南天山柯坪塔格推覆体前缘断裂活动性质及速率

地震地质 ›› 2007, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 272-281.

南天山柯坪塔格推覆体前缘断裂活动性质及速率

宋方敏, 闵伟, 韩竹军, 徐锡伟

中国地震局地质研究所,北京 100029

收稿日期:2007-01-30 修回日期:2007-04-08 出版日期:2007-06-09 发布日期:2009-08-27
作者简介:宋方敏,男,1948年出生,1975年毕业于南京大学地质系,研究员,主要从事活动构造研究,电话:010-62009029,E-mail:sfmin@tom.com.
基金资助:
中国地震局"新疆巴楚-伽师6.8级地震应急工作专项计划"项目资助

ACTIVITIES AND SLIP RATE OF THE FRONTAL FAULTS OF THE KALPINTAG NAPPE,TIANSHAN MOUNTAINS,CHINA

SONG Fang-min, MIN Wei, HAN Zhu-jun, XU Xi-wei

Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2007-01-30 Revised:2007-04-08 Online:2007-06-09 Published:2009-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 柯坪塔格推覆体位于天山西南麓,由多排NEE—EW向的褶皱-逆断裂带组成。文中介绍了皮羌—巴楚磷矿以西3排褶皱-逆断裂带前缘断裂的活动性质及速率。新获资料表明,各排褶皱-逆断裂带前缘皆由多条断裂构成,都具典型的逆断层性质。其中最新活动断裂位于褶皱-逆断裂带的最前缘,活动时代为晚更新世—全新世。它们切割冲沟T₀、T₁、T₂、T₃阶地堆积,形成不同高度的断层陡坎。根据陡坎剖面测量和年龄样品测试,求得T₀面形成以来断裂的垂直位移量、位移速率、地壳缩短量和缩短速率分别是0.9～1.1m、0.53～0.65mm/a、1.93～2.56m和1.14～1.52mm/a;T₁面形成以来分别是1.4～1.8m、0.36～0.46mm/a、3.00～3.86m和0.77～0.99mm/a;T₂面形成以来分别是2.1～3m、0.31～0.45mm/a、4.50～6.98m和0.67～1.04mm/a;T₃面形成以来分别是3.4～4.2m、0.28～0.35mm/a、7.29～9.22m和0.61～0.77mm/a。根据T₀面形成以来的缩短量和缩短速率,计算柯坪塔格推覆体约1.7ka以来总的地壳缩短量是9.65～12.80m,缩短速率5.68～7.53mm/a。

关键词: 柯坪塔格, 褶皱-逆断裂带, 垂直位移, 地壳缩短

Abstract: The Kalpintag nappe is located at the southwestern foot of the Tianshan Mountains,consisting of several rows of NE-to EW-trending fold-reverse fault zones.This paper demonstrates the activities and slip rate of the frontal faults of the first to third row fold-reverse fault zones located to the west of the Piqiang-Bachu phosphorite mine.The newly-found evidence shows that the front of each fold-reverse fault zone is composed of several faults of typical reverse fault type.The faults with newest activity are located at the forefront of the fold-reverse fault zones,and the active period of the faults is late Pleistocene-Holocene.They dissect the T₀,T₁,T₂ and T₃ terraces,resulting in fault scarps of different heights.According to the in-situ measurement of the fault scarps and the dating data of the relevant samples,it is estimated that the amount and rate of vertical displacement along the faults since the formation of the T₀ terrace are 0.9～1.1m and 0.53～0.65mm/a,respectively,while the amount and rate of the corresponding crustal shortening are 1.93～2.56m and 1.14～1.52mm/a,respectively.Similarly,it is estimated that the amount and rate of vertical displacement since the formation of the T₁ terrace are 1.4～1.8m,and 0.36～0.46mm/a,with the corresponding crustal shortening of 3.00～3.86m,and shortening rate of 0.77～0.99mm/a.The vertical displacement amount and rate since the formation of the T₂ terrace are about 2.1～3.0m and 0.31～0.45mm/a,respectively,and the amount and rate of the corresponding crustal shortening are 4.50～6.98m and 0.67～1.04mm/a.The amount and rate of vertical displacement since the formation of the T₃ terrace are 3.4～4.2m and 0.28～0.35mm/a,and the amount and rate of the corresponding crustal shortening are 7.29～9.22m and 0.61～0.77mm/a,respectively.Based on the obtained amount and rate of crustal shortening since the formation of T₀ terrace,the total amount and rate of crustal shortening of the Kalpintag nappe since 1.7ka can be estimated to be 9.65～12.80m and 5.68～7.53mm,respectively.

Key words: Kalpintag, fold-reverse-fault zone, vertical displacement, crustal shortening

中图分类号:

P315.2

宋方敏, 闵伟, 韩竹军, 徐锡伟. 南天山柯坪塔格推覆体前缘断裂活动性质及速率[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(2): 272-281.

SONG Fang-min, MIN Wei, HAN Zhu-jun, XU Xi-wei. ACTIVITIES AND SLIP RATE OF THE FRONTAL FAULTS OF THE KALPINTAG NAPPE,TIANSHAN MOUNTAINS,CHINA[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2007, 29(2): 272-281.

[1]	郝洪涛, 王青华, 张新林, 韦进, 吴桂桔, 胡敏章. 滇西地震预报实验场区重力长期变化特征及其机理[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 876-894.
[2]	张迎峰, 单新建, 张国宏, 李成龙, 温少妍, 解全才. 2020年M_W6.0柯坪塔格地震的变形特征及其对周边地震危险性的启示[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 377-393.
[3]	徐良鑫, 卞菊梅, 呼楠, 田勤虎, 田伟新, 段蕊. 骊山山前断裂华清池以西段晚更新世以来的活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(3): 561-575.
[4]	李伟, 张世民, 姜大伟, 郜宇. 龙门山南段晚第四纪逆冲活动的河流地貌研究[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1213-1236.
[5]	马冀, 冯希杰, 李高阳, 李晓妮, 张艺. 1556年华县地震地表破裂带同震垂直位移[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(1): 22-30.
[6]	张玲, 杨晓平, 黄伟亮, 李胜强. 褶皱陡坎中相关断层在缩短量计算中的作用——以东秋里塔格背斜为例[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 697-708.
[7]	李康, 徐锡伟, 谭锡斌. 龙泉山背斜的地壳缩短与隆升——来自河流阶地变形的证据[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(1): 22-36.
[8]	徐良鑫, 冉勇康, 刘华国, 李安. 柯坪塔格山前层状地貌面与晚第四纪逆断层变形——以三岔口北西山前断错地貌为例[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(4): 777-788.
[9]	陈长云, 何宏林. 大凉山地区新生代地壳缩短及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(2): 443-453.
[10]	杨晓平, 邓起东, 张培震, 徐锡伟. 天山山前主要推覆构造区的地壳缩短[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 111-131.
[11]	吴传勇, 沈军, 陈建波, 李军, 向志勇, 谢天, 宋正娜, 王翠. 新疆南天山库车坳陷晚第四纪以来地壳缩短速率的初步研究[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(2): 279-288.
[12]	程建武, 冉勇康, 杨晓平, 徐锡伟. 西南天山柯坪塔格前缘断裂带东段晚第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(2): 258-268.
[13]	冉勇康, 杨晓平, 程建武, 徐锡伟, 陈立春. 西南天山柯坪推覆构造柯坪塔格山前逆断裂东段晚第四纪的古地震[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(2): 245-257.
[14]	闵伟, 宋方敏, 韩竹军, 徐锡伟. 柯坪塔格断裂西段古地震初步研究[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(2): 234-244.
[15]	宋方敏, 闵伟, 韩竹军, 徐锡伟. 柯坪塔格推覆体的新生代变形与扩展[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(2): 224-233.