乌鲁木齐王家沟断层组地表变形特征及强变形带宽度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.01.006

地震地质 ›› 2011, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 56-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.01.006

乌鲁木齐王家沟断层组地表变形特征及强变形带宽度

吴传勇¹, 沈军¹, 史杰², 李军¹, 向志勇¹

1. 新疆维吾尔自治区地震局, 乌鲁木齐 830011;
2. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2009-08-20 修回日期:2010-12-03 出版日期:2011-04-29 发布日期:2011-12-18
作者简介:吴传勇,男,1978年生,2002年毕业于吉林大学地球科学学院,2005年在中国地震局兰州地震研究所获得硕士学位,助理研究员,主要从事活动构造方面的研究,电话: 0991-3820426,E-mail: wuchuanyong 001@163.com。
基金资助:
中国地震局 "天山北麓活动构造及地震危险性评价技术"项目(20080813)和新疆地震科学基金(200903)共同资助。

SURFACE DEFORMATION OF THE WANGJIAGOU FAULT SET IN URUMQI AND THE SAFETY DISTANCE FROM IT

WU Chuan-yong¹, SHEN Jun¹, SHI Jie², LI Jun¹, XIANG Zhi-yong¹

1. Earthquake Adminsstration of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China;
2. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2009-08-20 Revised:2010-12-03 Online:2011-04-29 Published:2011-12-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

王家沟断层组断错了中更新世砾石台地及王家沟东岸的Ⅲ级阶地,地貌形迹非常清晰,地表变形现象主要表现为地震断层、断层陡坎和挤压鼓包等。根据不同地貌面上跨断层测量获得的一系列实测数据,得到王家沟Ⅲ级阶地上的地表陡坎高度为0.4～1.6m,最大变形带宽度为50m左右; 中更新世台地上的陡坎高度多为1.5～5.0m,最大变形带宽度为90m左右。利用探槽开挖揭露出的断层位置与地表强变形带测量剖面的叠加对比,初步确定王家沟断层组上、下盘之间变形宽度的比例为2:1左右,并由此讨论了王家沟断层组上、下盘的 "避让带"宽度问题。

关键词: 王家沟断层组, 变形特征, 强变形带宽度, 乌鲁木齐

Abstract:

The Wangjiagou Fault set,a set of Holocene active faults,is located at western suburbs of Urumqi City.The faults dislocated the gravel platform of the mid Pleistocene and the third level terrace of the Wangjiagou east bank,generating apparent fault scarps of opposite-slope direction on the surface with clear geomorphic traces.There are a series of deformation indications on landform,such as seismic fault,scarp and upheaval.In the field,thirty-nine groups of data were measured by using line tape along the fault.Among them,six were measured on the third level terrace of the Wangjiagou,and the others on the mid Pleistocene platform.Based on the data measured across the fault,we obtain that the height of the scarps is 0.4～1.6m and the width of the fault deformation is about 50m on the third level terrace.And on the mid Pleistocene platform,the height of scarps is 1.5～5.0m and the width of the deformation is about 90m.After comparing the profile of strong topographic deformation zone with the trench section,we primarily recognize that the ratio of hanging wall to foot wall deformation width is 2: 1approximately.The widths of strong surface deformation belt on the mid Pleistocene platform and the third level terrace on the two walls are 60m,30m and 33m,17m,respectively.

Key words: Wangjiagou Fault set, deformation feature, safety distance, Urumqi

中图分类号:

P315.2

吴传勇, 沈军, 史杰, 李军, 向志勇. 乌鲁木齐王家沟断层组地表变形特征及强变形带宽度[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(1): 56-66.

WU Chuan-yong, SHEN Jun, SHI Jie, LI Jun, XIANG Zhi-yong. SURFACE DEFORMATION OF THE WANGJIAGOU FAULT SET IN URUMQI AND THE SAFETY DISTANCE FROM IT[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2011, 33(1): 56-66.

参考文献

邓起东,冯先岳,张培震,等.2000.天山活动构造［M］.北京: 地震出版社.
DENG Qi-dong,FENG Xian-yue,ZHANG Pei-zhen,et al.2000.Active Tectonics of Tianshan Mountains［M］.Seismological Press,Beijing(in Chinese).
李锡堤,郑锦桐,廖启雯.2000.921集集大地震的地盘变形现象及断层禁限建问题.见:第八届台湾地区地球物理研讨会论文集. 669-675.
LI Xi-di,ZHENG Jin-tong,LIAO Qi-wen.2000.Ground deformation of the Chi-Chi Earthquake and problems of no or limited construction on active faults.In: Collection Papers of the 8th Taiwan Geophysics Meeting.669-675(in Chinese).
冉勇康,陈立春,沈军,等.2007.乌鲁木齐西山断裂组与地表破裂型逆断层古地震识别标志［J］.地震地质,29(2): 218-235.
RAN Yong-kang,CHEN Li-chun,SHEN Jun,et al.2007.Xishan Fault group near Urumqi City and paleoearthquake identification on reverse fault［J］.Seismology and Geology,29(2): 218-235(in Chinese).
沈军,宋和平,李军.2007.乌鲁木齐城市活断层发震模型初探［J］.内陆地震,21(3): 193-204.
SHEN Jun,SONG He-ping,LI Jun.2007.Preliminary study on seismogenic tectonic model for active fault in Urumqi City［J］.Inland Earthquake,21(3): 193-204(in Chinese).
沈军,宋和平.2008.乌鲁木齐城市活断层探测与地震危险性评价主要成果简介［J］.地震地质,30(1): 273-288.
SHEN Jun,SONG He-ping.2008.Brief introduction on the predominant results of the active fault detecting and seismic risk assessment in Urumqi City［J］.Seismology and Geology,30(1): 273-288(in Chinese).
吴传勇,沈军,李军,等.2008.乌鲁木齐西山逆断层组的新活动特征［J］.中国地震,24(4): 337-344.
WU Chuan-yong,SHEN Jun,LI Jun,et al.2008.Recent activity characteristics of the Xishan Fault group in Urumqi［J］.Earthquake Research in China,24(4): 337-344(in Chinese).
吴传勇,沈军,李军,等.2009.乌鲁木齐西山断层系的新构造变形特征与机制［J］.地震学报,31(1): 42-49.
WU Chuan-yong,SHEN Jun,LI Jun,et al.2009.Neotectonic deformation feature and mechanism of the Xishan Fault system in Urumqi［J］.Acta Seismologica Sinica,22(1): 69-74.
徐锡伟,闻学泽,叶建青,等.2008.汶川M_S8.0地震地表破裂带及其发震构造［J］.地震地质,30(3): 597-629.
XU Xi-wei,WEN Xue-ze,YE Jian-qing,et al.2008.The M_S8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake surface ruptures and its seismogenic structure［J］.Seismology and Geology,30(3): 597-629(in Chinese).
徐锡伟,于贵华,马文涛,等.2002.活断层地震地表破裂 "避让带"宽度确定的依据与方法［J］.地震地质,24(4): 470-483.
XU Xi-wei,YU Gui-hua,MA Wen-tao,et al.2002.Evidence and methods for determining the safety distance from the potential earthquake surface rupture on active fault［J］.Seismology and Geology,24(4): 470-483(in Chinese).
于贵华,徐锡伟,陈桂华,等.2009.汶川8.0级地震地表变形局部化样式与建筑物破坏特征关系初步研究［J］.地球物理学报,52(12): 3027-3041.
YU Gui-hua,XU Xi-wei,CHEN Gui-hua,et al.2009.Relationship between the localization of earthquake surface ruptures and building damages associated with the Wenchuan M_S 8.0 earthquake［J］.Chinese Journal of Geophysics,52(12): 3027-3041(in Chinese).
中国地震局赴土耳其地震现场考察专家组.2000.伊兹米特地震的几点启示［J］.国际地震动态,(1): 24-27.
Expert Group of CEA to Turkey for Earthquake Site Investigation.2000.Some enlightenments gained from the Izmit earthquake［J］.Recent Developments in World Seismology,(1): 24-27(in Chinese).
张培震.2008.中国地震灾害与防震减灾［J］. 地震地质,30(3): 577-583.
ZHANG Pei-zhen.2008.Earthquake disaster characteristics and defense in China［J］.Seismology and Geology,30(3): 577-583(in Chinese).
周庆,徐锡伟,于贵华,等.2008.汶川8.0级地震地表破裂带宽度调查［J］.地震地质,30(3): 778-788.
ZHOU Qing,XU Xi-wei,YU Gui-hua,et al.2008.Investigation on widths of surface rupture zones of the M 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake,Sichuan Province,China［J］.Seismology and Geology,30(3): 778-788(in Chinese).

[1]	赵静, 任金卫, 江在森, 岳冲. 鲜水河断裂带三维变形特征[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(4): 818-831.
[2]	邹小波, 袁道阳, 邵延秀, 刘兴旺, 张波, 杨海波. 采用立体像对和差分GPS揭示民乐-永昌隐伏断裂地表变形特征[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1198-1212.
[3]	朱艾斓, 徐锡伟, 任烨, 孙冬军, 王鹏, 于海英, 宋秀青, 刘芳. 中国东南部地区背景地震重新定位及隐伏活动构造初步研究[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 67-80.
[4]	吴传勇, 谭明, 沈军, 刘景元. 乌鲁木齐碗窑沟断层电阻率成像探测与探槽剖面的对比研究[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(1): 155-161.
[5]	李莹甄, 高国英, 高歌, 李志海. 新疆乌鲁木齐地区震源深度分布与断层关系研究[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(2): 534-543.
[6]	沈军, 宋和平. 乌鲁木齐城市活断层探测与地震危险性评价主要成果简介[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 273-288.
[7]	林传勇, 沈军, 陈孝德, 史兰斌, 胡军, 向志勇. 显微探测手段在乌鲁木齐市活动断层探测中的应用[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(1): 218-235.
[8]	李宏, 谢富仁, 刘凤秋, 董建业, 孙启伟. 乌鲁木齐市区断层附近原地应力测量研究[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(4): 805-812.
[9]	冉勇康, 陈立春, 沈军, 李军, 宫会玲. 乌鲁木齐西山断裂组与地表破裂型逆断层古地震识别标志[J]. 地震地质, 2007, 29(2): 218-235.
[10]	刘洁, 曲国胜, 童晓光, 宋惠珍, 周庆, 张宁. 库车坳陷深浅构造变形与地震关系浅析[J]. 地震地质, 2004, 26(2): 236-247.
[11]	赵瑞斌, 杨主恩, 周伟新, 郭芳. 天山南北两侧山前坳陷带中新生代构造特征与地震[J]. 地震地质, 2000, 22(3): 295-304.
[12]	陈社发, 邓起东, 赵小麟, C. J. L. Wilson P. Dirks, 罗志立, 刘树根. 龙门山中段推覆构造带及相关构造的演化历史和变形机制(一)[J]. 地震地质, 1994, 16(4): 404-412.
[13]	吴章明, 邓起东. 西藏崩错8级地震地表破裂的变形特征及其破裂机制[J]. 地震地质, 1989, 11(1): 15-25.

乌鲁木齐王家沟断层组地表变形特征及强变形带宽度

SURFACE DEFORMATION OF THE WANGJIAGOU FAULT SET IN URUMQI AND THE SAFETY DISTANCE FROM IT

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价