郯庐断裂带安徽紫阳山段发现全新世活动证据

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.04.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 安丘-莒县断裂（F₅）为郯庐断裂带中段东地堑内最新活动断裂。近年来，F₅江苏段研究成果丰硕，发现不同地段普遍存在全新世活动性，运动方式以右旋走滑兼挤压逆冲为主。以往研究未讨论过F₅在淮河以南安徽境内的延伸情况以及进一步的活动性问题。文中选取与F₅江苏段线性影像特征延伸一致的淮河南岸郯庐紫阳山段作为突破口，通过遥感影像解译、地质地貌调查和探槽开挖，初步得到以下认识：1）紫阳山段线性构造地貌特征清晰，断层发育于浮山至紫阳山一线的中生代红色砂岩隆起边缘缓坡，为安丘-莒县断裂（F₅）过淮河后的南延部分；2）朱刘探槽开挖揭示，该段错断了晚更新世晚期黏土层，晚更新世晚期-全新世早期黑色黏土层受断层活动影响沿断面灌入、填充，形成黑色断层条带及黑土充填楔，表明断层最新活动时代达全新世早期；3）朱刘探槽开挖揭示，该段第四纪以来存在至少3次古地震事件，第1次古地震事件推测年代为第四纪早、中期，第2次古地震事件年代为20.10~13.46ka BP，第3次古地震事件年代为（10.15±0.05）~（8.16±0.05） ka BP。上述研究成果弥补了对郯庐断裂带安徽段晚第四纪活动性认识的不足，为安徽省的地震监测和震害防御工作提供了基础数据。

关键词: 郯庐断裂带, 晚第四纪, 全新世活动, 安徽, 紫阳山

Abstract: Anqiu-Juxian Fault(F₅) is the latest active fault in the eastern graben of the middle segment of the Tanlu fault zone. In recent years, the research results of F₅ in Jiangsu Province are abundant, and it is found that Holocene activity is prevalent in different segments, and the movement pattern is dominated by dextral strike-slip and squeezing thrust. The Anhui segment and the Jiangsu segment of the Tan-Lu fault zone are bounded by the Huaihe River. Previous studies have not discussed the extension and activity of F₅ in the south of the Huaihe River in Anhui Province. This paper chooses the Ziyangshan segment of Tanlu fault zone in the south of the Huaihe River as the breakthrough point, which is consistent with the linear image feature of extension of F₅ in Jiangsu Province. Through the remote sensing image interpretation, geological and geomorphological investigation and trench excavation, we initially get the following understanding:(1)The linear structural features of the Ziyang segment are clear, and the fault is developed on the gentle slope of the Mesozoic red sandstone uplift along the Fushan-Ziyangshan, which is the southern extension of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault(F₅); (2)The excavation of the Zhuliu trench reveals that the late Pleistocene clastic layers are interrupted, and the late late Pleistocene to early Holocene black clay layers are filled along the fault to form black fault strips and black soil-filled wedges, indicating that the latest active age of the fault is early Holocene; (3)The excavation of Zhuliu trench reveals that there are at least 3 paleo-earthquake events since the Quaternary, the first paleo-seismic event is dated to the early and middle Quaternary, and the 2nd paleo-seismic event is 20.10~13.46ka BP, the age of the third paleo-seismic event is(10.15±0.05)~(8.16±0.05)ka BP. These results complement our understanding of the late Quaternary activity in the Anhui segment of the Tanlu fault zone, providing basic data for earthquake monitoring and seismic damage prevention in Anhui Province.

Key words: Tanlu fault zone, late Quaternary, Holocene activity, Anhui Province, Ziyangshan

中图分类号:

P315.2

杨源源, 赵朋, 郑海刚, 姚大全, 王行舟, 缪鹏, 李军辉, 汪小厉, 疏鹏. 郯庐断裂带安徽紫阳山段发现全新世活动证据[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 644-655.

YANG Yuan-yuan, ZHAO Peng, ZHENG Hai-gang, YAO Da-quan, WANG Xing-zhou, MIAO Peng, LI Jun-hui, WANG Xiao-li, SHU Peng. EVIDENCE OF HOLOCENE ACTIVITY DISCOVERED IN ANHUI ZIYANGSHAN SEGMENT OF TANLU FAULT ZONE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2017, 39(4): 644-655.

参考文献

曹筠, 冉勇康, 许汉刚, 等. 2015. 宿迁城市活动断层探测多方法技术运用的典型案例[J]. 地震地质, 37(2):430-439. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.02.007. CAO Jun, RAN Yong-kang, XU Han-gang, et al. 2015. Typical case analysis on application of multi-method detection technique to active fault exploration in Suqian City[J]. Seismology and Geology, 37(2):430-439(in Chinese).
晁洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 1994. 郯庐断裂带中段全新世活断层的几何结构与分段[M]//国家地震局地质研究所. 活动断裂研究(3). 北京:地震出版社:180-190. CHAO Hong-tai, LI Jia-ling, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1994. Geometry and segmentation of the Quaternary fault in the middle segment of Tanlu fault zone[M]//Institute of Geology, State Seismological Bureau. Research of Active Fault (3). Seismological Press, Beijing:180-190(in Chinese).
方仲景, 丁梦林, 计凤桔, 等. 1980. 郯城-庐江断裂带地震活动的地质分析[J]. 地震地质, 2(4):39-45. FANG Zhong-jing, DING Meng-lin, JI Feng-ju, et al. 1980. Geological analysis of the seismicity in the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone, East China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2(4):39-45(in Chinese).
高维明, 郑郎荪. 1991. 郯庐断裂带的活断层分段与潜在震源区的划分[J]. 中国地震, 7(1):87-91. GAO Wei-ming, ZHENG Lang-sun. 1991. Active fault segmentation and the identification of potential seismic zones along the Tanlu Fault[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 7(1):87-91(in Chinese).
国家地震局地质研究所. 1987. 郯庐断裂[M]. 北京:地震出版社:219-222. Institute of Geology, State Seismological Bureau. 1987. The Tanlu Fault Zone[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing:219-222(in Chinese).
李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 等. 1991. 郯庐断裂带郯城-新沂段活断层研究[M]//国家地震局地质研究所. 活动断裂研究(1). 北京:地震出版社:164-173. LI Jia-ling, CHAO Hong-tai, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1991. Research on the active fault of Tancheng-Xinyi segment in the Tanlu fault zone[M]//Institute of Geology, State Seismological Bureau. Research of Active Fault (1). Seismological Press, Beijing:164-173(in Chinese).
李家灵, 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 等. 1994. 郯庐活断层的分段及其大震危险性分析[J]. 地震地质, 16(2):121-126. LI Jia-ling, CHAO Hong-tai, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1994. Segmentation of active fault along the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault zone and evaluation of strong earthquake risk[J]. Seismology and Geology, 16(2):121-126(in Chinese).
李起彤. 1994. 郯庐断裂带江苏段全新世活动新证据[M]//中国地震学会地震地质专业委员会. 中国活动断层研究. 北京:地震出版社:140-145. LI Qi-tong. 1994. New evidence for the Holocene movement along the Jiangsu segment of the Tanlu fault zone[M]//Seismogeological Committee of the Seismological Society of China. Research on Active Fault in China. Seismological Press, Beijing:140-145(in Chinese).
彭贵, 焦文强. 1990. 嶂山闸地裂缝沉积物的¹⁴C年龄[J]. 地震地质, 12(2):179-182. PENG Gui, JIAO Wen-qiang. 1990. Radiocarbon ages of sediments in Zhangshanzha ground fissures and their geological significance[J]. Seismology and Geology, 12(2):179-182(in Chinese).
沈小七, 姚大全, 郑海刚, 等. 2015. 郯庐断裂带重岗山-王迁段晚更新世以来的活动习性[J]. 地震地质, 37(1):139-148. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.01.011. SHEN Xiao-qi, YAO Da-quan, ZHENG Hai-gang, et al. 2015. The research on activity behavior of Chonggangshan-Wangqian segment of Tan-Lu fault zone since late Pleistocene[J]. Seismology and Geology, 37(1):139-148(in Chinese).
汤有标, 沈子忠, 林安培, 等. 1988. 郯庐断裂带安徽段的展布及其新构造活动[J]. 地震地质, 10(2):46-50. TANG You-biao, SHEN Zi-zhong, LIN An-pei, et al. 1988. Extending of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone at the Anhui section and its neotectonic activity[J]. Seismology and Geology, 10(2):46-50(in Chinese).
谢瑞征, 朱书俊, 丁政. 1991. 郯庐断裂带江苏段全新世活动问题的商榷[J]. 地震学刊, (4):15-18. XIE Rui-zheng, ZHU Shu-jun, DING Zheng. 1991. A discussion on the Holocene activity of the Jiangsu segment of Tanlu fault zone[J]. Journal of Seismology, (4):15-18(in Chinese).
许汉刚, 范小平, 冉勇康, 等. 2016. 郯庐断裂带宿迁段F₅断裂浅层地震勘探新证据[J]. 地震地质, 38(1):31-43. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.003. XU Han-gang, FAN Xiao-ping, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2016. New evidences of the Holocene fault in Suqian segment of the Tanlu fault zone discovered by shallow seismic exploration method[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(1):31-43(in Chinese).
徐嘉炜, 马国锋. 1992. 郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾[J]. 地质论评, 38(4):316-324. XU Jia-wei, MA Guo-feng. 1992. Review of ten-years(1981-1991)of research on the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone[J]. Geological Review, 38(4):3l6-324(in Chinese).
杨源源, 郑海刚, 姚大全, 等. 2016. 郯庐断裂带中段嶂山东侧断裂的活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 38(3):582-595. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.03.006. YANG Yuan-yuan, ZHENG Hai-gang, YAO Da-quan, et al. 2016. Activity features of faults at the east of Zhangshan on the middle segment of Tanlu fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(3):582-595(in Chinese).
姚大全, 刘家灿, 翟洪涛, 等. 2004. 郯庐断裂带白山-卅铺段第四纪以来的活动习性[J]. 地震地质, 26(4):622-629. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2004.04.008. YAO Da-quan, LIU Jia-can, ZHAI Hong-tao, et al. 2004. Quaternary activity of the Baishan-Sapu segment of the Tancheng-Lujiang fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 26(4):622-629(in Chinese).
翟炳松, 侍继成, 杨一冲. 1992. 郯庐断裂带泗洪段全新世活动性初步研究[J]. 地震, (5):61-64, 71. ZHAI Bing-song, SHI Ji-cheng, YANG Yi-chong. 1992. Preliminary research on recent activity along Sihong segment of Tanlu fault zone[J]. Earthquake, (5):61-64, 71(in Chinese).
张鹏, 李丽梅, 冉勇康, 等. 2015. 郯庐断裂带安丘-莒县断裂江苏段晚第四纪活动特征研究[J]. 地震地质, 37(4):1162-1176. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.04.018. ZHANG Peng, LI Li-mei, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2015. Research on characteristics of late Quaternary activity of the Jiangsu segment of Anqiu-Juxian Fault in the Tanlu fault zone[J]. Seismology and Geology, 37(4):1162-1176(in Chinese).
Wan T F. 1996. Formation and Evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault Zone[M]. China University of Geosciences Press, Beijing:1-11.
Xu J W. 1993. The Tangcheng-Lujiang Wrench Fault System[M]. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester:1-74.
Xu J W, Zhu G. 1994. Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone, eastern China[J]. International Geology Review, 36(8):771-784.

[1]	刘庆, 刘韶, 张世民. 大凉山断裂带中段越西断裂晚第四纪古地震[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 321-337.
[2]	赵朋, 李军辉, 陶月潮, 疏鹏, 方震. 郯庐断裂带女山湖北侧探槽的新活动现象及讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 338-354.
[3]	左玉琦, 杨海波, 杨晓平, 詹艳, 李安, 孙翔宇, 胡宗凯. 阿拉善地块南缘北大山断裂的晚第四纪构造活动证据[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 355-376.
[4]	杨晨艺, 李晓妮, 冯希杰, 黄引弟, 裴跟弟. 秦岭北缘断裂带的重要分支——桃川-户县断层的浅部结构与第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 464-483.
[5]	郑海刚, 姚大全, 赵朋, 杨源源, 黄金水. 郯庐断裂带赤山段全新世新活动的特征[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 127-138.
[6]	原浩东, 李安, 黄伟亮, 胡宗凯, 左玉琦, 杨晓平. 西准噶尔地区托里断裂晚第四纪构造变形[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 49-66.
[7]	张伟恒, 陈杰, 李涛, 邸宁, 姚远. 龙门山前陆冲断带南段三苏场背斜晚第四纪变形速率[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1351-1364.
[8]	杨源源, 李鹏飞, 路硕, 疏鹏, 潘浩波, 方良好, 郑海刚, 赵朋, 郑颖平, 姚大全. 郯庐断裂带中段F₅断裂淮河-女山湖段的古地震与垂直滑动速率[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1365-1383.
[9]	冯晶晶, 赵勇伟, 李霓, 陈正全, 王丽竹, 刘永顺, 聂保锋, 张学斌. 琼北晚第四纪火山锥体形貌与喷发机制[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1107-1127.
[10]	沈军, 戴训也, 肖淳, 焦轩凯, 白其乐格尔, 邓梅, 刘泽众, 夏方华, 刘玉, 刘明. 夏垫西断裂的晚第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 909-924.
[11]	徐伟, 刘志成, 王继, 高战武, 尹金辉. 西藏阿里地区喀喇昆仑断裂断错地貌及最近强震活动时代的初步研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 925-943.
[12]	秦晶晶, 刘保金, 王志才, 酆少英, 邓小娟, 花鑫升, 李倩. 利用地震反射剖面探测研究安丘-莒县断裂板泉段的浅部构造特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 349-362.
[13]	张驰, 李智敏, 任治坤, 刘金瑞, 张志亮, 武登云. 日月山断裂南段晚第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 1-19.
[14]	常昊, 常祖峰, 刘昌伟. 金沙江断裂带活动与大型滑坡群的关系研究:以金沙江拿荣—绒学段为例[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1435-1458.
[15]	李正芳, 李彦宝, 周本刚, 朱国军, 刘保金, 吴健. 北京平原大兴凸起东缘断裂全新世活动的新认识[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1671-1681.