地貌参数指示的临潭-宕昌断裂带最新构造隆升差异与地震活动

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.03.004

地震地质 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 709-718.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.03.004

地貌参数指示的临潭-宕昌断裂带最新构造隆升差异与地震活动

高明星^1,2, 陈桂华¹, 徐锡伟¹

1 中国地震局地质研究所, 活动构造与火山重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2 Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798

收稿日期:2013-09-24 修回日期:2015-04-08 出版日期:2015-09-20 发布日期:2015-10-20
作者简介:高明星,女,1981年生,2014年于中国地震局地质研究所博士后出站,主要从事构造地貌、活动构造研究,电话:15510163977,E-mail:cugbgao@gmail.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(200908029,41004037)和中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1303)共同资助

GEOMORPHIC INDICES INDICATED RECENT DIFFERENTIAL TECTONIC UPLIFT OF THE LINTAN-DANGCHANG FAULT AND THE MINXIAN-ZHANGXIAN EARTHQUAKE

GAO Ming-xing^1,2, CHEN Gui-hua¹, XU Xi-wei¹

1 Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Volcano, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2 Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798

Received:2013-09-24 Revised:2015-04-08 Online:2015-09-20 Published:2015-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2013年7月22日, 甘肃岷县漳县M_S6.6地震发生在青藏高原东北缘的临潭-宕昌断裂带上.为了研究该断裂的最新构造隆升的差异性, 基于ASTER GDEM数字高程模型数据提取了流域盆地及水系, 并以此为基础, 计算了面积高程积分及河道坡度指数.2个地貌参数的分析结果表明, 临潭-宕昌断裂不同部位的最新隆升呈现不均匀性.其中, 断裂的最新逆冲活动在临潭以西及以岷县附近明显强于其他各段.上述地貌参数所指示的断裂抬升强度还与历史及现今地震发震位置较好地匹配, 体现了定量化地貌分析对断裂活动强弱的指示作用.临潭-宕昌断裂受区域NE-SW向挤压构造应力作用影响, 其活动的差异可能与晚第四纪以来巴颜喀拉块体NE向扩展背景下的局部应力集中有关.

关键词: 岷县-漳县M_S6.6地震, 临潭-宕昌断裂, DEM, 构造地貌

Abstract:

The July, 22, 2013 M_S6.6 Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake occurred in the Lintan-Dangchang Fault belt which is located in the northeast Tibet Plateau. Recent tectonic activities show that the Lintan-Dangchang Fault is a thrust fault with strike-slip component. However, the spatial pattern and mechanism of the recent tectonic activity along this fault have not been analysed in detail before the occurrence of the Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake. For better understanding the differential recent tectonic uplift of this fault, drainage basins and river networks were extracted based on ASTER GDEM data in this study. Hypsometric integral and the stream length gradient were calculated. The geomorphic indices analysis results suggest the differential tectonic uplift along the Lintan-Dangchang Fault. The areas experiencing strong tectonic uplift were identified which locate at the west of the Lintan County and around Minxian County. Besides, high geomorphic indices values are associated with epicenters of the historical earthquakes, which demonstrates the importance of the quantitative geomorphic analysis. Our results suggest that the overall tectonic uplift along the Lintan-Dangchang Fault is not very strong. However, certain segments which are experiencing relative high tectonic uplift have the potential of generating moderate or even large earthquakes. Under the regional NE-SW compressional stress caused by the northeastward expansion of the Bayankala block, the tectonic uplift of the fault may relate to the local stress concentration.

Key words: Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake, Lintan-Dangchang Fault, DEM, tectonic geomorphology

中图分类号:

P315.2

高明星, 陈桂华, 徐锡伟. 地貌参数指示的临潭-宕昌断裂带最新构造隆升差异与地震活动[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 709-718.

GAO Ming-xing, CHEN Gui-hua, XU Xi-wei. GEOMORPHIC INDICES INDICATED RECENT DIFFERENTIAL TECTONIC UPLIFT OF THE LINTAN-DANGCHANG FAULT AND THE MINXIAN-ZHANGXIAN EARTHQUAKE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(3): 709-718.

参考文献

高明星. 2009. 基于DEM的青藏高原东北端地表过程分析［D］. ［学位论文］. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京).
GAO Ming-xing. 2009. DEM-based surface processes analysis for the northeast margin of the Tibetan plateau［D］. Dissertation. China University of Geosciences, Beijing(in Chinese).
高明星. 2013. 青藏高原边缘最新构造隆升特征的定量化地貌研究［D］. ［博士后出站报告］. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.
GAO Ming-xing. 2013. Quantitative geomorphic investigation on the recent uplift of the margin of the Tibetan plateau［D］. Postdoctoral research report. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
郭进京, 韩文峰, 梁收运, 等. 2006. 西秦岭岷县-宕昌地区洮河和岷江阶地特征对比研究: 兼论中国南北构造带在西秦岭的地貌响应［J］. 地质调查与研究, 29(4): 272—273.
GUO Jin-jing, HAN Wen-feng, LIANG Shou-yun, et al. 2006. Study and comparison on the terrace of Taohe River and Minjiang River in Minxinan-Dangchang area of the western Qinling［J］. Geological Survey and Research, 29(4): 272—273(in Chinese).
何文贵, 周志宇, 马尔曼, 等. 2006. 2004年9月7日岷县-卓尼5.0级地震的基本特征和地质背景研究［J］. 地震研究, 29(3): 373—378.
HE Wen-gui, ZHOU Zhi-yu, MA Er-man, et al. 2006. Basic features and geological background of the Minxian-Zhuoni M5.0 earthquake on Sept. 7, 2004［J］. Journal of Seismological Research, 29(3): 373—378(in Chinese).
谢富仁, 崔效锋, 赵建涛, 等. 2004. 中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区［J］. 地球物理学报, 47(4): 654—662.
XIE Fu-ren, CUI Xiao-feng, ZHAO Jian-tao, et al. 2004. Regional division of the recent tectonics stress field in China and adjacent areas［J］. Chinese J Geophys, 47(4): 654—662(in Chinese).
袁道阳, 张培震, 刘百篪, 等. 2004. 青藏高原东北缘晚第四纪活动构造的几何图像与构造转换［J］. 地质学报, 78(2): 270—278.
YUAN Dao-yang, ZHANG Pei-zhen, LIU Bai-chi, et al. 2004. Geometrical imagery and tectonic transformation of late Quaternary active tectonics in northeastern margin of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau［J］. Acta Geologic Sinica, 78(2): 270—278(in Chinese).
郑文俊, 雷中生, 袁道阳, 等. 2007a. 1573年甘肃岷县地震史料考证与发震构造探讨［J］. 中国地震, 23(1): 75—83.
ZHENG Wen-jun, LEI Zhong-sheng, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. 2007a. Textual research on the historical data of the 1573 AD Minxian earthquake in Gansu Province and discussion on its seismogenic structure［J］. Earthquake Research in China, 23(1): 75—83(in Chinese).
郑文俊, 雷中生, 袁道阳, 等. 2007b. 1837年甘肃岷县北6级地震考证与发震构造分析［J］. 地震, 27(1): 120—130.
ZHENG Wen-jun, LEI Zhong-sheng, YUAN Dao-yang, et al. 2007b. Structural research on the 1837 northern Minxian M 6 earthquake in Gansu Province and its causative structure［J］. Earthquake, 27(1): 120—130(in Chinese).
郑文俊, 刘小凤, 赵广坤, 等. 2004. 2003年甘肃岷县M_S5.2地震基本特征［J］. 西北地震学报, 27(1): 61—65.
ZHENG Wen-jun, LIU Xiao-feng, ZHAO Guang-kun, et al. 2004. Principal features of Minxian M_S5.2 earthquake in Gansu Province, on Nov. 13, 2003［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 27(1): 61—65(in Chinese).
郑文俊, 袁道阳, 何文贵, 等. 2013. 2013年甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震震害分布特征及发震构造分析［J］.地震地质, 35(3): 604—615. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2013.03.01.
ZHENG Wen-jun, YUAN Dao-yang, HE Wen-gui, et al. 2013. Distribution of the related disaster and the causative tectonic of the Minxian-Zhangxian M_S6.6 earthquake on July 22, 2013, Gansu, China［J］.Seismology and Geology, 35(3): 604—615(in Chinese).
Dehbozorgi M, Pourkermani M, Arian M, et al. 2010. Quantitative analysis of relative tectonic activity in the Sarvestan area, central Zagros, Iran［J］. Geomorphology, 121: 329—341.
Font M, Amorese D, Lagarde J L. 2010. DEM and GIS analysis of the stream gradient index to evaluate effects of tectonics: The Normandy intraplate area(NW France)［J］. Geomorphology, 119: 172—179.
Gao M, Zeilinger G, Xu X, et al. 2013. DEM and GIS analysis of geomorphic indices for evaluating recent uplift of the northeastern margin of the Tibetan plateau, China［J］. Geomorphology, 190: 61—72.
Hack J T. 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index［J］. U S Geological Survey Journal of Research, 1: 421—429.
Keller E A, Printer N. 2002. Active Tectonics: Earthquakes, Uplift and Landscape, 2nd ed［M］. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pedrera A, Pérez-Peña J V, Galindo-Zaldívar J, et al. 2009. Testing the sensitivity of geomorphic indices in areas of low-rate active folding(eastern Betic Cordillera, Spain)［J］. Geomorphology, 15: 218—231.
Pérez-Peña J V, Azañón J M, Azor A, et al. 2009. Spatial analysis of stream power using GIS: SLK anomaly maps［J］. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(1): 16—25.
Pérez-Peña V J, Azor A, Azañón M J, et al. 2010. Active tectonics in the Sierra Nevada(Betic Cordillera, SE Spain): Insights from geomorphic indexes and drainage pattern analysis［J］. Geomorphology, 119: 74—87.
Strahler A N. 1952. Hypsometric(area-altitude)analysis of erosional topography［J］. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63: 1117—1141.

[1]	张波, 王爱国, 田勤俭, 葛伟鹏, 贾伟, 姚赟胜, 袁道阳. 基于ALOS-PALSAR DEM的山体阴影图识别断裂线性——以西秦岭地区为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 130-149.
[2]	张波, 田勤俭, 王爱国, 李文巧, 徐岳仁, 高泽民. 西秦岭临潭-宕昌断裂第四纪最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 72-91.
[3]	魏聪敏, 葛伟鹏, 张波. 利用地貌形态估算西秦岭-松潘构造结及邻区的下地壳黏滞系数[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(1): 163-181.
[4]	孙稳, 何宏林, 魏占玉, 高伟, 孙浩越, 邹俊杰. 基于无人机航测获取高分辨率DEM数据的断层几何结构精细解译与分析——以海原断裂唐家坡为例[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(6): 1350-1365.
[5]	吴贵灵, 祝成宇, 王国灿, 张攀. 青藏高原东南缘地貌边界性质的界定及其对高原东南缘扩展模式的启示[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(2): 281-299.
[6]	艾明, 毕海芸, 郑文俊, 尹金辉, 袁道阳, 任治坤, 陈干, 刘金瑞. 利用无人机摄影测量技术提取活动构造定量参数[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(6): 1276-1293.
[7]	汪思妤, 艾明, 吴传勇, 雷启云, 张会平, 任光雪, 李传友, 任治坤. 高分辨率卫星影像提取DEM技术在活动构造定量研究中的应用——以库米什盆地南缘断裂陡坎为例[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(5): 999-1017.
[8]	石峰, 何宏林, Alexander L Densmore, 魏占玉, 孙浩越. 利用水系流域偏转研究走滑断层的运动模式——以南汀河断裂带为例[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(4): 773-783.
[9]	付博, 李志强, 陈杰, 范熙伟, 李晓丽, 李涛, 姚远, 刘耀辉. 微型无人机在2016年11月25日阿克陶M_W6.6地震中的应用探索[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(3): 672-684.
[10]	毕丽思, 何宏林, 徐岳仁, 魏占玉, 石峰, 孙浩越. 山西霍山山前断裂冲沟S-A双对数图、凹曲指数与陡峭指数的构造响应特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1158-1172.
[11]	邹小波, 袁道阳, 邵延秀, 刘兴旺, 张波, 杨海波. 采用立体像对和差分GPS揭示民乐-永昌隐伏断裂地表变形特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1198-1212.
[12]	扈桂让, 李自红, 闫小兵, 赵晋泉, 曾金艳, 郭瑾. 韩城断裂晚第四纪活动性研究[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 206-217.
[13]	杨海波, 杨晓平, 黄雄南, 黄伟亮, 罗佳宏. 移动摄影测量数据与差分GPS数据的对比分析——以祁连山北麓洪水坝河东岸断层陡坎为例[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(4): 1030-1046.
[14]	苏琦, 袁道阳, 谢虹. 祁连山-河西走廊黑河流域地貌特征及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3): 560-581.
[15]	魏占玉, Arrowsmith Ramon, 何宏林, 高伟. 基于SfM方法的高密度点云数据生成及精度分析[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(2): 636-648.

地貌参数指示的临潭-宕昌断裂带最新构造隆升差异与地震活动

GEOMORPHIC INDICES INDICATED RECENT DIFFERENTIAL TECTONIC UPLIFT OF THE LINTAN-DANGCHANG FAULT AND THE MINXIAN-ZHANGXIAN EARTHQUAKE

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价