2021年青海玛多MW7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.03.013

地震地质 ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 677-691.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2021.03.013

• 云南漾濞6.4级地震与青海玛多7.4级地震研究专题 • 上一篇下一篇

2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动

华俊^1,2), 赵德政¹⁾, 单新建^1),*, 屈春燕¹⁾, 张迎峰¹⁾, 龚文瑜¹⁾, 王振杰²⁾, 李成龙¹⁾, 李彦川¹⁾, 赵磊¹⁾, 陈晗^1,3), 范晓冉¹⁾, 王绍俊¹⁾

1)中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2)中国石油大学(华东), 海洋与空间信息学院, 青岛 266580;
3)河南理工大学, 测绘与国土信息工程学院, 焦作 454003

收稿日期:2021-06-08 修回日期:2021-06-26 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2021-07-20
作者简介:华俊, 男, 1996年生, 2019年于中国石油大学(华东)获测绘工程专业学士学位, 现为中国石油大学(华东)海洋与空间信息学院和中国地震局地质研究所联合培养测绘科学与技术专业在读硕士研究生, 主要从事InSAR技术在地震及地壳形变领域的应用研究, 电话: 17854291150, E-mail: 17854291150@163.com。*单新建, 男, 1966年生, 博士, 研究员, 博士生导师, 主要从事地壳运动与动力学、发震断层参数特征获取分析、震间-同震-震后活动构造变形演化与地震危险性分析、震源破裂特征联合反演、多源遥感(InSAR、热红外、高光谱)与断层活动性等方面的研究工作, E-mail: xjshan@163.com。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1509200)、国家自然科学基金(41872229)、中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA2104,IGCEA1809)和地震动力学国家重点实验室课题(LED2019A02)共同资助

COSEISMIC DEFORMATION FIELD, SLIP DISTRIBUTION AND COULOMB STRESS DISTURBANCE OF THE 2021 M_W7.3 MADUO EARTHQUAKE USING SENTINEL-1 INSAR OBSERVATIONS

HUA Jun^1,2), ZHAO De-zheng¹⁾, SHAN Xin-jian¹⁾, QU Chun-yan¹⁾, ZHANG Ying-feng¹⁾, GONG Wen-yu¹⁾, WANG Zhen-jie²⁾, LI Cheng-long¹⁾, LI Yan-chuan¹⁾, ZHAO Lei¹⁾, CHEN Han^1,3), FAN Xiao-ran¹⁾, WANG Shao-jun¹⁾

1)The State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2)College of Marine and Space Information in China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China;
3)School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China

Received:2021-06-08 Revised:2021-06-26 Online:2021-06-20 Published:2021-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文中基于D-InSAR技术, 利用欧空局C波段升降轨哨兵SAR数据, 获取了2021年5月22日青海玛多M_W7.3地震的InSAR同震形变场, 并对同震形变的空间特征、量级和断层破裂的分段性进行了分析。哨兵卫星的高质量观测数据清晰地描绘了玛多地震的地表破裂迹线, 地表破裂长度约210km。为了进一步认识玛多地震断层深部的同震滑动分布特征和发震断层几何性质, 基于升、降轨InSAR形变场及精定位余震数据确定的断层几何反演了同震滑动分布, 并基于同震库仑应力变化分析了本次地震对周边区域的应力扰动。结果表明, 玛多M_W7.3地震发生在巴颜喀拉块体内部的一条次级断层上, 且与东昆仑断裂带的主断裂近平行, 结合野外考察、地质资料和InSAR地表破裂迹线确定的发震断层为昆仑山口-江错断裂。玛多地震产生的同震形变场空间影响范围广, 形变场的长轴呈NWW向, 升、降轨观测的形变量符号相反, 结合哨兵数据的观测几何确定发震断层的运动性质以左旋走滑为主。基于升、降轨InSAR数据得到的最大视线向(Line of Sight, LOS)形变量约为0.9m。同震滑动分布模型显示, 整体上断层的走向为276°, 倾角为80°, 倾向NE, 最大滑移量约为6m, 平均滑动角为4°, 矩震级为M_W7.45, 地震主体破裂发生在0~10km深度范围内, 同震破裂至地表, 与野外考察所观测到的广泛分布的同震地表破裂带一致。以玛多-甘德断裂为接收断层的同震库仑应力模型显示, 玛多地震在玛多-甘德断裂西段附近产生了明显的应力降, 表明玛多地震释放了玛多-甘德断裂的库仑应力, 导致后者的地震危险性可能大大降低; 而在玛多-甘德断裂和昆仑山口-江错断裂交叉的区域存在应力加载效应, 但考虑到玛多地震的余震会释放多余的能量, 该区发生较大地震的危险性可能降低。以东昆仑断裂为接收断层的同震库仑应力模型显示, 玛多地震在东昆仑断裂东段附近产生了明显的应力加载效应, 结合该段震间较高的应变率特征, 其地震危险性需要引起关注。

关键词: 玛多地震, InSAR同震形变场, 断层滑动分布反演, 库仑应力, 地震危险性

Abstract: InSAR coseismic deformation fields caused by the Maduo M_W7.3 earthquake occurring on May 22, 2021 were generated using the C-band Sentinel-1A/B SAR images with D-InSAR technology. The spatial characteristics, magnitude of coseismic deformation and segmentation of the seismogenic fault were analyzed. The surface rupture trace was depicted clearly by InSAR observations. In addition, the coseismic slip distribution inversion was carried out constrained by both ascending and descending InSAR deformation fields and relocated aftershocks to understand the characteristics of deep fault slip and geometry of the seismogenic fault. The regional stress disturbance was analyzed based on coseismic Coulomb stress change. The results show that the Maduo M_W7.3 earthquake occurred on a secondary fault within the Bayan Har block which is almost parallel to the main fault trace of the Kunlun Fault. According to field investigation, geological data and InSAR surface rupture traces, the seismogenic fault is confirmed to be the Kunlunshankou-Jiangcuo Fault. The rupture length of seismogenic fault is estimated to be~210km. The NWW direction is followed by the overall displacement field, which indicates a left-lateral strike-slip movement of seismogenic fault. The maximum displacement is about 0.9m in LOS direction observed by both ascending and descending InSAR data. The inversion result denotes that the strike of the seismogenic fault is 276°and the dip angle is 80°. The maximum slip is about 6m and the average rake is 4°. The predicted moment magnitude is M_W7.45, which is overall consistent with the result of GCMT. An obvious slip-concentrated area is located at the depth of 0~10km. The coseismic Coulomb stress change with the East Kunlun Fault as the receiver fault shows that the Maduo earthquake produced obvious stress increase near the eastern segment of the East Kunlun Fault. Thus the seismic risk increases based on the high interseismic strain rate along this segment, which should receive more attention. In addition, the coseismic Coulomb stress change with the Maduo-Gande Fault as the receiving fault indicates that the Maduo earthquake produced an obvious stress drop near the western part of the Maduo-Gande Fault, which indicates that the Maduo earthquake released the Coulomb stress of the Maduo-Gande Fault, and its seismic risk may be greatly reduced. However, there is a stress loading effect in the intersection area of the Maduo-Gande Fault and the Kunlunshankou-Jiangcuo Fault. Considering that aftershocks of Maduo earthquake will release excess energy, the greater earthquake risk may be reduced.

Key words: Maduo earthquake, InSAR coseismic deformation field, coseismic slip distribution inversion, Coulomb stress, seismic hazard

中图分类号:

P315.2

华俊, 赵德政, 单新建, 屈春燕, 张迎峰, 龚文瑜, 王振杰, 李成龙, 李彦川, 赵磊, 陈晗, 范晓冉, 王绍俊. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 677-691.

HUA Jun, ZHAO De-zheng, SHAN Xin-jian, QU Chun-yan, ZHANG Ying-feng, GONG Wen-yu, WANG Zhen-jie, LI Cheng-long, LI Yan-chuan, ZHAO Lei, CHEN Han, FAN Xiao-ran, WANG Shao-jun. COSEISMIC DEFORMATION FIELD, SLIP DISTRIBUTION AND COULOMB STRESS DISTURBANCE OF THE 2021 M_W7.3 MADUO EARTHQUAKE USING SENTINEL-1 INSAR OBSERVATIONS[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2021, 43(3): 677-691.

参考文献

[1] 邓起东, 程绍平, 马冀, 等. 2014. 青藏高原地震活动特征及当前地震活动形势[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(7): 2025—2042.
DENG Qi-dong, CHENG Shao-ping, MA Ji, et al. 2014. Seismic activities and earthquake potential in the Tibetan plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(7): 2025—2042(in Chinese).
[2] 付真, 胡才博, 张海明, 等. 2014. 利用地表变形直接推算地震断层破裂深度[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 44(5): 919—927.
FU Zhen, HU Cai-bo, ZHANG Hai-ming, et al. 2014. Direct estimation of rupture depths of earthquake faults from coseismic surface deformation[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 44(5): 919—927(in Chinese).
[3] 季灵运, 刘传金, 徐晶, 等. 2017. 九寨沟M_S7.0地震的InSAR观测及发震构造分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(10): 4069—4082.
JI Ling-yun, LIU Chuan-jin, XU Jing, et al. 2017. InSAR observation and inversion of the seismogenic fault for the 2017 Jiuzhaogou M_S7.0 earthquake in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(10): 4609—4082(in Chinese).
[4] 刘斌. 2013. InSAR高精度观测地震形变场及其三维重建技术研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.
LIU Bin. 2013. Methods for monitoring displacement field of earthquake with high-precision and constructing 3D coseismic maps using InSAR [D]. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin(in Chinese).
[5] 刘琦. 2019. 汶川8.0级和芦山7.0级地震对区域地壳形变场及应力场的影响[J]. 国际地震动态, 484(4): 45—47.
LIU Qi. 2019. Influence of Wenchuan M_S8.0 and Lushan M_S7.0 earthquakes on regional crustal deformation and stress field[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, 484(4): 45—47(in Chinese).
[6] 刘云华, 单新建, 张迎峰, 等. 2018. 基于地震波及InSAR数据的2017年11月18日西藏米林M_S6.9地震发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 40(6): 1254—1275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2018.06.005.
LIU Yun-hua, SHAN Xin-jian, ZHANG Ying-feng, et al. 2018. Use of seismic waveforms and InSAR data for determination of the seismotectonics of the Mainling M_S6.9 earthquake on Nov.18, 2017[J]. Seismology and Geology, 40(6): 1254—1275(in Chinese).
[7] 屈春燕, 左荣虎, 单新建, 等. 2017. 尼泊尔M_W7.8地震InSAR同震形变场及断层滑动分布[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(1): 151—162.
QU Chun-yan, ZUO Rong-hu, SHAN Xin-jian, et al. 2017. Coseismic deformation field of the Nepal M_S8.1 earthquake from Sentinel-1 A/ InSAR data and fault slip inversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(1): 151—162(in Chinese).
[8] 沙海军, 吕悦军, 黄帅. 2018. 2017年九寨沟7.0级地震断层破裂尺度初步研究[J]. 震灾防御技术, 13(4): 921—930.
SHA Hai-jun, LÜ Yue-jun, HUANG Shuai. 2018. Preliminary study of fault rupture scale of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou M_S7.0 earthquake[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 13(4): 921—930(in Chinese).
[9] 单新建, 屈春燕, 龚文瑜, 等. 2017. 2017年8月8日四川九寨沟7.0级地震InSAR同震形变场及断层滑动分布反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(12): 4527—4536.
SHAN Xin-jian, QU Chun-yan, GONG Wen-yu, et al. 2017. Coseismic deformation field of the Jiuzhaigou M_S7.0 earthquake from Sentinel-1 A InSAR data and fault slip inversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(12): 4527—4536(in Chinese).
[10] 姚鑫, 周振凯, 李凌婧, 等. 2017. 2017年四川九寨沟M_S7.0地震InSAR同震形变场及发震构造探讨[J]. 地质力学学报, 23(4): 507—514.
YAO Xin, ZHOU Zhen-kai, LI Ling-jing, et al. 2017. InSAR co-seismic deformation of 2017 M_S7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and discussions on seismogenic tectonics[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(4): 507—514(in Chinese).
[11] 张国宏, 屈春燕, 宋小刚, 等. 2010. 基于InSAR同震形变场反演汶川M_W7.9地震断层滑动分布[J]. 地球物理学报, 53(2): 269—279.
ZHANG Guo-hong, QU Chun-yan, SONG Xiao-gang, et al. 2010. Slip distribution and source parameters inverted from co-seismic deformation derived by InSAR technology of Wenchuan M_W7.9 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53(2): 269—279(in Chinese).
[12] 张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 33(S1): 12—20.
ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. 2003. Strong earthquake activity and active blocks in Chinese mainland[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 33(S1): 12—20(in Chinese).
[13] 赵雪. 2019. 2017年九寨沟地震同震滑动分布及其对邻近断层库仑应力的影响 [D]. 成都: 西南交通大学.
ZHAO Xue. 2019. Coseismic slip distribution of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its influence on Coulomb stress of adjacent faults [D]. Southewest Jiaotong University, Chengdu(in Chinese).
[14] Galland O, Bertelsen H S, Guldstrand F, et al. 2016. Application of open-source photogrammetric software MicMac for monitoring surface deformation in laboratory models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(4): 2852—2872.
[15] Lin J, Stein R S. 2004. Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B2): B02303.
[16] Okada Y. 1985. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4): 1135—1154.
[17] Staniewicz S, Chen J. 2020. Accurate InSAR surface deformation mapping over the oil-producing Permian basin with automated tropospheric outlier removal[C]. IGARSS 2020. 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium: IEEE: 2153—7003.
[18] Toda S, Stein R S, Richards-Dinger K, et al. 2005. Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110(B5): B05S16.
[19] Wang R, Motagh M, Walter T R. 2008. Inversion of slip distribution from co-seismic deformation data by a sensitivity-based iterative fitting method[C]. EGU General Assembly 2008, 10: EGU2008-A-07971.
[20] Werner C, Wegmüller U, Strozzi T, et al. 2000. GAMMA SAR and interferometric processing software[C]. Proceedings of ERS-ENVISAT Symposium, Gothenburg, Sweden: 1620.

2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动

COSEISMIC DEFORMATION FIELD, SLIP DISTRIBUTION AND COULOMB STRESS DISTURBANCE OF THE 2021 M_W7.3 MADUO EARTHQUAKE USING SENTINEL-1 INSAR OBSERVATIONS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈鲲, 高孟潭, 俞言祥, 徐伟进, 杜义, 李雪靖, 陆东华. 融合三维断层源和二维潜在震源区的随机抽样概率地震危险性分析算法研发[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 435-454.
[2]	于书媛, 黄显良, 郑海刚, 李玲利, 骆佳骥, 丁娟, 范晓冉. 2022年门源M_W6.7地震的同震破裂模型及应力研究[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 286-303.
[3]	于书媛, 张国宏, 张迎峰, 丁娟, 张建龙, 范晓冉, 王绍俊. InSAR数据约束的2021年西藏比如M_W5.8地震同震滑动分布及库仑应力变化[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1190-1202.
[4]	姜丛, 蒋长胜, 尹欣欣, 王蕊嘉, 翟鸿宇, 张延保, 来贵娟, 尹凤玲. 水力压裂诱发地震活动中的b值时空异质性及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1333-1349.
[5]	邓文泽, 刘杰, 杨志高, 孙丽, 张雪梅. 青海玛多M_S7.4地震震源破裂过程反演结果的初步分析[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 1059-1070.
[6]	张国庆, 祝意青, 梁伟锋. 青藏高原东缘扶边河断裂周边地壳密度及垂向构造应力特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(3): 578-589.
[7]	魏延坤, 陈晓利. 不同地震滑坡危险性评价方法的适用性探讨——以玛多M_S7.4地震为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(3): 590-603.
[8]	刘小利, 夏涛, 刘静, 姚文倩, 徐晶, 邓德贝尔, 韩龙飞, 贾治革, 邵延秀, 王焱, 乐子扬, 高天琪. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震分布式同震地表裂缝特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 461-483.
[9]	韩龙飞, 刘静, 姚文倩, 王文鑫, 刘小利, 高云鹏, 邵延秀, 李金阳. 2021年玛多M_W7.4地震震中区地表破裂的精细填图及阶区内的分布式破裂讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 484-505.
[10]	邵延秀, 刘静, 高云鹏, 王文鑫, 姚文倩, 韩龙飞, 刘志军, 邹小波, 王焱, 李云帅, 刘璐. 同震地表破裂的位移测量与弥散变形分析——以2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 506-523.
[11]	姚文倩, 王子君, 刘静, 刘小利, 韩龙飞, 邵延秀, 王文鑫, 徐晶, 秦可心, 高云鹏, 王焱, 李金阳, 曾宪阳. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震同震地表破裂长度的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 541-559.
[12]	岳冲, 屈春燕, 牛安福, 赵德政, 赵静, 余怀忠, 王亚丽. 玛多M_S7.4 地震对周边断层的应力影响分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1041-1059.
[13]	徐晓雪, 季灵运, 朱良玉, 王光明, 张文婷, 李宁. 漾濞M_S6.4地震同震形变特征及发震构造探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 771-789.
[14]	谈洪波, 王嘉沛, 杨光亮, 陈正松, 吴桂桔, 申重阳, 黄金水. 2021年玛多M_S7.4地震的震后效应模拟[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 936-957.
[15]	哈广浩, 任治坤, 刘金瑞, 李智敏, 李正芳, 闵伟, 周本刚. 青海都兰地区夏日哈活动断裂带的发现及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 614-629.

2021年青海玛多MW7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动

COSEISMIC DEFORMATION FIELD, SLIP DISTRIBUTION AND COULOMB STRESS DISTURBANCE OF THE 2021 MW7.3 MADUO EARTHQUAKE USING SENTINEL-1 INSAR OBSERVATIONS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动

COSEISMIC DEFORMATION FIELD, SLIP DISTRIBUTION AND COULOMB STRESS DISTURBANCE OF THE 2021 M_W7.3 MADUO EARTHQUAKE USING SENTINEL-1 INSAR OBSERVATIONS