SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 806-826.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.005
• Research paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Xiang-yun1)(), YIN Hai-quan2), WANG Zhen-jie3), YANG Hui1)
Received:
2021-06-15
Revised:
2021-07-03
Online:
2021-08-20
Published:
2021-09-29
作者简介:
郭祥云, 女, 1975年生, 2014年于中国地震局地球物理研究所获固体地球物理学硕士学位, 高级工程师, 主要从事震源机制及构造应力场反演方面的研究, 电话: 010-68729469, E-mail: ldazui@sina.com。
基金资助:
CLC Number:
GUO Xiang-yun, YIN Hai-quan, WANG Zhen-jie, YANG Hui. EARTHQUAKE CENTROID, SEISMIC MOMENT TENSOR AND DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS OF THE MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE IN YANGBI, YUNNAN ON MAY 21, 2021[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 806-826.
郭祥云, 尹海权, 汪贞杰, 杨辉. 2021年5月21日云南漾濞M6.4地震序列的矩心矩张量解及动力环境分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 806-826.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.04.005
Fig. 2 Distribution of epicenter and surrounding stations and main active faults of Yangbi M6.4 earthquake in Yunnan Province, and the focal mechanism of earthquakes with M≥7.0 in history.
地壳厚度/km | 0 | 5 | 10 | 16 | 28 | 35 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VP/km·s-1 | 4.90 | 5.85 | 6.12 | 6.34 | 6.65 | 7.10 |
Table1 One-dimensional velocity model used in earthquake relocation
地壳厚度/km | 0 | 5 | 10 | 16 | 28 | 35 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VP/km·s-1 | 4.90 | 5.85 | 6.12 | 6.34 | 6.65 | 7.10 |
厚度/km | 纵波速度/km·s-1 | 横波速度/km·s | 密度/g·cm-3 |
---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
0.00 | 3.81 | 1.94 | 0.92 |
0.50 | 2.50 | 1.20 | 2.10 |
0.00 | 4.00 | 2.10 | 2.40 |
1.80 | 6.10 | 3.50 | 2.75 |
1.60 | 6.30 | 3.60 | 2.80 |
8.50 | 7.20 | 4.00 | 3.10 |
Table2 Velocity structure model
厚度/km | 纵波速度/km·s-1 | 横波速度/km·s | 密度/g·cm-3 |
---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
0.00 | 3.81 | 1.94 | 0.92 |
0.50 | 2.50 | 1.20 | 2.10 |
0.00 | 4.00 | 2.10 | 2.40 |
1.80 | 6.10 | 3.50 | 2.75 |
1.60 | 6.30 | 3.60 | 2.80 |
8.50 | 7.20 | 4.00 | 3.10 |
日期 | 时间 | 北纬 /(°) | 东经 /(°) | 深度 /km | 震级 M | 矩心 深度 /km | 矩震级 MW | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 精定 位后 北纬 /(°) | 精定 位后 东经 /(°) | 序号 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-05-18 | 20:56: 46 | 25.65 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 6.26 | 3.7 | 132 | 86 | -163 | 25.62 | 99.93 | 1 |
2021-05-18 | 21:39: 35 | 25.65 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 5.35 | 4.4 | 308 | 82 | 162 | 25.63 | 99.93 | 2 |
2021-05-19 | 03:27: 56 | 25.65 | 99.92 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 4.95 | 3.8 | 314 | 80 | 172 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 3 |
2021-05-19 | 21:13: 07 | 25.68 | 99.89 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 4.79 | 4.0 | 312 | 83 | 179 | 25.66 | 99.89 | 4 |
2021-05-20 | 01:58: 59 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 3.78 | 3.9 | 51 | 86 | -12 | 25.65 | 99.90 | 5 |
2021-05-21 | 20:56: 02 | 25.63 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 5.02 | 4.4 | 27 | 58 | -45 | 25.62 | 99.93 | 6 |
2021-05-21 | 21:21: 25 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 5.76 | 5.7 | 312 | 78 | -168 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 7 |
2021-05-21 | 21:21: 57 | 25.63 | 99.96 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 5.76 | 5.2 | 315 | 78 | 176 | 25.62 | 99.95 | 8 |
2021-05-21 | 21:22: 35 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 10.0 | 4.3 | 6.37 | 4.6 | 121 | 59 | 133 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 9 |
2021-05-21 | 21:48: 34 | 25.67 | 99.87 | 8.0 | 6.6 | 5.89 | 6.1 | 225 | 75 | -3 | 25.68 | 99.87 | 10(主震) |
2021-05-21 | 22:15: 16 | 25.59 | 99.96 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 6.40 | 4.4 | 134 | 88 | 160 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 11 |
2021-05-21 | 22:31: 10 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 8.0 | 5.6 | 8.16 | 5.1 | 46 | 77 | -36 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 12 |
2021-05-21 | 22:59: 37 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 6.29 | 4.0 | 105 | 72 | 153 | 25.62 | 99.94 | 13 |
2021-05-21 | 23:13: 53 | 25.64 | 99.94 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 5.35 | 4.0 | 30 | 86 | -1 | 25.61 | 99.94 | 14 |
2021-05-21 | 23:23: 34 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 4.30 | 4.5 | 216 | 81 | 7 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 15 |
2021-05-22 | 00:51: 41 | 25.70 | 99.87 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 3.60 | 4.3 | 34 | 82 | -10 | 25.68 | 99.88 | 16 |
2021-05-22 | 01:50: 17 | 25.61 | 100.00 | 14.0 | 3.9 | 3.54 | 3.9 | 317 | 80 | -174 | 25.60 | 99.96 | 17 |
2021-05-22 | 08:36: 46 | 25.68 | 99.90 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 5.20 | 3.9 | 16 | 62 | -25 | 25.67 | 99.89 | 18 |
2021-05-22 | 09:48: 00 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 12.0 | 4.5 | 4.19 | 3.7 | 312 | 83 | -176 | 25.66 | 99.88 | 19 |
2021-05-22 | 20:14: 36 | 25.61 | 99.93 | 10.0 | 4.8 | 6.90 | 4.3 | 318 | 49 | -150 | 25.59 | 99.93 | 20 |
2021-05-22 | 22:30: 05 | 25.60 | 99.93 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 7.20 | 3.8 | 308 | 70 | -166 | 25.58 | 99.92 | 21 |
2021-05-22 | 23:30: 16 | 25.57 | 99.96 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 7.40 | 3.6 | 137 | 54 | -138 | 25.58 | 99.96 | 22 |
2021-05-23 | 00:17: 19 | 25.59 | 99.99 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 5.95 | 3.6 | 334 | 74 | -150 | 25.56 | 99.96 | 23 |
2021-05-24 | 08:10: 58 | 25.59 | 100.00 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 6.64 | 3.6 | 141 | 80 | 170 | 25.55 | 100.00 | 24 |
2021-05-27 | 19:52: 46 | 25.74 | 99.95 | 12.0 | 4.1 | 6.07 | 4.35 | 285 | 82 | 175 | 25.73 | 99.93 | 25 |
2021-05-27 | 23:03: 57 | 25.69 | 99.89 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 7.13 | 4.0 | 144 | 75 | -143 | 25.68 | 99.87 | 26 |
Table3 Source parameters of Yangbi M6.4 earthquake sequence in Yunnan Province
日期 | 时间 | 北纬 /(°) | 东经 /(°) | 深度 /km | 震级 M | 矩心 深度 /km | 矩震级 MW | 走向 /(°) | 倾角 /(°) | 滑动角 /(°) | 精定 位后 北纬 /(°) | 精定 位后 东经 /(°) | 序号 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021-05-18 | 20:56: 46 | 25.65 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 6.26 | 3.7 | 132 | 86 | -163 | 25.62 | 99.93 | 1 |
2021-05-18 | 21:39: 35 | 25.65 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 5.35 | 4.4 | 308 | 82 | 162 | 25.63 | 99.93 | 2 |
2021-05-19 | 03:27: 56 | 25.65 | 99.92 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 4.95 | 3.8 | 314 | 80 | 172 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 3 |
2021-05-19 | 21:13: 07 | 25.68 | 99.89 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 4.79 | 4.0 | 312 | 83 | 179 | 25.66 | 99.89 | 4 |
2021-05-20 | 01:58: 59 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 3.78 | 3.9 | 51 | 86 | -12 | 25.65 | 99.90 | 5 |
2021-05-21 | 20:56: 02 | 25.63 | 99.93 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 5.02 | 4.4 | 27 | 58 | -45 | 25.62 | 99.93 | 6 |
2021-05-21 | 21:21: 25 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 5.76 | 5.7 | 312 | 78 | -168 | 25.63 | 99.92 | 7 |
2021-05-21 | 21:21: 57 | 25.63 | 99.96 | 10.0 | 4.7 | 5.76 | 5.2 | 315 | 78 | 176 | 25.62 | 99.95 | 8 |
2021-05-21 | 21:22: 35 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 10.0 | 4.3 | 6.37 | 4.6 | 121 | 59 | 133 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 9 |
2021-05-21 | 21:48: 34 | 25.67 | 99.87 | 8.0 | 6.6 | 5.89 | 6.1 | 225 | 75 | -3 | 25.68 | 99.87 | 10(主震) |
2021-05-21 | 22:15: 16 | 25.59 | 99.96 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 6.40 | 4.4 | 134 | 88 | 160 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 11 |
2021-05-21 | 22:31: 10 | 25.59 | 99.97 | 8.0 | 5.6 | 8.16 | 5.1 | 46 | 77 | -36 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 12 |
2021-05-21 | 22:59: 37 | 25.63 | 99.94 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 6.29 | 4.0 | 105 | 72 | 153 | 25.62 | 99.94 | 13 |
2021-05-21 | 23:13: 53 | 25.64 | 99.94 | 8.0 | 4.3 | 5.35 | 4.0 | 30 | 86 | -1 | 25.61 | 99.94 | 14 |
2021-05-21 | 23:23: 34 | 25.60 | 99.98 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 4.30 | 4.5 | 216 | 81 | 7 | 25.59 | 99.98 | 15 |
2021-05-22 | 00:51: 41 | 25.70 | 99.87 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 3.60 | 4.3 | 34 | 82 | -10 | 25.68 | 99.88 | 16 |
2021-05-22 | 01:50: 17 | 25.61 | 100.00 | 14.0 | 3.9 | 3.54 | 3.9 | 317 | 80 | -174 | 25.60 | 99.96 | 17 |
2021-05-22 | 08:36: 46 | 25.68 | 99.90 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 5.20 | 3.9 | 16 | 62 | -25 | 25.67 | 99.89 | 18 |
2021-05-22 | 09:48: 00 | 25.67 | 99.90 | 12.0 | 4.5 | 4.19 | 3.7 | 312 | 83 | -176 | 25.66 | 99.88 | 19 |
2021-05-22 | 20:14: 36 | 25.61 | 99.93 | 10.0 | 4.8 | 6.90 | 4.3 | 318 | 49 | -150 | 25.59 | 99.93 | 20 |
2021-05-22 | 22:30: 05 | 25.60 | 99.93 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 7.20 | 3.8 | 308 | 70 | -166 | 25.58 | 99.92 | 21 |
2021-05-22 | 23:30: 16 | 25.57 | 99.96 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 7.40 | 3.6 | 137 | 54 | -138 | 25.58 | 99.96 | 22 |
2021-05-23 | 00:17: 19 | 25.59 | 99.99 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 5.95 | 3.6 | 334 | 74 | -150 | 25.56 | 99.96 | 23 |
2021-05-24 | 08:10: 58 | 25.59 | 100.00 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 6.64 | 3.6 | 141 | 80 | 170 | 25.55 | 100.00 | 24 |
2021-05-27 | 19:52: 46 | 25.74 | 99.95 | 12.0 | 4.1 | 6.07 | 4.35 | 285 | 82 | 175 | 25.73 | 99.93 | 25 |
2021-05-27 | 23:03: 57 | 25.69 | 99.89 | 12.0 | 3.6 | 7.13 | 4.0 | 144 | 75 | -143 | 25.68 | 99.87 | 26 |
类型 | P轴倾俯角 | B轴倾俯角 | T轴倾俯角 |
---|---|---|---|
正断型(NF) | ≥52° | ≤35° | |
正走滑型(NS) | 40°≤倾角<52° | ≤20° | |
走滑型(SS) | <40° | ≥45° | ≤20° |
≤20° | ≥45° | <40° | |
逆走滑型(TS) | ≤20° | 40°≤倾角<52° | |
逆断型(TF) | ≤35° | ≥52° | |
不确定型(U) | 上述类型之外的震源机制解 |
Table4 Categories of focal mechanisms
类型 | P轴倾俯角 | B轴倾俯角 | T轴倾俯角 |
---|---|---|---|
正断型(NF) | ≥52° | ≤35° | |
正走滑型(NS) | 40°≤倾角<52° | ≤20° | |
走滑型(SS) | <40° | ≥45° | ≤20° |
≤20° | ≥45° | <40° | |
逆走滑型(TS) | ≤20° | 40°≤倾角<52° | |
逆断型(TF) | ≤35° | ≥52° | |
不确定型(U) | 上述类型之外的震源机制解 |
分区 | σ1轴 | σ2轴 | σ3轴 | R值 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | 方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | 方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | ||
北西段 | -7.12 | 13.43 | -97.29 | 0.75 | 169.58 | 76.55 | 0.33 |
中段 | -3.39 | 9.28 | -93.49 | 0.60 | 172.85 | 80.70 | 0.29 |
南东段东支 | -172.63 | 3.99 | -96.38 | 13.82 | -66.85 | 75.59 | 0.37 |
南东段西支 | 179.76 | 3.64 | 89.58 | 2.83 | -38.18 | 85.39 | 0.14 |
Table5 The inverted stress field parameters on grid of different regions
分区 | σ1轴 | σ2轴 | σ3轴 | R值 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | 方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | 方位角/(°) | 倾伏角/(°) | ||
北西段 | -7.12 | 13.43 | -97.29 | 0.75 | 169.58 | 76.55 | 0.33 |
中段 | -3.39 | 9.28 | -93.49 | 0.60 | 172.85 | 80.70 | 0.29 |
南东段东支 | -172.63 | 3.99 | -96.38 | 13.82 | -66.85 | 75.59 | 0.37 |
南东段西支 | 179.76 | 3.64 | 89.58 | 2.83 | -38.18 | 85.39 | 0.14 |
[1] | 白志明, 王椿镛. 2004. 云南遮放-宾川和孟连-马龙宽角地震剖面的层析成像研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 47(2): 257-267. |
BAI Zhi-ming, WANG Chun-yong. 2004. Tomography research of the Zhefang-Binchuan and Menglian-Malong wide-angle seismic profiles in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 47(2): 257-267. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 常祖峰, 常昊, 臧阳, 等. 2016. 维西-乔后断裂新活动特征及其与红河断裂的关系[J]. 地质力学学报, 22(3): 517-530. |
CHANG Zu-feng, CHANG Hao, ZANG Yang, et al. 2016. Recent active features of Weixi-Qiaohou Fault and its relationship with the Honghe Fault[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 22(3): 517-530. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 房立华, 吴建平, 苏金蓉, 等. 2018. 四川九寨沟MS7.0地震主震及其余震序列精定位研究[J]. 科学通报, 63(7): 649-662. |
FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, SU Jin-rong, et al. 2018. Relocation of mainshock and aftershock sequence of the MS7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou earthquake[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 63(7): 649-662. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 房立华, 吴建平, 王未来, 等. 2014. 云南鲁甸MS6.5地震余震重定位及其发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 36(4): 1173-1185. |
FANG Li-hua, WU Jian-ping, WANG Wei-lai, et al. 2014. Relocation of the aftershock sequence of the MS6.5 Ludian earthquake and its seismogenic structure[J]. Seismology and Geology, 36(4): 1173-1185. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 郭祥云, 蒋长胜, 王晓山, 等. 2017. 鄂尔多斯块体周缘中小地震震源机制及应力场特征[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 37(7): 675-685. |
GUO Xiang-yun, JIANG Chang-sheng, WANG Xiao-shan, et al. 2017. Characteristics of small to moderate focal mechanism solutions stress field of the circum-Ordos block[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 37(7): 675-685. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 嵇少丞, 王茜, 孙圣思, 等. 2008. 亚洲大陆逃逸构造与现今中国地震活动[J]. 地质学报, 82(12): 1644-1667. |
JI Shao-cheng, WANG Qian, SUN Sheng-si, et al. 2008. Continental extrusion and seismicity in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 82(12): 1644-1667. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 阚荣举, 王绍晋, 刘祖萌. 1979. 龙陵地震序列的震源机制特征[J]. 地震研究, 2(4): 9-21. |
KAN Rong-ju, WANG Shao-jin, LIU Zu-meng. 1979. Focal mechanism characteristics of Longling earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 2(4): 9-21. (in Chinese) | |
[8] |
李君, 王勤彩, 崔子健, 等. 2019. 川滇菱形块体东边界及邻区震源机制解与构造应力场空间分布特征[J]. 地震地质, 41(6): 1395-1412. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.06.006.
DOI |
LI Jun, WANG Qin-cai, CUI Zi-jian, et al. 2019. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field in the eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan block and its adjacent area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 41(6): 1395-1412. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 缪素秋. 2019. 川滇地区岩石圈结构及动力学特征[D]. 昆明: 云南大学. |
MIAO Su-qiu. 2019. The lithospheric structure and geodynamic characteristics beneath Sichuan-Yunnan region[D]. Yunnan University, Kunming. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 刘福田, 刘建华, 何建坤, 等. 2000. 滇西特提斯造山带下扬子地块的俯冲板片[J]. 科学通报, 45(1): 79-84. |
LIU Fu-tian, LIU Jian-hua, HE Jian-kun, et al. 2000. Subduction slab of lower Yangtze massif in Tethys orogenic belt, west Yunnan[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(1): 79-84. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
|
[11] | 刘兆才, 万永革, 黄骥超, 等. 2019. 2017年精河MS6.6地震邻区构造应力场特征与发震断层性质的厘定[J]. 地球物理学报, 62(4): 1336-1348. |
LIU Zhao-cai, WAN Yong-ge, HUANG Ji-chao, et al. 2019. The tectonic stress field adjacent to the source of the 2017 Jinghe MS6.6 earthquake and slip property of its seismogenic fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(4): 1336-1348. (in Chinese) | |
[12] |
罗钧, 赵翠萍, 周连庆. 2014. 川滇块体及周边区域现今震源机制和应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 36(2): 405-421. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.02.011.
DOI |
LUO Jun, ZHAO Cui-ping, ZHOU Lian-qing. 2014. Characteristics of focal mechanisms and stress field of the Chuan-Dian rhombic block and its adjacent regions[J]. Seismology and Geology, 36(2): 405-421. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 潘桂棠, 李兴振, 王立全, 等. 2002. 青藏高原及邻区大地构造单元初步划分[J]. 地质通报, 21(11): 701-707. |
PAN Gui-tang, LI Xing-zhen, WANG Li-quan, et al. 2002. Preliminary division of tectonic units of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its adjacent regions[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 21(11): 701-707. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 潘裕生, 方爱民. 2010. 中国青藏高原特提斯的形成与演化[J]. 地质科学, 45(1): 92-101. |
PAN Yu-sheng, FANG Ai-min. 2010. Formation and evolution of the Tethys in the Tibetan plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 45(1): 92-101. (in Chinese) | |
[15] |
祁玉萍, 龙锋, 林圣杰, 等. 2021. 南北地震带中段及周边中强地震序列类型的特征[J]. 地震地质, 43(1): 177-196. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.01.011.
DOI |
QI Yu-ping, LONG Feng, LIN Sheng-jie, et al. 2021. A study on the earthquake sequence type in the middle section of the north-south seismic belt and its surrounding regions[J]. Seismology and Geology, 43(1): 177-196. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 王刚, 王二七. 2005. 挤压造山带中的伸展构造及其成因: 以滇中地区晚新生代构造为例[J]. 地震地质, 27(2): 188-199. |
WANG Gang, WANG Er-qi. 2005. Extensional structures within the compressional orogenic belt and its mechanism: A case study for the late Cenozoic deformation in central Yunnan[J]. Seismology and Geology, 27(2): 188-199. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 王绍晋, 龙晓帆, 罗淑进. 1997. 丽江地震序列的震源机制、 发震应力场和破裂特征[J]. 地震研究, 20(1): 26-34. |
WANG Shao-jin, LONG Xiao-fan, LUO Shu-jin. 1997. The focal mechanism, seismogenic stress field and rupture characteristics of the Lijiang earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 20(1): 26-34. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 王晓山, 吕坚, 谢祖军, 等. 2015. 南北地震带震源机制解与构造应力场特征[J]. 地球物理学报, 58(11): 4149-4162. |
WANG Xiao-shan, LÜ Jian, XIE Zu-jun, et al. 2015. Focal mechanisms and tectonic stress field in the North-South Seismic Belt of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 58(11): 4149-4162. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 吴中海, 龙长兴, 范桃园, 等. 2015. 青藏高原东南缘弧形旋扭活动构造体系及其动力学特征与机制[J]. 地质通报, 34(1): 1-31. |
WU Zhong-hai, LONG Chang-xing, FAN Tao-yuan, et al. 2015. The arc rotational-shear active tectonic system on the southeastern margin of Tibetan plateau and its dynamic characteristics and mechanism[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 34(1): 1-31. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 吴建平, 明跃红, 王椿镛. 2004. 云南地区中小地震震源机制及构造应力场研究[J]. 地震学报, 26(5): 457-465. |
WU Jian-ping, MING Yue-hong, WANG Chun-yong. 2004. Source mechanism of small to moderate earthquake and tectonic stress field in Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(5): 457-465. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 熊绍柏, 郑晔. 1993. 丽江-攀枝花-者海地带二维地壳结构及其构造意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 36(4): 434-444. |
XIONG Shao-bai, ZHENG Ye. 1993. The 2-D structure and its tectonic implications of the crust in the Lijiang-Panzhihua-Zhehai region[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 36(4): 434-444. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 郑荣章, 等. 2003. 川滇地区活动块体最新构造变动样式及其动力来源[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S1): 151-162. |
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, ZHENG Rong-zhang, et al. 2003. The latest tectonic change patterns of active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan area and their sources of power[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 33(S1): 151-162. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 许志琴, 王勤, 李忠海, 等. 2016. 印度-亚洲碰撞: 从挤压到走滑的构造转换[J]. 地质学报, 90(1): 1-23. |
XU Zhi-qin, WANG Qin, LI Zhong-hai, et al. 2016. Indo-Asian collision: Tectonic transition from compression to strike slip[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 90(1): 1-23. (in Chinese) | |
[24] |
杨婷, 吴建平, 房立华, 等. 2014. 滇西地区地壳速度结构及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 36(2): 392-404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.02.010.
DOI |
YANG Ting, WU Jian-ping, FANG Li-hua, et al. 2014. 3-D Crustal P-wave velocity structure in western Yunnan area and its tectonic implications[J]. Seismology and Geology, 36(2): 392-404. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | Aki K, Richards P G. 2002. Quantitative Seismology: Second Edition[M]. University Science Books, Mill Valley, California. USA:49-62. |
[26] | Burchfiel B C. 2004. New technology: New geological challenges[J]. General Services Administration Today, 14(2): 4-10. |
[27] |
Hardebeck J L, Michael A J. 2006. Damped regional-scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B11): B11310. doi: 10.1029/2005JB004144.
DOI |
[28] | Kissling E. 1995. Velest User’s Guide[R]. Internal Report, Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich:1-26. |
[29] |
Lund B, Townend J. 2007. Calculating horizontal stress orientations with full or partial knowledge of the tectonic stress tensor[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 170(3): 1328-1335.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Martínez-Garzón P, Kwiatek G, Ickrath M, et al. 2014. MSATSI: A MATLAB package for stress inversion combining solid classic methodology, a new simplified user-handling, and a visualization tool[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 85(4): 896-904.
DOI URL |
[31] | Menke W. 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory[M]. San Diego, California: Academic Press. |
[32] |
Su G L, Zhan W. 2021. Seasonal and long-term vertical land motion in southwest China determined using GPS, GRACE, and surface loading model[J]. Earth Planets and Space, 73(131): 1-14.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. 2000. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward Fault, California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(6): 1353-1368.
DOI URL |
[34] | Wang E, Burchfiel B C, Royden L H, et al. 1998. The Cenozoic Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang, Red River, and Dali fault systems of southwestern Sichuan and central Yunnan, China[R]. Geological Society of America Special Papers 327:1-108. |
[35] |
Wang R J, Heimann S, Zhang Y, et al. 2017. Complete synthetic seismograms based on a spherical self-gravitating Earth model with an atmosphere-ocean-mantle-core structure[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 210(3): 1739-1764.
DOI URL |
[36] | Yang T, Li P, Fang L H, et al. 2021. Relocation of the foreshocks and aftershocks of the MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence[J]. Journal of Earth Science, in press. |
[37] |
Zhang Z Q, Gao Y. 2019. Crustal thicknesses and Poisson’s ratios beneath the Chuxiong-Simao Basin in the southeast margin of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 3(1): 69-84.
DOI URL |
[38] |
Zoback M L. 1992. First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project[J]. Journal Geophysical Research, 97(B8): 11703-11728.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Xi-long, LUO Yin-hua, JIN Xiu-ying, YANG Meng-yao, KONG Xiang-rui. GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS IN ACTIVE FAULT ZONE AND ITS IMPLICATION TO THE ADJUSTMENT OF REGIONAL STRESS FIELD IN THE SOUTHERN AREA OF LIAONING PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(3): 710-734. |
[2] | FAN Wen-jie. CHARACTERISTICS OF TECTONIC STRESS FIELD AROUND THE YANGBI MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE AND ITS SURROUNDING AREAS ON MAY 21, 2021 AND ITS GEODYNAMIC IMPLICATION [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(1): 208-230. |
[3] | WANG Yu-qing, FENG Wan-peng, ZHANG Pei-zhen. PRESENT DEFORMATION OF~90° INTERSECTING CONJUGATE FAULTS AND MECHANICAL IMPLICATION TO REGIONAL TECTONICS: A CASE STUDY OF 2019 MW≥6.4 PHILIPPINES EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 313-332. |
[4] | WANG Xiao-shan, WAN Yong-ge. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CRUSTAL STRESS FIELD AND ITS DIRECTION CONVERGENCE BEFORE THE WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 363-377. |
[5] | YU Zhan-yang, SHEN Xu-zhang, LIANG Hao, ZHENG Wen-jun, LIU Xu-zhou. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR FAULTS AND STRESS FIELD IN WEIHE-YUNCHENG BASIN CONSTRAINED BY SEISMIC ACTIVITY AND FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 395-413. |
[6] | ZHANG Zhi-wei, LONG Feng, ZHAO Xiao-yan, WANG Di. STUDY ON FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTION AND STRESS FIELD CHARACTERISTICS IN SICHUAN AND YUNNAN AREA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(1): 170-187. |
[7] | WANG Zhi-wei, MA Sheng-li, LEI Xing-lin, WANG Kai-ying. DISCUSSION ON SEISMICITY CHARACTERISTICS OF WEIXI-QIAOHOU FAULT IN THE NORTHERN SECTION OF RED RIVER FAULT ZONE BASED ON THE DENSE SEISMIC ARRAY OBSERVATION [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(6): 1524-1536. |
[8] | SUN Ye-jun, HUANG Yun, LIU Ze-min, ZHENG Jian-chang, JIANG Hao-lin, LI Ting-ting, YE Qing, FANG Tao. CHARACTERISTICS OF TECTONIC STRESS FIELD AND DYNAMIC SIGNIFICANCE IN THE SHANDONG-JIANGSU-ANHUI SEGMENT OF TANCHENG-LUJIANG FAULT ZONE AND ITS ADJACENT AREAS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(5): 1188-1207. |
[9] | XU Xiao-xue, JI Ling-yun, ZHU Liang-yu, WANG Guang-ming, ZHANG Wen-ting, LI Ning. THE CO-SEISMIC DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE YANGBI MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 771-789. |
[10] | LIANG Shan-shan, XU Zhi-guo, ZHANG Guang-wei, ZOU Li-ye, LIU Yan-qiong, GUO Tie-long. GEOMETRIC COMPLEXITY OF FAULT SYSTEM IN THE SOURCE REGION OF THE 2021 YANGBI, YUNNAN, MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 827-846. |
[11] | YIN Xin-xin, JIANG Chang-sheng, CAI Run, GUO Xiang-yun, JIANG Cong, WANG Zu-dong, ZOU Xiao-bo. STUDY OF CRUSTAL TOMOGRAPHY AND PRECISE EARTHQUAKE LOCATION IN YANGBI AREA, YUNNAN PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 864-880. |
[12] | CHANG Zu-feng, CHANG Hao, LI Jian-lin, MAO Ze-bin, ZANG Yang. HOLOCENE ACTIVITY AND PALEOEARTHQUAKES OF THE WEIXI-QIAOHOU FAULT [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(4): 881-898. |
[13] | LI Chuan-you, ZHANG Jin-yu, WANG Wei, SUN Kai, SHAN Xin-jian. THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT OF THE 2021 YUNNAN YANGBI MS6.4 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2021, 43(3): 706-721. |
[14] | WANG Pu, WANG Cheng-hu, WANG Hong, CHEN Nian, ZHOU Hao, WEI Xue-yong. ANALYSIS OF IN-SITU STRESS PARAMETERS OF YISHU FAULT ZONE BASED ON ORIENTATION OF DITF IN BHTV IMAGE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(6): 1316-1334. |
[15] | CUI Hua-wei, ZHENG Jian-chang, ZHANG Zheng-shuai, LI Dong-mei, CHAI Guang-bin. FITTING THE FAULT PLANE PARAMETERS WITH SMALL EARTHQUAKES AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STRESS FIELD OF CHANGDAO AREA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(6): 1432-1445. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||