1927年古浪8级大地震断层面参数和滑动性质

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.03.012

地震地质 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 818-828.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.03.012

1927年古浪8级大地震断层面参数和滑动性质

刘白云^1,3, 曾文浩³, 袁道阳^2,3, 李秋红³, 陈文凯³

1 兰州地球物理国家野外科学观测研究站, 兰州 730000;
2 中国地震局地震预测研究所兰州科技创新基地, 兰州 730000;
3 甘肃省地震局, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2014-02-25 修回日期:2015-04-30 出版日期:2015-09-20 发布日期:2015-10-20
通讯作者: 曾文浩,高级工程师,电话:0931-8277890,E-mail:Zengwh@gssb.gov.cn
作者简介:刘白云,男,1980年生,2012年于中国地震局兰州地震研究所获构造地质学专业硕士学位,工程师,主要从事活动构造与地震之间的关系研究,电话:0931-8275393,E-mail:421121833@qq.com.
基金资助:
中国地震局兰州地震研究所地震科技发展基金(2012Y03)、甘肃省青年科技基金计划(145RJYA316)和中国地震科学台阵探测项目(A34)共同资助.

THE RESEARCH ON FAULT PARAMETER AND SLIDING BEHAVIOR OF THE 1927 GULANG M8.0 EARTHQUAKE

LIU Bai-yun^1,3, ZENG Wen-hao³, YUAN Dao-yang^2,3, LI Qiu-hong³, CHEN Wen-kai³

1 State Geophysics Observatory in Lanzhou, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2 Lanzhou Base of Institute of Earthquake Prediction, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3 Earthquake Administration of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2014-02-25 Revised:2015-04-30 Online:2015-09-20 Published:2015-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

1927年古浪发生8级大地震, 此次地震给古浪及邻近地区造成了轻重不等的破坏.对这次地震的发震构造, 前人的研究结果存在较大分歧.本研究根据成丛小震发生在大震断层面附近的原则及参考前人对该地震发震构造的认识, 采用1985年到2012年发生在地震破裂区的精定位地震目录, 选定了2个长条状研究区域, 将模拟退火算法和高斯-牛顿算法结合, 利用小震密集程度求解主震断层面的走向与倾角.在此基础上考虑区域构造应力参数, 给出了已求得的断层面上的滑动角.然后结合已有的深部构造研究结果以及地表考察结果, 简单讨论了此次地震的孕震环境和发震机制.文中反演到的断层①位于此次地震等震线的最高烈度(Ⅺ度)圈内, 表明反演到的震源断层可能就是控制此次地震的发震构造.另外, 首次发现在主干断裂中南部有1个小震成丛区, 也能反演出1个断层, 这可能是地震时震区整体发生了逆时针旋转而在主干断裂之上新发育的张性地震断层.

关键词: 小震丛集, 古浪地震, 断层面解, 发震构造

Abstract:

The Gulang M8.0 great earthquake occurred in 1927, many places in Gulang and adjacent areas had suffered destruction in various degrees. So far, divergences exist in the former studies on its seismogenic structure. It is known that clustered small earthquakes often occur in vicinities of fault plane of large earthquake. In this study, the precisely relocated earthquakes which occurred near the earthquake rupture zone between 1985 and 2012 are used, and two strip-shaped zones of clustered small earthquakes are chosen according to the previous studies of the causative structure of this earthquake. Based on the simulated annealing and Gauss-Newtonian nonlinear inversion algorithms, we obtained fault plane parameters of the earthquake such as strike, dip, and location using data of densely concentrated small events. On this condition, rake angles of the fault plane are further inferred from regional tectonic stress parameter. Then we discussed briefly the seismogenic environment and causal mechanism of the earthquake, combined with the results of deep tectonics and surface investigations. The focal fault we inverted locates within the meizoseismal area (intensity Ⅺ)of the Gulang M8.0 in 1927, suggesting that the focal fault obtained by inversion is possibly the causative structure of this earthquake. Besides, we found a clustered zone of small earthquakes near the south-central part of the main fault, and a fault plane could be derived from them, which we think might be a tensional seismic fault developed on the main fault when the whole earthquake-hit region rotated counterclockwise during the big earthquake.

Key words: small earthquake clustering, the Gulang earthquake, fault plane solution, causative structures

中图分类号:

P315.2

刘白云, 曾文浩, 袁道阳, 李秋红, 陈文凯. 1927年古浪8级大地震断层面参数和滑动性质[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 818-828.

LIU Bai-yun, ZENG Wen-hao, YUAN Dao-yang, LI Qiu-hong, CHEN Wen-kai. THE RESEARCH ON FAULT PARAMETER AND SLIDING BEHAVIOR OF THE 1927 GULANG M8.0 EARTHQUAKE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(3): 818-828.

参考文献

卜玉菲, 万永革, 张元生. 2013. 甘肃及邻近地区的构造应力场［J］. 地震地质, 35(4): 833—840. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2013.04.012.
BU Yu-fe, WAN Yong-ge, ZHANG Yuan-sheng. 2013. Tectonic stress analysis in Gansu and its adjacent areas［J］. Seismology and Geology, 35(4): 833—840(in Chinese).
陈涛, 刘玉刚, 闵伟, 等. 2012. 塔儿湾断裂活动时代厘定及地貌陡坎成因分析［J］. 地震地质, 34(3): 401—414. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.03.002.
CHEN Tao, LIU Yu-gang, MIN Wei, et al. 2012. The activity age of Tarwan fault and genesis of the topographic scarp［J］. Seismology and Geology,34(3): 401—414(in Chinese).
高祥林, 罗焕炎. 1992. 大陆板内震源断层的特征［J］. 地震地质, 14(3): 260—263.
GAO Xiang-lin, LUO Huan-yan. 1992. Characteristics of seismic-source faults within the continental plate［J］. Seismology and Geology, 14(3): 260—263(in Chinese).
顾功叙主编. 1983. 中国地震目录(公元1831年—公元1969年)[Z]. 北京: 科学出版社.
GU Gong-xu(ed). 1983. Catalogue of Earthquakes in China(1831—1969)[Z]. Science Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
国家地震局兰州地震研究所编. 1989. 甘肃省地震资料汇编［M］. 北京: 地震出版社.
Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, SSB. 1989. Corpus of Earthquake Data in Gansu Province［M］. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
国家地震局兰州地震研究所, 宁夏回族自治区地震队. 1980. 1920年海原大地震［M］. 北京: 地震出版社.
Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, Seismological Bureau of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. 1980. The Haiyuan Great Earthquake in 1920［M］. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
郭安宁, 郭增建. 2010. 从震源模式讨论2008年汶川8级地震的回顾性预测［J］. 地震地质, 32(1): 115—118. doi:10.3969/.jissn.0253-4967.2010.01.012.
GUO An-ning, GUO Zeng-jian. 2010. A discussion on the retrospective prediction of the MS8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 by means of earthquake source models［J］. Seismology and Geology, 32(1): 115—118(in Chinese).
侯康明, 邓起东, 刘百篪, 等. 1998. 1927年古浪8级大震破裂的三维数值理论模拟［J］. 西北地震学报, 20(3): 59—65.
HOU Kang-ming, DENG Qi-dong, LIU Bai-chi, et al. 1998. 3-D numerical simulation of surface rupture caused by the 1927 Gulang MS8 earthquake［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 20(3): 59—65(in Chinese).
胡新亮, 刁桂苓, 高景春, 等. 2002. 用现今小震推断洪洞、临汾2次历史大震的震源断层［J］. 中国地震, 18(1): 76—85.
HU Xin-liang, DIAO Gui-ling, GAO Jing-chun, et al. 2002. Application of present small earthquakes to infer the focal faults of two large historical earthquakes in Hongdong and Linfen, Shanxi Province［J］. Earthquake Research in China, 18(1): 76—85(in Chinese).
贾云鸿, 陈志泰, 戴华光, 等. 1988. 1927年古浪地震断层特征及其与活动断层的关系［A］. 见: 新疆维吾尔自治区地震局编. 中国地震断层研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社.
JIA Yun-hong, CHEN Zhi-tai, DAI Hua-guang, et al. 1988. The relationship of active fault and the characteristic of the seismic fault of Gulang strong earthquake in 1927［A］. In: Seismological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(ed). The Studies of Chinese Seismic Faults. Xinjiang People's Publishing House, Urumqi(in Chinese).
李海鸥, 徐锡伟, 马文涛. 2011. 天祝-古浪地区双差地震层析成像与古浪地震构造探讨［J］. 地震学报, 33(2): 156—164.
LI Hai-ou, XU Xi-wei, MA Wen-tao. 2011. Double-difference tomography in Tianzhu-Gulang region and discussion on seismotectonics of 1927 Gulang M8.0 earthquake［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 33(2): 156—164(in Chinese).
李文军. 2004. 用余震序列的数字地震资料对卢龙地区活动构造的研究［D］. ［学位论文］. 北京: 中国地震局地球物理研究所.
LI Wen-jun. 2004. Study on tectonics of Lulong, eastern Heibei Province using digital seismic data of aftershocks［D］. Ph D thesis. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
梁桂培, 陈爱玲, 何善康, 等. 1983. 甘肃西部地区深部构造［J］. 西北地震学报, 15(1):66—78.
LIANG Gui-pei, CHEN Ai-ling, HE Shan-kang, et al. 1983. The deep structure of the western region of Gansu Province［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 15(1): 66—78(in Chinese).
刘白云, 袁道阳, 张波, 等. 2012. 1879年武都南8级大地震断层面参数和滑动性质的厘定［J］. 地震地质, 34(3): 415—424. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.03.003.
LIU Bai-yun, YUAN Dao-yang, ZHANG Bo, et al. 2012. Determination of fault parameters and sliding behavior of the 1879 southern Wudu 8.0 earthquake［J］. Seismology and Geology, 34(3): 415—424(in Chinese).
刘白云, 曾文浩, 袁道阳, 等. 1954年腾格里沙漠北7级地震断层面参数和滑动性质研究［J］. 地震工程学报, 36(3): 622—627. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2014.03.0622.
LIU Bai-yun, ZENG Wen-hao, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. 2014. Fault parameter and sliding behavior determination of the 1954 northern Tenggeli desert M7.0 earthquake［J］. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 36(3): 622—627(in Chinese).
刘澜波, Zoback M D, 陆燕萍, 等. 1995. 美国新马德里地震带的震间应变积累［J］. 地球物理学报, 38(6): 757—766.
LIU Lan-bo, Zoback M D, LU Yan-ping, et al. 1995. Interseismic strain accumulation in the new Madrid seismic zone［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 38(6): 757—766(in Chinese).
邵学钟, 张家茹, 章思亚, 等. 1993. 邢台地震区深部构造背景的地震转换波探测和研究［J］. 地球物理学报, 36(5): 610—619.
SHAO Xue-zhong, ZHANG Jia-ru, ZHANG Si-ya, et al. 1993. Study of deep structures in Xingtai earthquake area by method of converted waves of earthquakes［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 36(5): 610—619(in Chinese).
万永革, 沈正康, 刁桂苓, 等. 2008. 利用小震分布和区域应力场确定大震断层面参数方法及其在唐山地震序列中的应用［J］. 地球物理学报, 51(3): 793—804.
WAN Yong-ge, SHEN Zheng-kang, DIAO Gui-ling, et al. 2008. An algorithm of fault parameter determination using distribution of small earthquakes and parameters of regional stress field and its application to Tangshan earthquake sequence［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(3): 793—804(in Chinese).
王鸣, 王培德. 1992. 1989年10月18日大同-阳高地震的震源机制和发震构造［J］. 地震学报, 14(4): 407—415.
WANG Ming, WANG Pei-de. 1992. The mechanism and seismogenic structure of Datong-Yanggao earthquake which occurred on 0ct.18, 1989［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 14(4): 407—415(in Chinese).
王泽皋. 1985. 大震区的"长期活动"［J］. 地震学报, 7(3): 254—266.
WANG Ze-gao. 1985. The"long-term activity"of large seismic regions［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 7(3): 254—266(in Chinese).
杨智娴, 陈运泰, 郑月军, 等. 2003. 双差地震定位法在我国中西部地区地震精确定位中的应用［J］. 中国科学(D辑), 33(增刊): 129—134.
YANG Zhi-xiang, CHEN Yun-tai, ZHENG Yue-jun, et al. 2003. Relocation of earthquakes in central-western China using the double difference earthquake location algorithm［J］. Science in China(Ser D), 33(Supp1.): 129—134(in Chinese).
曾宪伟, 冯建刚, 王晓山. 2013. 利用小震分布和区域应力场确定临潭-宕昌断裂断层面参数［J］. 地震工程学报, 35(4): 743—750. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2013.04.743.
ZENG Xian-wei, FENG Jian-gang, WANG Xiao-shan. 2013. Determination of fault plane parameter of Lintan-Tanchang fault using distribution of small earthquakes and regional stress field［J］. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 35(4): 743—750(in Chinese).
詹艳, 赵国泽, 王继军, 等. 2008. 1927年古浪8级大震区及其周边地块的深部电性结构［J］. 地球物理学报, 51(2): 511—520.
ZHAN Yan, ZHAO Guo-ze, WANG Ji-jun, et al. 2008. Deep electric structure beneath the epicentre of the 1927 Gulang M8 earthquake and its adjacent areas from magnetotelluric sounding［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysic, 51(2): 511—520(in Chinese).
张杰, 沈小七, 王行舟, 等. 2004. 安徽历史地震等震线长轴方位分布及地震地质意义［J］. 中国地震, 20(2): 152—155.
ZHANG Jie, SHEN Xiao-qi, WANG Xing-zhou, et al. 2004. Distribution of the historical earthquake isoseismal curve major axis direction and significance of the seismogeology in the Anhui region［J］. Earthquake Research in China, 20(2): 152—155(in Chinese).
郑文俊, 袁道阳, 张冬丽, 等. 2004. 1927年古浪8级地震的破裂习性及破裂机制的数值模拟［J］. 中国地震, 20(4): 353—363.
ZHENG Wen-jun, YUAN Dao-yang, ZHANG Dong-li, et al. 2004. Rupture property in the Gulang MS8.0 earthquake, 1927 and numerical simulation of rupture mechanism［J］. Earthquake Research in China, 20(4): 353—363(in Chinese).
周光. 1954. 甘肃山丹地震的地质现象［J］. 地质学报, 34(3): 391—400.
ZHOU Guang. 1954. The geological phenomenon of Shandan earthquake in Gansu Province［J］. Journal of Geology, 34(3): 391—400.
朱艾斓, 徐锡伟, 周永胜, 等. 2005. 川西地区小震重新定位及其活动构造意义［J］. 地球物理学报, 48(3): 629—636.
ZHU Ai-lan, XU Xi-wei, ZHOU Yong-sheng, et al. 2005. Relocation of small earthquakes in western Sichuan, China and its implications for active tectonics［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(3): 629—636(in Chinese).
Zhou C Y, Diao G L, Geng J, et al. 2010. Fault plane parameters of Tancheng M8 1/2 earthquake on the basis of present-day seismological data［J］. Earthq Sei, 23:657—576.
Gaudemer Y, Tapponnier P, Meyer B, et al. 1995. Partitioning of crustal slip between linked, active faults in the eastern Qilianshan, and evidence for a major seismic gap, 'the Tianzhu gap’, on the western Haiyuan Fault, Gansu(China)［J］. Geophysical Journal, 120(3): 599—645.

[1]	刘白云, 赵莉, 刘云云, 王文才, 张卫东. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M7.4地震余震重新定位与断层面参数拟合[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 500-516.
[2]	赵德政, 屈春燕, 张桂芳, 龚文瑜, 单新建, 朱传华, 张国宏, 宋小刚. 基于InSAR技术的同震形变获取、地震应急监测和发震构造研究应用进展[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 570-592.
[3]	张珂, 王鑫, 杨红樱, 王玥, 徐岩, 李静. 2021年云南漾濞M_S6.4地震序列特征及其发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 231-251.
[4]	李传友, 孙凯, 马骏, 李俊杰, 梁明剑, 房立华. 四川泸定6.8级地震--鲜水河断裂带磨西段局部发起、全段参与的一次复杂事件[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1648-1666.
[5]	张博譞, 郑文俊, 陈杰, 何骁慧, 李启雷, 张冬丽, 段磊, 陈干. 柴达木盆地北部2021年6月16日青海茫崖M_S5.8地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1313-1332.
[6]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 刘炜, 张加庆, 袁建新. 阿木尼克山山前地表破裂带与1962年6.8级地震关系的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 976-991.
[7]	梁宽, 何仲太, 姜文亮, 李永生, 刘泽民. 2022年1月8日青海门源M_S6.9地震的同震地表破裂特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 256-278.
[8]	高帆, 韩竹军, 袁仁茂, 董绍鹏, 郭鹏. 滇东南地区小江断裂南段历史滑坡特征及其地震地质意义[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1412-1434.
[9]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 李鑫. 青海玛多M_S7.4地震地表破裂带的基本特征和典型现象[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1060-1072.
[10]	贾蕊, 张国宏, 解朝娣, 单新建, 张迎峰, 李成龙, 黄自成. 2019年巴基斯坦新米尔普尔M_W6.0地震的同震形变场与断层滑动分布反演[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 600-613.
[11]	赵启光, 孙业君, 黄耘, 杨伟林, 顾勤平, 孟科, 杨浩. 高邮-宝应M_S4.9地震的发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 630-646.
[12]	李传友, 张金玉, 王伟, 孙凯, 单新建. 2021年云南漾濞6.4级地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 706-721.
[13]	崔仁胜, 赵翠萍, 周连庆, 陈阳. 2020年1月19日新疆伽师M_S6.4地震序列的活动特征和发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 329-344.
[14]	李启雷, 李玉丽, 屠泓为, 刘文邦. 丁青地区地震重定位、震源机制及其发震构造初步分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 209-231.
[15]	刘白云, 尹志文, 袁道阳, 李亮, 王维欢. 青藏高原东北缘老虎山断裂的断层面参数拟合及其几何意义[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(6): 1354-1369.

1927年古浪8级大地震断层面参数和滑动性质

THE RESEARCH ON FAULT PARAMETER AND SLIDING BEHAVIOR OF THE 1927 GULANG M8.0 EARTHQUAKE

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价