地震地质 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 513-535.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.03.001

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震亚失稳过程中前兆异常演化的综合解释——以2014年鲁甸6.5级地震为例

蒋海昆1)(), 邓世广1), 姚琪2), 宋金1), 王锦红2)   

  1. 1) 中国地震台网中心, 100045 北京
    2) 中国地震局地震预测研究所, 100036 北京
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15 修回日期:2023-07-04 出版日期:2024-06-26 发布日期:2024-07-19
  • 作者简介:

    蒋海昆, 男, 1964年生, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事余震统计、 余震机理、 外因触发地震活动的定量检测及地震预测相关研究, E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    科技基础资源调查专项(2023FY101503); 地震动力学国家重点实验室开放基金(LED2022B05)

INTEGRATED INTERPRETATION ON THE PRECURSORY PROCESS EVOLUTION IN THE META-INSTABILITY STAGE OF THE EARTHQUAKE: A CASE STUDY ON 2014 LUDIAN MS6.5 EARTHQUAKE

JIANG Hai-kun1)(), DENG Shi-guang1), YAO Qi2), SONG Jin1), WANG Jin-hong2)   

  1. 1) China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China
    2) Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, Beijing 100036, China
  • Received:2023-05-15 Revised:2023-07-04 Online:2024-06-26 Published:2024-07-19

摘要:

文中以2014年鲁甸6.5级地震为例, 在亚失稳实验及理论指导下, 基于震前地震活动及地球物理观测资料并结合地震成核数值模拟结果, 综合分析前兆异常时空演化与亚失稳过程的关系, 首次提供了一个可明确佐证亚失稳阶段震源区成核、 震源区附近协同化过程持续加剧的典型震例和观测事实。研究结果显示, 依据大区域强震活动及流动重力观测, 可判定鲁甸地震前研究区已处于高应力状态。在高应力背景判定的基础上, 依据地震活动及地球物理观测前兆异常, 可粗略判定鲁甸地震亚失稳过程可能起始于震前7、 8个月, 最突出的现象或判定指标是由震中附近小地震活跃所表征的断层应力状态由积累为主向释放为主的转变, 以及由定点地球物理观测异常数量显著增加所表征的断层运动协同化现象, 从地震成核的角度与成核后期核心弱化区扩张过程有关。之后至主震发生, 还有2个时间节点需要关注: 一是震前4、 5个月, 定点地球物理观测异常空间分布范围自震中附近向外围的明显扩展, 显示断层变形的加速协同化; 二是震前2个月之后, 震中附近小地震活动开始减弱、 微震活动及定点地球物理异常出现向震中的迁移收缩, 与地震成核过程核心弱化区扩展之后的收缩过程相关联。

关键词: 亚失稳阶段, 应力状态变化, 断层变形协同化, 鲁甸M6.5地震, 小地震活动, 地球物理观测

Abstract:

The transition from the metastable state to the meta-instability stage indicates that the seismic fault has entered an irreversible deformation process and will lead to an inevitable instability(Ma Jin et al., 2014). Therefore, identifying the meta-instability stage is helpful for the judgment of short-term earthquake precursor anomalies. Under laboratory conditions, the meta-instability stage can be visually identified through stress-time curves, thus potentially predicting the occurrence of the laboratory earthquake. However, there are significant differences between field conditions and laboratory environments. Firstly, the underground medium and structural conditions in the real earthquake source region are unclear and far more complex than laboratory specimens. Secondly, the distribution of the sensors, sensor density, as well as measurement accuracy are limited by various conditions, making it impossible to construct an ideal observation environment covering the entire region. Thirdly, the loading stress cannot be directly measured, and the current actual stress state of the study area is unknown, which is the most difficult problem to solve. Therefore, under the guidance of meta-instability experiments and theories, it is a beneficial attempt to conduct retrospective studies on typical earthquake cases with relatively good observation conditions in the past, analyze the spatial-temporal evolution of different physical fields at different stages before the earthquakes, compare the observed phenomena with the characteristics and change processes of meta-instability stages obtained from experiments or theoretical research. Its final goal is to find possible characteristics or indirect criteria for meta-instability stages under field observation conditions.

Therefore, taking the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake as an example and under the guidance of the meta-instability experiments and theories, the paper comprehensively analyzes the relationship between the spatial-temporal evolution of precursory anomalies and the meta-instability process based on the seismic activity and the geophysical observation data prior the earthquake, and combined with numerical simulation results of the earthquake nucleation. The Ludian MS6.5 earthquake occurred on August 3, 2014 in northeastern Yunnan Province, China. The observation conditions in this region were relatively good, with 26 seismometers within a 300-km radius of the epicenter, which were able to basically monitor earthquakes with completeness magnitude ML≥1.5 and locating accuracy of less than 20km. There were 79 fixed geophysical observation stations, including 11 within 100km, 32 between 101~200km, and 36 between 201~300km. The observation terms covered 43 deformation observations(22 tilt observations, 18 borehole strain observations, and 3 gravity observations), 187 underground fluid observations(90 water physical observations such as water level and temperature, 43 material compositions measurements including radon, mercury and so on, 26 gas measurements such as CO2, and 28 ion measurements including bicarbonate, calcium, and magnesium), and 52 electromagnetic observations(36 geomagnetic observations, 16 resistivity and electromagnetic wave observations). There were a large number of credible medium- and short-term precursor anomalies before the Ludian MS6.4 earthquake, a total of 48 precursor anomalies were identified. Among of them, there were 8 seismic anomalies and 40 geophysical anomalies, accounting for approximately 15% of all measurement items. Among these 40 geophysical anomalies, 31 were proposed before the earthquake, and most of them were investigated and verified on-site with reliable changes.(Wu, et al., 2019).

Based on this abundant precursor abnormally data before the Ludian MS6.4 earthquake and further systematic analysis, a typical earthquake case and relevant observational facts have been provided which can support the viewpoint that during the meta-instability stage, the earthquake nucleation occurred in the epicenter region and the synergy process evolved continuously in surrounding area of the epicenter. The results show that based on large-scale strong earthquake activities and the observation data of the mobile gravity, it can be determined that the concerned area was already in a high-stress state before the Luding earthquake. At that time, the stress level in the large area including the epicenter of the Ludian earthquake was relatively high, and the northeastern Yunnan region and its nearby areas where the Ludian earthquake occurred were already in a critical stress state where strong earthquakes could occur at any time. Under the premise of determining a high-stress state, according to the precursors of seismic activities and geophysical observation precursor anomalies, it can be roughly determined that the meta-instability process of the Ludian earthquake may have begun seven or eight months before the mainshock. The most prominent phenomenon or judgment index is the transition of the fault stress state from accumulation to release, characterized by the active of small earthquakes near the epicenter, as well as the synergistic phenomenon of fault deformation characterized by the significant increase in the number of geophysical observation anomalies, which is related to the expansion process of the core weakening zone in the late period of the earthquake nucleation. After that, until the occurrence of the mainshock, two times should be paying attention to. Firstly, four to five months before the mainshock, the spatial distribution range of the geophysical observation anomalies expands significantly from the epicenter area to the periphery region, indicating accelerated synergistic deformation of the fault. Secondly, after two months before the mainshock, the small earthquake activities near the epicenter began to weaken, and the micro-earthquake activities and the geophysical anomalies showed a migration and contraction towards the epicenter, which is associated with the contraction process of the core weakening zone during the final stage of the earthquake nucleation. The concept of seismic meta-instability proposed from the perspective of stress changes in seismic fault has an explicit physical implication, and the meta-instability stage is associated with the earthquake nucleation process(He et al., 2023). The basic premise for the meta-instability theory to play a role in short-term earthquake prediction lies in how to apply laboratory research results to natural earthquakes, understand whether the regional or fault stress state tends to or enters a meta-instability state through field observations, and further utilize it for practical earthquake prediction.

Key words: meta-instability stage, changes of stress states, synergy of fault deformation, Ludian MS6.5 earthquake, activity of small earthquakes, geophysical observation