长白山天池火山古锥体形貌重建

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.06.002

地震地质 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1248-1262.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.06.002

长白山天池火山古锥体形貌重建

马晨语¹^,²⁾(), 程滔³⁾^,^*(), 万园⁴⁾, 潘波¹^,²⁾, 周秉锐¹^,²⁾, 颜丽丽¹^,²⁾

¹⁾ 吉林长白山火山国家野外科学观测研究站, 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029
²⁾ 中国地震局地震与火山灾害重点实验室, 北京 100029
³⁾ 国家基础地理信息中心, 北京 100830
⁴⁾ 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2023-11-20 修回日期:2024-01-15 出版日期:2024-12-20 发布日期:2025-01-22
通讯作者: *程滔, 男, 1981年生, 正高级工程师, 主要从事自然资源调查监测、摄影测量与遥感影像数据处理与应用, E-mail: chengtao@ngcc.cn。
作者简介:
马晨语, 男, 1997年生, 2024年于中国地震局地质研究所获地球化学专业硕士学位, 主要研究方向为火山地貌, E-mail: machenyu@ies.ac.cn。
基金资助:
吉林长白山火山国家野外科学观测研究站课题(NORSCBS20-08)

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PALEOCONE MORPHOLOGY OF CHANGBAISHAN TIANCHI VOLCANO

MA Chen-yu¹^,²⁾(), CHENG Tao³⁾^,^*(), WAN Yuan⁴⁾, PAN Bo¹^,²⁾, ZHOU Bing-rui¹^,²⁾, YAN Li-li¹^,²⁾

¹⁾ Jilin Changbaishan Volcano National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
²⁾ Key Laboratory of Seismic and Volcanic Hazards, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
³⁾ National Geomatics Center of China, Beijing 100830, China
⁴⁾ Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2023-11-20 Revised:2024-01-15 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

破火山口是火山发生大规模爆炸式喷发后遗留下的锅型地貌, 恢复其原始锥体形貌对于理解火山发展演化和灾害过程具有重要意义。长白山天池火山是一座保存完整的大型破火山口, 其原始锥体形貌和形成过程备受关注。文中借鉴国内外相关破火山口的锥体重建方法, 在全球范围内寻找与天池火山形貌相似的大型火山, 通过分析这些火山地形建立锥体形貌的三段式经验方程, 结合长白山现今地貌恢复了长白山天池火山的古锥体形貌。天池火山古锥体最高可能约达4 100m, 火口顶部直径约390m, 深度约为170m, 锥体外缘上部陡峭, 平均坡度角为27°, 外缘下部坡度略缓, 平均坡度角为18.5°。天池火山古锥体形貌的恢复为理解天池火山的发展演化历史、冰川地貌的形成和喷发成灾的过程提供了科学依据。

关键词: 长白山天池火山, 破火山口, 古锥体形貌, 高分遥感影像, 三段式经验方程

Abstract:

Calderas, large basin-shaped landforms created by massive explosive eruptions, leave behind “pot-like” structures that can provide essential insights into the history and processes of volcanic development and associated hazards. The Changbaishan Tianchi caldera, located on the Sino-North Korean border in eastern Jilin Province, China, is one of the best-preserved large Cenozoic composite active volcanoes in China. This caldera, close to the Wangtiane and Baotaishan volcanoes to the south and southeast, sits atop a basalt plateau, reaching a peak elevation of 2 749m. Its formation involved multiple phases of overflow eruption activities, followed by caldera collapse due to explosive eruptions and pressure loss within the crustal magma chamber during the late Pleistocene. Over time, glaciers and flowing water have sculpted its surroundings, creating U-shaped valleys along the caldera rim. The structure and formation processes of its paleocone have thus attracted significant attention.

In this study, we drew from reconstruction techniques applied to similar calderas globally. Starting with a focus on the volcanic cone profile, we identified large-scale stratovolcanoes with symmetrical cone shapes akin to Changbaishan Tianchi for comparison. Using high-resolution stereo imagery, we extracted a Digital Elevation Model(DEM)with remote sensing software. From these DEMs, we performed detailed topographic analysis, calculating and statistically modeling geomorphological parameters, which allowed us to develop a three-phase empirical model of cone topography. Applying a moving surface algorithm in MATLAB, we generated surface equations for each volcano profile, revealing quantitative relationships between pixel position, coordinates, and elevation in 3D geographic space. We then used ArcGIS's Kriging interpolation method to create a DEM of the reconstructed cone of Changbaishan Tianchi volcano, allowing us to approximate the original cone structure.

The results estimate the original Changbaishan Tianchi cone reached a height of 4, 100m, with a crater diameter of about 390m and a depth of 170m. The cone displayed a funnel-like structure at the summit, with slopes characteristic of stratovolcanoes. The inner edge of the cone had a relatively uniform slope, while the upper outer edge was steep, averaging 27°, and the lower outer slope angle decreased to an average of 18.5°. These parameters align with typical stratovolcano profiles. The explosive eruptions and subsequent cone collapse are estimated to have led to a volume loss of approximately 28.92km³.

This paleocone reconstruction of Tianchi volcano enhances our understanding of the history of the development and evolution of Tianchi volcano, contributing valuable data for reconstructing similar caldera cones and examining eruption mechanisms within the Changbaishan volcanic field. Moreover, this study provides critical information for analyzing the geological history of Tianchi volcano, including the formation of glacial landforms and processes related to eruptions and natural disasters.

Key words: Changbaishan-Tianchi volcano, caldera, paleocone morphology, high resolution remote sensing imagery, Three-segmented empirical equations

马晨语, 程滔, 万园, 潘波, 周秉锐, 颜丽丽. 长白山天池火山古锥体形貌重建[J]. 地震地质, 2024, 46(6): 1248-1262.

MA Chen-yu, CHENG Tao, WAN Yuan, PAN Bo, ZHOU Bing-rui, YAN Li-li. RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PALEOCONE MORPHOLOGY OF CHANGBAISHAN TIANCHI VOLCANO[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2024, 46(6): 1248-1262.

图/表 8

图1 a 长白山火山群地貌景观图; b 天池水底等深线图(杨清福等, 2018)

Fig. 1 Landscape map of Changbaishan Volcanic Group(a)and isobath map of floor of Tianchi caldera lake(b)(after YANG Qing-fu et al., 2018).

图2 重建长白山天池火山原始锥体技术路线图

Fig. 2 Technical flowchart for reconstructing the original cone of Changbaishan Tianchi volcano.

图3 长白山天池火山DEM可视化图 a DEM; b 坡度图; c 天池火山中心点及重建区域指示图; d 坡度重分类图

Fig. 3 DEM visualization of Tianchi volcano in Changbai Mountain.

图4 研究选取层状火山的DEM和分布图

Fig. 4 Distribution map of selected stratovolcanoes with the DEM images of the world in the study.

图5 重建曲线生成图 a 富士山剖面离散点云图; b 四分位数拟合线图; c 重建曲线生成图; d 天池火山剖面点恢复高程图

Fig. 5 Graph of the reconstruction curve.

图6 重建曲线的经验方程图

Fig. 6 Plot of empirical equations for reconstructed curves.

图7 天池火山现存锥体、原始锥体的三维模型图

Fig. 7 Three-dimensional model of extant cone and original cone of Tianchi volcano.

表1 天池火山现存锥体和原始锥体的主要形貌参数

Table1 Main morphologic parameters of the extant and original cones of Tianchi volcano

分类	参数	现存锥体	原始锥体
火山口内缘	最大半径	2341m	390m
	最小半径	1086m	390m
	火口深度	517m	171m
	火口内缘平均坡度	23.19°	24.35°
	火口内缘最大坡度	29.50°	24.72°
火山口外缘	锥体平均高度	2600m	4074m
	最大高程	2749m	4105m
	火口外缘最大坡度	19.33°	24.35°
	火口外缘平均坡度	15.16°	18.64°

参考文献 34

[1]	樊祺诚, 隋建立, 王团华, 等. 2006. 长白山天池火山粗面玄武岩的喷发历史与演化[J]. 岩石学报, 22(6): 1449—1457.
	FAN Qi-cheng, SUI Jian-li, WANG Tuan-hua, et al. 2006. Eruption history and magma evolution of the trachybasalt in the Tianchi volcano, Changbaishan[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(6): 1449—1457(in Chinese).
[2]	樊祺诚, 隋建立, 王团华, 等. 2007. 长白山火山活动历史、岩浆演化与喷发机制探讨[J]. 高校地质学报, 13(2): 175—190.
	FAN Qi-cheng, SUI Jian-li, WANG Tuan-hua, et al. 2007. History of volcanic activity, magma evolution and eruptive mechanisms of the Changbai volcanic province[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 13(2): 175—190(in Chinese).
[3]	何春雄, 龙卫江, 朱锋峰. 2012. 概率论与数理统计[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社:1—79.
	HE Chun-xiong, LONG Wei-jiang, ZHU Feng-feng. 2012. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics[M]. Higher Education Press, Beijing: 1—79(in Chinese).
[4]	刘嘉麒, 陈双双, 郭文峰, 等. 2015. 长白山火山研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 34(6): 710—723.
	LIU Jia-qi, CHEN Shuang-shuang, GUO Wen-feng, et al. 2015. Research advances in the Mt. Changbai volcano[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry, 34(6): 710—723(in Chinese).
[5]	刘嘉麒, 王松山. 1982. 长白山火山与天池的形成时代[J]. 科学通报, 27(21): 1312—1315.
	LIU Jia-qi, WANG Song-shan. 1982. The formation age of Changbaishan Volcano and Tianchi[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 27(21): 1312—1315(in Chinese).
[6]	刘若新. 2000. 中国的活火山[M]. 北京: 地震出版社:101—102.
	LIU Ruo-xin. 2000. Active Volcanoes in China[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing: 101—102(in Chinese).
[7]	刘若新, 樊祺诚, 郑祥身, 等. 1998. 长白山天池火山的岩浆演化[J]. 中国科学(D 辑), 28(3): 226—231.
	LIU Ruo-xin, FAN Qi-cheng, ZHENG Xiang-shen, et al. 1998. Magma evolution of Changbaishan Tianchi volcano[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 28(3): 226—231(in Chinese).
[8]	刘若新, 李继泰, 魏海泉, 等. 1992. 长白山天池火山: 一座具潜在喷发危险的近代火山[J]. 地球物理学报, 35(5): 661—665.
	LIU Ruo-xin, LI Ji-tai, WEI Hai-quan, et al. 1992. Volcano at Tianchi Lake, Changbaishan Mt.: A modern volcano with pontential danger of eruption[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 35(5): 661—665(in Chinese).
[9]	栾鹏, 许建东, 潘波, 等. 2009. 长白山天池火山喷发物地形地貌特征初步研究[J]. 地震研究, 32(2): 182—187.
	LUAN Peng, XU Jian-dong, PAN Bo, et al. 2009. Preliminary study on geomorphic characteristics of eruptive products of Tianchi Volcano, Changbai Mountains[J]. Journal of Seismological Research, 32(2): 182—187(in Chinese).
[10]	潘波, 樊祺诚, 许建东, 等. 2017. 长白山天池火山千年大喷发的岩浆过程[J]. 岩石学报, 33(1): 163—172.
	PAN Bo, FAN Qi-cheng, XU Jian-dong, et al. 2017. Magmatic processes of the Millen-nium eruption at Changbaishan Tianchi volcano, China /North Korea[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 33(1): 163—172(in Chinese).
[11]	钱程, 崔天日, 江斌, 等. 2014. 长白山地区晚新生代火山地貌形态研究及其地质应用[J]. 第四纪研究, 34(2): 312—324.
	QIAN Cheng, CUI Tian-ri, JIANG Bin, et al. 2014. A study on the characteristics of Late Cenozoic volcanic terrain in Changbaishan Mountains and its geological application[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 34(2): 312—324(in Chinese).
[12]	王颖, 王敏京. 2018. 火山地貌例述[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 38(4): 1—20.
	WANG Ying, WANG Min-jing. 2018. A summarization of volcanic geomorphologies[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 38(4): 1—20(in Chinese).
[13]	魏海泉, 刘若新, 樊祺诚, 等. 1998. 中国的活火山及有关灾害[J]. 自然杂志, 20(4): 196—200.
	WEI Hai-quan, LIU Ruo-xin, FAN Qi-cheng, et al. 1998. Active volcanoes and related disasters in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 20(4): 196—200(in Chinese).
[14]	许建东, 栾鹏, 樊笑英, 等. 2009. 基于遥感影像光谱与纹理分析的地物分类: 以长白山天池火山地区为例[J]. 地震地质, 31(4): 607—616. DOI
	XU Jian-dong, LUAN Peng, FAN Xiao-ying, et al. 2009. Analysis of spectrum and texture information on Changbaishan Tianchi volcano caldera and its application[J]. Seismology and Geology, 31(4): 607—616(in Chinese). DOI
[15]	杨清福, 原晓军, 武成智, 等. 2018. 中朝边境天池破火山口湖底地形多波束测深探测[J]. 岩石学报, 34(1): 185—193.
	YANG Qing-fu, YUAN Xiao-jun, WU Cheng-zhi, et al. 2018. The multibeam sounding exploration of the Tianchi caldera lakebed topography at the China-North Korea border[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 34(1): 185—193(in Chinese).
[16]	张柳毅, 李霓, 赵勇伟, 等. 2012. 腾冲火山区地形地貌特征及断裂制约关系: 卫片与DEM解译的认识[J]. 地震地质, 34(4): 755—767. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2012.04.018.
	ZHANG Liu-yi, LI Ni, ZHAO Yong-wei, et al. 2012. Geomorphic characteristics and fault restriction in the Tengchong volcanic region: Interpretation based on DEM and TM data[J]. Seismology and Geology, 34(4): 755—767(in Chinese). DOI
[17]	Burrough P A, McDonnell R A. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems[M]. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1—245.
[18]	Davidson J, DeSilva S. 2000. Composite Volcanoes[M]//Haraldur S. Encyclopedia of Volcanoes. Academic Press, San Diego: 663—681.
[19]	Favall M, Innocenti F, Pareschi M T, et al. 1999. The DEM of Mt. Etna: Geomorphological and structural implications[J]. Geodinamica Acta, 12(5): 279—290.
[20]	Grosse P, Euillades P A, Euillades L D, et al. 2014. A global database of composite volcano morphometry[J]. Bulletin of Volcanology, 76(1): 1—16.
[21]	Karátson D, Telbisz T, Singer B S. 2010. Late-stage volcano geomorphic evolution of the Pleistocene San Francisco Mountain, Arizona(USA), based on high-resolution DEM analysis and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar chronology[J]. Bulletin of Volcanology, 72(7): 833—846.
[22]	Karátson D, Telbisz T, Wörner G. 2012. Erosion rates and erosion patterns of Neogene to Quaternary stratovolcanoes in the Western Cordillera of the Central Andes: An SRTM DEM based analysis[J]. Geomorphology, (139-140): 122—135.
[23]	Karátson D, Yepes J, Favalli M, et al. 2016. Reconstructing eroded paleovolcanoes on Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, using advanced geomorphometry[J]. Geomorphology, 253: 123—134.
[24]	Ludwig R, Schneider P. 2006. Validation of digital elevation models from SRTM X-SAR for applications in hydrologic modeling[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, 60(5): 339—358.
[25]	Pan B, de Silva S L, Danišík M, et al. 2022. The Qi xiang zhan eruption, Changbaishan-Tianchivolcano, China/DPRK: New age constraints and their implications[J]. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 22485.
[26]	Pan B, de Silva S L, Xu J D, et al. 2017. The VEI-7 Millennium eruption, Changbaishan-Tianchi volcano, China/DPRK: New field, petrological, and chemical constraints on stratigraphy, volcanology, and magma dynamics[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 343: 45—59.
[27]	Pan B, de Silva S L, Xu J D, et al. 2020. Late Pleistocene to present day eruptive history of the Changbaishan-Tianchi Volcano, China /DPRK: New field, geochronological and chemical constraints[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 399: 1—18.
[28]	Parrot J F. 2007. Tri-dimensional parameterisation: an automated treatment to study the evolution of volcanic cones[J]. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement, 13(3): 247—257.
[29]	Székely B, Karátson D. 2004. DEM-based volcanic geomorphology as a tool for reconstructing volcanic edifices: Examples from the Börzsöny Mts, North Hungary[J]. Geomorphology, 63: 25—37.
[30]	Tibaldi A. 1995. Morphology of pyroclastic cones and tectonics[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B12): 24521—24535.
[31]	Wadge G, Francis P W, Ramirez C F. 1995. The Socompa collapse and avalanche event[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 66(1-4): 309—336.
[32]	Wang N, Li S, Hu R, et al. 2020. Geomorphology of the underwater caldera of the Changbaishan Tianchi volcano using 3D virtual visualization[J]. Geological Journal, 55(7): 5186—5196. DOI
[33]	Xu J D, Liu G M, Wu J P, et al. 2012. Recent unrest of Changbaishan volcano, northeast China: A precursor of future eruption?[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 39: L16305.
[34]	Zhang W, Montgomery D R. 1994. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations[J]. Water Resources Research, 30(4): 1019—1028.

长白山天池火山古锥体形貌重建

RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PALEOCONE MORPHOLOGY OF CHANGBAISHAN TIANCHI VOLCANO

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊国华, 季灵运, 刘传金. 长白山天池火山2015—2022年InSAR变形与活动状态分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(6): 1309-1327.
[2]	阮帅, 汤吉, 董泽义, 王立凤, 邓琰, 韩冰. 基于三维大地电磁AR-QN反演的长白山天池火山区电性结构[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(6): 1282-1300.
[3]	唐攀攀, 单新建, 王长林. 基于PSInSAR技术的长白山天池火山形变监测[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(1): 177-185.
[4]	许建东, 于红梅, 赵波. 长白山天池火山天文峰黄色浮岩的岩相学与显微结构特征[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(2): 363-370.
[5]	刘俊清, 孙继财, 武成智, 李克. 长白山天池火山溃湖洪水最大流量的初步估算及影响分析[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(1): 85-91.
[6]	尹功明, 樊祺诚. 长白山天池火山顶部黄色物质成因的初步探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2012, (4): 739-742.
[7]	于红梅, 许建东, 林传勇. 长白山天池火山千年大喷发空降浮岩碎屑的形貌特征和最终沉降速度[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(2): 440-451.
[8]	范小平, 李清河, 何海兵, 杨从杰, 金淑梅. 长白山天池火山区S波包络展宽的特征[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(4): 598-606.
[9]	孙春强, 魏海泉, 刘强, 盘晓东. 长白山天池火山造锥粗面岩新的K-Ar年龄[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(2): 484-496.
[10]	刘辉, 洪汉净, 武成智. 火山区地表形变及应力分布的有限元模拟——以长白山天池火山为例[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(3): 513-521.
[11]	杨清福, 史兰斌, 张羽, 陈波, 陈孝德. 长白山天池火山千年大喷发火山碎屑流堆积的粒度特征与地质意义[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(3): 480-491.
[12]	吕政, 杨清福, 张恒荣, 刘国明, 高金哲. 长白山天池火山地震活动与西北太平洋俯冲带内中深源地震关系的研究[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(3): 470-479.
[13]	李霓, Nicole Métrich, 樊祺诚. 长白山天池火山全新世3期浮岩长石斑晶中熔体包裹体高温热台实验研究[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(3): 459-469.
[14]	胡亚轩, 王庆良, 崔笃信, 王文萍, 李克, 陈红卫. Mogi模型在长白山天池火山区的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(1): 144-151.
[15]	金东淳, 崔天日, 金美兰. 长白山天池火山热(温)泉观测与研究[J]. 地震地质, 2003, 25(s1): 121-127.