安丘-莒县断裂北段几何结构与最新活动特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

安丘-莒县断裂是沂沭断裂带的主要分支之一, 也是最主要的一条活动断裂。通过断裂活动性调查和地质填图, 查明了安丘-莒县断裂北段的空间展布、几何结构以及最新活动特征。在莒县至昌邑一带, 安丘-莒县断裂自北向南大致可划分为昌邑—南流段、安丘—孟疃段、青峰岭段和孟堰段等4个段落。它们以左阶斜列形式展布, 而每个断层段又由更次一级的段落以右阶斜列的形式组成。昌邑—南流断层段的最新活动时代为全新世中晚期, 除右旋走滑断层活动外, 还观察到逆冲和正断运动分量, 其中正断运动分量的发生时代较新。安丘—孟疃和青峰岭2个断层段以右旋走滑运动为主, 兼有逆冲运动分量, 最新活动时代分别为晚更新世和全新世早期。孟堰断层段也以右旋为主兼具逆冲分量, 最新活动时代为全新世早期。安丘—孟疃断层段公元前70年曾发生过安丘7级地震, 结合断层活动性质和最新活动时代综合判断, 山东莒县以北的安丘-莒县断裂的未来地震危险性较大, 在今后的地震灾害防御和地震预测工作中应予以重视。

关键词: 活断层分段, 安丘-莒县断裂, 安丘7级地震

Abstract:

The Anqiu-Juxian Fault is a major branch fault and an active prominent fault of the Yishu Fault belt. The spatial distribution, geometric features and the latest activities of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault are studied by field survey and mapping in this study. The northern segment of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault between Juxian and Changyi can be divided into four segments, namely from north to south, the Changyi-Nanliu segment, the Anqiu-Mengtuan segment, the Qingfengling segment and the Mengyan segment. These segments are left-step en echelon arranged, and each of the fault segments consists of right-step en echelon arranged sub-segments. The Changyi-Nanliu segment is about 31km long and composed of 4 sub-segments in right-step en-echelon arrangement, namely, Wenshan sub-segment, Zhuli sub-segment, Shuangguan-Meicun sub-segment and Nanliu sub-segment, from north to south. The length of these sub-segments is 5km, 7km, 10km and 9km, respectively. The width of the stepover between them is about 2～3km. The Changyi-Nanliu segment generally strikes～15°, and the fault plane dips both west and east with dip angle 70°～80°. This segment offsets the widely distributed eolian yellow or orange fine sand and silt that were formed in the latest late Pleistocene, and it also offsets the mid-Holocene grey-yellow clay. The latest active age of the Changyi-Nanliu segment is the middle and late Holocene. This segment is characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion with thrust and normal fault component, and the normal faulting activity is usually younger than the reverse faulting activity. The Anqiu-Mengtuan segment is about 50km long and exposes～21km. It strikes 15°～20°with the major fault plane dipping NWW with dip angle 70°～80°. This fault segment is characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion with west-to-east thrust component. The segment can also be divided into two sub-segments, namely, the 13km long Anqiu-Guangong sub-segment and the 8km long Anshang-Mengtuan sub-segment, as in right-step en echelon arrangement, with a stepover of about 3km in width. The youngest offset stratum along the Anqiu-Mengtuan segment is the late Pleistocene, so, its latest active age is the late Paleocene and early Holocene. The Qingfengling segment is about 32km long, striking 15°～20°, dipping mainly southeast and partly west with dip angles more than 60° generally. This segment is characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion with minor thrust component. It is composed of 4 sub-segments, which are the Xiaodianzi-Henhushan sub-segment, Kushan-Chezhuang, Maobu and Wangtaizi sub-segment, respectively from north to south. The length of these sub-segments is 6km, 8km, 14km and 4km, respectively. The former three sub-segments are aligned right-laterally. The Qingfengling segment offsets the upper late Pleistocene and the early Holocene strata; its latest active age is the early Holocene. The Mengyan segment exposes about 20km, striking 20° and dipping northwest with dip angle ～70°. It is also characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion with thrust component, and its latest active age is the early Holocene.
The only historical earthquake that occurred on the north segment of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault between Juxian and Changyi is the 70BC Anqiu M7 earthquake. However, paleo-earthquake researches show that several strong earthquakes occurred along the Qingfengling segment and the Mengyan segment between the latest late Pleistocene to early Holocene. The time of the latest strong earthquake is ～3 500a BP, 2 084a BP (-70BC), ～10 000a BP, ～10 000a BP on the Changyi-Nanliu segment, Anqiu-Mengtan segment, Qingfengling segment, and Mengyan segment, respectively. Since the strong earthquake recurrence interval is still not known for each segment, the exact time for the next strong earthquake can't be predicted. However, according to the geometric features, latest active age, latest activity features, historic earthquake data and paleoearthquake documents of this active fault, the 4 segments do have seismotectonic conditions for generating M≥7 earthquake, and the potential earthquake risk does exist and may be rather high and imperative. Thus, the fault activities and the potential earthquake hazard should be considered during future earthquake hazard prevention and prediction.

Key words: active fault segmentation, Anqiu-Juxian Fault, Anqiu M7 earthquake

中图分类号:

P315.2

王志才, 王冬雷, 许洪泰, 葛孚刚, 杨传成, 李建虎. 安丘-莒县断裂北段几何结构与最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(1): 176-191.

WANG Zhi-cai, WANG Dong-lei, XU Hong-tai, GE Fu-gang, YANG Chuan-cheng, LI Jian-hu. GEOMETRIC FEATURES AND LATEST ACTIVITIES OF THE NORTH SEGMENT OF THE ANQIU-JUXIAN FAULT[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2015, 37(1): 176-191.

参考文献

晁洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 1994a. 郯庐断裂带中段全新世活断层的几何结构与分段【A】. 见: 国家地震局地质研究所编. 活动断裂研究(3). 北京: 地震出版社. 180—190.
CHAO Hong-tai, LI Jia-ling, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1994. Geometry and segmentation of the Quaternary fault in the middle segment of the Tanlu Fault zone 【A】. In: Institute of Geology, SSB (ed). Research of Active Fault (3). Seismological Press, Beijing. 180—190(in Chinese).
晁洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 1994b. 郯庐断裂带中段全新世活断层的特征滑动行为与特征地震【J】. 内陆地震, 8(4): 297—304.
CHAO Hong-tai, LI Jia-ling, CUI Zhao-wen, et al.1994b. Characteristic slip and earthquakes on the Quaternary faults in the middle segment of the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Inland Earthquake, 8(4): 297—304(in Chinese).
晁洪太, 王志才, 刘西林, 等. 1999. 郯庐断裂带下辽河莱州湾段与潍坊嘉山段地震构造和地震活动特征对比【J】. 华北地震科学, 17(2): 36—41.
CHAO Hong-tai, WANG Zhi-cai, LIU Xi-lin et al. 1999. Comparison of seismostructure and seismicity between the Xialiaohe-Laizhouwan segment and the Weifang-Jiashan segment of the Tanlu Fault belt 【J】. North China Earthquake Sciences, 17(2): 36—41(in Chinese).
陈国星, 高维明. 1988. 沂沭断裂带现代活动特征及其与强震构造的关系【J】. 中国地震, 4(3): 130—135.
CHEN Guo-xing, GAO Wei-ming. 1988. Modern active features of the Yishu Fault zone and its relationship with the strong earthquake structure 【J】. Earthquake Research in China, 4(3): 130—135(in Chinese).
陈正位, 杨攀新, 李智敏, 等. 2010. 玉树7.1级地震断裂特征与地震地表破裂带【J】. 第四纪研究, 30(3): 628—631.
CHEN Zheng-wei, YANG Pan-xin, LI Zhi-min, et al. 2010. Characteristics of the earthquake fault and surface rupture of the Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake 【J】. Quaternary Sciences, 30(3): 628—631(in Chinese).
邓起东, 高翔, 陈桂华, 等. 2010. 青藏高原昆仑-汶川地震系列与巴颜喀喇断块的最新活动【J】. 地学前缘, 17(5): 163—178.
DENG Qi-dong, GAO Xiang, CHEN Gui-hua, et al. 2010. Recent tectonic activity of Bayankala fault-block and the Kunlun-Wenchuan earthquake series of the Tibetan plateau 【J】. Earth Science Frontiers, 17(5): 163—178(in Chinese).
邓起东, 于贵华, 叶文华. 1992. 地震地表破裂参数与震级的关系研究【M】. 见: 国家地震局地质研究所编. 活动断裂研究(2). 北京: 地震出版社. 247—264.
DENG Qi-dong, YU Gui-hua, YE Wen-hua. 1992. Research on relationship between surface rupture parameters and magnitude 【A】. In: Institute of Geology, SSB(ed). Research of Active Fault (2). Seismological Press, Beijing. 247—264(in Chinese).
方仲景, 计凤桔, 向宏发, 等. 1976. 郯庐带中段第四纪断裂活动特征与地震地质条件述评【J】. 地质科学, (4): 354—365.
FANG Zhong-jing, JI Feng-ju, XIANG Hong-fa, et al. 1976. Review on the Quaternary fault activities and seismo-geological conditions in the middle segment of the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Chinese Geology of Science, 4: 354—365(in Chinese).
高维明, 李家灵, 孙竹友. 1980. 沂沭大陆裂谷的生成与演化【J】. 地震地质, 2(3): 11—18.
GAO Wei-min, LI Jia-ling, SUN Zhu-you. 1980. Development and evolution of the Yishu rift 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 2(3): 11—18(in Chinese).
高维明, 郑郞荪, 李家灵, 等. 1988. 1668年山东郯城8.5级地震的发震构造【J】. 中国地震, 4(3): 9—15.
GAO Wei-min, ZHENG Lang-sun, LI Jia-ling, et al. 1988. Seismogenic structure of the 1668 Tancheng M=8.5 earthquake in Shandong 【J】. Earthquake Research in China, 4(3): 9—15(in Chinese).
韩竹军, 徐杰, 冉勇康, 等. 2003. 华北地区活动地块与强震活动【J】. 中国科学(D辑), 33(增刊): 108—118.
HAN Zhu-jun, XU Jie, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2003. Active blocks and strong earthquakes in North China 【J】. Science in China(Ser D), 33(Suppl): 108—118(in Chinese).
何宏林, 宋方敏, 李传友, 等. 2005. 郯庐断裂带莒县胡家孟堰地震破裂带的发现【J】. 地震地质, 26(4): 630—637.
HE Hong-lin, SONG Fang-min, LI Chuan-you, et al. 2005. Hujiamengyan surface rupture in Juxian County, Shandong Province: A new discovery on the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 26(4): 630—637(in Chinese).
贾荣光, 王志才, 王健, 等. 2007. 潍坊市主要隐伏断层活动特征研究【J】. 震灾防御技术, 2(3): 249—263.
JIA Rong-guang, WANG Zhi-cai, WANG Jian, et al. 2007. Prospecting on the main hidden faults in Weifang City 【J】. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2(3): 249—263(in Chinese).
李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 等. 1991. 郯庐断裂带郯城—新沂段活断层研究【A】. 见: 国家地震局地质研究所编. 活动断裂研究(1). 北京: 地震出版社. 164—173.
LI Jia-ling, CHAO Hong-tai, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1991. Researches on the active fault of the Tancheng-Xinyi segment of the Tanlu Fault 【A】. In: Institute of Geology, SSB(ed). Research of Active Fault (1). Seismological Press, Beijing. 164—173(in Chinese).
李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 等. 1994a. 郯城活断层的分段及其大震危险性分析【J】. 地震地质, 16(2): 122—126.
LI Jia-ling, CHAO Hong-tai, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1994a. Segmentation of active fault along the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault zone and evaluation of strong earthquake risk 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 16(2): 122—126(in Chinese).
李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 等. 1994b. 1668年郯城 8 1/2 级地震断层及其破裂机制【J】. 地震地质, 16(3): 230—237.
LI Jia-ling, CHAO Hong-tai, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1994b. Seismic fault of the 1668 Tancheng M=8 1/2 earthquake and its fracture mechanism 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 16(3): 230—237(in Chinese).
李善邦. 1981. 中国地震【M】. 北京: 地震出版社.
LI Shan-bang. 1981. Earthquakes in China 【M】. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
林伟凡, 高维明. 1987. 沂沭断裂带大地震复发周期【J】. 中国地震, 3(3): 34—40.
LIN Wei-fan, GAO Wei-ming. 1987. Recurrence interval of the strong earthquakes in the Yishu Fault zone 【J】. Earthquake Research in China, 3(3): 34—40(in Chinese).
刘昌铨, 嘉世旭, 杜官恒. 1991. 江苏响水—内蒙古满都拉地学断面地震折射测深结果【J】. 地震地质, 13(3): 193—204.
LIU Chang-quan, JIA Shi-xu, DU Guan-heng. 1991. Seismic refraction results of the geological transection from Xiangshui, Jiangsu to Mandula, Inner Mongolia 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 13(3): 193—204(in Chinese).
马杏垣, 刘昌铨, 刘国栋. 1991. 江苏响水至内蒙古满都拉地学断面【J】. 地质学报, 3: 199—215.
MA Xing-yuan, LIU Chang-quan, LIU Guo-dong. 1991. Geological transection from Xiangshui, Jiangsu to Mandula, Inner Mongolia 【J】. Acta Geologica Sinica, 3: 199—215(in Chinese).
山东省第四地质矿产勘查院. 2003. 山东省区域地质、山东省1 : 50万地质图及说明书【Z】. 济南: 山东省地图出版社.
Fourth Exploration Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources. 2013. Regional Geology of Shandong Province—Geological Map of Shandong Province(1 : 500000)and Its Explanatory Text 【Z】. Shandong Map Press, Jinan(in Chinese).
宋方敏, 杨晓平, 何宏林, 等. 2005. 山东安丘-莒县断裂小店子—茅埠段新活动及其定量研究【J】. 地震地质, 27(2): 200—211.
SONG Fang-min, YANG Xiao-ping, HE Hong-lin, et al. 2005. Quantitative analysis of recent activity of the Xiaodianzi-Maobu segment of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault, Shandong Province 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 27(2): 200—211(in Chinese).
汤有标, 姚大全. 1987. 郯庐断裂带赤山段晚更新世以来的活动性【J】. 中国地震, 6(2): 63—69.
TANG You-biao, YAO Da-quan. 1987. Pleistocene activity of the Chiahan segment of the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Earthquake Research in China, 6(2): 63—69(in Chinese).
郯庐活动断裂带地质填图课题组. 2013. 郯庐活动断裂带地质图及(1 : 50000)说明书【Z】. 北京: 地震出版社.
Tanlu Active Fault Mapping Group. 2013. Geological Map of the Tanlu Active Fault Zone(1 : 50000)and Its Explanatory Text 【Z】. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
万天丰, 朱鸿, 赵磊, 等. 1996. 郯庐断裂带的形成与演化: 综述【J】. 现代地质, 10(2): 159—168.
WAN Tian-feng, ZHU Hong, ZHAO Lei, et al. 1996. Formation and evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault zone: A Review 【J】. Geoscience, 10(2): 159—168(in Chinese).
王来明, 宋明春, 王沛成. 2002. 胶南-威海造山带研究进展及重要地质问题讨论【J】. 山东地质, 18: (3-4): 78—83.
WANG Lai-ming, SONG Ming-chun, WANG Pei-cheng. 2002. Progress of researches of the Jiao-Weihai orogenic belt and discussion on some significant geological problems 【J】. Geology of Shandong, 18: (3-4): 78—83(in Chinese).
王世进, 万渝生, 宋志勇, 等. 2012. 鲁西泰山岩群地层划分及形成时代: 锆石SHRIMP U-Pb 测年的证据【J】. 山东国土资源, 28(12): 15—22.
WANG Shi-jin, WAN Yu-sheng, SONG Zhi-yong, et al. 2012. Stratigraphic division and formation era of Taishan Group in Luxi area: Evidence of zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating 【J】. Shandong Land Resources, 28(12): 15—22(in Chinese).
王志才, 孙昭民, 贾荣光, 等. 2005. 沂沭断裂带安丘-莒县断裂安丘—朱里段几何结构与活动特征【J】. 地震地质, 27(2): 212—220.
WANG Zhi-cai, SUN zhao-min, JIA Rong-guang, et al. 2005. Geometry and activity of the Anqiu-Zhuli segment of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault of the Yishu Fault zone 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 27(2): 212—220(in Chinese).
夏东兴, 刘振夏, 吴桑云, 等. 1996. 末次冰期黄河解体事件初探【J】. 海洋与湖沼, 27(5): 511—517.
XIA Dong-xing, LIU Zhen-xia, WU Sang-yun, et al. 1996. A preliminary study on disintegration event of the Huanghe River during the maximum of the last glacial period 【J】. Oceanologia Et Limnologia Sinica, 27(5): 511—517(in Chinese).
徐嘉炜. 1984. 郯城-庐江平移断裂系统【A】. 见: 构造地质论丛(3). 北京: 地质出版社. 18—32.
XU Jia-wei. 1984. Tancheng-Lujiang Wrench Fault System 【A】. In: Collection on Structural Geology(3). Geological Publishing House, Beijing. 18—32(in Chinese).
徐锡伟, 陈文彬, 于贵华, 等. 2002. 2001年11月14日昆仑山库赛湖地震(M_S8.1)地表破裂带的基本特征【J】. 地震地质, 24(1): 1—13.
XU Xi-wei, CHEN Wen-bin, YU Gui-hua, et al. 2002. Characteristic features of the surface ruptures of the Huh Sai Hu(Kunlunshan)earthquake(M_S8.1), northern Tibetan plateau, China 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 24(1): 1—13(in Chinese).
徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 叶建青, 等. 2008. 汶川 M_S8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造【J】. 地震地质, 30(3): 597—629.
XU Xi-wei, WEN Xue-ze, Ye Jian-qing, et al. 2008. Surface ruptures and its seismogenic structure of the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 30(3): 597—629(in Chinese).
杨晓平, 宋方敏, 张兰凤, 等. 2006. 郯庐断裂带青峰岭断层上最新一次古地震事件【J】. 地震学报, 28(2): 213—218.
YANG Xiao-ping, SONG Fang-min, ZHANG LAN-feng, et al. 2006. A recent paleoearthquake on Qingfengling seismic fault of the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(2): 213—218(in Chinese).
张碧秀, 汤永安. 1988. 沂沭断裂带地壳结构特征【J】. 中国地震, 4(3): 16—22.
ZHANG Bi-xiu, TANG Yong-an. 1988. Features of the crust structure of the Yishu Fault zone 【J】. Earthquake Research in China, 4(3): 16—22(in Chinese).
张国伟, 孟庆任, 赖绍聪. 1995. 秦岭造山带的结构构造【J】. 中国科学(B辑), 25(9): 994—1003.
ZHANG Guo-wei, MENG Qing-ren, LAI Shao-cong. 1995. Tectonics and structure of the Qinling orogenic belt 【J】. Science in China(Ser B), 25(9): 994—1003(in Chinese).
张继红, 赵国泽, 肖骑彬, 等. 2010. 郯庐断裂带中段(沂沭断裂带)电性结构研究与孕震环境【J】. 地球物理学报, 53(3): 605—611.
ZHANG Ji-hong, ZHAO Guo-ze, Xiao Qi-bin, et al. 2010. Analysis of electric structure of the central Tan-Lu Fault zone(the Yishu Fault zone)and seismogenic condition 【J】. Chinese J Geophys, 53(3): 605—6l1(in Chinese).
张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 2003. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块【J】. 中国科学(D辑), 33(增刊): 12—20.
ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China 【J】. Science in China(Ser D), 33(Suppl): 12—20(in Chinese).
张培震, 闻学泽, 徐锡伟, 等. 2009. 2008年汶川8.0级特大地震孕育和发生的多单元组合模式【J】. 科学通报, 54(7): 944—953.
ZHANG Pei-zhen, WEN Xue-ze, XU Xi-wei, et al. 2009. Tectonic model of the great Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008, Sichuan, China 【J】. Chinese Sci Bull(Chinese Ver), 54(7): 944—953(in Chinese).
张培震, 朱守彪, 张竹琪, 等. 2012. 汶川地震的发震构造与破裂机理【J】. 地震地质, 34(4): 566—575. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.04.003.
ZHANG Pei-zhen, ZHU Shou-biao, ZHANG Zhu-qi, et al. 2012. Seismogenic structure and rupture mechanism of the M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake 【J】. Seismology and Geology, 34(4): 566—575(in Chinese).
张增奇, 刘书才, 杜圣贤, 等. 2011. 山东省地层划分对比厘定意见【J】. 山东国土资源, 27(9): 1—9.
ZHANG Zeng-qi, LIU Shu-cai, DU Sheng-xian, et al. 2011. Determination opinions on stratigraphic division and correlation in Shandong Province 【J】. Shandong Land Resources, 27(9): 1—9(in Chinese).
张祖陆. 1995. 渤海南岸滨海平原的黄土研究【J】. 科学通报, 40(1): 93—94.
ZHANG Zu-lu. 1995. Research on the loess accumulated on the coastal plain to the south of Bohai Sea 【J】. Chinese Science Bulletin, 40(1): 93—94(in Chinese).
朱光, 王勇生, 王道轩, 等. 2006. 前陆沉积与变形对郯庐断裂带的同造山运动的制约【J】. 地质科学, 41(1): 102—121.
ZHU Guang, WANG Yong-sheng, WANG Dao-xuan, et al. 2006. Constraints of foreland sedimentation and deformation on synorogenic motion of the Tanlu Fault zone 【J】. Chinese Journal of Geology, 41(1): 102—121(in Chinese).
朱光, 张力, 谢成龙, 等. 2009. 郯庐断裂带构造演化的同位素年代学制约【J】. 地质科学, 44(4): 1327—1342.
ZHU Guang, ZHANG Li, XIE Cheng-long, et al. 2009. Geochronological constraints on tectonic evolution of the Tan-Lu Fault zone 【J】. Chinese Journal of Geology, 44(4): 1327—1342(in Chinese).
朱书俊, 孙寿成. 1991. 1668年莒县-郯城大震研究综述【J】. 地震学刊, (4): 19—24.
ZHU Shu-jun, SUN Shou-cheng. 1991. Reviews on researches of the 1668 Juxian-Tancheng great earthquake 【J】. Journal of Seismology, (4): 19—24(in Chinese).

[1]	张浩, 王金艳, 许汉刚, 李丽梅, 蒋新, 赵启光, 顾勤平. 安丘-莒县断裂新沂段的几何结构特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1448-1468.
[2]	王雷, 许洪泰, 王志才, 杨传成, 张建民, 王冬雷, 夏暖, 蔡明刚, 鲁人齐, 任治坤. 安丘-莒县断裂驸马营覆盖区第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1156-1171.
[3]	曹筠, 李彦宝, 冉勇康, 徐锡伟, 马董伟, 张志强. 城市隐伏活动断层避让典型案例分析--以新沂市郯庐断裂带沿线某场地为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 1071-1085.
[4]	秦晶晶, 刘保金, 王志才, 酆少英, 邓小娟, 花鑫升, 李倩. 利用地震反射剖面探测研究安丘-莒县断裂板泉段的浅部构造特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 349-362.
[5]	计昊旻, 李安, 张世民. 基于冲沟右旋水平位错的安丘-莒县断裂地震特征位移分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 471-487.
[6]	张鹏, 张媛媛, 李丽梅, 蒋新, 孟科. 郯庐断裂带安丘-莒县断裂江苏段全新世活动的新证据[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(3): 576-586.
[7]	张鹏, 李丽梅, 冉勇康, 曹筠, 许汉刚, 蒋新. 郯庐断裂带安丘-莒县断裂江苏段晚第四纪活动特征研究[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(4): 1162-1176.
[8]	王志才, 贾荣光, 孙昭民, 石荣会, 晁洪太. 沂沭断裂带安丘-莒县断裂安丘—朱里段几何结构与活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2005, 27(2): 212-220.
[9]	田勤俭, 张立人, 郝平, 王赞军, 王志才. 昆仑山口西8.1级地震地表破裂参数相互关系的新认识[J]. 地震地质, 2005, 27(1): 20-30.
[10]	李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 赵清玉. 郯庐活断层的分段及其大震危险性分析[J]. 地震地质, 1994, 16(2): 121-126.