岩石暴露与埋藏面释光测年进展及其应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.01.014

地震地质 ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 183-192.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.01.014

岩石暴露与埋藏面释光测年进展及其应用

罗明, 陈杰, 刘进峰

中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2016-02-29 修回日期:2016-10-13 出版日期:2017-02-20 发布日期:2017-04-26
通讯作者: 陈杰,研究员,E-mail:chenjie@ies.ac.cn
作者简介:罗明,男,1989年生,2016年于中国地震局地质研究所获构造地质学硕士学位,主要从事光释光年代学、活动构造等方面的研究,电话010-62009243,E-mail:lm618655@163.com
基金资助:
中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项（IGCEA1417）与地震动力学国家重点实验室自主研究课题（LED2013A09）共同资助

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON LUMINESCENCE DATING OF ROCK SURFACES AND ITS APPLICATION

LUO Ming, CHEN Jie, LIU Jin-feng

State Key Lab of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029 China

Received:2016-02-29 Revised:2016-10-13 Online:2017-02-20 Published:2017-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

岩石暴露与埋藏面光释光测年是最近提出的一种新测年方法，其测年基本原理是当岩石暴露于太阳光下时，岩石表层的释光信号会被晒退，被晒退的深度随着岩石暴露时间的延长而增加，当岩石暴露面被沉积埋藏后其光释光信号又开始积累。利用岩石暴露（或埋藏）面残留释光信号与暴露（或埋藏）时间和深度的定量关系，就可以估算该岩石的暴露和埋藏年龄及历史。文中简要介绍了不同释光信号测定岩石暴露与埋藏面年龄的方法、进展、应用实例及存在的问题。这些研究实例表明，岩石暴露与埋藏面光释光测年方法在第四纪地质、地貌演化、考古和活动构造研究上可能具有广泛的应用前景。

关键词: 岩石, 暴露年龄, 埋藏年龄, 释光测年, 晚第四纪

Abstract:

There are many examples of exposed or buried rock surfaces whose age is of interest to geologists and archaeologists. Luminescence dating is a well-established method of absolute chronology which has been successfully applied to a wide range of fine-grained sediments from hundreds of years to several hundred thousand years. Optical stimulated luminescence (OSL) has been recently proposed as a new method to date these rock surfaces (Laskariset al., 2011; Sohbatiet al., 2012a; Chapotet al., 2012; Pedersonet al., 2014; Sohbatiet al., 2015; Freieslebenet al., 2015). The basic principle is that luminescence signal of rock surface will soon decay when the rock is exposed to sunlight. When the rock surface is turned to be buried side, the OSL signal begins to accumulate again. With the variation of residual luminescence with depth, it is possible to estimate exposure and burial history of the rock. This article describes briefly the different luminescence dating methods for rock surfaces, its progress, application examples and present problems. For instance, Sohbatiet al. (2011) studied the depth dependence of the bleaching of the IRSL signal from granitic rocks, Laskaris and Liritzis (2011) proposed a mathematical function to describe the attenuation of daylight into rock surfaces, Sohbatiet al. (2012a) developed their model to include the environmental dose rate, Sohbatiet al. (2012b) overcame the problem of parameter estimation by using a known-age road-cut sample for calibration, Sohbatiet al. (2012c) further developed the OSL surface exposure dating model by including the simultaneous effect of daylight bleaching and environmental dose rate, and so on. These studies indicate that OSL dating method for rock surface can be applied widely to studies of geological and geomorphological evolution, archeology and Quaternary tectonic activity.

Key words: rock surface, exposure age, burial age, OSL, late Quaternary

中图分类号:

P597⁺.3

罗明, 陈杰, 刘进峰. 岩石暴露与埋藏面释光测年进展及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 183-192.

LUO Ming, CHEN Jie, LIU Jin-feng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON LUMINESCENCE DATING OF ROCK SURFACES AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2017, 39(1): 183-192.

参考文献

黄费新, 刘小汉, 孔屏, 等. 2004. 东南极内陆格罗夫山地区基岩暴露年龄研究［J］. 极地研究, 16(1): 22-28.
HUANG Fei-xin, LIU Xiao-han, KONG Ping,et al. 2004. Bedrock exposure ages in the Grove Mountains, interior East Antarctica［J］. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 16(1): 22-28(in Chinese).
Aitken M J. 1998. An Introduction to Optical Dating: The Dating of Quaternary Sediments by the Use of Photon-stimulated Luminescence［M］. Oxford University Press, London. 267.
Chapot M S, Sohbati R, Murray A S,et al. 2012. Constraining the age of rock art by dating a rockfall event using sediment and rock-surface luminescence dating techniques［J］. Quaternary Geochronology, 13: 18-25.
Cockburn H A P, Summerfield M A. 2004. Geomorphological applications of cosmogenic isotope analysis［J］. Progress in Physical Geography, 28(1): 1-42.
Freiesleben H T. 2014. Developing a method for luminescence dating of rock surfaces: Developing a mathematical model to describe multiple daylight exposure and burial events for rocks and developing a preparation method for rock samples for optically stimulated luminescence dating［D］. Roskilde University, Roskilde. 76.
Freiesleben T, Sohbati R, Murray A,et al. 2015. Mathematical model quantifies multiple daylight exposure and burial events for rock surfaces using luminescence dating［J］. Radiation Measurements, 81: 16-22.
Gosse J C, Phillips F M. 2001. Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: Theory and application［J］. Quaternary Science Reviews, 20(14): 1475-1560.
Kong P, Fink D, Na C G,et al. 2009. Late Quaternary glaciation of the Tianshan, Central Asia, using cosmogenic ¹⁰Be surface exposure dating［J］. Quaternary Research, 72(2): 229-233.
Laskaris N, Liritzis I. 2011. A new mathematical approximation of sunlight attenuation in rocks for surface luminescence dating［J］. Journal of Luminescence, 131(9): 1874-1884.
Li B, Roberts R G, Jacobs Z,et al. 2014. A single-aliquot luminescence dating procedure for K-feldspar based on the dose-dependent MET-pIRIR signal sensitivity［J］. Quaternary Geochronology, 20: 51-64.
Liritzis I, Galloway R B. 1999. Dating implications from solar bleaching of thermoluminescence of ancient marble［J］. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 241(2): 361-368.
Liritzis I, Guibert P, Foti F,et al. 1997. The temple of Apollo(Delphi)strengthens novel thermoluminescence dating method［J］. Geoarchaeology, 12(5): 479-496.
Liritzis I, Vafiadou A. 2015. Surface luminescence dating of some Egyptian monuments［J］. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(2): 134-150.
Pederson J L, Chapot M S, Simms S R,et al. 2014. Age of Barrier Canyon-style rock art constrained by cross-cutting relations and luminescence dating techniques［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(36): 12986-12991.
Polikreti K, Michael C T, Maniatis Y. 2002. Authenticating marble sculpture with thermoluminescence［J］. Ancient TL, 20(1): 11-18.
Polikreti K, Michael C T, Maniatis Y. 2003. Thermoluminescence characteristics of marble and dating of freshly excavated marble objects［J］. Radiation Measurements, 37(1): 87-94.
Rhodes E J. 2011. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of sediments over the past 200000 years［J］. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 39: 461-488.
Sohbati R, Murray A S, Jain M,et al. 2011. Investigating the resetting of OSL signals in rock surfaces［J］. Geochronometria, 38(3): 249-258.
Sohbati R, Murray A S, Buylaert J P,et al. 2012a. Optically stimulated luminescence(OSL)dating of quartzite cobbles from the Tapada do Montinho archaeological site(east-central Portugal)［J］. Boreas, 41(3): 452-462.
Sohbati R, Murray A S, Chapot M S,et al. 2012b. Optically stimulated luminescence(OSL)as a chronometer for surface exposure dating［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(B9): B09202.
Sohbati R, Jain M, Murray A. 2012c. Surface exposure dating of non-terrestrial bodies using optically stimulated luminescence: A new method［J］. Icarus, 221(1): 160-166.
Sohbati R, Murray A S, Porat N,et al. 2015. Age of a prehistoric "Rodedian" cult site constrained by sediment and rock surface luminescence dating techniques［J］. Quaternary Geochronology, 30: 90-99.
Theocaris P S, Liritzis I, Galloway R B. 1997. Dating of two Hellenic Pyramids by a novel application of thermoluminescence［J］. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(5): 399-405.
Wintle A G, Huntley D J. 1979. Thermoluminescence dating of a deep-sea sediment core［J］. Nature, 279(5715): 710-712.
Wintle A G, Huntley D J. 1982. Thermoluminescence dating of sediments［J］. Quaternary Science Reviews, 1(1): 31-53.
Yuan Z D, Chen J, Owen L A,et al. 2013. Nature and timing of large landslides within an active orogen, eastern Pamir, China［J］. Geomorphology, 182: 49-65.

[1]	刘庆, 刘韶, 张世民. 大凉山断裂带中段越西断裂晚第四纪古地震[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 321-337.
[2]	左玉琦, 杨海波, 杨晓平, 詹艳, 李安, 孙翔宇, 胡宗凯. 阿拉善地块南缘北大山断裂的晚第四纪构造活动证据[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 355-376.
[3]	原浩东, 李安, 黄伟亮, 胡宗凯, 左玉琦, 杨晓平. 西准噶尔地区托里断裂晚第四纪构造变形[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 49-66.
[4]	张伟恒, 陈杰, 李涛, 邸宁, 姚远. 龙门山前陆冲断带南段三苏场背斜晚第四纪变形速率[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1351-1364.
[5]	冯晶晶, 赵勇伟, 李霓, 陈正全, 王丽竹, 刘永顺, 聂保锋, 张学斌. 琼北晚第四纪火山锥体形貌与喷发机制[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1107-1127.
[6]	沈军, 戴训也, 肖淳, 焦轩凯, 白其乐格尔, 邓梅, 刘泽众, 夏方华, 刘玉, 刘明. 夏垫西断裂的晚第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 909-924.
[7]	徐伟, 刘志成, 王继, 高战武, 尹金辉. 西藏阿里地区喀喇昆仑断裂断错地貌及最近强震活动时代的初步研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 925-943.
[8]	张驰, 李智敏, 任治坤, 刘金瑞, 张志亮, 武登云. 日月山断裂南段晚第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 1-19.
[9]	常昊, 常祖峰, 刘昌伟. 金沙江断裂带活动与大型滑坡群的关系研究:以金沙江拿荣—绒学段为例[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1435-1458.
[10]	杨晨艺, 李晓妮, 冯希杰, 朱琳, 李苗, 张恩会. 渭河盆地北缘口镇-关山断层的晚第四纪—现今的活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 504-520.
[11]	覃金堂, 陈杰, 李涛. 阿尔金断裂带中段现代沉积物样品钾长石红外激发后红外释光的残留信号——对年轻古地震事件测年的指示意义[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(4): 981-992.
[12]	梁明剑, 杨耀, 杜方, 宫悦, 孙玮, 赵敏, 何强. 青海达日断裂中段晚第四纪活动性与1947年M73/4地震地表破裂带再研究[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(3): 703-714.
[13]	杨海明, 陈顺云, 刘培洵, 郭彦双, 卓燕群, 齐文博. 岩石加载变形过程中超声尾波与声发射变化的实验[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(3): 715-731.
[14]	梁明剑, 陈立春, 冉勇康, 李彦宝, 王栋, 高帅坡, 韩明明, 曾蒂. 鲜水河断裂带雅拉河段晚第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(2): 513-525.
[15]	李彦宝, 陈立春, 王虎, 曾蒂, 刘成龙. 雅鲁藏布江断裂带昂仁段晚第四纪活动证据[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(5): 1091-1104.

岩石暴露与埋藏面释光测年进展及其应用

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON LUMINESCENCE DATING OF ROCK SURFACES AND ITS APPLICATION

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价