岩石加载变形过程中超声尾波与声发射变化的实验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2020.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 文中采用尺寸为50mm×50mm×150mm的花岗闪长岩、大理岩以及砂岩3种不同的岩石样品, 开展了超声尾波和声发射同步观测研究。结果显示: 1)尾波变化与声发射演化过程存在良好的对应关系, 声发射频度增加时尾波的变化随之改变, 尤其是声发射频度增加的早期阶段尾波便出现变化。这预示了分析尾波可获得岩石早期的损伤信息。 2)不同变形阶段, 尾波变化的物理机制不同。加载初期, 尾波变化存在明显的散射体改变特征; 随后, 在线弹性变形阶段则以波速变化为主; 加载后期, 散射体的改变增加, 且与波速变化共存, 散射体的改变效应与岩石微破裂的程度有关。 3)随着载荷的增加, 波速增加的幅度总体呈逐渐减小的趋势, 这与通过直达波获得的认识基本一致。 4)岩石变形过程中产生的微破裂会改变尾波变化的物理机制, 散射体效应将显著增强。同时, 声发射波形将对超声尾波造成干扰, 因此在仅利用尾波资料分析岩石损伤时需要关注相关的问题。总之, 超声尾波变化和声发射均可反映岩石内部的损伤情况, 且不同的变形阶段尾波的变化机制不同, 二者的联合观测可起到相互验证的作用, 有利于提高观测结果的可靠性。

关键词: 超声尾波, 声发射, 岩石实验, 波速变化, 散射体变化

Abstract: The coda wave propagation path has received extensive attention as it is more sensitive to small changes in the medium than the direct wave. During the process of loading, the wave velocity, medium or source changes may cause the coda wave to change. The physical mechanism of change in the ultrasonic coda wave varies during different deformation stages. Meanwhile, there exist local damages in the rock sample during the deformation, and it will be accompanied by acoustic emission. Combining the ultrasonic coda wave and acoustic emission is beneficial to characterize the coda wave characteristics and damage degree of the sample at different deformation stages. In this paper, three kinds of rocks, including granodiorite, marble and sandstone with the sizes of 50mm×50mm×150mm, are used to carry out observations of ultrasonic coda wave and acoustic emission during the whole process of loading so as to study characteristics of the coda wave at different deformation stages. The major results are given below: 1)There is a good correspondence between the coda wave variation and the acoustic emission evolution process. When the acoustic emission frequency increases, the coda wave changes accordingly. In particular, the coda wave changes in the early stages of increased acoustic emission frequency, which indicates that the early damage information of rock can be obtained by analysis of the coda wave. 2)The physical mechanism of the coda wave change is different in different deformation stages. At the initial stage of loading, there are obvious scatterer changes in the coda wave change; then, in the linear elastic deformation stage, the wave velocity change is dominating; in the late-stage of loading, the scatterer change increases and coexists with the wave velocity change, the scatterer change effect is related with the rock micro-fracture degree, the rock will locally be damaged before rupturing, and the role of the scatterer will be enhanced. 3)With the increase of loading, the amplitude of increase of the wave velocity generally decreases gradually, which is basically consistent with the understanding obtained through the direct wave. The interference of acoustic emission can be eliminated because of the Kaiser effect when analyzing the coda wave. The consistency of the wave velocity change and stress loading and unloading is further verified. 4)The micro-fracture generated during rock deformation will change the physical mechanism of the coda wave change, and the scatterer effect will be significantly enhanced. At the same time, the acoustic emission waveform will cause interference to the ultrasonic coda wave. This means that attention needs to be paid when analyzing rock damage using only coda wave data. In short, the ultrasonic coda wave and acoustic emission can reflect the damage inside the rock, and the change mechanism of the coda wave in different deformation stages is different. The joint observation of the two can play a mutual verification role, which is conducive to improving the reliability of the observation results.

Key words: ultrasonic coda wave, acoustic emission, rock experiment, wave velocity variation, scattering change

中图分类号:

P589.1

杨海明, 陈顺云, 刘培洵, 郭彦双, 卓燕群, 齐文博. 岩石加载变形过程中超声尾波与声发射变化的实验[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(3): 715-731.

YANG Hai-ming, CHEN Shun-yun, LIU Pei-xun, GUO Yan-shuang, ZHUO Yan-qun, QI Wen-bo. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE CHANGES OF ULTRASONIC CODA WAVE AND ACOUSTIC EMISSION DURING ROCK LOADING AND DEFORMATION[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(3): 715-731.

参考文献

[1] 蒋海昆, 马胜利, 张流, 等. 2002. 雁列式断层组合变形过程中的声发射活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 24(4): 385-396.
JIANG Hai-kun, MA Sheng-li, ZHANG Liu, et al.2002. Spatio-temporal characteristics of acoustic emission during the deformation of rock samples with compressional and extensional en-echelon fault pattern[J]. Seismology and Geology, 24(4): 385-396(in Chinese).
[2] 李乐, 钮凤林, 陈棋福. 2017. 由重复地震的尾波研究汶川强震破裂区震后波速的微变化[C]. 中国地球科学联合学术年会.
LI Le, NIU Feng-lin, CHEN Qi-fu.2017. Microwave variations of post-seismic wave velocity in Wenchuan strong earthquake rupture areas from coda waves of repeated earthquakes[C]. Annual Meeting of Chinese Geoscience Union(in Chinese).
[3] 马胜利, 陈顺云, 刘培洵, 等. 2008. 断层阶区对滑动行为影响的实验研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 38(7): 842-851.
MA Sheng-li, CHEN Shun-yun, LIU Pei-xun, et al.2008. Experimental study on the influence of fault step area on sliding behavior[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 38(7): 842-851(in Chinese).
[4] 肖卓, 高原. 2016. 运用尾波干涉技术监测2014年盈江双震期间地壳介质状态的变化[J]. 地球物理学进展, 31(6): 2421-2428.
XIAO Zhuo, GAO Yuan.2016. Monitoring dynamic variations of crustal media during 2014 Yingjiang double earthquake by coda wave interferometry[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 31(6): 2421-2428(in Chinese).
[5] 谢凡, 任雅琼, 王宝善. 2017. 利用超声尾波观测1.5m长岩石断层黏滑实验的波速变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 60(4): 1470-1478. doi: 10.6038/cjg20170420.
XIE Fan, REN Ya-qiong, WANG Bao-shan.2017. Observation of stick-slips on a 1.5m-long granite fault using ultrasonic coda wave[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 60(4): 1470-1478(in Chinese).
[6] 张金川. 2014. 利用尾波干涉法研究水库蓄水引起的库区介质变化 [D]. 北京: 中国地震局地震预测研究所: 73-74.
ZHANG Jin-chuan.2014. The study of media changes caused by the reservoir storage with coda wave interferometry [D]. Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing: 73-74(in Chinese).
[7] Aki K.1969. Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(2): 615-631.
[8] Chouet B.1979. Temporal variation in the attenuation of earthquake coda near Stone Canyon, California[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 6(3): 143-146.
[9] Dodge D A, Beroza G C.1997. Source array analysis of coda waves near the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, mainshock: Implications for the mechanism of coseismic velocity changes[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 102(B11): 24437-24458.
[10] Grêt A, Snieder R, Aster R C, et al.2005. Monitoring rapid temporal change in a volcano with coda wave interferometry[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(6): L06304.
[11] Lagendijk A, Van Tiggelen B A.1996. Resonant multiple scattering of light[J]. Physics Reports, 270(3): 143-215.
[12] Lockner D.1993. The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30(7): 883-899.
[13] Mclaskey G C, Kilgore B D.2013. Foreshocks during the nucleation of stick-slip instability[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(6): 2982-2997.
[14] Niu F L, Silver P G, Daley T M, et al.2008. Preseismic velocity changes observed from active source monitoring at the Parkfield SAFOD drill site[J]. Nature, 454(7201): 204-208.
[15] Niu F L, Silver P G, Nadeau R M, et al.2003. Migration of seismic scatters associated with the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient event[J]. Nature, 426(6966): 544-548.
[16] Poupinet G, Ellsworth W L, Frechet J.1984. Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras Fault, California[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 89(B7): 5719-5731.
[17] Sato H.1988. Temporal change in scattering and attenuation associated with the earthquake occurrence: A review of recent studies on coda waves[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 126(2): 465-497.
[18] Silver P G, Daley T M, Niu F L, et al.2007. Active source monitoring of cross-well seismic travel time for stress-induced changes[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(1B): 281-293.
[19] Snieder R K.2002. Coda wave interferometry and the equilibration of energy in elastic media[J]. Physical Review E, 66(4): 046615.
[20] Snieder R K.2006. The theory of coda wave interferometry[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163(2-3): 455-473.
[21] Snieder R K, Gret A, Douma H, et al.2002. Coda wave interferometry for estimating nonlinear behavior in seismic velocity[J]. Science, 295(5563): 2253-2255.
[22] Snieder R K, Scales J A.1998. Time-reversed imaging as a diagnostic of wave and particle chaos[J]. Physical Review E, 58(5): 5668-5675.
[23] Wang B S, Zhu P, Chen Y, et al.2008. Continuous subsurface velocity measurement with coda wave interferometry[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(B12): B12313.
[24] Wegler U, Lühr B G, Snieder R, et al.2006. Increase of shear wave velocity before the 1998 eruption of Merapi volcano(Indonesia)[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(9): L09303.
[25] Xie F, Ren Y, Zhou Y, et al.2018. Monitoring local changes in granite rock under biaxial test: A spatiotemporal imaging application with diffuse waves[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(3): 2214-2227.
[26] Zhuo Y, Liu P, Chen S, et al.2018. Laboratory observations of tremor-like events generated during preslip[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(14): 6926-6934.