光学遥感技术的发展及其在活动构造研究中的应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.016

地震地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 211-220.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.016

• 专题综述 • 上一篇

光学遥感技术的发展及其在活动构造研究中的应用

孙鑫喆¹, 唐声权²

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 活动构造与火山重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 北京航天计量测试技术研究所, 北京 100076

收稿日期:2015-05-22 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-05-17
作者简介:孙鑫喆,男,1984年生,2008年毕业于中国地质大学地质学专业,现为中国地震局地质研究所在读博士研究生,主要研究方向为活动构造,E-mail:sunxinzhe1023@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(91214201)与中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1303)共同资助

THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE ACTIVE TECTONICS RESEARCH

SUN Xin-zhe¹, TANG Sheng-quan²

1. Key Lab of Active Tectonics & Volcano, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Beijing Aerospace Institute for Metrology and Measurement Technology, Beijing 100076, China

Received:2015-05-22 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-05-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

遥感技术自诞生以来对于我们从宏观尺度上认识地质体带来了极大的便利,特别是20世纪中叶以来,遥感平台和传感器的制造技术都取得了很大的进步,获取了大量的全球范围的遥感数据,质量也随着传感器的进步有了很大的提高。文中在简要梳理遥感技术发展的过程中,详细阐述了Landsat、SPOT、QuickBird等几个对于活动构造解译有着里程碑意义的卫星和影像的参数,并系统回顾了光学影像解译随着分辨率发展而取得的进步;简单介绍了当前最新的光学影像对比技术;此外还基于高分辨率卫星影像进行的精细地貌填图技术取得的成果,对遥感技术在未来活动构造研究中可能发挥的作用进行了展望。

关键词: 活动构造, 光学遥感, 空间分辨率, 光学影像对比技术, Landsat卫星, SPOT卫星, QuickBird卫星

Abstract:

Remote sensing technology has brought great convenience to our understanding of the macroscopic geological features since its inception. Especially, great progress has been made in manufacturing techniques of remote sensing platforms and sensors since the mid 20th century, and a huge number of global remote sensing data have been acquired. The quality of the data has been greatly improved based on the sensor's development. This article briefly reviews the processes of development of the remote sensing technology, elaborates on several satellites' parameters which have important significance for active tectonics interpretation, such as Landsat, SPOT, QuickBird, etc., and systematically reviews the progress in optical image interpretation made with the improvement of image resolution. The paper also briefly introduces the latest optical imaging correlation techniques, the detailed geomorphological mapping techniques based high-resolution satellite images, and the perspective of application of the remote sensing technology to active tectonics research.

Key words: active tectonics, optical remote sensing, spatial resolution, optical imaging correlation, Landsat, SPOT, QuickBird

中图分类号:

P315.2

孙鑫喆, 唐声权. 光学遥感技术的发展及其在活动构造研究中的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(1): 211-220.

SUN Xin-zhe, TANG Sheng-quan. THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE ACTIVE TECTONICS RESEARCH[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(1): 211-220.

参考文献

陈杰, 李佑国, 崔志强, 等. 2008. 成都盆地南缘与新构造运动有关的河道演变及其对沉积作用影响初步探讨［J］. 资源调查与环境, 29(1):18-23.
CHEN Jie, LI You-guo, CUI Zhi-qiang, et al. 2008. Stream channel transition related to neotectonic movement and its influence upon sedimentation in the south of Chengdu Basin［J］. Resources Survey & Environment, 29(1):18-23(in Chinese).
邓起东. 1996. 中国活动构造研究［J］. 地质论评, 42(4):295-299.
DENG Qi-dong. 1996. Active tectonics in China［J］. Geological Review, 42(4):295-299(in Chinese).
冯钟葵, 厉银喜. 1999. SPOT系列卫星及其数据产品的特征［J］. 遥感信息, (3):32-35.
FENG Zhong-kui, LI Yin-xi. 1999. SPOT satellites and their data characteristics［J］. Remote Sensing Information, (3):32-35(in Chinese).
石峰, 何宏林, 张英. 2010. 青海玉树M_S7.1级地震地表破裂带的遥感影像解译［J］. 震灾防御技术, (2):220-227.
SHI Feng, HE Hong-lin, ZHANG Ying. 2010. Remote sensing interpretation of the M_S7.1 Yushu earthquake surface ruptures［J］. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, (2):220-227(in Chinese).
孙鑫喆, 徐锡伟, 陈立春, 等. 2012. 2010年玉树地震地表破裂带典型破裂样式及其构造意义［J］. 地球物理学报, 55(1):155-170.
SUN Xin-zhe, Xu Xi-wei, CHEN Li-chun, et al. 2012. Surface rupture features of the 2010 Yushu earthquake and its tectonic implication［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(1):155-170(in Chinese).
Binet R, Bollinger L. 2005. Horizontal coseismic deformation of the 2003 Bam(Iran)earthquake measured from SPOT-5 THR satellite imagery［J］. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(2):L02307.
Clausen I, Miller E A. 2012. Intelligence Revolution 1960:Retrieving the Corona Imagery That Helped Win the Cold War[M].National Reconnaissance Office Center for the Study of National Reconnaissance Chantilly,Virginia.
Dashova A, Lohani B, Malik J N. 2007. A repository of earth resource information-CORONA satellite programme［J］. Current Science, 92(7):926-932.
Dominguez S,Avouac J-P, Michel R, et al. 2003. Horizontal coseismic deformation of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake measured from SPOT satellite images:Implications for the seismic cycle along the western foothills of central Taiwan［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B2):2083.
Klinger Y, Etchebes M, Tapponnier P, et al. 2011. Characteristic slip for five great earthquakes along the Fuyun Fault in China［J］. Nature Geosci, 4(6):389-392.
Klinger Y, Michel R, King G C P. 2006. Evidence for an earthquake barrier model from M_W-7.8 Kokoxili(Tibet)earthquake slip-distribution［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 242(3-4):354-364.
Klinger Y, Xu X, Tapponnier P, et al. 2005. High-resolution satellite imagery mapping of the surface rupture and slip distribution of the M_W-7.8, 14 November 2001 Kokoxili earthquake, Kunlun Fault, Northern Tibet, China［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(5):1970-1987.
Michel R, Avouac J-P. 2002. Deformation due to the 17 August 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake measured from SPOT images［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(B4):2062.
Molnar P, Tapponnier P. 1975. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia:Effects of a continental collision［J］. Science, 189:419-426.

[1]	张玲, 苗树清, 杨晓平. 基于ArcGIS平台的天山北麓活动逆断层智能化提取方法的研究与实现[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 422-434.
[2]	艾明, 毕海芸, 郑文俊, 尹金辉, 袁道阳, 任治坤, 陈干, 刘金瑞. 利用无人机摄影测量技术提取活动构造定量参数[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(6): 1276-1293.
[3]	汪思妤, 艾明, 吴传勇, 雷启云, 张会平, 任光雪, 李传友, 任治坤. 高分辨率卫星影像提取DEM技术在活动构造定量研究中的应用——以库米什盆地南缘断裂陡坎为例[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(5): 999-1017.
[4]	吴熙彦, 徐锡伟, 于贵华, 程佳, 陈桂华, 安艳芬, 王启欣. 国家川滇实验场地震地表破裂带分布图编制[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 27-41.
[5]	韩晓明, 刘芳, 张帆, 陈立峰, 李娟, 李拴虎, 杨红樱. 鄂尔多斯块体东北缘的P波速度精细结构[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 215-231.
[6]	毕海芸, 郑文俊, 曾江源, 俞晶星, 任治坤. SfM摄影测量方法在活动构造定量研究中的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 656-674.
[7]	艾晟, 张波, 樊春, 王洋. 武威盆地南缘断裂晚第四纪活动地表形迹与活动速率[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(2): 408-422.
[8]	马超, 屈春燕, 孟秀军. 南水北调总干渠中线工程豫北段基础稳定性的InSAR时序分析[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 749-762.
[9]	冯梅, 张纪中, 安美建. 2008年汶川地震前后震源区构造应力场变化[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(4): 701-720.
[10]	于贵华, 杜克平, 徐锡伟, 吴熙彦, 王银. 活动构造数据库建设相关问题的研究[J]. 地震地质, 2012, (4): 713-725.
[11]	陈桂华. 光学遥感影像阴影与2008年汶川地震同震地表变形的影像识别[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(1): 107-114.
[12]	屈春燕. 最新1/400万中国活动构造空间数据库的建立[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 298-304.
[13]	邓起东, 闻学泽. 活动构造研究——历史、进展与建议[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 1-30.
[14]	姜文亮, 张景发, 龚丽霞. 海南岛北部地区活动断裂的遥感解译研究[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(4): 796-804.
[15]	张会平, 张培震, 郑文俊, 郑德文, 陈正位. 活动构造研究中相关速率的原地宇宙成因核素年代学约束[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(2): 418-430.

光学遥感技术的发展及其在活动构造研究中的应用

THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE ACTIVE TECTONICS RESEARCH

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价