芦山7.0级地震强震台仪器烈度与调查点烈度的对比分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.02.018

地震地质 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 222-229.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.02.018

芦山7.0级地震强震台仪器烈度与调查点烈度的对比分析

冯蔚^1,2, 姜立新¹, 杨天青¹, 李洋³, 郑通彦¹

1 中国地震台网中心, 北京 100045;
2 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036;
3 中国地震局, 北京 100036

收稿日期:2013-07-13 修回日期:2013-11-10 出版日期:2014-03-30 发布日期:2014-04-08
基金资助:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目（2012BAK15B0602）资助

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL INTENSITY AND SURVEY SPOT INTENSITY OF LUSHAN M7.0 EARTHQUAKE

FENG Wei^1,2, JIANG Li-xin¹, YANG Tian-qing¹, LI Yang³, ZHENG Tong-yan¹

1 China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China;
2 Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China;
3 China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China

Received:2013-07-13 Revised:2013-11-10 Online:2014-03-30 Published:2014-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2013年4月20日四川芦山7.0级地震发生在龙门山断裂带南段，该地震是继汶川8.0级地震后的1次强震，但并非余震。文中利用2013年4月20日芦山地震的强震记录计算等效峰值加速度A_0.5换算地震仪器烈度，并且将地震仪器烈度与强震台站周边5km内调查点烈度对比分析。结果表明，芦山地震的仪器烈度与周边调查点烈度吻合度58.6%，且偏差不超过1度。然而，即使宏观烈度相同，观测地面运动参数也存在较大离散度。但在缺少现场调查的震后初期，地震仪器烈度有可能为地震烈度范围判断提供定量的参考指标。

关键词: 芦山地震, 地震烈度, 仪器烈度, 调查点烈度

Abstract: Lushan M7.0 earthquake on April 20, 2013 occurred on the southern segment of Longmen Shan Fault zone. It is another strong earthquake after the Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake, rather than an aftershock. A total of 196 people died in Lushan M7.0 earthquake, 21 people missing, and 13019 injured. In this paper, we use the April 20, 2013 Lushan M7.0 earthquake strong motion records to calculate equivalent peak acceleration A_0.5 and convert it into the instrumental intensity. Then, we carry out the comparative analysis of instrumental intensity and surveyed intensity at the spots in the range of 5 kilometers around the stations. The results show a coincidence degree of 58.6% between the instrumental intensity and surveyed intensity, with the deviation less than ±1 degree. Meanwhile, we also recognize that there is a big dispersion of the observed ground motion parameters, even in the same macro-intensity. It is uncertain about the corresponding relationship between the individual station measured ground motion parameter values and the seismic intensity. The damage may be caused by earthquake ground motion characteristics, building types and site conditions and other factors, and therefore the difference between instrument intensity and actual seismic intensity cannot be ignored. On the whole, instrumental seismic intensity has potential for determining the range of seismic intensity, thus to provide quantitative reference, especially, in the absence of earthquake site investigation initially.

Key words: Lushan M7.0 earthquake, seismic intensity, instrumental intensity, survey spot intensity

中图分类号:

P316

冯蔚, 姜立新, 杨天青, 李洋, 郑通彦. 芦山7.0级地震强震台仪器烈度与调查点烈度的对比分析[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(1): 222-229.

FENG Wei, JIANG Li-xin, YANG Tian-qing, LI Yang, ZHENG Tong-yan. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL INTENSITY AND SURVEY SPOT INTENSITY OF LUSHAN M7.0 EARTHQUAKE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2014, 36(1): 222-229.

参考文献

雷建成, 高孟潭, 俞言祥. 2007. 四川及邻区地震动衰减关系［J］. 地震学报, 29(5): 500—511.
LEI Jian-cheng, GAO Meng-tan, YU Yan-xiang. 2007. Seismic motion attenuation relations in Sichuan and adjacent areas［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 29(5): 500—511(in Chinese).
李亮. 2011. 基于地震动参数的烈度计算方法研究［D］: [学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.
LI Liang. 2011. On the computational method of instrumental seismic intensity based on ground motion parameters［D］. Dissertation. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin(in Chinese).
李英民, 蔡辉腾, 韩军, 等. 2007. 重庆及邻近地区地震烈度衰减关系研究［J］. 防灾减灾工程学报, 27(1): 17—22.
LI Ying-min, CAI Hui-teng, HAN Jun, et al. 2007. Study on attenuation relation of seismic intensity in Chongqing and its adjacent areas［J］. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 27(1): 17—22(in Chinese).
李志强, 侯建盛, 李洋, 等.2013.2013年4月20日四川芦山M_S 7.0地震灾害特点分析［J］. 地震地质, 35(2): 399—410.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2013.02.018.
LI Zhi-qiang, HOU Jian-sheng, LI Yang, et al. 2013. Analysis on the characteristics of the M_S 7.0 Lushan, Sichuan Province, earthquake hazard on April 20, 2013［J］. Seismology and Geology, 35(2): 399—410(in Chinese).
林淋, 孙景江. 2011. 不同地震动参数与地震烈度相关性对比研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 31(1): 6—10.
LIN Lin, SUN Jing-jiang. 2011. Comparative research on correlation between strong ground motion parameters and seismic intensity［J］. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 31(1): 6—10(in Chinese).
孙继浩, 帅向华. 2011. 川滇及其邻区中强地震烈度衰减关系适用性研究［J］. 地震工程与工程振动, 31(1): 11—18.
SUN Ji-hao, SHUAI Xiang-hua. 2011. Study on moderate-strong seismic intensity attenuation relations in Sichuan-Yunnan and its adjacent areas［J］. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 31(1): 11—18(in Chinese).
汪素云, 俞言祥, 高阿甲, 等. 2000. 中国分区地震动衰减关系的确定［J］. 中国地震, 16(2): 99—106.
WANG Su-yun, YU Yan-xiang, GAO A-jia, et al. 2000. Development of attenuation relations for ground motion in China［J］. Earthquake Research in China, 16(2): 99—106(in Chinese).
张明. 2010. 仪器烈度计算方法及标准的初步研究［D］: [学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所.
ZHANG Ming. 2010. Preliminary research on the computational method and standards of seismic intensity［D］. Dissertation. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin(in Chinese).
Wald D J, Quitoriano V, Heaton T H, et al.1999. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California［J］. Earthquake Spectra, 15(3): 557—564.

[1]	李春果, 王宏伟, 温瑞智, 强生银, 任叶飞. 2021年青海玛多M_S7.4地震随机有限断层三维地震动模拟[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1085-1100.
[2]	郭建兴, 张宇翔, 姬建中, 袁小祥, 肖本夫. 利用居民地建筑物数据和高分遥感影像评估地震烈度的方法初探[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(4): 968-980.
[3]	徐志萍, 王夫运, 姜磊, 赵延娜, 杨利普, 唐淋. 龙门山中南段地壳上地幔三维密度结构[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 84-98.
[4]	冯蔚, 刘杰, 罗佳宏, 侯建盛. 运用理论格林函数模拟新疆阿克陶6.7级地震强地面运动[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(4): 850-860.
[5]	曾蒂, 陈立春, 陈顺云, 李东雨. 2013年芦山M_S7.0地震前基岩地温变化的再分析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(5): 994-1006.
[6]	畅柳, 杨博, 张风霜, 许明元, 杨国华. 基于GPS和水准数据的2013年芦山7.0级地震震源滑动模型[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(3): 561-571.
[7]	白玉柱, 徐锡伟. 由强震动数据分析芦山地震地面运动持时及周期特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 92-103.
[8]	王林, 周青云, 王峻, 李文巧, 周连庆, 陈翰林, 苏鹏, 梁朋. 基于深部地震资料与地表变形资料的芦山地震发震构造研究[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(2): 458-476.
[9]	张致伟, 周龙泉, 龙锋, 阮祥. 汶川8.0和芦山7.0级地震序列应力场时空特征[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 804-817.
[10]	刘丽娜, 许冲, 陈剑. 基于地貌信息熵与滑坡物源的芦山地震区泥石流危险性评价[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 880-892.
[11]	解滔, 郑晓东, 康春丽, 马未宇, 卢军. 2013年4月20日芦山M_S7.0地震前热红外亮温异常分析[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(1): 149-161.
[12]	陈鲲, 俞言祥, 高孟潭, 亢川川. 中国西部地区利用烈度数据估计地震动参数的方法[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(4): 1043-1052.
[13]	苏琴, 杨永林, 郑兵, 王双洪, 李菲菲, 刘冠中. 4 ·20芦山7.0级地震预测思路及过程回顾[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(4): 1077-1093.
[14]	庾露, 单新建, 陈晓利. 基于综合指标法的芦山地震滑坡危险区等级快速划分[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(4): 1106-1115.
[15]	邓志辉, 陈梅花, 杨竹转, 严兴, 邓远立. 芦山地震、汶川地震与龙门山地区水汽异常[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 658-666.

芦山7.0级地震强震台仪器烈度与调查点烈度的对比分析

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INSTRUMENTAL INTENSITY AND SURVEY SPOT INTENSITY OF LUSHAN M7.0 EARTHQUAKE

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价