震等烈度区判定[J]. 遥感学报, 22(S1): 162-173. |
ZHANG Jing-fa, LI Qiang, ZHANG Qing-yun, et al. 2018. Intensity zone of the 1976 MS7.8 Tangshan earthquake based on multisource remote sensing images[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 22(S1): 162-173. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 张凌, 谭璇, 宋冬梅, 等. 2019. 基于马尔科夫随机场的单时相震害影像受损建筑物识别方法[J]. 地震地质, 41(5): 1273-1288. |
ZHANG Ling, TAN Xuan, SONG Dong-mei, et al. 2019. Study on the MRF-based method for damaged buildings extraction from the single-phase seismic image[J]. Seismology and Geology, 41(5): 1273-1288. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | He N J, Fang L Y, Plaza A. 2020. Hybrid first and second order attention Unet for building segmentation in remote sensing images[J]. Science China(Information Sciences), 63(4): 69-80. |
[16] |
Hu Y B, Zhang J, Ma Y, et al. 2019. Deep learning classification of coastal wetland hyperspectral image combined spectra and texture features: A case study of Huanghe(Yellow)River estuary wetland[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(5): 142-150.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Guo H D, Chen Y, Feng Q, et al. 2011. Assessment of damage to buildings and farms during the 2011 M9.0 earthquake and tsunami in Japan from remote sensing data[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(20): 2138-2144.
DOI URL |
[18] | Guo C, Xu Q, Dong X J, et al. 2021. Geohazard recognition and inventory mapping using airborne LiDAR data in complex mountainous areas[J/OL][2021-07-08]. Journal of Earth Science, 1-29. http://kns.cnki.netkcmsdetail/42.1788.P.20210409.1737.002.html. |
[19] | Li P, Tao X X. 2009. Integrating RS technology into a GIS-based earthquake prevention and disaster reduction system for earthquake damage evaluation[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration, 8(1): 95-101. |
[20] | Lin X C, Zhang H Y, Chen H F, et al. 2015. Field investigation on severely damaged aseismic buildings in 2014 Ludian earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Engineering Vibration, 14(1): 169-176. |
[21] |
Wang X S, LI Y R, Cheng Y H. 2020. Hyperspectral image classification based on unsupervised heterogeneous domain adaptation CycleGan[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 29(4): 608-614.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Xie J L, Li Y S, Cai G L, et al. 2018. An improved Mahalanobis distance-based colour segmentation method for rural building recognition[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 15(7): 1460-1470.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Zhang G Y, Wang H B, Zhao W, et al. 2021. Application of improved multi-objective ant colony optimization algorithm in ship weather routing[J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 20(1): 45-55.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Ying, ZHAO Tao, HU Jing, LIU Chun. RELOCATION AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 847-863. |
[2] | WU Gui-ju, YU Bing-fei, HAO Hong-tao, HU Min-zhang, TAN Hong-bo. THE DEEP STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE SEIS-MOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE YANGBI EARTHQUAKE REGION AND ITS SURROUNDING AREAS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 739-756. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||