川西理塘活动断裂最新同震地表破裂形成时代与震级的重新厘定

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.02.009

地震地质 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 455-467.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.02.009

川西理塘活动断裂最新同震地表破裂形成时代与震级的重新厘定

周春景^1,2, 吴中海¹, 张克旗¹, 李家存⁴, 蒋瑶^1,3, 田婷婷^1,3, 刘艳辉^1,3, 黄小巾^1,4

1. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所, 北京 100081;
2. 中国地质科学院, 北京 100026;
3. 中国地质大学(北京), 北京 100083;
4. 首都师范大学, 北京 100048

收稿日期:2014-04-21 修回日期:2015-01-22 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-08-19
通讯作者: 吴中海,研究员,电话:010-88815090,E-mail:wzhh4488@sina.com
作者简介:周春景,女,1974年生,2003年于中国石油勘探开发研究院获工学硕士学位,助理研究员,研究方向为地震地质与构造应力场模拟,电话:010-88815061,E-mail:Zhouchunjing01@aliyun.com。
基金资助:
中国地质调查局项目(1212011120163, 12120114002101)、中国地质科学院地质力学研究所基本科研业务专项(DZLXJK201212)和国家自然科学基金(41171009)共同资助。

NEW CHRONOLOGICAL CONSTRAINT ON THE CO-SEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURE SEGMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LITANG FAULT

ZHOU Chun-jing^1,2, WU Zhong-hai¹, ZHANG Ke-qi¹, LI Jia-cun⁴, JIANG Yao^1,3, TIAN Ting-ting^1,3, LIU Yan-hui^1,3, HUANG Xiao-jin^1,4

1. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100026, China;
3. China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
4. Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China

Received:2014-04-21 Revised:2015-01-22 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在开展理塘左旋走滑活动断裂带的同震地表破裂实测填图基础上, 结合历史地震资料及地震事件测年, 对该断裂带的最新同震地表破裂形成年代和震级进行了重新厘定。结果表明: 理塘活动断裂带的最新同震地表破裂可分为南、北2段, 其中北段最长约25km, 最大左旋错动量1.8m; 南段最长约41km, 最大左旋错动量3.2m。综合探槽揭露的地震事件及AMS-¹⁴C测年结果和历史地震资料的分析结果, 北段和南段同震地表破裂应为2次地震沿理塘断裂带不同段先、后破裂的结果, 属典型的分段破裂现象。其中北段破裂极可能是历史记载的1729年地震活动的产物, 而南段由1948年大地震所产生。根据震级和地表破裂长度的经验关系计算结果, 前者的矩震级(M_W)约为6.7, 后者约为7.0。2次大地震沿同一断裂分段破裂的现象表明, 该断层带尚未破裂的段可能是未来强震活动的危险地段。

关键词: 同震地表破裂, 历史地震, 地震危险性评价, 理塘断裂带, 1948年理塘地震

Abstract:

Detailed mapping shows that there are two segments of co-seismic surface ruptures on the Litang-Dewu left-lateral strike-slip fault. The north segment is about 25km long, with a strike about 135°NE. The maximum horizontal left-lateral displacement on the north one is~1.8m and located at the high floodplains on the north side of the Wuliang River near Cun'ge village, offsetting the linear ridges that were left behind by human activity. The south segment is about 41km, striking generally about 146°NE. The maximum horizontal left-lateral displacement is located at the piedmont near the north side of the Rongjia mountain pass and the river floodplain scarp here is offset about 3.2m. There is a surface rupture gap about 11km between these two co-seismic surface rupture segments. The distribution of the co-seismic surface ruptures acquired by detailed mapping in the field survey, the earthquake event revealed by the trench, the AMS-¹⁴C dating result, the historical records of earthquakes at least since AD 1729 in the study area and the visiting on the local people, show consistently that the northern co-seismic surface rupture segment is most possibly produced by the 1729 Litang earthquake. The 1948 Litang earthquake was only responsible for the southern surface rupture segment. However, if only according to the 2 sigma calendar calibrated results of ¹⁴C dating, it cannot be excluded the possibility that the north segment maybe was produced by some older large earthquake occurring at some time during the AD 1420 to AD 1690. The moment magnitude(M_W)of the 1729 earthquake is about 6.7 and that of the 1948 earthquake is about 7.0 calculated from the empirical relations between the earthquake magnitude and the rupture length.

Key words: co-seismic surface rupture, historical earthquake, seismic hazard assessment, Litang Fault, the 1948 Litang earthquake

中图分类号:

P315.3⁺2

周春景, 吴中海, 张克旗, 李家存, 蒋瑶, 田婷婷, 刘艳辉, 黄小巾. 川西理塘活动断裂最新同震地表破裂形成时代与震级的重新厘定[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(2): 455-467.

ZHOU Chun-jing, WU Zhong-hai, ZHANG Ke-qi, LI Jia-cun, JIANG Yao, TIAN Ting-ting, LIU Yan-hui, HUANG Xiao-jin. NEW CHRONOLOGICAL CONSTRAINT ON THE CO-SEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURE SEGMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LITANG FAULT[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(2): 455-467.

参考文献

国家地震局全国地震烈度区划编图组. 1979. 中国地震等烈度线图集【Z】. 北京: 地震出版社. 41.
Compiling Team of National Earthquake Intensity Zoning Map of China of State Seismological Bureau. 1979. Atlas of Isoseismal Maps of Chinese Earthquakes 【Z】. Seismological Press, Beijing. 41(in Chinese).
黄彩权. 1988. 四川理塘地震断裂与发震构造【A】. 见: 新疆维吾尔自治区地震局编.中国地震断层研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社. 172—176.
HUANG Cai-quan. 1988. The Litang Fault(Sichuan Province)and the seismogenic structure 【A】. In: Earthquake Administration of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(ed). Earthquake Faults Study in China. Xinjiang People's Publishing House, Urumqi. 172—176(in Chinese).
马丹, 吴中海, 李家存, 等. 2014. 川西理塘断裂带的空间展布与第四纪左旋走滑活动的遥感影像标志【J】. 地质学报, 88(8): 1417—1435.
MA Dan, WU Zhong-hai, LI Jia-cun, et al. 2014. Geometric distribution and the Quaternary activity of Litang active fault zone based on remote sensing 【J】. Acta Geologica Sinica, 88(8): 1417—1435(in Chinese).
四川地震资料汇编编辑组. 1980. 四川地震资料汇编(一)【M】. 成都: 四川人民出版社.
Editorial Team of the Compilation of Earthquakes in Sichuan Province. 1980. Compilation of Earthquakes in Sichuan Province(1)【M】. Sichuan People's Publishing House, Chengdu(in Chinese).
四川省地震局地震地质队. 1988. 1948年理塘7.3级地震【J】. 四川地震, 4: 26—56.
Seismogeological Team of Sichuan Seismological Bureau. 1988. The 1948 Litang M7.3 Earthquake 【J】. Earthquake Research in Sichuan, 4: 26—56(in Chinese).
唐荣昌, 韩渭宾. 1993. 四川活动断裂与地震【M】. 北京: 地震出版社.
TANG Rong-chang, HAN Wei-bin. 1993. Active Faults and Earthquakes in Sichuan Province 【M】. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
徐杰. 1979. 四川理塘强震区的地震地质特征【A】. 见: 国家地震局西南烈度队编. 川滇强震区地震地质调查汇编. 北京: 地震出版社. 85—91.
XU Jie. 1979. The seismogeological characteristics of the Litang meizoseismal area, Sichuan 【A】. In: Southwest Earthquake Intensity Survey Team, State Seismological Bureau(ed). Compilation of Seismic and Geological Survey Results on the Meizoseismal Areas in Sichuan-Yunnan. Seismological Press, Beijing, 85—91(in Chinese).
徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 于贵华, 等. 2005. 川西理塘断裂带平均滑动速率、地震破裂分段与复发特征【J】. 中国科学(D 辑), 35(6): 540—551.
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, YU Gui-hua, et al. 2005. Average slip rate, earthquake rupturing segmentation and recurrence behavior on the Litang Fault zone, western Sichuan Province, China 【J】. Science in China(Ser D), 48(8): 1183—1196.
中央地震工作小组办公室. 1971. 中国地震目录(第一、第二合订)【M】. 北京: 科学出版社. 320—321.
Office of Central Earthquake Working Group. 1971. China Earthquake Catalogue(1-2)【M】. Science Press, Beijing. 320—321(in Chinese).
周春景, 吴中海, 尼玛次仁, 等. 2014. 青海玉树M_S7.1 级地震同震地表破裂构造【J】. 地质通报, 33(4): 551—566.
ZHOU Chun-jing, WU Zhong-hai, Nimaciren, et al. 2014. Structural analysis of the co-seismic surface ruptures associated with the Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake, Qinghai Province 【J】. Geological Bulletin of China, 33(4): 551—566(in Chinese).
周荣军, 陈国星, 李勇, 等. 2005. 四川西部理塘-巴塘地区的活动断裂与1989年巴塘 6.7 级震群发震构造研究【J】. 地震地质, 27(1): 31—43.
ZHOU Rong-jun, CHEN Guo-xing, LI Yong, et al. 2005. Research on active faults in Litang-Batang region, western Sichuan Province and the seismogenic structures of the 1989 Batang M6.7 earthquake swarm 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 27(1): 31—43(in Chinese).
周荣军, 闻学泽, 蔡长星, 等. 1997. 甘孜-玉树断裂带的近代地震与未来地震趋势估计【J】. 地震地质, 19(2): 115—124.
ZHOU Rong-jun, WEN Xue-ze, CAI Chang-xing, et al. 1997. Recent earthquakes and assessment of seismic tendency on the Garzê-Yushu Fault zone 【J】. Seismological Geology, 19(2): 115—124(in Chinese).
周荣军, 叶友清, 李勇, 等. 2007. 理塘断裂带沙湾段的晚第四纪活动性【J】. 第四纪研究, 27(1): 45—53.
ZHOU Rong-jun, YE You-qing, LI Yong, et al. 2007. Late Quaternary activity of the Shawan segment of the Litang Faults 【J】. Quaternary Sciences, 27(1): 45—53(in Chinese).
Erchie W, Burchfiel B C. 2000. Late Cenozoic to Holocene deformation in southwestern Sichuan and adjacent Yunnan, China, and its role in formation of the southeastern part of the Tibetan plateau 【J】. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 112(3): 413—423.
Wells D J, Coppersmiths K J. 1994. New empirical relations among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement 【J】. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 84(4): 974—1002.
WEN Xue-ze, MA Sheng-li, XU Xi-wei, et al. 2008. Historical pattern and behavior of earthquake ruptures along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan faulted-block, southwestern China 【J】. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 168: 16—36.

[1]	申华梁, 杨耀, 周志华, 芮雪莲, 廖晓峰, 赵德杨, 梁明剑, 陈梦蝶, 官致君, 任宏微. 川西理塘毛垭温泉群的成因及深部地热过程[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 689-709.
[2]	吴中海, 白玛多吉, 叶强, 韩帅, 史亚然, 尼玛次仁, 高扬. 西藏阿里阿鲁错地堑系的第四纪活动性、最新同震地表破裂及其地震地质意义[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 67-91.
[3]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 刘炜, 张加庆, 袁建新. 阿木尼克山山前地表破裂带与1962年6.8级地震关系的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 976-991.
[4]	刘小利, 夏涛, 刘静, 姚文倩, 徐晶, 邓德贝尔, 韩龙飞, 贾治革, 邵延秀, 王焱, 乐子扬, 高天琪. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震分布式同震地表裂缝特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 461-483.
[5]	姚文倩, 王子君, 刘静, 刘小利, 韩龙飞, 邵延秀, 王文鑫, 徐晶, 秦可心, 高云鹏, 王焱, 李金阳, 曾宪阳. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震同震地表破裂长度的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 541-559.
[6]	盖海龙, 李智敏, 姚生海, 李鑫. 2022年青海门源M_S6.9地震地表破裂特征的初步调查研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 238-255.
[7]	李智敏, 李文巧, 李涛, 徐岳仁, 苏鹏, 郭鹏, 孙浩越, 哈广浩, 陈桂华, 袁兆德, 李忠武, 李鑫, 杨理臣, 马震, 姚生海, 熊仁伟, 张彦博, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 徐玮阳, 董金元. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M_S7.4地震的发震构造和地表破裂初步调查[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 722-737.
[8]	徐良鑫, 冉勇康, 梁明剑, 吴富峣, 高帅坡, 王虎. 新疆巴里坤1842年和1914年2次M71/2历史地震地表破裂的几何展布及特征[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(1): 1-17.
[9]	马冀, 冯希杰, 李高阳, 李晓妮, 师亚芹. 1568年陕西高陵地震考证与发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 178-188.
[10]	闫小兵, 周永胜, 李自红, 郭瑾. 1695年临汾7(3/4)级地震发震构造研究[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(4): 883-902.
[11]	姚琪, 邢会林, 徐锡伟, 张微, 刘杰. 利用非线性摩擦有限元方法计算大凉山次级块体及其周边地区地震危险性[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 171-185.
[12]	郝海健, 何宏林, 魏占玉, 石峰. 同震地表破裂及活动断层迹线的几何形貌特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1267-1282.
[13]	袁道阳, 雷中生, 吴赵, 冯建刚. 公元前47年甘肃陇西地震考证与发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 819-836.
[14]	梁明剑, 陈立春, 冉勇康, 王虎, 李东雨. 龙门山断裂南段天全段的新活动特征与1327年天全地震的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3): 546-559.
[15]	刘兴旺, 袁道阳, 雷中生, 邵延秀. 甘肃酒西盆地发现地震地表破裂带[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3): 605-616.

川西理塘活动断裂最新同震地表破裂形成时代与震级的重新厘定

NEW CHRONOLOGICAL CONSTRAINT ON THE CO-SEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURE SEGMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LITANG FAULT

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价