2008年西藏改则地震多视角InSAR成果的三维形变解算及初步分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.014

地震地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 978-986.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.014

2008年西藏改则地震多视角InSAR成果的三维形变解算及初步分析

王家庆^1,2, 张国宏¹, 单新建¹, 张迎峰^1,3

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 中国地震局第一监测中心, 天津 300180;
3. 中国石油大学华东, 青岛 266555

收稿日期:2015-04-09 修回日期:2016-07-27 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2017-01-20
通讯作者: 张国宏,副研究员,E-mail:zhanggh@ies.ac.cn
作者简介:王家庆,男,1990年生,现为中国地震局地质研究所硕士研究生,研究方向为InSAR干涉处理及形变场数值模拟等,E-mail:wjqrs08@163.com。
基金资助:
地震动力学国家重点实验室基本科研业务专项（LED2013A02，LED2014A01）；国家自然科学基金（4141101073；41461164002）与中国地震局第一监测中心科技创新主任基金（FMC2016009）共同资助

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEFORMATION OF THE 2008 GAIZE EARTHQUAKES RESOLVED FROM INSAR MEASUREMENTS BY MULTIPLE VIEW ANGLES AND ITS TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS

WANG Jia-qing^1,2, ZHANG Guo-hong¹, SHAN Xin-jian¹, ZHANG Ying-feng^1,3

1. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. First Crust Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300180, China;
3. China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266555, China

Received:2015-04-09 Revised:2016-07-27 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2017-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2008年西藏改则M_W6.4地震发生于青藏高原腹地拉萨块体与羌塘块体之间的张性活动构造带上，是一次典型的正断层破裂事件。基于InSAR对SN向形变的极度不敏感性，文中利用结合先验条件的最小二乘迭代逼近法解算了改则地震的三维同震形变场。结果显示：主震断层两盘的垂直运动差异明显，上盘存在明显的沉降“双心”特征，量值分别为-41.4 cm、-48.9cm，而下盘的最大隆升量仅5cm；除余震断层附近存在小量级（<5cm）的N向形变外，SN向形变总体趋势向S；三维形变场的整体以垂直形变为主，并集中于上盘，而水平形变具有明显的EW向分离和E向旋转特征；所得到的各形变分量与模拟值的残差标准差不超过6cm，说明此方法能够用于获取精度较高的三维同震形变场。整体上，三维形变场的分解结果与改则地震的张性破裂特征及其所处的EW向拉伸、SN向压缩构造应力背景呈现一致性特征。

关键词: 2008年改则地震, InSAR, 多视角, 三维形变场

Abstract:

The 2008 Gaize M_W6.4 earthquake,occurring on the tensional active fault zone located between Lhasa terrane and Qiangtang terrane in the interior of Tibet is a typical normal-faulting event.In this paper,we resolve the three-dimensional coseismic displacement fields of the earthquakes using a least-square iterative approximation solution with a priori knowledge,according to the theoretical basis that InSAR measurements are extremely insensitive to N-S component.Results show that the boundary dividing the two sides of the main-shock fault is very clear in the vertical movement,and two remarkable subsidence centers can be observed on the hanging wall,while amplitude of the west one (-48.9cm) is larger than the east (-41.4cm),but the maximum uplift on the footwall is only 5cm.In addition to some northward movement with amplitude less than 5cm around the aftershock fault,the north-south deformation field suggests an overall southward movement.The three-dimensional results indicate that the induced surface movement is predominantly vertical and mostly occurred on the upper side,while there are obvious east-west separation and eastward rotation in the horizontal plane.The full vectors are consistent with simulated deformation field with the RMSE less than 6cm,so the research demonstrates the feasibility of the method to recover precise three-dimensional deformation field.On the whole,the three-dimensional deformation field coincides with the tensile fracture characteristics of Gaize earthquakes,and the tectonic stress background of coeval east-west extension and north-south shortening.

Key words: the 2008 Gaize earthquake, InSAR, multiple view angles, three-dimensional deformation field

中图分类号:

P315.2

王家庆, 张国宏, 单新建, 张迎峰. 2008年西藏改则地震多视角InSAR成果的三维形变解算及初步分析[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(4): 978-986.

WANG Jia-qing, ZHANG Guo-hong, SHAN Xin-jian, ZHANG Ying-feng. THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEFORMATION OF THE 2008 GAIZE EARTHQUAKES RESOLVED FROM INSAR MEASUREMENTS BY MULTIPLE VIEW ANGLES AND ITS TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 978-986.

参考文献

邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2012. 中国活动构造基本特征［J］. 中国科学(D辑), 32(12):1020-1030.
DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2012. Basic characteristics of active tectonics of China［J］. Science in China(Ser D), 32(12):1020-1030(in Chinese).
冯万鹏, 许力生, 许忠淮, 等. 2009. 利用InSAR资料反演2008年西藏改则M_W6.4和M_W6.9地震的断层参数［J］. 地球物理学报, 52(4):983-993.
FENG Wan-peng, XU Li-sheng, XU Zhong-huai,［M］et al［M］. 2009. Source parameters of the 2008 Gaize M_W6.4 and M_W6.9 earthquake from InSAR measurements［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 52(4):983-993.
洪顺英. 2010. 基于多视线向D-InSAR技术的三维同震形变场解算方法研究及应用. 北京:中国地震局地质研究所.
HONG Shun-ying. 2010. The resolving methods for the 3-D coseismic deformation field based on the Multi-LOS DInSAR technology and applications. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
卢景齐, 何兴梅, 方慧, 等. 2010. 西藏洞错盆地大地电磁测深电性特征［J］. 物探与化探, 34(6):787-790.
LU Jing-qi, HE Xing-mei, FANG Hui, et al. 2010. Analysis of the electrical structure feature beneath the Dongcuo Basin in Tibetan plateau based on result of magnetotelluric sounding detection［J］. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 34(6):787-790(in Chinese).
乔学军, 游新兆, 王琪, 等. 2009. 2008年1月9日西藏改则扎西错M_S6.9地震的InSAR实测形变场［J］. 自然科学进展, 19(2):173-179.
QIAO Xue-jun, YOU Xin-zhao, WANG Qi, et al. 2009. Deformation of M_S6.9 Gaize Zhaxicuo earthquake in Tibet on January 9, 2008 measured by InSAR［J］. Progress in Natural Science, 19(2):173-179(in Chinese).
陶刚, 朱利东, 杨文光, 等. 2014. 西藏改则北上三叠统日干配错组沉积相分析及控盆机制探讨［J］. 科技视界, 11:182-184.
TAO Gang, ZHU Li-dong, YANG Wen-guang, et al. 2014. Sedimentary facies analysis and discussions on the basin-controlling mechanism of the Upper Triassic Riganpeicuo Formation in northern Gaize, Tibet［J］. Science & Technology Vision, 11:182-184(in Chinese).
王永哲, 李志伟, 朱建军, 等. 2012. 融合多平台DInSAR数据解算拉奎拉地震三维同震形变场［J］. 武汉大学学报信息科学版, 37(7):859-863.
WANG Yong-zhe, LI Zhi-wei, ZHU Jian-jun, et al. 2012. Coseismic three-dimensional deformation of L'Aquila earthquake derived from multi-platform DInSAR data［J］. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 37(7):859-863(in Chinese).
张桂芳, 单新建, 张国宏, 等. 2009. 利用D-InSAR技术研究西藏改则地震同震形变场［J］. 地震地质, 31(2):334-340. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2009.02.014.
ZHANG Gui-fang, SHAN Xin-jian, ZHANG Guo-hong, et al. 2009. Observing coseismic deformation of the Gaize, Xizang earthquake with differential interferometric SAR［J］. Seismology and Geology, 31(2):334-340(in Chinese).
赵文津, 刘葵, 蒋忠锡, 等. 2004. 西藏班公湖-怒江缝合带深部地球物理结构给出的启示［J］. 地质通报, 23(7):623-635.
ZHAO Wen-jin, LIU Kui, JIANG Zhong-xi, et al. 2004. Bangong Co-Nujiang suture zone, Tibet:A suggestion given by deep geophysical structure［J］. Geological Bulletin of China, 23(7):623-635(in Chinese).
Burgmann R, Rosen A P, Fielding J E. 2000. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry to measure earth's surface topography and its deformation［J］. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28:169-209.
Dziewonski A M, Chou T A, Woodhouse J H. 1981. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 86(B4):2825-2852.
Elliott J R, Walters R J, England P C, et al. 2010. Extension on the Tibetan plateau:Recent normal faulting measured by InSAR and body wave seismology［J］. Geophysical Journal International, 183:503-535.
Hu J, Li Z W, Ding X L, et al. 2014a. Resolving three-dimensional surface displacements from InSAR measurements:A review［J］. Earth-Science Reviews, 133:1-17.
Hu J, Wang Q J, Li Z W, et al. 2014b. Resolving three-dimensional coseismic displacements from the 2008 Gaize, Tibet earthquake from multi-path interferometric phase analysis［J］. Natural Hazards, 73:1311-1322.
Michael T, Peltzer G. 2006. Current slip rates on conjugate strike-slip faults in central Tibet using synthetic aperture radar interferometry［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B12):B12402.
Michael T, Yin A, Ryerson F J, et al. 2003. Conjugate strike-slip faulting along the Bangong-Nujiang suture zone accommodates coeval east-west extension and north-south shortening in the interior of the Tibetan plateau［J］. Tectonics, 22(4):18(1-20).
Okada Y. 1985. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 75(4):1135-1154.
Wright T J, Parsons B E, Lu Z. 2004. Toward mapping surface deformation in three dimensions using InSAR［J］. Geophysical Research Letters, 31:L01607. doi:10.1029/2003GL018827.
Yin A, Harrison T M. 2000. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogeny［J］. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28:211-280.

[1]	蒋锋云, 季灵运, 朱良玉, 刘传金. 联合GPS和InSAR研究海原-六盘山断裂现今的地壳变形特征[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 377-400.
[2]	赵德政, 屈春燕, 张桂芳, 龚文瑜, 单新建, 朱传华, 张国宏, 宋小刚. 基于InSAR技术的同震形变获取、地震应急监测和发震构造研究应用进展[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 570-592.
[3]	靳立周, 王盈, 常文斌, 田颖颖, 袁仁茂. 基于D-InSAR和PFC2D技术的白格滑坡稳定性分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 153-171.
[4]	于书媛, 黄显良, 郑海刚, 李玲利, 骆佳骥, 丁娟, 范晓冉. 2022年门源M_W6.7地震的同震破裂模型及应力研究[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 286-303.
[5]	华俊, 龚文瑜, 单新建, 王振杰, 季灵运, 刘传金, 李永生. 多轨道InSAR震间形变速率场拼接方法[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1172-1189.
[6]	于书媛, 张国宏, 张迎峰, 丁娟, 张建龙, 范晓冉, 王绍俊. InSAR数据约束的2021年西藏比如M_W5.8地震同震滑动分布及库仑应力变化[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1190-1202.
[7]	王雨晴, 冯万鹏, 张培震. 交角约90°共轭断裂的现今形变及对构造应力场的指示意义——以2019年M_W≥6.4菲律宾地震序列为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 313-332.
[8]	徐芳, 鲁人齐, 王帅, 江国焰, 龙锋, 王晓山, 苏鹏, 刘冠伸. 基于多元约束方法的2020年四川青白江M_S5.1地震构造研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 220-237.
[9]	邱江涛, 季灵运, 刘雷, 刘传金. 2020年西藏尼玛M_W6.3地震的InSAR同震形变与构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1586-1599.
[10]	徐晓雪, 季灵运, 朱良玉, 王光明, 张文婷, 李宁. 漾濞M_S6.4地震同震形变特征及发震构造探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 771-789.
[11]	刘瑞春, 张锦, 郭文峰, 陈慧, 郑亚迪, 成诚. 鄂尔多斯块体东南缘现今的变形特征与构造模式探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 540-558.
[12]	华俊, 赵德政, 单新建, 屈春燕, 张迎峰, 龚文瑜, 王振杰, 李成龙, 李彦川, 赵磊, 陈晗, 范晓冉, 王绍俊. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.3地震InSAR的同震形变场、断层滑动分布及其对周边区域的应力扰动[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 677-691.
[13]	张迎峰, 单新建, 张国宏, 李成龙, 温少妍, 解全才. 2020年M_W6.0柯坪塔格地震的变形特征及其对周边地震危险性的启示[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 377-393.
[14]	张文婷, 季灵运, 朱良玉, 蒋锋云, 徐晓雪. 南天山前陆盆地的一次典型逆冲破裂事件——2020年新疆伽师6.4级地震[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 394-409.
[15]	温少妍, 单新建, 张迎峰, 刘云华, 汪驰升, 宋春燕. 基于Sentinel-1A的新疆阿克陶M_S6.7地震同震形变与滑动分布特征[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(6): 1401-1416.

2008年西藏改则地震多视角InSAR成果的三维形变解算及初步分析

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEFORMATION OF THE 2008 GAIZE EARTHQUAKES RESOLVED FROM INSAR MEASUREMENTS BY MULTIPLE VIEW ANGLES AND ITS TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价