2014年3月湖北省秭归县M4.2、M4.5地震成因分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.009

地震地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 121-130.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.009

2014年3月湖北省秭归县M4.2、M4.5地震成因分析

王秋良^1,2, 张丽芬^1,2,3, 廖武林^1,2, 李井冈^1,2,3

1. 中国地震局地震研究所, 地震与大地测量重点实验室, 武汉 430071;
2. 三峡工程生态与环境监测系统地震监测重点站, 武汉 430071;
3. 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2015-10-26 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-05-17
通讯作者: 张丽芬,副研究员,E-mail:270152675@qq.com
作者简介:王秋良,1972年生,2007年毕业于中国地质大学(武汉),获博士学位,副研究员,现主要从事地震地质、水库诱发地震等方面的研究,电话:13657278367,E-mail:wql0703@163.com。
基金资助:
中国长江三峡集团公司科研专项基金(SXSN2377,SXSN3354)资助

RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY, HUBEI PROVINCE

WANG Qiu-liang^1,2, ZHANG Li-fen^1,2,3, LIAO Wu-lin^1,2, LI Jing-gang^1,2,3

1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy, Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan 430071, China;
2. Key Seismic Monitoring Station of the Ecological and Environmental Monitoring System of Three Gorges Project, Wuhan 430071, China;
3. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2015-10-26 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-05-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2014年3月27日和3月30日,三峡库首区秭归县分别发生M4.2和M4.5地震,震中相距约1km,地震序列类型为双震型。地震发生在175m试验性蓄水库水位缓慢下降阶段,G-R关系显示地震序列的b值与该地区构造地震的b值较为接近。为了检验库水对地震的影响,利用ETAS模型检验了库水对地震的触发作用。结果表明,三峡库水对秭归地震序列有一定的触发作用,但影响较小。利用双差定位法进行地震精定位,结果显示,2地震序列发生在NNW向仙女山断裂与NE向断裂的交会部位,平面上呈共轭展布。采用矩张量反演和P波初动2种方法研究了2次4.0级以上地震的震源机制解,均显示逆走滑性质。结合余震分布特征可知,2地震序列的发震构造分别为NE向节面和NNW向节面。从震源深度剖面分析,M4.2地震序列的发震构造为走向NE,倾角较陡的断层,余震震源深度剖面呈三角形,分析该地震序列在其右侧受到了走向NW界面的约束; M4.5地震序列是在NE向小断层和NNW向仙女山断裂共轭作用影响下发生的。

关键词: 地震序列, 震源深度剖面, 震源机制, ETAS模型

Abstract:

On 27^th and 30^th March 2014, an M4.2 and M4.5 earthquake sequence occurred in Zigui County, Hubei Province, and the earthquake sequence type is double seismic type. The two earthquake sequences occurred at the water unloading stage of the 175m trial impounding, and G-R relations showed the similar characteristics with that of the tectonic earthquakes. In order to verify the influences of dam reservoir on earthquake triggering, ETAS model was introduced, the results showed that the slow water level changes had little impact on the occurrence of earthquake. Double difference precision relocation results indicated that the two earthquake sequences occurred at the intersection part of a NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan Fault, and the preferred direction of aftershock distribution was separately NE and NNW. Moment tensor inversion method and P wave initial motion method were used to determine the focal mechanisms of the two earthquakes, and the results indicated that the two earthquakes were controlled by the regional tectonic stress field and were of reverse-slip type. Comprehensive analysis showed that the M4.2 earthquake was caused by a small-scale fault striking NE with a big dip angle. From the hypocenter profile, it can be seen that the M4.2 earthquake sequence was restrained by an east-dip fault, and the M4.5 earthquake sequence was the product under the conjugate action of the NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan fault.

Key words: earthquake sequence, focal depth profile, focal mechanism, ETAS model

中图分类号:

P315.1

王秋良, 张丽芬, 廖武林, 李井冈. 2014年3月湖北省秭归县M4.2、M4.5地震成因分析[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(1): 121-130.

WANG Qiu-liang, ZHANG Li-fen, LIAO Wu-lin, LI Jing-gang. RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY, HUBEI PROVINCE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(1): 121-130.

参考文献

车用太, 陈俊华, 张莉芬, 等. 2009. 长江三峡工程库首区胡家坪M_S4.1水库诱发地震研究［J］. 地震, 29(4):1-13.
CHE Yong-tai, CHEN Jun-hua, ZHANG Li-fen, et al. 2009. Study of the reservoir induced Hujiaping M_S4.1 earthquake in the Three Gorges dam area［J］. Earthquake, 29(4):1-13(in Chinese).
高士钧, 王青云, 宋慧珍, 等. 1992. 长江三峡地区地壳应力场与地震[M]. 北京:地震出版社. 4-9.
GAO Shi-jun, WANG Qing-yun, SONG Hui-zhen, et al. 1992. Crustal Stress Field and Earthquakes in Chang Jiang Three Gorges Region[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing. 4-9(in Chinese).
蒋海昆, 李永莉, 曲延军, 等. 2006. 中国大陆中强震序列类型的空间分布特征［J］. 地震学报, 28(4):389-398.
JIANG Hai-kun, LI Yong-li, QU Yan-jun, et al. 2006. Spatial distribution features of sequence types of moderate and strong earthquakes in Chinese mainland［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 28(4):389-398(in Chinese).
蒋海昆, 宋金, 吴琼, 等. 2012. 基于ETAS模型对三峡库区流体触发微震活动的定量检测［J］. 地球物理学报, 55(7):2341-2352.
JIANG Hai-kun, SONG Jin, WU Qiong, et al. 2012. Quantitative investigation of fluid triggering on seismicity in the Three Gorges Reservoir area based on ETAS model［J］. Chinese J Geophys, 55(7):2341-2352(in Chinese).
李蓉川, 韩晓光. 1984. 湖北及邻区现代构造应力场初析［J］. 西北地震学报, 6(3):92-98.
LI Rong-chuan, HAN Xiao-guang. 1984. Recent tectonic stress field of Hubei Province and its vicinity［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 6(3):92-98(in Chinese).
廖武林, 张丽芬, 姚运生. 2009. 三峡水库地震活动特征研究［J］. 地震地质, 31(4):707-714. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2009.04.014.
LIAO Wu-lin, ZHANG Li-fen, YAO Yun-sheng. 2009. Characteristics of seismicity in the Three Gorges Reservoir area［J］. Seismology and Geology, 31(4):707-714(in Chinese).
王秋良, 姚运生, 夏金梧, 等. 2009. 统计预测模型对三峡库区诱发地震预测的应用［J］. 地震地质, 31(2):287-294. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2009.02.009.
WANG Qiu-liang, YAO Yun-sheng, XIA Jin-wu, et al. 2009. Application of statistical forecasting model to the prediction of the Three Gorges Reservoir induced seismicity［J］. Seismology and Geology, 31(2):287-294(in Chinese).
王秋良, 张丽芬, 廖武林, 等. 2013. 三峡库首区断裂构造与地震活动特征［J］. 大地测量与地球动力学, 33(5):29-33.
WANG Qiu-liang, ZHANG Li-fen, LIAO Wu-lin, et al. 2013. Fault tectonics and seismic activity characteristics of Three Gorges Reservoir［J］. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 33(5):29-33(in Chinese).
于品清. 1993. 从水文地质条件探讨未来三峡水库发生构造型水库地震的可能性［J］. 华南地震, 13(1):76-83.
YU Pin-qing. 1993. Discussion on the possible tectonic earthquake in Changjiang Three-Gorge Reservoir area in relation to hydrogeologic conditions［J］. South China Journal of Seismology,13(1):76-83(in Chinese).
Hainzl S, Ogata Y. 2005. Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling［J］. J Geophys Res, 110:B05S07. doi:10.1029/2004JB003247.
Lei Xing-lin, Yu Guo-zheng, Ma Sheng-li, et al. 2008. Earthquakes induced by water injection at -3km depth within the Rongchang gas field, Chongqing, China［J］. J Geophys Res, 113:B10310. doi:10.1029/2008JB005604.
Ogata Y. 1989. Statistical models for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis for point processes［J］. Tectonophysics, 83:9-27.

[1]	樊文杰. 2021年5月21日漾濞M_S6.4地震及周边的构造应力场特征和动力学意义[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 208-230.
[2]	张珂, 王鑫, 杨红樱, 王玥, 徐岩, 李静. 2021年云南漾濞M_S6.4地震序列特征及其发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 231-251.
[3]	张丽娟, 万永革, 王福昌, 靳志同, 崔华伟. 采用模糊聚类算法确定2021年漾濞地震序列的断层结构[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1634-1647.
[4]	邓文泽, 刘杰, 杨志高, 孙丽, 张雪梅. 青海玛多M_S7.4地震震源破裂过程反演结果的初步分析[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 1059-1070.
[5]	李宗旭, 贺日政, 冀战波, 李娱兰, 牛潇. 2009年7月24日西藏尼玛M_S5.6地震的震源机制及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 992-1010.
[6]	王雨晴, 冯万鹏, 张培震. 交角约90°共轭断裂的现今形变及对构造应力场的指示意义——以2019年M_W≥6.4菲律宾地震序列为例[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 313-332.
[7]	王晓山, 万永革. 汶川地震前震中周围地壳应力场及应力方向集中的特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 363-377.
[8]	余占洋, 沈旭章, 梁浩, 郑文俊, 刘旭宙. 基于地震活动性和震源机制解研究渭河-运城盆地主要断裂带的特征及应力场分布[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 395-413.
[9]	张致伟, 龙锋, 赵小艳, 王迪. 川滇地区的震源机制解及应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 170-187.
[10]	李佳妮, 韩竹军, 罗佳宏, 郭鹏. 青藏高原东缘岷山活动地块周缘的地震活动特征与启示[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1459-1484.
[11]	孙业君, 黄耘, 刘泽民, 郑建常, 江昊琳, 李婷婷, 叶青, 方韬. 郯庐断裂带鲁苏皖段及邻区构造应力场特征及其动力学意义[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1188-1207.
[12]	薛艳, 解孟雨, 刘杰, 庄建仓. 全球M_W≥8.0浅源地震的前震序列研究[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1233-1249.
[13]	赵韬, 王莹, 马冀, 邵若潼, 徐一斐, 胡景. 2021年青海玛多7.4级地震序列重定位和震源机制特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 790-805.
[14]	王莹, 赵韬, 胡景, 刘春. 2021年云南漾濞6.4级地震序列重定位及震源机制解特征分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(4): 847-863.
[15]	张盛峰, 张永仙, 范晓易. 基于时-空ETAS模型的新疆伽师地区背景及触发地震活动的探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 297-310.

2014年3月湖北省秭归县M4.2、M4.5地震成因分析

RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY, HUBEI PROVINCE

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价