汶川MS8.0地震地表破裂带白沙河段破裂及其位移特征

地震地质 ›› 2008, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 658-673.

汶川M_S8.0地震地表破裂带白沙河段破裂及其位移特征

何宏林¹, 孙昭民², 魏占玉¹, 董绍鹏¹, 高翔¹, 王世元³, 王纪强²

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 国家地震活动断层研究中心, 北京, 100029;
2. 山东省地震局, 济南, 250014;
3. 四川省地震局, 成都, 100717

收稿日期:2008-08-03 修回日期:2008-08-11 出版日期:2008-09-18 发布日期:2009-11-27
作者简介:何宏林,1964年生,1985年毕业于北京大学地质系,1988年在中国地震局地质研究所获硕士学位,2000年获东京大学理学博士学位,研究员,主要研究方向为活动构造和变动地貌、活动断层与地震、GIS技术应用与灾害预测评估,电话:010-62009215,E-mail:honglinhe123@vip.sina.com.
基金资助:
中国地震局汶川8.0级地震应急科学考察项目资助

RUPTURE OF THE M_S8.0 WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE ALONG BAISHAHE RIVER

HE Hong-lin¹, SUN Zhao-min², WEI Zhan-yu¹, DONG Shao-peng¹, GAO Xiang¹, WANG Shi-yuan³, WANG Ji-qiang²

1. National Center for Active Fault Studies, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Earthquake Administration of Shandong Province, Jinan 250014, China;
3. Earthquake Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 100717, China

Received:2008-08-03 Revised:2008-08-11 Online:2008-09-18 Published:2009-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2008年5月12日14时28分,四川省汶川县发生M_S8.0特大地震。这次地震在地表形成2条地表破裂带,主破裂沿龙门山中央断裂发育,长约240km;次级破裂沿龙门山前山断裂发育,长约72km。白沙河破裂带位于中央主破裂带的南端,沿都江堰市北约11km的白沙河河谷展布,长14km。该破裂带几何结构复杂,多条短小破裂或斜列或平行或斜交组成破裂带,总体走向N50°E,但几乎每条次级小破裂走向都不与平均走向一致,在0°～90°之间变化。同震位移沿该破裂带也同样表现出复杂性和多样性,总体以NW盘逆冲为主,最大垂直位移为6.5m,局部存在反冲断层挠曲坎;走向滑动以右旋为主,最大水平位移为4.8m,局部存在左旋位移,而且同震位移分布特征与白沙河破裂带的几何展布特征密切相关。该破裂带北段出露的地表断层产状为40°/NW∠76°,其上的擦痕有2组,侧伏角分别为75°SW和80°SW,不仅反映了该次地震在此段以逆冲运动为主,兼有少量的右旋走滑分量,还反映了该次特大地震包括了2次破裂事件。分析破裂几何和同震位移分布特征得出如下认识:1)破裂面从震源深度的低角度逐渐向地表转化为高角度,迫使垂直断层走向的水平缩短转化为隆起的垂直位移,直接导致了走滑分量与水平缩短量的比例接近1,还导致了主破裂后侧反冲断层挠曲坎的形成;2)地震地表破裂带走滑分量变化受地表破裂走向的变化、标志线方位角变化产生的视走滑位移和重力作用等三大因素影响;3)上覆松散堆积物的厚度影响破裂带出露的规模和方式。

关键词: 汶川M_S8.0地震, 白沙河, 破裂带填图, 同震位移

Abstract: At 14:28,May 12,2008,a great earthquake of M_S8.0 occurred in Wenchuan County,Sichuan Province.It produced two ruptures along the Longmenshan Thrust Belt,with the major one of ca.240km along the central fault zone and minor one of ca.70km along the mountain front fault zone,respectively.Baishahe rupture section,located at the southern end of the rupture of Wenchuan earthquake,extends 14km along Baishahe River,11km north of Dujiangyan City.This rupture section presents complicated geometric features,and is composed of several segments.Almost each segment has different strike from others(from 0 to 90°),but the section has an average strike of 50°.Co-seismic slip along the rupture section also shows complexity and multiformity.Up-thrust of the northwest wall is the main vertical co-seismic slip,and the maximum height of fault flexure scarp is 6.5m,but local backward flexure scarps exist there;the right-slip is the main co-seismic strike slip,and the maximum right-slip offset is 4.8m,but local left-slip offset also appears.A rupture plane of 40°/NW∠76° crops out at the northern end of the rupture section.Two groups of striations present on the plane,75°SW and 80°SW.This indicates not only that reverse faulting is major,and strike-slip faulting is minor,but also two rupture events in the earthquake.Based on the analysis of the rupture geometric features and co-seismic slip distribution,we have found the following knowledge: 1)The gradual change of the rupture plane from low angle at source depth to high angle at surface compels the horizontal shortening to transform into uplifting,causing directly the ratio of strike-slip to horizontal shortening approaching to 1,and forming backward fault flexure scarp behind the main rupture zone;2)The direction and amount of strike slip are determined by three factors of strike of rupture,azimuth of reference and gravity;3)The thickness of the overlying unconsolidated deposits affects the scope and style of rupture at the surface.

Key words: M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, Baishahe, rupture mapping, co-seismic slip

中图分类号:

P315.2

何宏林, 孙昭民, 魏占玉, 董绍鹏, 高翔, 王世元, 王纪强. 汶川M_S8.0地震地表破裂带白沙河段破裂及其位移特征[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(3): 658-673.

HE Hong-lin, SUN Zhao-min, WEI Zhan-yu, DONG Shao-peng, GAO Xiang, WANG Shi-yuan, WANG Ji-qiang. RUPTURE OF THE M_S8.0 WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE ALONG BAISHAHE RIVER[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2008, 30(3): 658-673.

[1]	陈丽娟, 陈学忠, 李艳娥, 龚丽文. b值下降幅度与汶川M_S8.0 地震孕震区的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 1046-1058.
[2]	邵延秀, 刘静, 高云鹏, 王文鑫, 姚文倩, 韩龙飞, 刘志军, 邹小波, 王焱, 李云帅, 刘璐. 同震地表破裂的位移测量与弥散变形分析——以2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 506-523.
[3]	梁子晗, 魏占玉, 庄其天, 孙稳, 何宏林. 基于高分辨率地形数据的富蕴M8.0地震地表破裂带精细特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1507-1523.
[4]	李经纬, 陈长云, 占伟, 武艳强. 青海玛多7.4级地震GNSS同震水平位移的快速获取[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1073-1084.
[5]	康文君, 徐锡伟, 于贵华, 罗佳宏. 2种基于Matlab平台的断层位移测量软件对比分析--以阿尔金断裂东段为例[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(3): 732-747.
[6]	郝海健, 何宏林, 魏占玉. 地表破裂的几何结构与同震位移的相关性[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(1): 109-124.
[7]	尹得余, 刘启方, 刘畅, 季鑫洋. 基于近场强震记录和同震位移的汶川地震破裂过程[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(3): 698-717.
[8]	李细光, 潘黎黎, 李冰溯, 聂冠军, 吴教兵, 陆俊宏, 严小敏. 广西灵山1936年6¾级地震地表破裂类型与位错特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(5): 904-916.
[9]	魏文薪, 江在森, 邹镇宇, 杨永林, 张龙, 武艳强. 芦山“4·20”7.0级地震同震位移场考证及地表变形模式初探[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(2): 333-343.
[10]	徐锡伟, 谭锡斌, 吴国栋, 陈建波, 沈军, 方伟, 宋和平. 2008年于田M_S7.3地震地表破裂带特征及其构造属性讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(2): 462-471.
[11]	张继红, 赵国泽, 王晋生, 唐廷梅, 齐丽杰. 2008年汶川M_S8.0地震与青岛台地电阻率异常变化的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(3): 409-416.
[12]	屈春燕, 单新建, 宋小刚, 张桂芳, 张国宏, 郭利民, 刘云华, 韩宇飞. D-InSAR技术应用于汶川地震地表位移场的空间分析[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(2): 175-190.
[13]	刘进峰, 陈杰, 尹金辉, 陈立春, 卢演俦, 杨会丽. 龙门山映秀-北川断裂带擂鼓探槽剖面古地震事件测年[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(2): 191-199.
[14]	孙昌斌, 谢新生, 江娃利. 汶川M_S8.0地震绵竹县汉旺镇周边地表破裂带展布方式及其震害意义[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(2): 200-212.
[15]	郁耀闯, 周旗, 王长燕. 普通民众认知与响应汶川M_S8.0地震特征分析——以陕西勉县为例[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(2): 269-281.