2014年云南景谷MS6.6地震前地震活动变化分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于Region-Time-Length（RTL）算法，使用震前约6a和15a的地震目录定量检验了2014年景谷M_S6.6地震前的地震活动变化。研究时段近6a的分析结果显示：自2013年初在震中附近检测到地震活动增强，空间异常分布在22.5°~24.5°N，99°~102°E内，异常范围和异常程度随时间由小变大再变小；综合反映区域地震活动水平的参数RTL面积分——I_RTL从2013年8月开始上升，达到峰值点后回落，峰值点至地震发生的时间间隔为9个月。研究时段近15a时，研究区内发生了2007年宁洱M_S6.4地震，结果表明：宁洱地震前检测到地震活动平静；景谷地震前，先检测到地震活动平静，后于震前1a检测到地震活动增强，异常分布在22.5°~25°N，99.5°~101.5°E范围内，I_RTL峰值与地震发生的时间间隔为7个月。这说明即使发震位置相距较近且震级相当的地震，震前的地震活动变化也会明显不同。对于景谷M_S6.6，不同研究时段检测到的结果虽有不同，但震前地震活动增强异常区的分布和参数I_RTL出现峰值的时间较一致，所以探索RTL空间分布和参数I_RTL与发震位置和时间的关系有重要的研究意义。

关键词: Region-Time-Length(RTL)算法, RTL面积分, 景谷地震, 地震危险性分析

Abstract:

According to the Region-Time-Length (RTL) algorithm,the analysis of seismicity changes prior to the 2014 Yunnan Jinggu M_S6.6 earthquake was conducted by using the earthquake catalogues about 6 and 15 years before this earthquake,respectively.When the studied period was nearly 6 years,an enhancement of seismic activity was detected around the epicenter since the beginning of 2013.The anomalies mainly distributed in the region of 22.5°~24.5°N and 99°~102°E.The range and degree of anomalies changed from small to large,and then to small chronologically.As the surface integral in respect to RTL,the physical parameter I_RTL,which could reflect the regional seismicity level,began to increase since August 2013,and then reduced after reaching the peak point.The time length from the peak point of I_RTL curve to the earthquake occurrence was 9 months.When the analyzed catalogue was nearly 15 years,the 2007 Ninger M_S6.4 occurred in the studied region.Seismicity quiescence was detected prior to the Ninger M_S6.4.Before the Jinggu M_S6.6,seismicity quiescence was detected firstly,and then enhanced activity was observed 1 year prior to the earthquake occurrence.The anomalies mainly distributed in the region of 22.5°~24.5°N and 99°~102°E.The time length from the peak point of I_RTL curve to the earthquake occurrence was 7 months.The above study showed that even the earthquakes location was near and the magnitude was close to each other,a big difference in seismic activity before the earthquakes may exist.Before the Jinggu M_S6.6,there was some difference in seismicity changes according to different beginning time of catalogues,but the distribution of anomalies and the time length from the peak point of I_RTL to the earthquake occurrence were uniform.So there was an important significance for exploring the relationship between the distribution of anomalies and the earthquake location,and the relationship between the time of the peak point of I_RTL and the earthquake occurrence time.

Key words: Region-Time-Length(RTL)algorithm, surface integral of RTL, Jinggu earthquake, seismic hazard evaluation

中图分类号:

P315.2

刘月, 邵志刚. 2014年云南景谷M_S6.6地震前地震活动变化分析[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(4): 1070-1081.

LIU Yue, SHAO Zhi-gang. ANALYSIS OF SEISMICITY CHANGES PRIOR TO THE 2014 YUNNAN JINGGU M_S6.6 EARTHQUAKE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 1070-1081.

参考文献

郭增建, 秦保燕. 1991. 地震成因和地震预报［M］. 北京:地震出版社. 177-178.
GUO Zeng-jian, QIN Bao-yan. 1991. Causes of Earthquakes and Earthquake Prediction［M］. Seismological Press, Beijing. 177-178(in Chinese).
蒋长胜, 吴忠良. 2011. 2010 年玉树M_S7.1地震前的中长期加速矩释放(AMR)问题［J］. 地球物理学报, 54(6):1501-1510.
JIANG Chang-sheng, WU Zhong-liang. 2011. Intermediate-term medium-range accelerating moment release(AMR)prior to the 2010 Yushu M_S7.1 earthquake［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 54(6):1501-1510(in Chinese).
蒋海昆, 侯海峰, 周焕鹏, 等. 2004a. "区域-时间-长度算法"及其在华北中强地震中短期前兆特征研究中的应用［J］. 地震学报, 26(2):151-161.
JIANG Hai-kun, HOU Hai-feng, ZHOU Huan-peng, et al. 2004a. Region-time-length algorithm and its application to the study of intermediate-short term earthquake precursor in North China［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 26(2):151-161(in Chinese).
蒋海昆, 侯海峰, 周焕鹏, 等. 2004b. "区域-时间-长度算法"在华北地区中强地震地点判定中的应用研究［J］. 地震, 24(4):17-26.
JIANG Hai-kun, HOU Hai-feng, ZHOU Huan-peng, et al. 2004b. Application study on Region-Time-Length algorithm for the site judgment of coming moderately strong earthquakes on North China area［J］. Earthquake, 24(4):17-26(in Chinese).
李闽峰. 2002. 震害预测快速服务平台的模型与方法及一些相关理论的研究. 北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所.
LI Min-feng. 2002. Study on models & approaches and some associated theories of rapid internet service of earthquake loss estimation. Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
李永华, 徐小明, 张恩会, 等. 2014. 青藏高原东南缘地壳结构及云南鲁甸、景谷地震深部孕震环境［J］. 地震地质, 36(4):1204-1216. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.04.021.
LI Yong-hua, XU Xiao-ming, ZHANG En-hui, et al. 2014. Three-dimensional crust structure beneath SE Tibetan plateau and its seismotectonic implications for the Ludian and Jinggu earthquakes［J］. Seismology and Geology, 36(4):1204-1216(in Chinese).
刘月, 吕晓健. 2016b. 基于区域-时间-长度算法的区域地震活动与强震关系的研究［J］. 地震学报, 38(2):208-219.
LIU Yue, LÜ Xiao-jian. 2016b. Relationship between regional seismic activity and strong earthquake based on the region-time-length algorithm［J］. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 38(2):208-219.
刘月, 吕晓健, 田勤俭. 2016a. 基于 "区域-时间-长度算法"分析川滇地区强震前地震活动性变化［J］. 地震, 36(2):94-104.
LIU Yue, LÜ Xiao-jian, TIAN Qin-jian. 2016a. Analysis of seismicity changes prior to strong earthquakes in Sichuan-Yunnan region by the Region-Time-Length algorithm［J］. Earthquake, 36(2):94-104(in Chinese).
刘月, 吕晓健, 田勤俭. 2016c. 芦山M_S7.0地震前地震活动性分析及区域地震活动水平参数IRTL的应用［J］. 地学前缘(待发表). http://epub.cnki.net/KNS/brief/result.aspx?dbprefix=CJFQ.
LIU Yue, LÜ Xiao-jian, TIAN Qin-jian. 2016c. Seismicity changes prior to the M_S7.0 Lushan earthquake and the application of regional seismic activity parameter［M］I［M］_RTL［J］. Earth Science Frontiers(To be published)(in Chinese). http://epub.cnki.net/KNS/brief/result.aspx?dbprefix=CJFQ.
刘月, 田勤俭, 吕晓健, 等. 2016d. 鲁甸M_S6.5地震前地震活动性分析及川滇东边界中部未来地震危险性研究［J］. 地球物理学报, 59(9):3269-3279.
LIU Yue, TIAN Qin-jian, LÜ Xiao-jian, et al. 2016d. Analysis of the seismicity changes prior to the M_S6.5 Ludian earthquake and study on the potential strong-earthquake risk for the middle part of eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(9):3269-3279(in Chinese).
梅秀苹, 刘小凤. 2013. "区域-时间-长度算法"用于甘肃及邻近地区中强地震预测的回溯性检验［J］. 西北地震学报, 35(s1):61-66.
MEI Xiu-ping, LIU Xiao-feng. 2013. Retrospective test on application of region-time-length algorithm to monitoring moderate earthquakes in Gansu Province and its surrounding areas［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 35(s1):61-66(in Chinese).
闻学泽, 范军, 易桂喜, 等. 2008. 川西安宁河断裂上的地震空区［J］. 中国科学(D辑), 38(7):797-807.
WEN Xue-ze, FAN Jun, YI Gui-xi, et al. 2008. The seismicity gap on the Anninghe fault zone of Sichuan［J］. Science in China(Ser D), 38(7):797-807(in Chinese).
徐锡伟, 程佳, 许冲, 等. 2014. 青藏高原块体运动模型与地震活动主体地区讨论:鲁甸和景谷地震的启示［J］. 地震地质, 36(4):1117-1134. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2014.04.015.
XU Xi-wei, CHENG Jia, XU Chong, et al. 2014. Discussion on block kinematic model and future themed areas for earthquake occurrence in the Tibetan plateau:Inspiration from the Ludian and Jinggu earthquakes［J］. Seismology and Geology, 36(4):1117-1134(in Chinese).
张国民, 马宏生, 王辉, 等. 2005. 中国大陆活动地块边界带与强震活动［J］. 地球物理学报, 48(3):141-149.
ZHANG Guo-min, MA Hong-sheng, WANG Hui, et al. 2005. Boundaries between active-tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the China mainland［J］. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 48(3):141-149(in Chinese).
Aki K. 1965. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log［M］N=a-bM［M］ and its confidence limits［J］. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 43:237-239.
Gardonio B, Marsan D, LenglinéO, et al. 2015. Changes in seismicity and stress loading on subduction faults in the Kanto region, Japan, 2011-2014［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 120:2616-2626. doi:10.1002/2014JB011798.
Gentili S. 2010. Distribution of seismicity before the larger earthquakes in Italy in the time interval 1994-2004［J］. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167:933-958.
Gutenberg B, Richter C F. 1944. Frequency of earthquakes in California［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34:185-188.
Huang Q H. 2008. Seismicity changes prior to the M_S8. 0 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China［J］. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(23). doi:10.1029/2008GL036270.
Huang Q H, Öncel A O, Sobolev G A. 2002. Precursory seismicity changes associated with the M_W=7.41999 August 17 Izmit(Turkey)earthquake［J］. Geophysical Journal International, 151(1):235-242.
Huang Q H, Sobolev G A, Nagao T. 2001. Characteristics of the seismic quiescence and activation patterns before the M=7.2 Kobe earthquake, January 17, 1995［J］. Tectonophysics, 337:99-116.
Keilis-Borok V I, Knopoff L, Rotyain I M. 1980. Bursts of aftershocks, long-term precursors of strong earthquakes［J］. Nature, 283:259-263.
Mogi K. 1979. Two kinds of seismic gap［J］. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 117(6):1176-1186.
Ogata Y, Imoto M, Katsura K. 1991. 3-D spatial variation of b values of magnitude frequency distribution beneath the Kanto district, Japan［J］. Geophysical Journal International, 14:135-146.
Reasenberg P. 1985. Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B7):5479-5495.
Sobolev G A, Tyupkin Y S. 1997. Low-seismicity precursors of large earthquakes in Kamchatka［J］. Volcanology and Seismology, 18:433-446.
Wiemer S, Wyss M. 2000. Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogues:Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90:859-869.

[1]	陈鲲, 高孟潭, 俞言祥, 徐伟进, 杜义, 李雪靖, 陆东华. 融合三维断层源和二维潜在震源区的随机抽样概率地震危险性分析算法研发[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 435-454.
[2]	姜丛, 蒋长胜, 尹欣欣, 王蕊嘉, 翟鸿宇, 张延保, 来贵娟, 尹凤玲. 水力压裂诱发地震活动中的b值时空异质性及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1333-1349.
[3]	曹颖, 钱佳威, 黄江培, 张国权, 付虹. 利用时移层析成像方法分析2014年云南景谷M_S6.6地震震源区的P波速度变化[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1563-1585.
[4]	谢张迪, 韩竹军. 2014年云南景谷M_S6.6地震发震断层及其动力学参数[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(4): 887-912.
[5]	毛泽斌, 常祖峰, 李鉴林, 常昊, 赵晋民, 陈刚. 景谷M6.6地震震中区断裂晚第四纪活动[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(4): 821-836.
[6]	程远志, 汤吉, 邓琰, 董泽义. 云南景谷M_S6.6地震震源区深部电性结构及其孕震环境[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(2): 352-369.
[7]	陈为涛, 甘卫军, 肖根如, 梁诗明, 盛传贞. 3·11日本大地震对中国东北部地区地壳形变态势的影响[J]. 地震地质, 2012, (3): 425-439.
[8]	周本刚. 论发震构造特性在潜在震源区参数确定中的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2004, 26(4): 750-760.
[9]	韩竹军, 张裕明, 于贵华. 如何确定对场地地震危险性贡献量最大的潜在震源区[J]. 地震地质, 1999, 21(4): 443-451.
[10]	蒋溥. 场地地震效应及其预测的某些考虑[J]. 地震地质, 1989, 11(1): 101-114.