基于三维剩余密度结构的松原地震成因

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.02.013

地震地质 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 462-476.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2024.02.013

基于三维剩余密度结构的松原地震成因

刘文玉¹^,⁴^,⁵⁾(), 程正璞²^,³⁾^,^*(), 年秀清⁴⁾, 陈闫¹⁾, 胡钰铃⁴⁾, 覃祖建⁴⁾, 邵明正⁴⁾

¹⁾ 吉林大学, 地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026
²⁾ 中国地质调查局水文地质环境地质调查中心, 天津 300309
³⁾ 中国科学技术大学, 地球和空间科学学院, 合肥 230026
⁴⁾ 东华理工大学, 地球物理与测绘技术学院, 南昌 330000
⁵⁾ 江西省防震减灾与工程地质灾害探测工程研究中心, 南昌 330013

收稿日期:2023-04-13 修回日期:2023-12-08 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-05-29
通讯作者: *程正璞, 男, 1990年生, 现为中国科学技术大学地球和空间科学学院资源与环境专业在读博士研究生, 高级工程师, 主要从事地球物理研究及深部资源勘查相关工作, E-mail: czp1990@126.com。
作者简介:
刘文玉, 男, 1986年生, 2018年于中国科学院大学获矿床学、岩石学和矿物学博士学位, 现为东华理工大学固体地球物理学专业讲师和吉林大学博士后, 研究方向为深部地质结构、构造与矿产勘查, E-mail: Liujiahongsuv@sina.com。
基金资助:
江西省防震减灾与工程地质灾害探测工程研究中心开放基金(1410600024); 基于松原地区三维地壳电性结构研究项目(1410001022)

GENESIS OF SONGYUAN EARTHQUAKES BASED ON 3D RESIDUAL DENSITY STRUCTURE

LIU Wen-yu¹^,⁴^,⁵⁾(), CHENG Zheng-pu²^,³⁾^,^*(), NIAN Xiu-qing⁴⁾, CHEN Yan¹⁾, HU Yu-ling⁴⁾, QIN Zu-jian⁴⁾, SHAO Ming-zheng⁴⁾

¹⁾ College of Geoexploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
²⁾ Center for Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology Survey, CGS, Tianjin 300309, China
³⁾ School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
⁴⁾ School of Geophysics and Measurement-control Technology, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330000, China
⁵⁾ Engineering Research Center for Seismic Disaster Prevention and Engineering Geological Disaster Detection of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2023-04-13 Revised:2023-12-08 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

自2006年以来松原市乾安县与宁江区地震频发, 成为东北地震活动最为频繁的区域, 目前对两地的发震构造和地震成因的认识存在严重分歧, 制约了地震危险性评价与预防工作的开展。文中通过对区域重力数据进行非线性共轭梯度聚焦反演, 获得了松原震区的三维剩余密度结构, 结合石油井震资料, 获得了如下认识: 1)研究区的剩余密度异常呈高低相间的带状分布, 南部异常走向为NNW, 北部异常转变为NNE向, 该特征反映出乾安震区和宁江震区的深部孕震环境不同, 前者震源位于查干花高密度异常体内及其边缘, 后者震源位于松原低密度异常带中部, 指示两地震源位置的岩性不同; 2)两者的发震构造不相同, 前者受控于查干花断裂和乾安断裂, 后者受控于松原断裂和扶余北断裂; 3)地震的形成与区域应力, 基底结构, 深部气、流体运移和长期油气开采等因素有关。长期注水采油破坏了地质结构和应力环境, 可能是重要的地震诱发因素。

关键词: 松原地震, 三维剩余密度结构, 深部孕震环境, 基底构造, 地震成因

Abstract:

Since 2006, more than 10 earthquakes with the magnitude of 4 or higher have occurred continuously in Ningjiang district and Qian’an county, Songyuan city of Jilin province, with tens of thousands of aftershocks. The largest earthquake is the magnitude 5.8 earthquake on November 23, 2013 in Qiangorlos Mongolian autonomous county, Songyuan city, Jilin province. Frequent earthquake activities not only cause a large number of damaged buildings, but also trigger geological disasters such as sand liquefaction and slope instability, which have attracted widespread attention from the public and government departments. In order to comprehensively understand the causes of earthquakes in the Songyuan area, much studies on earthquake anomalies, seismogenic structures, and source depths have benn conducted recently. However, there are still some difference opinions in understanding the causes of earthquakes in the Songyuan area, for example, the major different viewpoints include: 1)it is caused by the regional stress release caused by Pacific subduction, mainly based on the consistency between the stress field in the source area and the background stress field of the Pacific plate subducting towards the edge of the east Asian continent; 2)it is related to deep melt or fluid migration, mainly based on the existence of low-speed and low resistance anomalous bodies in the deep part of the seismic area; 3)it is related to long-term oil and gas extraction, the main basis is that the seismic source spectrum exhibits characteristics of early and fast attenuation compared to typical structural earthquakes, and the time-domain and frequency-domain characteristic parameters such as waveform complexity and spectral ratio are also significantly different from typical structural earthquakes. In addition, the seismic source mechanism contains a large number of nondual force source components and shallow seismic source depth. Moreover, there is also significant controversy over the seismogenic structure, with the focus on whether the Qian’an and Ningjiang earthquake regions are controlled by the same fault zones. Some scholars infer that the seismogenic structures in both areas are the NE-trending Fuyu-Zhaodong Fault based on the source mechanism solution. Another group of scholars believe that the Qian’an earthquake area is controlled by NW-trending hidden faults, while the seismic structure in the Ningjiang earthquake area is the second NW-trending Songhuajiang Fault. The reason for the above controversy lies in the lack of necessary constraints on the deep structure of the seismic area.

To solve above problems, in this article we studied the three-dimensional residual density structure of the Songyuan earthquake area by performing nonlinear conjugate gradient focusing inversion on regional gravity data. Combined with oil drilling and reflection seismic data, some new insights were obtained as follows: 1)The residual density anomaly in the study area shows a high-low alternating strip distribution, with the southern anomaly trending NNW and the northern anomaly transitioning to NNE, This feature reflects the different deep earthquake environments in the Qian’an earthquake area and the Ningjiang earthquake area. The former’s source is located in the high-density anomaly body and its edge of Chaganhua, while the latter’s source is located in the middle of the low-density anomaly zone in Songyuan, indicating different rock types in the two locations. The basement of the Qian’an earthquake area is composed of limestone and metamorphic volcanic rocks, while the basement of the Ningjiang earthquake area is composed of fractured granite magmatic rocks. The stability of the basement structures in both areas is poor; 2)The seismic structures of the two are different. The former is controlled by the Chaganhua Fault and Qian’an Fault, while the latter is controlled by the Songyuan Fault and the Fuyubei Fault; 3)The formation of earthquakes is related to factors such as regional stress, basement structure, deep gas/fluid migration, and long-term oil and gas extraction. Long term water injection and oil recovery have damaged geological structures and stress environments, which may be important triggering factors. 4)In terms of the seismic source mechanism, we concluded that under the sustained action of regional stress in the near EW direction in the Songyuan area, the basement fault structures and fractures in the Qian’an and Ningjiang earthquake areas are extremely developed. Deep gas/fluid migrates upwards along the basement fractures, further reducing the stability of the basement structure. Long term water injection, oil and gas recovery, as well as fracturing, greatly damage the structural integrity of the cap rock and the distribution of deep stress, which results in the compressive and torsional strike slip movements in the relevant structures.

Key words: Songyuan earthquake, Three-dimensional residual density structure, deep seismogenic environment, basement structure, seismic genesis

刘文玉, 程正璞, 年秀清, 陈闫, 胡钰铃, 覃祖建, 邵明正. 基于三维剩余密度结构的松原地震成因[J]. 地震地质, 2024, 46(2): 462-476.

LIU Wen-yu, CHENG Zheng-pu, NIAN Xiu-qing, CHEN Yan, HU Yu-ling, QIN Zu-jian, SHAO Ming-zheng. GENESIS OF SONGYUAN EARTHQUAKES BASED ON 3D RESIDUAL DENSITY STRUCTURE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2024, 46(2): 462-476.

图/表 8

图1 松原地区的活动构造与震中分布图

Fig. 1 Tectonics and epicenter distribution map in Songyuan area.

图2 布格重力异常原始场(a)与拟合场(b)对比图

Fig. 2 Comparison of Bouguer gravity anomaly between the original field(a)and the fitting field(b).

图3 研究区三维剩余密度结构的水平切片图

Fig. 3 The horizontal slices showing 3D residual density structure in the study area.

图4 研究区三维剩余密度结构的剖面图

Fig. 4 3D residual density structure profile of the study area.

图5 研究区总梯度模与欧拉反褶积结果的叠合图

Fig. 5 Overlay diagram of total gradient modulus and Euler deconvolution results in the study area.

图6 研究区基底断裂构造的平面图(红色箭头为区域应力, 引自王斌, 2021)

Fig. 6 The basement fault structure in the study area(red indicates regional stress, cited from WANG Bin, 2021).

图7 研究区基底断裂构造的剖面图(据时应敏, 2012修)

Fig. 7 Profile of basement fault structure in the study area(after SHI Ying-min, 2012).

图8 震源机制模型图

Fig. 8 Diagram of source mechanism model.

参考文献 51

[1]	陈闯, 危自根, 李伟, 等. 2021. 2019-05-18松原 M_S5.1 地震震源机制与地震参数分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 41(6): 584—588.
	CHEN Chuang, WEI Zi-gen, LI WEI, et al. 2021. Analysis of Seismogenic Focal Mechanism and Seismic Parameter of Songyuan M_S5.1 Earthquake on May 18, 2019[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 41(6): 584—588(in Chinese).
[2]	陈闫. 2014. 重磁共轭梯度聚焦反演研究与应用[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 123.
	CHEN Yan. 2014. Gravity magntic conjugate gradient fousing inversion research and application[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 123(in Chinese).
[3]	范婕. 2018. 长岭断陷龙凤山—东岭地区断-盖耦合控藏机制研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东): 153.
	FAN Jie. 2018. Study on fault-caprock couling reservoir controlling mechanism in Longfengshan-Dongling area in Changling Faulted Basin[D]. China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao: 153(in Chinese).
[4]	符伟. 2019. 深反射剖面揭示的松辽盆地北部深部结构、动力学背景与油气远景[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 113.
	FU Wei. 2019. Deep sturcture, dynamic background and hydrocarbon prospect of northern Songliao Basin: revealed by deep seismic reflection profile[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 113(in Chinese).
[5]	高金哲, 李志伟, 包丰, 等. 2013. 2006年吉林乾安-前郭M5.0地震深度及其成因探讨[J]. 地球物理学进展, 28(5): 2328—2335.
	GAO Jin-zhe, LI Zhi-wei, BAO Feng, et al. 2013. Resolving focal depth of the 31 March 2006 Jilin Qianan-Qianguo earthquake with multiple datasets and its implication for seismogenesis[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 28(5): 2328—2335(in Chinese).
[6]	高立新, 戴勇, 王磊, 等. 2021. 现今中国东北地区地震活动特征与趋势探讨[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 41(5): 441—447, 453.
	GAO Li-xin, DAI Yong, WANG Lei, et al. 2021. Study on the present characteristics and trends of seismicity in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 41(5): 441—447, 453(in Chinese).
[7]	韩江涛, 郭振宇, 刘文玉, 等. 2018. 松辽盆地岩石圈减薄的深部动力学过程[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(6): 2265—2279.
	HAN Jiang-tao, GUO Zhen-yu, LIU Wen-yu, et al. 2018. Deep dynamic process of lithosphere thinning in Songliao Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(6): 2265—2279(in Chinese).
[8]	姜伟, 李兆焱, 卢坤玉, 等. 2019. 5·28吉林松原地震液化特征初步分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 39(3): 52—60.
	JIANG Wei, LI Zhao-yan, LU Kun-yu, et al. 2019. Preliminary analysis of liquefaction characteristics induced by the Songyuan earthquake of May 28 in Jilin[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 39(3): 52—60(in Chinese).
[9]	蒋雨函, 王子思, 刘佳琪, 等. 2023. 中国地震断裂带氢气观测研究现状[J]. 地震地质, 45(3): 622—637. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2023.03.002.
	JIANG Yu-han, WANC Zi-si, LIU Jia-qi, et al. 2023. Status of research and observation on underground fluid hydrogen in seismic fault zones in China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 45(3): 622—637(in Chinese). DOI
[10]	李传友, 汪一鹏, 沈军, 等. 1999. 第二松花江断裂新活动性讨论[J]. 地震地质, 21(4): 351—360.
	LI Chuan-you, WANG Yi-peng, SHEN Jun, et al. 1999. Discussion on New activity of the second Songhuajiang Fault[J]. Seismology and Geology, 21(4): 351—360(in Chinese).
[11]	李洪丽, 刘财, 田有, 等. 2021. 松原前郭地震区孕震构造的地震层析成像研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 64(5): 1597—1607. DOI
	LI Hong-li, LIU Cai, TIAN You, et al. 2021. Seismic tomography of the Songyuan area, Northeast China: Constraints on seismogenic structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 64(5): 1597—1607(in Chinese).
[12]	李君, 王勤彩. 2018. 2013年松原5级震群序列精定位、震源机制解及发震构造特征[J]. 地震, 38(4): 62—73.
	LI Jun, WANG Qin-cai. 2018. Relocation and focal mechanism of the Songyuan earthquake swarm sequence in 2013[J]. Earthquake, 38(4): 62—73(in Chinese).
[13]	李君, 王勤彩, 郑国栋, 等. 2019. 2018年5月松原 M_S5.7 地震序列发震断层及应力场特征[J]. 地震学报, 41(2): 207—218.
	LI Jun, WANG Qin-cai, ZHENG Guo-dong, et al. 2019. Characteristics of seismogenic faults and stress fields of the Songyuan M_S5.7 earthquake sequence in May 2018[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(2): 207—218(in Chinese).
[14]	李平, 田兆阳, 薄景山, 等. 2019. 松原5.7级地震砂土液化研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 52(9): 91—99.
	LI Ping, TIAN Zhao-yang, BO Jing-shan, et al. 2019. Study on sand liquefaction of the magnitude-5.7 Songyuan earthquake[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 52(9): 91—99(in Chinese).
[15]	李艳娥, 邢成起, 陈丽娟, 等. 2019. 2017—2018年吉林松原地震序列研究[J]. 地震学报, 41(4): 435—444.
	LI Yan-e, XING Cheng-qi, CHEN Li-juan, et al. 2019. Study of the Songyuan, Jilin, earthquake sequence in 2017—2018[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 41(4): 435—444(in Chinese).
[16]	李永生, 赵谊, 李继业, 等. 2020. 2018年5月28日吉林松原 M_S5.7 地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震学报, 42(1): 12—23.
	LI Yong-sheng, ZHAO Yi, LI Ji-ye, et al. 2020. Seismogenic structure analysis of the M_S5.7 Songyuan, Jilin, earthquake on May 28, 2018[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 42(1): 12—23(in Chinese).
[17]	连鑫葆. 2021. 松原市区壳内电性结构及热源分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 61.
	LIANG Xin-bao. 2021. Analysis of electric structure and heat source in the crust of Songyuan City[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 61(in Chinese).
[18]	梁姗姗, 徐志国, 张广伟, 等. 2019. 2019年吉林宁江 M_S5.1 地震全矩张量反演及其发震机理初探[J]. 中国地震, 35(3): 488—498.
	LIANG Shan-shan, XU Zhi-guo, ZHANG Guang-wei, et al. 2019. Full moment tensor inversion for the 2019 Ningjiang M_S5.1 earthquake in Jilin Province and study on its seismogenic mechanism[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 35(3): 488—498(in Chinese).
[19]	刘爱华, 张伟, 龚飞, 等. 2018. 利用CAP方法分析吉林松原4.9级地震震源机制[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 39(6): 78—85.
	LIU Ai-hua, ZHANG Wei, GONG Fei, et al. 2018. Focal mechanisms of Songyuan M4.9 earthquake in Jilin Province determined from CAP method[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 39(6): 78—85(in Chinese).
[20]	刘俊清. 2018. 吉林省西部地区典型地震活动研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 110.
	LIU Jun-qing. 2018. The study of the typical seismicity in western region of Jilin Province[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 110(in Chinese).
[21]	刘俊清, 刘财, 雷建设, 等. 2017. 2013年前郭 M_S5.8 震群矩张量研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(9): 3418—3431. DOI
	LIU Jun-qing, LIU Cai, LEl Jian-she, et al. 2017. The moment tensors of the 2013 Qianguo M_S5.8 seismic swarm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(9): 3418—3431(in Chinese).
[22]	刘玉琢, 梁海庆, 刘建中. 1989. 我国东北地区新生代构造应力场的时空变化与地震活动[J]. 东北地震研究, 5(1): 17—24.
	LIU Yu-zhuo, LIANG Hai-qing, LIU Jian-zhong. 1989. The stress field change in time and space in northeast China and seismological activity[J]. Seismological Research of Northeast China, 5(1): 17—24(in Chinese).
[23]	吕晗. 2017. 扶余/松原-肇东断层南段地震危险性分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 70.
	LÜ Han. 2017. Risks assessment of southern segment of Fuyu/Songyuan-Zhaodong Fault[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 70(in Chinese).
[24]	卢燕红, 吴兆营, 丁广, 等. 2017. 吉林前郭5.8级震区上地壳速度结构[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 47(6): 1894—1903.
	LU Yan-hong, WU Zhao-ying, DING Guang, et al. 2017. Upper crustal velocity structure in Qianguo M5.8 earthquake region[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 47(6): 1894—1903(in Chinese).
[25]	盘晓东, 刘俊清, 贾若, 等. 2021. 2019年5月18日吉林松原宁江 M_S5.1 地震总结[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 42(2): 147—148.
	PAN Xiao-dong, LIU Jun-qing, JIA Ruo, et al. 2021. About the Ningjiang M_S5.1 earthquake in Songyuan, Jilin Province on May 18, 2019[J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 42(2): 147—148(in Chinese).
[26]	盘晓东, 贾若, 康建红, 等. 2018. 2013年10月31日吉林前郭M5.8震群研究[J]. 国际地震动态, 4(472): 80—89.
	PAN Xiao-dong, Jia Ruo, Kang Jian-hong, et al. 2018. Research on Qianguo M5.8 earthquake swarm on October 31, 2013[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, 4(472): 80—89(in Chinese).
[27]	阮庆丰. 2022. 松原地区地震震群分布、迁移和动力学机制研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 115.
	RUAN Qing-feng. 2022. Study on the distribution, migration and dynamic mechanism of earthquake swarm in Songyuan area[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 115(in Chinese).
[28]	盛书中, 万永革, 王晓山, 等. 2017. 2013年吉林松原震群重定位及其发震构造[J]. 地学前缘, 24(2): 212—219. DOI
	SHENG Shu-zhong, WAN Yong-ge, WANG Xiao-shan, et al. 2017. Relocation of the 2013 Songyuan earthquake swarm in Jilin Province and its seismogenic structure[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 24(2): 212—219(in Chinese).
[29]	时应敏. 2012. 松辽盆地长岭断陷火山机构及天然气成藏特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学: 237.
	SHI Ying-min. 2012. Volcano edifices and gas pool formation in Changling Faulted Depression, Songliao Basin, China[D]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing: 237(in Chinese).
[30]	唐裕, 翁爱华, 杨悦, 等. 2021. 松原地震与流体作用联系的大地电磁证据[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 51(1): 134—149.
	TANG Yu, WENG Ai-hang, YANG Yue, et al. 2021. Connection between earthquakes and deep fluids revealed by magnetotelluric imaging in Songyuan China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 51(1): 134—149(in Chinese).
[31]	王斌. 2021. 松辽盆地现今应力环境研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院: 251.
	WANG Bin. 2021. Study on the current in-situ stress state of the Songliao Basin[D]. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing: 251(in Chinese).
[32]	王亮, 李君, 顾强强, 等. 2015. 吉林松原5级震群的重新定位研究[J]. 防灾减灾学报, 31(1): 30—34.
	WANG Liang, LI Jun, GU Qiang-qiang, et al. 2015. Accurate Relocation of Earthquake Swarm in Songyuan, Jilin, China[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Reduction, 31(1): 30—34(in Chinese).
[33]	王向腾, 李志伟, 邓居智, 等. 2021. 沉积盆地台网稀疏地区中等强度浅源地震起始深度测定: 以2013年前郭 M_S5.8 和2016年Fairview M_W5.1 地震序列为例[J]. 地球物理学报, 64(3): 851—863. DOI
	WANG Xiang-teng, LI Zhi-wei, DENG Ju-zhi, et al. 2021. Hypocentral depth determination for moderate-magnitude shallow earthquakes in sedimentary basins with sparse network: Case studies of the 2013 Qianguo M_S5.8 and the 2016 Fairview M_W5.1 earthquake sequences[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 64(3): 851—863(in Chinese).
[34]	尉洋, 沈军, 于晓辉, 等. 2016. 石油地震资料在隐伏活断层探测中的应用——以松原活断层探测为例[J]. 地震地质, 38(2): 423—433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.02.015.
	WEI Yang, SHEN Jun, YU Xiao-hui, et al. 2016. The application of petroleum seismic data to the buried active fault detection: A case study of active faults surveying in Songyuan city[J]. Seismology and Geology, 38(2): 423—433(in Chinese).
[35]	吴微微, 杨建思, 苏金蓉, 等. 2014. 2013年吉林前郭—乾安震源区中强地震矩张量反演与区域孕震环境研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 57(8): 2541—2554. DOI
	WU Wei-wei, YANG Jian-si, SU Jin-rong, et al. 2014. Moment inversion of moderate earthquakes and seismogenic environment in Qianguo-Qian’an source region, 2013, Jilin Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(8): 2541—2554(in Chinese).
[36]	向钰鉥. 2022. 松辽盆地中央古隆起带南部基岩风化壳型储层特征及油气成藏模式[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 121.
	XIANG Yu-shu. 2022. Reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation model of bedrock weathering crust in southern part of central paleo-uplift belt, Songliao Basin[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 121(in Chinese).
[37]	谢富仁, 张红艳, 崔效锋, 等. 2011. 中国大陆现代构造应力场与强震活动[J]. 国际地震动态, 385(1): 4—12.
	XIE Fu-ren, ZHANG Hong-yan, CUI Xiao-feng, et al. 2011. The modern tectonic stress field and strong earthquakes in China[J]. Recent Developmenst in World Seismology, 385(1): 4—12(in Chinese).
[38]	薛林福, 祝铭, 李文庆, 等. 2018. 岩浆泡破裂引发地震的模式——以吉林松原2013年地震群为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 48(6): 1865—1875.
	XUE Lin-fu, ZHU Ming, LI Wen-qing, et al. 2018. Earthquake triggered by magma bubble bursting: 2013 Songyuan earthquake group in Jilin Province as an example[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 48(6): 1865—1875(in Chinese).
[39]	杨宇, 雷建设, 张广伟, 等. 2019. 前郭 M_S5.8 和松原 M_S5.7 地震震源区地壳速度结构与孕震环境[J]. 地球物理学报, 62(11): 4259—4278. DOI
	YANG Yu, LEI Jian-she, ZHANG Guang-wei, et al. 2019. The crustal velocity structure and seismogenic environment in the source areas of the Qianguo M_S5.8 and Songyuan M_S5.7 earthquake[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(11): 4259—4278(in Chinese).
[40]	杨悦. 2019. 松原地震活跃区深部电性结构及其孕震机制[D]. 长春: 吉林大学: 121.
	YANG Yue. 2019. Deep electrical structure and seismogenic mechanism in seismic active area of Songyuan[D]. Jilin University, Changchun: 121(in Chinese).
[41]	郁广程, 姚运生, 张丽芬, 等. 2020. 2013年吉林省松原地区M_S≥5地震群成因研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 40(5): 534—539.
	YU Guang-cheng, YAO Yun-sheng, ZHANG Li-fen, et al. 2020. Study on genesis of M_S≥5 earthquake swarms in Jilin Province in 2013[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 40(5): 534—539(in Chinese).
[42]	于晓辉. 2019. 松辽盆地东南部断裂构造活动性分析[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所: 105.
	YU Xiao-hui. 2019. Reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation model of bedrock weathering crust in southern part of central paleo-uplift belt, Songliao Basin[D]. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing: 105(in Chinese).
[43]	于晓辉, 沈军, 戴训也, 等. 2018. 生长地层揭示松原地区孤店断裂第四纪以来的构造特征[J]. 地震地质, 40(6): 1240—1253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2018.06.004.
	YU Xiao-hui, SHEN Jun, DAI Xun-ye, et al. 2018. Growth strata reveal the Quaternary tectonic feature of Gudian Fault in Songyuan, Songliao Basin, China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 40(6): 1240—1253(in Chinese). DOI
[44]	张超群. 2014. 长岭断陷构造特征及其演化规律研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学: 57.
	ZHANG Chao-qun. 2014. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of Changling rift basin[D]. Northeastern Petroleum University, Daqing: 57(in Chinese).
[45]	Grigoli F, Cesca S, Rinaldi A P, et al. 2018. The November 2017 M_W5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea[J]. Science, 360(6392): 1003—1006. DOI PMID
[46]	Guglielmi Y, Cappa F, Avouac J P, et al. 2015. Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip[J]. Science, 348(6240): 1224—1226. DOI PMID
[47]	Kim K H, Ree J H, Kim Y, et al. 2018. Assessing whether the 2017 M_W5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event[J]. Science, 360(6392): 1007—1009.
[48]	Su Z, Xu X W, Liang S S, et al. 2020. Seismotectonics of the 2017-2018 Songyuan earthquake sequence, northeastern China: Passive bookshelf faulting and block rotation in the Songliao Basin[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 91(3): 1593—1605.
[49]	Xu Z, Liang S, Liu J, et al. 2020. Relocation, focal mechanisms and stress field characteristics of earthquake swarms in the Songyuan area of Jilin Province, China[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 177(11): 5147—5168.
[50]	Zhang G W, Lei J S, Sun D Y. 2019. The 2013 and 2017 M_S5 seismic swarms in Jilin, NE China: Fluid-triggered earthquakes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124(12): 13079—13111.
[51]	Zhdanov M S, Ellis R, Mukherjee S. 2004. Three-dimensional regularized focusing inversion of gravity gradient tensor component data[J]. Geophysics, 69(4): 925—937.

基于三维剩余密度结构的松原地震成因

GENESIS OF SONGYUAN EARTHQUAKES BASED ON 3D RESIDUAL DENSITY STRUCTURE

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 51

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王明亮, 张扬, 徐顺强, 徐志萍. 华北坳陷中南部深部结构大地电磁探测[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 536-552.
[2]	冯向东, 岳秀霞, 王曰风, 王晓山, 刁桂苓, 张洪智, 程万正, 李悦, 冯志仁. 由向家坝水库震源机制探讨诱发地震的成因[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(2): 565-575.
[3]	赵俊猛, 卢造勋, 姚长利, 黎益仕, 刘占坡. 准噶尔盆地基底断裂的重磁学研究[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 132-143.