SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 669-685.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.03.007

• Special topic on extremely low-frequency seismo-electromagnetic phenomena • Previous Articles     Next Articles

THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ANOMALY OF TANGSHAN GUYE MS5.1 EARTHQUAKE ON JULY 12, 2020

FAN Ye1,2)(), TANG Ji1),*(), MIAO Jie3), YE Qing2), CUI Teng-fa4), DONG Ze-yi1), HAN Bing1), SUN Gui-cheng5)   

  1. 1) State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
    2) China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China
    3) Lingyang Seismic Station, Shandong Earthquake Agency, Lingyang 276521, China
    4) Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China
    5) Chengde Earthquake Monitoring Center Station, Chengde 067000, China
  • Received:2021-10-12 Revised:2021-11-25 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-08-02
  • Contact: TANG Ji

2020年7月12日唐山古冶5.1级地震的电磁现象

范晔1,2)(), 汤吉1),*(), 缪杰3), 叶青2), 崔腾发4), 董泽义1), 韩冰1), 孙贵成5)   

  1. 1)中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029
    2)中国地震台网中心, 北京 100045
    3)山东省地震局陵阳地震台, 陵阳 276521
    4)中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036
    5)承德地震监测中心站, 承德 067000
  • 通讯作者: 汤吉
  • 作者简介:范晔, 女, 1987年生, 2022年于中国地震局地质研究所获固体地球物理学专业博士学位, 高级工程师, 研究方向为地震电磁数据处理与解释, 电话: 010-59959160, E-mail: fanye_1987@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41674081);中国地震科技计划项目(3JH-202001113);北京市自然科学基金(8212045)

Abstract:

On July 12, 2020, an MS5.1 occurred in Guye, Hebei Province, and as the largest earthquake in the capital circle in recent years, its unique geographical location has attracted more attention. During an earthquake, the electromagnetic properties of underground media will change, so dense electromagnetic observation stations were arranged in the capital circle. In this study, the data of geoelectric resistivity, geoelectric field, and extremely low frequency(ELF)observation within 400km of the Guye earthquake are analyzed using a combination of time-domain waveform analysis, sliding Fourier analysis with annual variation removed, normalized variation rate method(NVRM), and geo-electric azimuthal method. After eliminating the influencing factors such as operation status, observational environment, and the spatial electromagnetic effect, we analyzed the characteristics of electromagnetic phenomena that may be related to the Guye earthquake preliminarily and found that there was a variation process of “trend decrease—accelerated decrease—postseismic recovery” observed in 6 geoelectric resistivity stations and that the normalized variation rate exceeded the threshold value of ±2.4 in 7 stations within one year before the earthquake. In Luanxian station, the intensity of the geoelectric field in the north-south and north-western directions decreased and then rose back before the earthquake. In addition, the azimuth shifted to the direction of the Guye earthquake in the preseismic period, and then returned to the direction of the Luanxian-Laoting Fault. The ELF stations in Wen'an and Fengning precisely recorded the coseismic change of the 16Hz natural magnetic field, in which the variation of the vertical component is twice larger than that of the horizontal component. Under the condition of large subsurface structure difference beneath the stations, the observed electric values from the two stations are distinctively different; moreover, the coseismic disturbance is submerged by the background noise. The subsurface electric structure was obtained by interpolating and inversing the data collected from the ELF stations in the capital area, which indicates that the Guye earthquake occurs near the boundary of the electric property changes. Meanwhile, it shows high electric resistivity in the northern area, low electric resistivity in the southwestern area, and partially low electric resistivity in Baodi and Wen'an, which is consistent with the location of the abnormally stronger ground motion. Regarding the spatial selectivity of the anomalies, we believe it may be related to the direction of the two main conjugated structures in the capital area, which lie in NEE and NW direction, respectively. And the study also enlightens researchers that the investigation of the mechanism of seismic electromagnetic anomaly should start from the coseismic phenomenon, and then focus on the aspects of seismic signal source and propagation path, because the extremely low-frequency observation band is wide and the coseismic electromagnetic signals can be clearly recorded. There are many effective ways to extract electromagnetic signals related to earthquakes from strong interference background, such as making retrospective analysis of moderately strong earthquakes in time, summarizing the electromagnetic anomaly characteristics of different earthquake events, densifying the electromagnetic observation layout appropriately, so that the abnormal information can be mutually corroborated and a variety of means for fusion and comparative analysis can be developed.

Key words: Guye MS5.1 earthquake, georesistivity, geoelectrical field, extremely low frequency(ELF), electromagnetic anomaly

摘要:

文中使用时间域波形分析、 滑动傅式去年变分析、 归一化变化速率方法和矢量方位角方法处理分析了2020年7月12日古冶 MS5.1 地震震中距400km范围内的地电阻率、 地电场、 极低频观测数据。在排除各台站仪器运行、 台站观测环境、 空间电磁活动等影响因素后, 认为有6个地电阻率台站于震前出现了“趋势性下降—加速下降—震后恢复”的变化过程, 7个地电阻率台站在震前1a内的归一化变化速率超过±2.4阈值; 滦县地电场NS和NW向测道于震前3个月出现先下降后回升的变化, 且矢量方位角在震前向古冶地震方向偏移, 后恢复为沿滦县-乐亭断裂方向; 文安和丰宁极低频台清晰地记录到16hz天然源磁场同震变化, 磁场垂直分量的变化超过水平分量的2倍, 由于台站的地下结构存在巨大差异, 2个台站的电场观测值差别较大, 且电场同震扰动淹没在背景噪声中。文中利用首都圈极低频台站观测数据反演了地下电性结构, 发现古冶地震的震源位于电性发生变化的边界附近, 北边为高阻区, 西南方向为低阻区, 宝坻和文安处于局部低阻区, 并据此初步分析了古冶地震的电磁现象特征。针对异常空间选择性问题, 认为可能与京津唐地区NEE和NW向2个主要共轭构造方向有关。对地震电磁异常机理开展研究时, 应从地震电磁同震现象入手, 从地震电磁信号产生的源和传播路径2方面展开相关工作。

关键词: 古冶MS5.1地震, 地电阻率, 地电场, 极低频, 电磁异常

CLC Number: