福州八一水库-尚干断裂的高密度电法和瞬变电磁法试验探测

地震地质 ›› 2002, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 557-564.

福州八一水库-尚干断裂的高密度电法和瞬变电磁法试验探测

白登海¹, 王立凤¹, 孙洁¹, 朱金芳², 黄宗林², 黄丹青³, 何兆海¹, 祖金华¹, 廉雨方¹, Quentin Yarie⁴, Volker Schaepe⁵

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京, 100029;
2. 福建省地震局, 福州, 350003;
3. 中国煤田地质总局物探研究院, 河北涿州, 072750;
4. GEONICSLIMITED, 8-1745, MeyersideDrive, Mississauga, OntarioL5T1C6, Canada;
5. DMTMines&MoreDivision, DeutscheMontanTechnologieGmbH, AmTechnologiepark1, 45307Essen, Germany

收稿日期:2002-09-09 修回日期:2002-09-22 出版日期:2002-12-03 发布日期:2009-10-26
作者简介:白登海,男,1957年生,1991年在北京大学地质系获博士学位,1993年在中国科学院地球物理研究所完成博士后研究,研究员,主要从事地球电磁方法研究,电话010-62009262,E-mail:bdh607@sina.com.
基金资助:
国家发展计划委员会项目(2001977)资助.

DC AND TEM TEST SOUNDING FOR THE BAYISHUIKU- SHANGGAN FAULT IN FUZHOU CITY, FUJIAN PROVICE, CHINA

BAI Deng-hai¹, WANG Li-feng¹, SUN Jie¹, ZHU Jin-fang², HUANG Zong-lin², HUANG Dan-qing³, HE Zhao-hai¹, ZU Jin-hua¹, LIAN Yu-fang¹, Quentin Yarie⁴, Volker Schaepe⁵

1. Institute of Geology, China Seismological Bureau, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Seismological Bureau of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350003, China ;
3. Institute of Geophysical Exploration, China Coal Geological Bureau, Zhuo Zhou 072750, Hebei Province, China;
4. GEONICS LIMITED, 8-1745, Meyerside Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L5T 1C6, Canada;
5. DMT Mines &, More Division, Deutsche Montan Technologie GmbH, Am Technologiepark 1, 45307 Essen, Germany

Received:2002-09-09 Revised:2002-09-22 Online:2002-12-03 Published:2009-10-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了检验高密度电法和瞬变电磁法在城市活断层探测中的有效性,在福州市区及周围进行了试验探测^①,文中主要介绍对八一水库尚干断裂的探测结果.八一水库尚干断裂是一条穿过福州市区的主要断裂带,其主断裂在八一水库测区位于一条由新店通往古城的水泥马路东侧,在横向上表现为东西宽几十米的电阻率低异常带,在纵向上从盖层底部向下延伸到基底深处.试验表明,高密度电法和瞬变电磁法可以互相补充和验证,从而提高整体探测效果.

关键词: 高密度电法, 瞬变电磁法, 活断层, 八一水库-尚干断裂

Abstract: To test the effectiveness of DC and TEM soundings for urban active faults, experiments were carried out in Fuzhou City, Fujian Province in 2001. This paper is focusing on the test results of the Bayishuiku-Shanggan Fault, which is the major fault crossing the downtown of Fuzhou City. Two DC(DC-Ⅰ-1 and DC-Ⅰ-23)and three TEM(TEM-Ⅰ-1, TEM-Ⅰ-2 and TEM-Ⅰ-3)traverses were deployed in Bayishuiku area. DC experiment used a RESECS equipment. An array of 96 electrodes(192m long)was employed for the measurement, while a 16 electrode string(32m long)is prepared for rolling ahead at the end of the array for a long traverse. Electrode spacing is 2m. TEM used EM-47 and EM-67 systems. For EM-47 the measurements were made at the center of the transmitter loop with a dimension of 40m×40m. A large fixed loop with side length of 100～200m was employed for EM-67. Two adjacent loops overlap half of the side length. Site spacing is 10m for both EM-47 and EM-67. DC models show the electric structures at a depth range of 1 to 30m, while TEM models indicate those of 10 to 300m depths. DC model coincides excellently with the TEM model in the same traverse. All the DC and TEM models represent a layered structure with a strong vertical low resistivity anomaly in the middle part of each profile, which is inferred to be the main strand of the Bayishuiku-Shanggan Fault in the area. The fault appears to be several ten meters wide dipping NNE into the basement. The experiments suggest that the results will be much improved by using the combined DC and TEM method.

Key words: multi-electrode direct current method, transient electromagnetic method, Bayishuiku-Shanggan Fault

中图分类号:

P631.3+25

白登海, 王立凤, 孙洁, 朱金芳, 黄宗林, 黄丹青, 何兆海, 祖金华, 廉雨方, Quentin Yarie, Volker Schaepe. 福州八一水库-尚干断裂的高密度电法和瞬变电磁法试验探测[J]. 地震地质, 2002, 24(4): 557-564.

BAI Deng-hai, WANG Li-feng, SUN Jie, ZHU Jin-fang, HUANG Zong-lin, HUANG Dan-qing, HE Zhao-hai, ZU Jin-hua, LIAN Yu-fang, Quentin Yarie, Volker Schaepe. DC AND TEM TEST SOUNDING FOR THE BAYISHUIKU- SHANGGAN FAULT IN FUZHOU CITY, FUJIAN PROVICE, CHINA[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2002, 24(4): 557-564.

[1]	田晓峰, 熊伟, 王夫运, 徐朝繁, 段永红, 嘉世旭. 京津地区顺义—塘沽高分辨地震折射剖面的走时成像结果及其揭示的上地壳断裂构造特征[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(2): 414-434.
[2]	李智敏, 任治坤, 刘金瑞, 哈广浩, 李正芳, 王勃, 王林建. 青海都兰热水-桃斯托河断裂的新发现及构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(1): 18-32.
[3]	张迪, 吴中海, 李家存, 刘绍堂, 马丹, 卢燕. 利用地面激光与地质雷达综合探测活断层浅层三维结构——以川西理塘毛垭坝盆地北缘正断层为例[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(2): 377-399.
[4]	赵建明, 李营, 陈志, 刘兆飞, 赵荣琦, 荣伟健. 蔚县-广灵断裂和口泉断裂气体排放和断裂活动性关系[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(6): 1402-1416.
[5]	尉洋, 沈军, 于晓辉, 吴晓歌. 石油地震资料在隐伏活断层探测中的应用——以松原活断层探测为例[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(2): 423-433.
[6]	酆少英, 刘保金, 赵成彬, 何银娟, 谭雅丽, 贾艳霞. 3维反射地震方法在活断层探测中的应用试验——以芦花台断层为例[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(2): 627-635.
[7]	王志才, 王冬雷, 许洪泰, 葛孚刚, 杨传成, 李建虎. 安丘-莒县断裂北段几何结构与最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(1): 176-191.
[8]	邱泽华, 张国宏, 张宝红, 唐磊, 宋乃波, 郭燕平, 周龙寿, 赵京轶, 苏文浩. 用高密度电法勘探预判钻孔应变观测点岩石完整性[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(4): 805-816.
[9]	李峰, 张效亮, 刘华国. 重庆市主要构造地震危险性评价[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(3): 518-531.
[10]	雷启云, 柴炽章, 杜鹏, 王银, 孟广魁. 基于钻探的芦花台隐伏断层晚第四纪活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(3): 602-614.
[11]	雷启云, 柴炽章, 孟广魁, 杜鹏, 王银, 谢晓峰. 隐伏活断层钻孔联合剖面对折定位方法[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(1): 45-55.
[12]	张华, 曹军, 孙海. 瞬变电磁法多匝重叠小回线装置实验研究[J]. 地震地质, 2010, 32(1): 90-97.
[13]	刘静, 申旭辉, 徐岳仁, 申俊峰, 荆凤, 洪顺英. 拉萨那林拉卡断裂带晚第四纪古地震研究[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(2): 265-275.
[14]	杨卓欣, 袁道阳, 段永红, 徐朝繁, 嘉世旭, 酆少英. 高分辨折射勘探技术在浅层反射勘探失效地区的应用——兰州市活断层浅层地震探测实例[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(1): 57-68.
[15]	江娃利. 试论地质学者的地震理念[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 305-323.