六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2023.03.009

地震地质 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 753-771.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2023.03.009

六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系

张文亮¹⁾(), 李营¹⁾^,^*(), 刘兆飞¹⁾, 胡乐¹⁾, 路畅¹⁾, 陈志¹⁾, 韩晓昆²⁾

¹⁾ 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 中国地震局地震预测重点实验室, 北京 100036
²⁾ 天津大学, 地球系统科学学院, 表层地球系统科学研究院, 天津 300072

收稿日期:2023-02-20 修回日期:2023-03-13 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-07-18
通讯作者: * 李营, 男, 1978年生, 研究员, 主要从事与构造、地震有关的流体地球化学工作, E-mail: subduction6@hotmail.com。
作者简介:
张文亮, 男, 1999年生, 现为中国地震局地震预测研究所构造地质学专业在读硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为与构造、地震有关的流体地球化学工作, E-mail: zhangwli99@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42073063); 高压物理与地震科技联合实验室开放基金(2021IEF0101); 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务专项(CEAIEF20220504); 联合国教科文组织国际地球化学计划IGCP-724项目

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS HE CONCENTRATION IN THE EASTERN LIUPANSHAN FAULT ZONE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH TECTONIC ACTIVITY

ZHANG Wen-liang¹⁾(), LI Ying¹⁾^,^*(), LIU Zhao-fei¹⁾, HU Le¹⁾, LU Chang¹⁾, CHEN Zhi¹⁾, HAN Xiao-kun²⁾

¹⁾ Key Laboratory of Earthquake Prediction, Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China
²⁾ Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2023-02-20 Revised:2023-03-13 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-07-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

断裂带土壤气体地球化学特征与区域构造演化密切相关。文中为探讨六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系, 在六盘山东麓断裂跨断层布设了8条土壤气测量剖面, 沿测线开展土壤气He浓度的测量; 同时, 为进行对比分析, 选择位于六盘山东麓断裂以东14km的小关山断裂布设3条跨断层土壤气测量剖面, 沿测线开展土壤气He浓度的测量。测量结果显示, 六盘山东麓断裂各测量剖面的He浓度平均值为4.983~6.335ppm; 小关山断裂各测量剖面的He浓度平均值为4.784~5.235ppm。2条断裂的He浓度在空间分布上均呈现出断裂北部高于断裂中南段的特征, 这与断裂的区域活动性差异密切相关。结合前人对六盘山东麓断裂活动时代、闭锁程度、滑移速率、构造应力的研究成果, 分析表明六盘山东麓断裂北段的活动性强于断裂中南段。经对比分析认为, 六盘山东麓断裂和小关山断裂的构造演化过程相似, 且断裂性质均为逆冲型, 因此2条断裂土壤气He浓度的空间分布特征一致。

关键词: 土壤气, 氦, 地球化学, 构造活动, 六盘山东麓断裂带

Abstract:

The geochemical characteristics of soil gas in fault zone are closely related to regional tectonic evolution and seismic activity. He is a noble gas element with high chemical inertness, diffusivity and mobility, which can migrate from the deep underground to the surface along fractures. Its escape level in the crust is generally controlled by crustal stress. Therefore, soil gas He is an effective tracer, which can be used to study the process before the occurrence of dangerous earthquakes. Monitoring the He in a seismically active area may provide evidence of stress field changes caused by tectonic activity, and better understand the seismic genesis process within the region. The eastern Liupanshan fault zone is located between the Ordos block and the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and is an important part of the northern section of the North-South Seismic Belt. The medium-strong earthquakes in this zone are frequent, and there have been many strong earthquakes above 7 in history.
In order to explore the spatial distribution characteristics of soil gas He concentrations in the eastern Liupanshan fault zone and its relationship with tectonic activities, eight cross-fault soil gas measurement profiles were deployed in the eastern Liupanshan Fault, along which soil gas He concentrations were measured. In the meantime, in order to carry out comparative studies, the Xiaoguanshan Fault located 14km away from the eastern Liupanshan Fault was selected, and three cross-fault soil gas measurement profiles were also set to measure the soil gas He concentration along the survey line. The measurement results showed that the concentration of soil gas He in the eastern Liupanshan Fault is 3.786~7.472ppm, and the average He concentration of eight measurement profiles is between 4.983~6.335ppm. The He concentration range in Xiaoguanshan Fault is 2.168~7.043ppm, and the average He concentration of the three measurement profiles is between 4.784~5.235ppm. The soil gas He concentration in the eastern Liupanshan Fault has a decreasing trend from north to south. The soil gas He concentration in the Xiaoguanshan Fault is the highest in the north of the fault and smaller in the south-central part of the fault. The spatial distribution of He concentration in the north parts of the two faults is higher than that in the middle and south parts of the fault, which is closely related to the difference of regional activity of the faults. In combination with previous research results on the age of fault activity, locking degree, slip rate and tectonic stress in the eastern Liupanshan Fault, it is considered that the activity of the northern segment of the fault is more intense than that of the middle and southern segments of the fault. The comparative analysis shows that the tectonic evolution process of the eastern Liupanshan Fault is similar to that of the Xiaoguanshan Fault, and both faults are thrust type. Therefore, the spatial distribution characteristics of soil gas He concentration in the two faults are consistent. Combined with previous studies, it was found that the spatial variation of soil gas He concentration measured in the eastern Liupanshan Fault was consistent with the spatial variation of soil gas Rn and CO₂ flux. The He concentration of soil gas in the eastern Liupanshan fault zone is close to that in Tangshan area, lower than that in Yanhuai Basin, the middle and southern section of Xiadian Fault and the rupture zone of Wenchuan earthquake, and higher than that in Xinbaoan-Shacheng Fault.

Key words: soil gas, He, geochemistry, tectonic activity, the eastern Liupanshan fault zone

张文亮, 李营, 刘兆飞, 胡乐, 路畅, 陈志, 韩晓昆. 六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 753-771.

ZHANG Wen-liang, LI Ying, LIU Zhao-fei, HU Le, LU Chang, CHEN Zhi, HAN Xiao-kun. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS HE CONCENTRATION IN THE EASTERN LIUPANSHAN FAULT ZONE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH TECTONIC ACTIVITY[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2023, 45(3): 753-771.

图/表 6

图 1 研究区的构造简图、地质图及地质剖面图改自文献(邓起东等, 1989; Zhang et al., 1991; 向宏发等, 1998a, b)

Fig. 1 Structural sketch, geological map and geological section of the study area.

图 2 土壤气浓度布点示意图

Fig. 2 Measuring sites for the concentration of soil gases.

表 1 土壤气He浓度的测量结果

Table 1 Measurement results of the concentration of soil gas He

剖面		测点数	均值	标准差	最小值	中位数	最大值	Q1	Q3	异常上界	异常下界
孙永庄	SZ	120	5.216	0.191	4.648	5.233	5.785	5.098	5.332	5.407	5.025
海家庄	HJZ	99	6.335	0.347	5.094	6.410	6.874	5.991	6.597	6.682	5.988
杨岭村	YLC	102	4.983	0.353	3.884	4.986	5.915	4.810	5.245	5.336	4.629
六盘村	LP	87	5.240	0.517	4.258	5.155	7.472	4.873	5.537	5.757	4.722
大庄村	DZ	68	5.351	0.282	4.498	5.332	5.987	5.169	5.541	5.633	5.069
森林公园	SL	90	5.212	0.300	4.518	5.262	5.862	4.988	5.423	5.512	4.912
西贤	XX	105	5.123	0.43	3.786	5.170	5.970	4.870	5.468	5.553	4.686
刘店	LD	102	5.069	0.356	4.192	5.109	5.834	4.786	5.325	5.425	4.712
乃家河	NJ	108	5.235	0.343	4.374	5.258	6.015	5.010	5.475	5.578	4.891
蒿店	HD	107	4.784	0.943	2.168	4.984	7.043	4.203	5.312	5.727	3.842
羊槽村	YC	120	4.958	0.473	3.517	4.972	6.119	4.613	5.332	5.431	4.485

图 3 研究区土壤气He浓度变化的箱线图

Fig. 3 Variation of the soil gas He concentrations in the study area.

图 4 六盘山东麓断裂和小关山断裂各个剖面的He浓度空间分布

Fig. 4 The spatial distribution of He concentration in each section of the eastern Liupanshan Fault and the Xiaoguanshan Fault.

图 5 中国不同断裂带土壤气He浓度的均值和最大值对比图 LPS 六盘山东麓断裂; XGS 小关山断裂; LMS 龙门山断裂带汶川地震地表破裂带; TS 唐山断裂带; XDZN 夏垫断裂中南段; YHPD 延怀盆地; XBA-SC 新保安-沙城断裂。数据引自文献(李营等, 2009; Zhou et al., 2010;韩晓昆等, 2013; Li et al., 2013; 盛艳蕊等, 2015)

Fig. 5 Comparison of mean and maximum values of soil gas He concentration in different fault zones in China.

参考文献 84

[1]	鲍志诚, 赵爱平, 吕坚, 等. 2022. 瑞昌-武宁活动断裂带土壤气地球化学特征[J]. 地震研究, 45(2): 249-256.
	BAO Zhi-cheng, ZHAO Ai-ping, LÜ Jian, et al. 2022. Geochemical characteristics of the soil gas in the Ruichang-Wuning active fault zone[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 45(2): 249-256. (in Chinese)
[2]	柴炽章, 马禾青, 金春华. 2003. 祁连山-六盘山地震带中强地震活动特点及震前异常特征[J]. 西北地震学报, 25(4): 67-71.
	CHAI Chi-zhang, MA He-qing, JIN Chun-hua. 2003. Features of moderate-strong earthquake activity and anomalous features before earthquakes in Qilian Mt.-Liupan Mt. earthquake belt[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 25(4): 67-71. (in Chinese)
[3]	车用太, 刘成龙, 鱼金子, 等. 2008. 汶川 M_S8.0 地震的地下流体与宏观异常及地震预测问题的思考[J]. 地震地质, 30(4): 828-838.
	CHE Yong-tai, LIU Cheng-long, YU Jin-zi, et al. 2008. Underground fluid anomaly and macro anomaly of M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and opinions about earthquake prediction[J]. Seismology and Geology, 30(4): 828-838. (in Chinese)
[4]	陈绍绪, 张跃刚, 乔子云, 等. 2003. 晋冀蒙交界地区主要断裂的现今活动[J]. 华北地震科学, 21(2): 16-22.
	CHEN Shao-xu, ZHANG Yue-gang, QIAO Zi-yun, et al. 2003. The current activity of main faults in the joint area of Shanxi, Hebei and Inner Mongolia[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 21(2): 16-22. (in Chinese)
[5]	邓起东, 张维岐, 张培震, 等. 1989. 海原走滑断裂带及其尾端挤压构造[J]. 地震地质, 11(1): 1-14.
	DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Wei-qi, ZHANG Pei-zhen, et al. 1989. Haiyuan strike-slip fault zone and its compressional structures of the end[J]. Seismology and Geology, 11(1): 1-14. (in Chinese)
[6]	杜方, 闻学泽, 冯建刚, 等. 2018. 六盘山断裂带的地震构造特征与强震危险背景[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(2): 545-559.
	DU Fang, WEN Xue-ze, FENG Jian-gang, et al. 2018. Seismo-tectonics and seismic potential of the Liupanshan fault zone(LPSFZ), China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(2): 545-559. (in Chinese)
[7]	付碧宏, 王萍, 孔屏, 等. 2008. 四川汶川5·12大地震同震滑动断层泥的发现及构造意义[J]. 岩石学报, 24(10): 2237-2243.
	FU Bi-hong, WANG Ping, KONG Ping, et al. 2008. Preliminary study of coseismic fault gouge occurred in the slip zone of the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake and its tectonic implications[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(10): 2237-2243. (in Chinese)
[8]	高小其, 蓝陵, 许秋龙, 等. 2002. 乌鲁木齐10号泉He含量变化的映震特征[J]. 四川地震, (3): 27-31.
	GAO Xiao-qi, LAN Ling, XU Qiu-long, et al. 2002. Change of He content in spring-water of Urumqi 10th well and corresponding ability to earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Research in Sichuan, (3): 27-31. (in Chinese)
[9]	郭正府, 郑国东, 孙玉涛, 等. 2017. 中国大陆地质源温室气体释放[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 36(2): 204-212, 183.
	GUO Zheng-fu, ZHENG Guo-dong, SUN Yu-tao, et al. 2017. Greenhouse gases emitted from geological sources in China[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 36(2): 204-212, 183. (in Chinese)
[10]	韩晓昆, 李营, 杜建国, 等. 2013. 夏垫断裂中南段土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 37(6): 976-982.
	HAN Xiao-kun, LI Ying, DU Jian-guo, et al. 2013. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the central south segment of Xiadian Fault[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 37(6): 976-982. (in Chinese)
[11]	郝明, 李煜航, 秦姗兰. 2017. 基于GPS数据的海原-六盘山断裂带滑动速率亏损时空分布[J]. 地震地质, 39(3): 471-484. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.03.003. DOI
	HAO Ming, LI Yu-hang, QIN Shan-lan. 2017. Spatial and temporal distribution of slip rate deficit across Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone constrained by GPS data[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(3): 471-484. (in Chinese)
[12]	蒋锋云, 季灵运, 赵强. 2021. 海原-六盘山断裂带现今地震危险性的数值模拟分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 27(2): 230-240.
	JIANG Feng-yun, JI Ling-yun, ZHAO Qiang. 2021. Numerical simulation of the present seismic risk of the Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 27(2): 230-240. (in Chinese)
[13]	江娃利, 侯治华, 肖振敏, 等. 2000. 北京平原夏垫断裂齐心庄探槽古地震事件分析[J]. 地震地质, 22(4): 413-422.
	JIANG Wa-li, HOU Zhi-hua, XIAO Zhen-min, et al. 2000. Study on paleoearthquakes of Qixinzhuang trench at the Xiadian Fault, Beijing plain[J]. Seismology and Geology, 22(4): 413-422. (in Chinese)
[14]	孔令昌, 陈文寄. 1986. 氦及其同位素比值与断层和地震活动的关系[J]. 地震地质译丛, (5): 40-42.
	KONG Ling-chang, CHEN Wen-ji. 1986. The relationship between helium and its isotope ratio with fault and seismic activity[J]. Seismic Geology Translation Series, (5): 40-42. (in Chinese)
[15]	李海兵, 王宗秀, 付小方, 等. 2008. 2008年5月12日汶川地震(M_S8.0)地表破裂带的分布特征[J]. 中国地质, 35(5): 803-813.
	LI Hai-bing, WANG Zong-xiu, FU Xiao-fang, et al. 2008. The surface rupture zone distribution of the Wenchuan earthquake(M_S8.0)happened on May 12th, 2008[J]. Geology in China, 35(5): 803-813. (in Chinese)
[16]	李强, 江在森, 武艳强, 等. 2013. 海原-六盘山断裂带现今构造变形特征[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 33(2): 18-22.
	LI Qiang, JIANG Zai-sen, WU Yan-qiang, et al. 2013. Present-day tectonic deformation characteristics of Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 33(2): 18-22. (in Chinese)
[17]	李营, 陈志, 胡乐, 等. 2022. 流体地球化学进展及其在地震预测研究中的应用[J]. 科学通报, 67(13): 1404-1420.
	LI Ying, CHEN Zhi, HU Le, et al. 2022. Advances in seismic fluid geochemistry and its application in earthquake forecasting[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 67(13): 1404-1420. (in Chinese)
[18]	李营, 杜建国, 王富宽, 等. 2009. 延怀盆地土壤气体地球化学特征[J]. 地震学报, 31(1): 82-91, 117.
	LI Ying, DU Jian-guo, WANG Fu-kuan, et al. 2009. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in Yanqing-Huailai Basin, North China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 31(1): 82-91, 117. (in Chinese)
[19]	林茂炳, 吴山. 1991. 龙门山推覆构造变形特征[J]. 成都地质学院学报, 18(1): 46-55.
	LIN Mao-bing, WU Shan. 1991. Deformational features of nappe structure in the Longmenshan Mountains[J]. Journal of Chengdu College of Geology, 18(1): 46-55. (in Chinese)
[20]	刘亢, 曲国胜, 房立华, 等. 2015. 唐山古冶、滦县地区中小地震活动与构造关系研究[J]. 地震, 35(2): 111-120.
	LIU Kang, QU Guo-sheng, FANG Li-hua, et al. 2015. Relationship between tectonics and small to moderate earthquakes in Guye and Luanxian area, Hebei Province[J]. Earthquake, 35(2): 111-120. (in Chinese)
[21]	刘兆飞, 李营, 陈志, 等. 2019. 吉兰泰断陷盆地周缘断裂带气体释放及其对断层活动性的指示意义[J]. 地震学报, 41(5): 613-632, 680.
	LIU Zhao-fei, LI Ying, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2019. Gas emission from active fault zones around the Jilantai faulted depression basin and its implications for fault activities[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(5): 613-632, 680. (in Chinese)
[22]	庞亚瑾, 杨少华, 李海兵, 等. 2019. 青藏高原东北缘海原-六盘山断裂带现今地壳应力环境的数值分析[J]. 岩石学报, 35(6): 1848-1856.
	PANG Ya-jin, YANG Shao-hua, LI Hai-bing, et al. 2019. Numerical modeling of current crustal stress state in Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault system of the NE Tibet[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 35(6): 1848-1856. (in Chinese) DOI URL
[23]	盛艳蕊, 张子广, 周晓成, 等. 2015. 新保安-沙城断裂带土壤气地球化学特征分析[J]. 地震, 35(4): 90-98.
	SHENG Yan-rui, ZHANG Zi-guang, ZHOU Xiao-cheng, et al. 2015. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in Xinbaoan-Shacheng fault zone[J]. Earthquake, 35(4): 90-98. (in Chinese)
[24]	史志刚, 李廷栋, 袁道阳, 等. 2014. 六盘山东麓断裂南段断裂沟槽韵律沉积特征对最新活动时代的限定[J]. 地球学报, 35(1): 31-37.
	SHI Zhi-gang, LI Ting-dong, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. 2014. The recent active time of the south segment of the eastern Liupanshan piedmont fault: Constraints from the characteristics of rhythmic deposits in the fault grooves[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 35(1): 31-37. (in Chinese)
[25]	王登红, 毛景文. 1996. 氦同位素地质研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 15(2): 51-56.
	WANG Deng-hong, MAO Jing-wen. 1996. Advances in the studies of helium isotopes geology[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 15(2): 51-56. (in Chinese)
[26]	王广才, 张作辰, 汪民, 等. 2003. 延怀盆地地下热水与稀有气体的地球化学特征[J]. 地震地质, 25(3): 421-429.
	WANG Guang-cai, ZHANG Zuo-chen, WANG Min, et al. 2003. Geochemistry of geothermal water and noble gases in Yanhuai Basin, China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 25(3): 421-429. (in Chinese)
[27]	王喜龙, 李营, 杜建国, 等. 2017. 首都圈地区土壤气Rn, Hg, CO₂地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 地震学报, 39(1): 85-101, 155.
	WANG Xi-long, LI Ying, DU Jian-guo, et al. 2017. Geochemical characteristics of soil gases Rn, Hg, CO₂ and their genesis in the capital area of China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 39(1): 85-101, 155. (in Chinese)
[28]	王小娟, 韩晓昆, 陈志, 等. 2016. 六盘山东麓断裂带逸出气氡浓度特征分析[J]. 地震工程学报, 38(S2): 276-281.
	WANG Xiao-juan, HAN Xiao-kun, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2016. Characteristic analysis of escape gas radon concentration from the eastern Liupanshan piedmont fault zone[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 38(S2): 276-281. (in Chinese)
[29]	王永才, 孙香荣. 1992. 河北及邻近地区地下水溶解二氧化碳、氢和氦分布的地震地质特征[J]. 华北地震科学, 10(2): 58-66.
	WANG Yong-cai, SUN Xiang-rong. 1992. Seismogeological features of the dissolved CO₂, H₂ and He in groundwater in Hebei Province and its adjacent area[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 10(2): 58-66. (in Chinese)
[30]	吴玉涛, 杨为民, 谭成轩, 等. 2018. 延怀盆地隐伏断裂第四纪活动性研究[J]. 华北地震科学, 36(4): 1-9.
	WU Yu-tao, YANG Wei-min, TAN Cheng-xuan, et al. 2018. Quaternary activity of buried fault in Yanhuai Basin[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 36(4): 1-9. (in Chinese)
[31]	向宏发, 方仲景, 徐杰, 等. 1988. 三河-平谷8级地震区的构造背景与大震重复性研究[J]. 地震地质, 10(1): 15-28.
	XIANG Hong-fa, FANG Zhong-jing, XU Jie, et al. 1988. Study on the tectonic background and large earthquake repeatability of Sanhe-Pinggu M8 earthquake zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 10(1): 15-28. (in Chinese)
[32]	向宏发, 虢顺民, 张秉良, 等. 1998a. 六盘山东麓地区活动构造研究[J]. 国际地震动态, (7): 24-27.
	XIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, ZHANG Bing-liang, et al. 1998a. Research on the active structure of the eastern foot of Liupanshan Mountains[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (7): 24-27. (in Chinese)
[33]	向宏发, 虢顺民, 张秉良, 等. 1998b. 六盘山东麓活动逆断裂构造带晚第四纪以来的活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 20(4): 321-327.
	XIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, ZHANG Bing-liang, et al. 1998b. Active features of the eastern Liupanshan piedmont reverse fault zone since late Quaternary[J]. Seismology and Geology, 20(4): 321-327. (in Chinese)
[34]	谢富仁, 舒塞兵, 窦素芹, 等. 2000. 海原-六盘山断裂带至银川断陷第四纪构造应力场分析[J]. 地震地质, 22(2): 139-146.
	XIE Fu-ren, SHU Sai-bing, DOU Su-qin, et al. 2000. Quaternary tectonic stress field in the region of Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone to Yinchuan fault-depression[J]. Seismology and Geology, 22(2): 139-146. (in Chinese)
[35]	谢富仁, 张红艳, 崔效锋, 等. 2007. 延怀盆地活动断裂运动与现代构造应力场[J]. 地震地质, 29(4): 693-705.
	XIE Fu-ren, ZHANG Hong-yan, CUI Xiao-feng, et al. 2007. Active fault movement and recent tectonic stress field in Yanhuai Basin[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(4): 693-705. (in Chinese)
[36]	徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 叶建青, 等. 2008. 汶川 M_S8.0 地震地表破裂带及其发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 30(3): 597-629.
	XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, YE Jian-qing, et al. 2008. The M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake surface ruptures and its seismogenic structure[J]. Seismology and Geology, 30(3): 597-629. (in Chinese)
[37]	杨江, 李营, 陈志, 等. 2019. 唐山断裂带南西段和北东段土壤气Rn和CO₂浓度特征[J]. 地震, 39(3): 61-70.
	YANG Jiang, LI Ying, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2019. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the south-west and north-east segments of the Tangshan fault zone, northern China[J]. Earthquake, 39(3): 61-70. (in Chinese)
[38]	詹艳, 赵国泽, 王继军, 等. 2005. 青藏高原东北缘海原弧形构造区地壳电性结构探测研究[J]. 地震学报, 27(4): 431-440, 466.
	ZHAN Yan, ZHAO Guo-ze, WANG Ji-jun, et al. 2005. Crustal electric structure of Haiyuan arcuate tectonic region in the northeastern margin of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 27(4): 431-440, 466. (in Chinese)
[39]	张秉良, 向宏发, 虢顺民, 等. 2000. 六盘山东麓断裂断层泥的组构特征及其意义[J]. 地震地质, 22(1): 47-52.
	ZHANG Bing-liang, XIANG Hong-fa, GUO Shun-min, et al. 2000. The fabric of fault gouge from the eastern Liupanshan piedmont fault zone and their implication[J]. Seismology and Geology, 22(1): 47-52. (in Chinese)
[40]	张宏志, 刁桂苓, 陈祺福, 等. 2008. 1976年唐山7.8级地震震区现今地震震源机制分析[J]. 地震研究, 31(1): 1-6, 99.
	ZHANG Hong-zhi, DIAO Gui-ling, CHEN Qi-fu, et al. 2008. Focal mechanism analysis of the recent earthquake in Tangshan seismic region of M7.8 in 1976[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 31(1): 1-6, 99. (in Chinese)
[41]	张慧, 张新基, 苏鹤军, 等. 2010. 兰州市活动断层土壤气汞、氡地球化学特征场地试验[J]. 西北地震学报, 32(3): 273-278.
	ZHANG Hui, ZHANG Xin-ji, SU He-jun, et al. 2010. Field test on the geochemical features of radon and mercury from soil gas on the active faults in Lanzhou[J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 32(3): 273-278. (in Chinese)
[42]	张培震, 郑德文, 尹功明, 等. 2006. 有关青藏高原东北缘晚新生代扩展与隆升的讨论[J]. 第四纪研究, 25(1): 5-13.
	ZHANG Pei-zhen, ZHENG De-wen, YIN Gong-ming, et al. 2006. Discussion on Late Cenozoic growth and rise of northeastern margin of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 25(1): 5-13. (in Chinese)
[43]	张晓亮, 师昭梦, 蒋锋云, 等. 2011. 海原-六盘山弧型断裂及其附近最新构造变形演化分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 31(3): 20-24.
	ZHANG Xiao-liang, SHI Zhao-meng, JIANG Feng-yun, et al. 2011. Research on late tectonic deformation evolvement of Huaiyuan-Liupanshan arc fault and its surrounding area[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 31(3): 20-24. (in Chinese)
[44]	赵元鑫, 李营, 陈志, 等. 2022. 唐山断裂带气体组分变异函数空间分布特征[J]. 地震, 42(1): 18-32.
	ZHAO Yuan-xin, LI Ying, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2022. The spatial characteristics of gas composition variogram in the area of Tangshan fault zones[J]. Earthquake, 42(1): 18-32. (in Chinese)
[45]	周晓成, 杜建国, 陈志, 等. 2012. 地震地球化学研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 31(4): 340-346.
	ZHOU Xiao-cheng, DU Jian-guo, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2012. Advance review of seismic geochemistry[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 31(4): 340-346. (in Chinese)
[46]	周晓成, 郭文生, 杜建国, 等. 2007. 呼和浩特地区隐伏断层土壤气氡、汞地球化学特征[J]. 地震, 27(1): 70-76.
	ZHOU Xiao-cheng, GUO Wen-sheng, DU Jian-guo, et al. 2007. The geochemical characteristics of radon and mercury in the soil gas of buried faults in the Hohhot district[J]. Earthquake, 27(1): 70-76. (in Chinese)
[47]	周晓成, 孙凤霞, 陈志, 等. 2017. 汶川 M_S8.0 地震破裂带CO₂、 CH₄、 Rn和Hg脱气强度[J]. 岩石学报, 33(1): 291-303.
	ZHOU Xiao-cheng, SUN Feng-xia, CHEN Zhi, et al. 2017. Degassing of CO₂, CH₄, Rn and Hg in the rupture zones produced by Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 33(1): 291-303. (in Chinese)
[48]	Annunziatellis A, Beaubien S E, Bigi S, et al. 2008. Gas migration along fault systems and through the vadose zone in the Latera caldera(central Italy): Implications for CO₂ geological storage[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(3): 353-372. DOI URL
[49]	Bauer S, Gardner W, Lee H. 2016. Release of radiogenic noble gases as a new signal of rock deformation[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20): 10688-10694. DOI URL
[50]	Buttitta D, Caracausi A, Chiaraluce L, et al. 2020. Continental degassing of helium in an active tectonic setting(northern Italy): The role of seismicity[J]. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 162-175. DOI PMID
[51]	Caracausi A, Buttitta D, Picozzi M, et al. 2022. Earthquakes control the impulsive nature of crustal helium degassing to the atmosphere[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1): 224-232.
[52]	Chen Z, Li Y, Giovanni M, et al. 2020. Spatial and temporal variations of CO₂ emissions from the active fault zones in the capital area of China[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 112(C): 104489. DOI URL
[53]	Chen Z, Li Y, Liu Z F, et al. 2018. Radon emission from soil gases in the active fault zones in the capital of China and its environmental effects[J]. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 16772. DOI PMID
[54]	Chen Z, Li Y, Liu Z F, et al. 2022. Geochemical and geophysical effects of tectonic activity in faulted areas of the North China Craton[J]. Chemical Geology, 609: 121048. DOI URL
[55]	Chen Z, Zhou X C, Du J G, et al. 2015. Hydrochemical characteristics of hot spring waters in the Kangding district related to the Lushan M_S=7.0 earthquake in Sichuan, China[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 15(6): 1149-1156. DOI URL
[56]	Cheng B, Zhao D P, Cheng S Y, et al. 2016. Seismic tomography and anisotropy of the Helan-Liupan tectonic belt: Insight into lower crustal flow and seismotectonics[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(4): 2608-2635. DOI URL
[57]	Ciotoli G, Lombardi S, Annunziatellis A. 2007. Geostatistical analysis of soil gas data in a high seismic intermontane basin: Fucino Plain, central Italy[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112(B5): 2637-2655.
[58]	Cui Y, Du J, Zhang D, et al. 2013. Anomalies of total column CO and O₃ associated with great earthquakes in recent years[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(10): 2513-2519. DOI URL
[59]	Etiope G, Martinelli G. 2002. Migration of carrier and trace gases in the geosphere: An overview[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 129(3): 185-204. DOI URL
[60]	Fu C C, Yang T F, Du J, et al. 2008. Variations of helium and radon concentrations in soil gases from an active fault zone in southern Taiwan[J]. Radiation Measurements, 43(S1): S348-S352. DOI URL
[61]	Ghosh D, Deb A, Sengupta R. 2009. Anomalous radon emission as precursor of earthquake[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 69(2): 67-81. DOI URL
[62]	Guo X Y, Gao R, Wang H Y, et al. 2015. Crustal architecture beneath the Tibet-Ordos transition zone, NE Tibet, and the implications for plateau expansion[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(24): 10631-10639.
[63]	Han X K, Li Y, DU J G, et al. 2014. Rn and CO₂ geochemistry of soil gas across the active fault zones in the capital area of China[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 1414(10): 2803-2815.
[64]	King C Y. 1986. Gas geochemistry applied to earthquake prediction: An overview[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91(B12): 12269-12281.
[65]	Li Y C, Shan X J, Qu C Y, et al. 2016. Fault locking and slip rate deficit of the Haiyuan-Liupanshan fault zone in the northeastern margin of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 12: 47-57.
[66]	Li Y, Du J G, Wang X, et al. 2013. Spatial variations of soil gas geochemistry in the Tangshan area, northern China[J]. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 24(3): 323-332. DOI URL
[67]	Liu Z, Li Y, Chen Z, et al. 2022. Environmental impacts of ²²²Rn, Hg and CO₂ emissions from the fault zones in the western margin of the Ordos block, China[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 45(2): 457-472. DOI
[68]	Mahajan S, Walia V, Bajwa B S, et al. 2010. Soil-gas radon/helium surveys in some neotectonic areas of NW Himalayan foothills, India[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10(6): 1221-1227.
[69]	Papp B, Deák F, Horváth Á, et al. 2008. A new method for the determination of geophysical parameter by radon concentration measurements in bore-hole[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99(11): 1731-1735. DOI PMID
[70]	Reimer G M. 1980. Use of soil-gas helium concentrations for earthquake prediction: Limitations imposed by diurnal variation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85(B6): 3107-3114. DOI URL
[71]	Roques C, Weber U W, Bernard K H, et al. 2020. In situ observation of helium and argon release during fluid-pressure-triggered rock deformation[J]. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 6949. DOI PMID
[72]	Sano Y, Takahata N, Igarashi G, et al. 1998. Helium degassing related to the Kobe earthquake[J]. Chemical Geology, 150(1): 171-179. DOI URL
[73]	Sun X L, Yang P T, Xiang Y, et al. 2018. Across-fault distributions of radon concentrations in soil gas for different tectonic environments[J]. Geosciences Journal, 22(2): 227-239. DOI
[74]	Tamburello G, Pondrelli S, Chiodini G, et al. 2018. Global-scale control of extensional tectonics on CO₂ earth degassing[J]. Nature communications, 9(1): 4608. DOI PMID
[75]	Toutain J P, Baubron J C. 1999. Gas geochemistry and seismotectonics: A review[J]. Tectonophysics, 304(1): 1-27. DOI URL
[76]	Umeda K, Asamori K, Kusano T. 2013. Release of mantle and crustal helium from a fault following an inland earthquake[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 37: 134-141. DOI URL
[77]	Wang C Y, Sandvol E, Zhu L, et al. 2014. Lateral variation of crustal structure in the Ordos block and surrounding regions, North China, and its tectonic implications[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 387: 198-211. DOI URL
[78]	Woodruff L G, Cannon W F, Eberl D D, et al. 2009. Continental-scale patterns in soil geochemistry and mineralogy: Results from two transects across the United States and Canada[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 24(8): 1369-1381. DOI URL
[79]	Zhang P Z, Burchfiel B C, Molnar P, et al. 1991. Amount and style of Late Cenozoic deformation in the Liupan Shan area, Ningxia Autonomous Region, China[J]. Tectonics, 10(6): 1111-1129. DOI URL
[80]	Zheng W J, Zhang P Z, He W G, et al. 2013. Transformation of displacement between strike-slip and crustal shortening in the northern margin of the Tibetan plateau: Evidence from decadal GPS measurements and late Quaternary slip rates on faults[J]. Tectonophysics, 584: 267-280. DOI URL
[81]	Zhou H, Su H, Zhang H, et al. 2020. Geochemical characteristics of soil gas and strong seismic hazard potential in the Liupanshan fault zone(LPSFZ)[J]. Geofluids, (7): 4917924.
[82]	Zhou X C, Chen Z, Cui Y J. 2016. Environmental impact of CO₂, Rn, Hg degassing from the rupture zones produced by Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake in western Sichuan, China[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 38(5): 1067-1082. DOI URL
[83]	Zhou X C, Du J G, Chen Z, et al. 2010. Geochemistry of soil gas in the seismic fault zone produced by the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake, southwestern China[J]. Geochemical Transactions, 11(1): 5-15. DOI
[84]	Zhu M, Zhou R G, Yin D X, et al. 2003. Stress emission of helium and argon in coal seams[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 46(6): 547-560. DOI URL

六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL GAS HE CONCENTRATION IN THE EASTERN LIUPANSHAN FAULT ZONE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH TECTONIC ACTIVITY

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 84

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李营, 方震, 张晨蕾, 李继业, 鲍志诚, 张翔, 刘兆飞, 周晓成, 陈志, 杜建国. 地震流体地球化学短临预测研究进展与展望[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 593-621.
[2]	蒋雨函, 王子思, 刘佳琪, 梁卉, 周启超, 高小其. 中国地震断裂带氢气观测研究现状[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 622-637.
[3]	申华梁, 杨耀, 周志华, 芮雪莲, 廖晓峰, 赵德杨, 梁明剑, 陈梦蝶, 官致君, 任宏微. 川西理塘毛垭温泉群的成因及深部地热过程[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 689-709.
[4]	王喜龙, 罗银花, 金秀英, 杨梦尧, 孔祥瑞. 辽南地区断裂带的断层土壤气地球化学特征及其对区域应力调整的指示[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 710-734.
[5]	王江, 陈志, 张帆, 张志相, 张素欣. 雄安新区主要断裂带土壤气体的Rn与CO₂脱气特征[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 735-752.
[6]	王博, 崔凤珍, 刘静, 周永胜, 徐胜, 邵延秀. 玛多 M_S7.4地震断层土壤气特征与地表破裂的相关性[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 772-794.
[7]	朱治国, 祝意青, 王东振, 艾力夏提·玉山. 2020年伽师M_S6.4地震重力与地壳形变综合分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 269-285.
[8]	李昭, 付碧宏. 东昆仑断裂带玛沁-玛曲段晚第四纪构造活动特征的地貌响应定量研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1421-1447.
[9]	蒋雨函, 高小其, 杨朋涛, 刘冬英, 孙小龙, 向阳, 朱成英, 汪成国. 新疆北天山地区断裂带断层土壤气的地球化学特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1597-1614.
[10]	朱成英, 闫玮, 麻荣, 李志海, 汪成国, 黄建明, 周晓成. 2017年8月9日精河M_S6.6地震宏观烈度及其余震分布的断层气体地球化学表征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1225-1239.
[11]	周秉锐, 潘波, 尹成孝, 张哲宇, 颜丽丽. 基于MELTS模型的长白山天池火山岩浆演化过程的新认识[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 831-844.
[12]	王博, 周永胜, 钟骏, 胡小静, 张翔, 周青云, 李旭茂. 滇西北断裂带土壤气地球化学特征及对断层活动性的启示[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 428-447.
[13]	路畅, 周晓成, 李营, 刘磊, 颜玉聪, 徐岳仁. 玛多M_S7.4 地表破裂带与东昆仑断裂温泉的水文地球化学特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1101-1126.
[14]	文翔, 周斌, 史水平, 覃坚, 李家宁, 何衍, 阎春恒, 罗远鹏. 桂西北地区近期重力与地壳形变综合分析[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(4): 927-943.
[15]	熊诚, 谢祖军, 郑勇, 熊熊, 艾三喜, 谢仁先. 大别—郯庐造山带地壳上地幔Rayleigh面波层析成像[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 1-20.