SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 1983, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 29-41.
• Brief Report • Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Suowang, Gan Jiasi, Xue Hongjiao
Received:
Online:
Published:
刘锁旺, 甘家思, 薛宏交
Abstract: In this paper,according to the horizontal dislocation patterns of the active fault and the composed features of deformation and fracture having taken place in the Cretaceous-Tertiary and Quaternary strata,related parameters of main stress axes (σ1,σ2 and σ3) at the observed sites are obtained by means of the stereographic projection; and by combining with the data of focal mechanism,macroscopic earthquake phenomenon,crustal deformation and others,the tectonic stress field from the time of Himalayan movement is remoulded. It is show that,the axis direction (σ1) of principal compressive stress in various tectonic zones of the Changjiang River and their related regions may have some tendency to evolve progressively,and may appear to be intersected state with time and space. During early and late neotectonic movement σ1-axis of central faulting zone (A) in Hubei province is NNE-SSW and ENE-WSW,and at this same time,this axis in the southern segment of southwest tectonic zone (B) is NW-SE,but the northern position it is dominated by NNW-SSE In the eastern part of northwest tectonic zone (C),σ1-axis direction is mainly NE-SW,while in its southwestern and northern segments this directron is under the control of NW-WNW-SE-ESE. In the recent stress field,σ1-axis in the eastern portion of the (A) zone is NNE-SSW,in the western portion it is ENE-WSW,and the included angle between them is 40皁r so; σ1-axis in the southwest (B)zone is NE-SW,but in the northeast part it is nearly N-S; in the whole (Ozone,ranges from NW-SE to WNW-ESE. with the obvious NE-SW principal compressive stress,It is quite evident that σ1-axis distribution seems to be in the lack of uniform direction between or in the tectonic zones.According to "elastic rebound hypothesis" and "Boushinger effect",the relation shup between the alternation of σ1-axis direction and seismicity of the Danjiang area is dealt with in the paper. Finally,the authors suggest that,in the tectonic stress field the alternation of σ1-axis may be regarded as one of the seismogeological marks in the intraplate weak shock regions (or zones),based on the comparison of abovementioned features with the cases similar to relative stable segments of strong earthouake regions in North China and South-west China (for example Honghe River area).
摘要: 本文根据活动断裂的错动方式、白垩-第三纪红层变形和破裂的组合关系等资料,利用赤平投影作图求出各观测点主应力(σ1、σ2和σ3)的参数,并结合震源机制和地壳形变测量数据,着重描述了喜马拉雅运动以来的构造应力场。结果表明:长江三峡(及邻区)各构造区域内σ1轴向随时空而变化。按照“弹性回跳理论”和“Baushinger效应”分析了现今应力场的这种变化与地震活动的关系。提出构造应力场σ1轴的长期变化,可以作为板内弱震活动区(带)的一种构造标志。
Liu Suowang, Gan Jiasi, Xue Hongjiao. TECTONIC STRESS FIELD AND SEISMICITY IN THE THREE GORGE REGION ON THE CHANGJIANG RIVER[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 1983, 5(1): 29-41.
刘锁旺, 甘家思, 薛宏交. 长江三峡地区的构造应力场与地震活动[J]. 地震地质, 1983, 5(1): 29-41.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/
https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/Y1983/V5/I1/29